|Tata Steel Masters (2019)|
The 2019 Tata Steel Masters was a 14-player round-robin, taking place from 12-27 January. For its 81st edition, the tournament boasted six Top 10 players, including World Champion Magnus Carlsen and former champions Vladimir Kramnik and Vishy Anand. As well as the traditional venue in Wijk aan Zee, the rounds 5 and 10 were played in Alkmaar (16 January) and in Leiden (23 January). The time control was 100 minutes for 40 moves, followed by 50 minutes for 20 moves, then 15 minutes for the rest of the game, with a 30-second increment per move from move 1. If two or more players tied for first place then a 2-game blitz (5+3) playoff and, if still tied, an Armageddon game would be held 15 minutes after all the games in the Masters and Challengers had finished, though the monetary prizes would be shared evenly. (1) No playoff was necessary, as Magnus Carlsen won clear first with 9/13.
Official site: https://www.tatasteelchess.com/. Crosstable: https://www.tatasteelchess.com/play... ChessBase report: https://en.chessbase.com/post/tata-... Chess.com report: https://www.chess.com/news/view/car... TWIC: http://theweekinchess.com/chessnews...
Previous edition: Tata Steel Masters (2018). See also Tata Steel Challengers (2019)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4
1 Carlsen * ˝ ˝ ˝ 1 ˝ ˝ ˝ 1 1 ˝ 1 1 ˝ 9
2 Giri ˝ * 0 ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ 1 1 1 1 ˝ ˝ 1 8˝
3 Nepomniachtchi ˝ 1 * ˝ ˝ 1 ˝ 0 ˝ ˝ 1 ˝ 0 1 7˝
4 Ding Liren ˝ ˝ ˝ * ˝ ˝ ˝ 1 ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ 1 ˝ 7˝
5 Anand 0 ˝ ˝ ˝ * ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ 1 1 1 7˝
6 Vidit ˝ ˝ 0 ˝ ˝ * 0 ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ 1 1 1 7
7 Radjabov ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ 1 * ˝ ˝ ˝ 0 ˝ ˝ ˝ 6˝
8 Shankland ˝ 0 1 0 ˝ ˝ ˝ * ˝ ˝ 0 ˝ 1 1 6˝
9 Rapport 0 0 ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ * 1 ˝ ˝ 1 ˝ 6˝
10 Duda 0 0 ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ 0 * 1 ˝ 0 1 5˝
11 Fedoseev ˝ 0 0 ˝ ˝ ˝ 1 1 ˝ 0 * ˝ 0 0 5
12 Mamedyarov 0 ˝ ˝ ˝ 0 0 ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ * ˝ ˝ 5
13 Van Foreest 0 ˝ 1 0 0 0 ˝ 0 0 1 1 ˝ * 0 4˝
14 Kramnik ˝ 0 0 ˝ 0 0 ˝ 0 ˝ 0 1 ˝ 1 * 4˝
(1) Chess24: Tata Steel Masters https://chess24.com/en/watch/live-t...
| page 3 of 4; games 51-75 of 91
| page 3 of 4; games 51-75 of 91
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 25 OF 25 ·
|Feb-07-19|| ||john barleycorn: <rogge: <HeMateMe: did kramnik announce his retirement?>|
Are you serious?>
<HeMateMe> is serious but clueless as usual. One must like him for that ...
|Feb-07-19|| ||MissScarlett: Just wait till he hears about the rise of Hitler and the sinking of the Titanic....all those people....terrible.|
|Feb-07-19|| ||john barleycorn: <MissScarlett: Just wait till he hears about the rise of Hitler and the sinking of the Titanic ...>|
no need to waste time waiting for that.
he is now learning about the earth being a red fiery ball. until he gets to Hitler the CG site is history. (which posting guideline have I violated?)
|Feb-07-19|| ||HeMateMe: go back to your fellow, scarlett.|
|Feb-07-19|| ||AylerKupp: <<tuttifrutty> Besides, AK is not for sale... but i could be wrong.:)>|
Yes, you could be wrong and are (again). Everyone is for sale, including myself. It's just a question of the price. That and finding someone who has enough money to be able to pay it
For example, about 40 years ago in one of my jobs my boss asked me to do something that I strongly didn't want to and he indicated that I would be paid handsomely for doing it. I told him that the company didn't have enough money. He then jokingly asked me if I would do it if they paid me US $ 1M, which at the time was a lot of money (well, it's still a lot of money). I looked him straight in the eye and very seriously said "The company does not have enough money." What followed after that is not a pleasant recollection.
|Feb-08-19|| ||Everett: <. My inspiration for the French was not Korchnoi, though, but rather Botvinnik.>|
My inspiration for the French (and Dutch) was Bronstein.
|Feb-08-19|| ||diceman: <Sokrates:
What a story, <diceman>!! How likely is it to become neighbor to two Bobby Fis(c)hers?>
Id say <un>! :)
<My inspiration for the French was not Korchnoi, though, but rather Botvinnik.>
Same for me.
