chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 Women's World Championship Knockout Tournament (2017)

  PARTICIPANTS (sorted by highest achieved rating; click on name to see player's games)
Anna Muzychuk, Ju Wenjun, Zhao Xue, Nana Dzagnidze, Alexandra Kosteniuk, Antoaneta Stefanova, Pia Cramling, Valentina Gunina, Dronavalli Harika, Zhu Chen, Ekaterina Valentinovna Kovalevskaya, Bela Khotenashvili, Tan Zhongyi, Elina Danielian, Nino Batsiashvili, Hoang Thanh Trang, Aleksandra Goryachkina, Natalia Pogonina, Olga Girya, Monika (Bobrowska) Socko, Lilit Mkrtchian, Anna Ushenina, Lela Javakhishvili, Natalia Zhukova, Huang Qian, Elisabeth Paehtz, Dinara Saduakassova, Ekaterina Polovnikova-Atalik, Shen Yang, Salome Melia, Inna Gaponenko, Anastasia Bodnaruk, Nino Khurtsidze, Alina Kashlinskaya, Sarasadat Khademalsharieh, Padmini Rout, Marina Romanko Nechaeva, Shiqun Ni, Deysi Estela Cori Tello, Sopiko Guramishvili, Anastasia Savina, Irine Kharisma Sukandar, Nastassia Ziaziulkina, Le Thao Nguyen Pham, Olga Zimina, Sopio Gvetadze, Daria Charochkina, Mo Zhai, Sabina-Francesca Foisor, Nataliya Buksa, Katerina Nemcova, Atousa Pourkashiyan, Mitra Hejazipour, Yaniet Marrero Lopez, Maritza Arribas Robaina, Qiyu Zhou, Viktorija Ni, Ayelen Martinez, Khaled Mona, Shamima Akter Liza, Amina Mezioud, Sabrina Latreche, Nancy Lane

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
Women's World Championship Knockout Tournament (2017)

Official site: http://tehran2017.fide.com/. See also Wikipedia article: Women's World Chess Championship 2017.

Rules and details

The 2017 FIDE Women's World Championship, held from February 11 to March 3 in Tehran, Iran, featured 64 (1) players in a series of knockout matches. The early rounds had two games each, plus a tiebreak if necessary. The final was a match of four games and two tiebreak games, with the winner declared Women's World Champion. The prize fund was USD $450,000 with the winner taking home $60,000.

Players received 90 minutes for the first 40 moves followed by 30 minutes for the rest of the game with a 30-second increment from move one. The tiebreaks consisted of two 25 min + 10-sec increment rapid games, then if needed two additional 10+10 games, two 5+3 blitz games and finally a single Armageddon game, where White had 5 minutes to Black's 4, but a draw counted as a win for Black. (2)

Controversial points

The reigning champion Yifan Hou, winner of the Muzychuk - Hou Women's World Championship Match (2016), boycotted the qualification system and did not participate. Other absentees were Koneru Humpy and Irina Krush, as well as US Women's Champion Nazi Paikidze, and former (2015–16) Women's World Champion Mariya Muzychuk, who boycotted the event over the choice of the Iranian venue.

The final match

On way to the final, Tan Zhongyi knocked out Sabina-Francesca Foisor, Anna Ushenina, Padmini Rout, Ju Wenjun in the quarterfinal, and Dronavalli Harika in the semifinal. Anna Muzychuk knocked out Amina Mezioud, Alina Kashlinskaya, Le Thao Nguyen Pham, Antoaneta Stefanova, and Alexandra Kosteniuk. The final match started February 27. After 2-2 in the Classical games, Tan Zhongyi won the second tiebreak game:

Classical Tie Tan Zhongyi (CHN) 2502 ˝ 1 0 ˝ ˝ 1 3˝ Anna Muzychuk (UKR) 2558 ˝ 0 1 ˝ ˝ 0 2˝

Tan Zhongyi thus became the 16th Women's World Champion. To be challenged by Ju Wenjun, the winner of the Grand Prix series 2015-2016 (see FIDE Women's Grand Prix Khanty-Mansiysk (2016)), in the Tan - Ju Women's World Championship Match (2018).

(1) The event started with only 63 players due to the passing away of qualifier Cristina-Adela Foisor. Her intended first-round opponent Olga Girya was seeded directly into the second round.
(2) Source: Chess24, https://chess24.com/en/watch/live-t...

Previous edition: Muzychuk - Hou Women's World Championship Match (2016). Next: Tan - Ju Women's World Championship Match (2018)

 page 9 of 9; games 201-217 of 217  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
201. Tan Zhongyi vs D Harika 1-0442017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentE53 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3
202. A Muzychuk vs Kosteniuk 1-0302017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentB40 Sicilian
203. D Harika vs Tan Zhongyi 1-01622017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentB30 Sicilian
204. Tan Zhongyi vs D Harika  1-0732017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentD50 Queen's Gambit Declined
205. D Harika vs Tan Zhongyi  ½-½502017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentB32 Sicilian
206. Tan Zhongyi vs D Harika  ½-½772017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentB06 Robatsch
207. D Harika vs Tan Zhongyi 1-0792017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentB32 Sicilian
208. Tan Zhongyi vs D Harika 1-0602017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentD36 Queen's Gambit Declined, Exchange, Positional line, 6.Qc2
209. D Harika vs Tan Zhongyi 0-1992017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentA06 Reti Opening
210. Kosteniuk vs A Muzychuk 0-1642017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentC07 French, Tarrasch
211. D Harika vs Tan Zhongyi 1-0172017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentB06 Robatsch
212. A Muzychuk vs Tan Zhongyi ½-½422017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentC10 French
213. Tan Zhongyi vs A Muzychuk 1-0562017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentD43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
214. A Muzychuk vs Tan Zhongyi 1-0322017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentC11 French
215. Tan Zhongyi vs A Muzychuk ½-½242017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentD11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
216. A Muzychuk vs Tan Zhongyi  ½-½562017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentC42 Petrov Defense
217. Tan Zhongyi vs A Muzychuk 1-0422017Women's World Championship Knockout TournamentD11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
 page 9 of 9; games 201-217 of 217  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 33 OF 33 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <tamar> Well, as far as "other cultures conform to