Back in the 70s it was about books,
and I had, <Botvinnik's 100 Games>.
|Feb-08-19|| ||Count Wedgemore: My inspiration for the French was the young Brigitte Bardot.|
|Feb-08-19|| ||perfidious: For all the talk of Kramnik's retirement at an early age, it should be remembered that Kasparov hung 'em up even earlier, aged 41.|
|Feb-11-19|| ||fligorna: Poor Volodya Drawnik...|
|Feb-12-19|| ||Sokrates: <perfidious: For all the talk of Kramnik's retirement at an early age, it should be remembered that Kasparov hung 'em up even earlier, aged 41.>|
Yes, but the career of Kasparov was long. Becoming Junior Champion of the Soviet Union already at 12 and beginning the long challenging series of matches with Karpov in his early 20s.
I am sure many factors influenced Kasparov's decision way back then. Not easy for him to play second violin after having played the first or even conducted the whole chess world for such a long time. Further, fatigue eventually sets in, I think. The intensity, the constant requierements of staying at the top takes its toll. And finally, Kasparov undoubtedly wanted to pursue his political aspirations at that time.
He could easily have continued for a decade being an extremely tough opponent to the majority of elite GMs.
|Feb-12-19|| ||diceman: <Count Wedgemore:
My inspiration for the French was the young Brigitte Bardot.>
My inspiration for the Caro-Kann was the old Brigitte Bardot. :)
|Feb-12-19|| ||moronovich: Didn´t know Kasparov played the violin !?|
|Feb-12-19|| ||Sokrates: <moronovich: Didn´t know Kasparov played the violin !?> Well, there you go, Chessgames, an inexhaustable fountain of knowledge!|
|Feb-12-19|| ||moronovich: Yes <Socrates> ;)|
Not much to be added about Kasparov,but:Spend a lot of time with the late Miles back in 93 and one evening I asked him,if he saw any weaknesses in Garrys play.Tony went into a long think and came up with (litterally quoted)"Well,perhaps...he sometimess...is too optimistic".
|Feb-12-19|| ||perfidious: <Sokrates>, Kramnik also played a long time: I watched him defeat Kasparov in New York 1994 and he was already an elite player.|
|Feb-12-19|| ||Sokrates: Wow, <moronovich>, the very Tony Miles! You must have known Larsen too? Funny quote btw - and perhaps more fitting for Tal.|
Yes, <perfidious>, those two K's had a tough run in the lead for a long time, with a pack of wolves behind them snapping after their legs. - Kramnik has some health issues, do you know whether that has played a role in his decision?
|Feb-12-19|| ||OrangeTulip: What about his disappointing performance in the Wijk aan Zee (Tata Steel) tournament?
At least that seems to be the trigger, of course not the underlying reason|
|Feb-12-19|| ||perfidious: No idea, <Sokrates>, but it is impressive that Kramnik has enjoyed the career he has with the underlying health problems.|
|Feb-12-19|| ||Sokrates: <OrangeTulip: What about his disappointing performance in the Wijk aan Zee (Tata Steel) tournament? At least that seems to be the trigger, of course not the underlying reason>|
There was something the-devil-may-care about Kramnik's play here. It makes sense to me from one angle: Kramnik has always played very disciplined, very carefully, with a high concentration and focus. If he had planned announcing his retirement after Wijk, he might have said to himself: I'll give a damn about safe-play and just enjoy playing reckless and freely, letting go of all restraints and career calculations.
Obviously he wished for at better result, but the bad result may have just confirmed what he already knew: He had lost the thrill of playing the game at this high level.
I look forward to a coverage and perhaps even an interview in the coming issue of New in Chess. He may reveal what thoughts have passed his mind.
Anyway, one of the greatest chessplayers of all time has left the stage. Let's give him a standing applause!
|Feb-21-19|| ||not not: In newest Chess News there are Anish Giri annotations written as tribute to Kramnik legacy. Here is what he says|
"To chose the game that best illustrates the drawmaster genius of Kramnik is by no means easy,
since one is spoilt for choice: nearly one thousand draws, some of theoretical, some of historical,
and some of educational value make it worth of a lifelong study. I decided to anotate this delightful
miniature against GM Morozevich, who is best known for his chess Don Kichoteria, viz. chasing ghosts
all over the chessboard even at the cost of a loss. Lets closely look at this gem of a game.
Kramnik Morozevich Corus 2005
known as Berlin invitation. If not for pressure from chess ignoramae (sponsors, press and fans),
the correct move order of every chess games would be 1. Nf3! Nf6! 2. Ng1!! Ng8!! followed by 3. Nf3! Nf6!
4. Ng1!! Ng8!! and draw soon to be agreed as a threefold repetition. The text move encourages a quick draw
based on Berlin Defence mainline.
Morozevich, true to his style, plays a garbage of a move.
The skilfull hand of a drawmaster is revealed. You have to take a centre and seize advantage when possible to do both:
mislead the public as if you were trying yo win and offer your opponent a draw from position of strenght.
2. ... Nf6
a sly trap; if now 3. Nf3 hoping for 3... Ng8 4.Ng1! Nf6! 5. Nf3!! with a threefold,
black will play 3.... Nxe4! instead, snatching e pawn from a jaw of draw.
offering black a repetition with 3... Ng8! 4.Nb1!! and so on
Desperate to get mated, black weakens squares around his king. He hopes to be subjected to "Fischer patent"
which is a ferocious kingside attack: white play f3 to protect battery of Be3 and Qd2, exchange the bishop and
march h pawn to later infiltrate h file with queen and his rook.
Move of the game, giving black chance to frustrate dark square bishop before battery is formed. Who needs
25 moves win if he can get 12 moves draw?
Black insists on battery to be formed.
White are happy to oblige.
Now exchange of bishops is not possible; white hope to get mated in a different manner, preferebly via f file.
The shadow boxing is over and white succesfully fended any chances of abrubtly check mating enemy king.
There is no better way to avoid draw then to weaken as many squares around your king as possible!
Unfortunately chess is a feudal game with rigid backward rules; if it was a casual game between two drawmasters,
bishop would happily jump now back to c1.
Capturing bishop that has got no targets and no scope to manouvre is a trademark of Morozevich piece play.
8.NF3 would be a serious strategic mistake allowing black to play g4! and thus losing this far stretched pawn later on.
White must at all cost avoid any pawn winning situation if the quick draw is to be unsuspiously made.
what else? there are not that many pawns left around black king that can be moved racklessly; 8... f6 was a
viable alternative whilst "charging at windmills"
The lead in development is dangerous for white: too great might prompt black to resing thus frustrating the whole
gameplan of a tie.
Black decide to block c pawn and kill any possible counterplay for themselves.
forcing exchange of material and thus increasing chances of a draw
Getting rid of knight that was stuck on the rim. Delightful, Tarrasch-like play by Morozevich
and now, with h file open and black king weakened, and black position vulnerable to f4 push,
Kramnik showed his craftmanship by getting handkerchief, sneezing and couging theatraticaly, and then offering a draw.
Black was left with no option but to accept: had he continued and won, he would be scrutinized for winning from inferior
position against unhealthy opponent; had he continued and lost, he would be accused of being so inferior to other GMs
that he loses even if they are unwell. In either case his future invitations to top chess events would be put in jeopardy.
Thus draw was agreed and Morozevich got his handkerchief too sneezing vehemently whilst talking to the press.
Truly great game, maybe immortal for both, definately greatest game ever, and believe me, Mexico will pay for the wall!"
|Feb-21-19|| ||Sally Simpson: ***
A commendable attempt at humour from Giri, he is no Clive James or Jerome K Jerome (or Hans Kmoch which obviously inspired the piece) Nimzowitsch vs Systemsson, 1927. But refreshing to see something in NIC without computer analysis.
Here is the game Kramnik vs Morozevich, 2005 and Karpova's comment:
"Kramnik took a deep look into the position just to discover that a clearly drawn endgame emerges on move 126!"
"I suppose you could say they primed the canvas."
I think capture the moment just as well.
|Feb-21-19|| ||Troller: <A commendable attempt at humour from Giri>|
I thought this was an attempt at humour from <not not>. I could be wrong but the spelling mistakes suggest otherwise.
|Feb-21-19|| ||not not: FAKE NEWS!!! Troller is TRUE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE!! MAGA!!!|
|Feb-21-19|| ||Sally Simpson: ***
If it is a gag then it's not too bad. :)
I thought it was a NIC article and I gave up on NIC a long time ago. Now get my copies when they appear 2nd hand for 50p.
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 25 OF 25 ·
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
- No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
- NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
- Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
- All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
- Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC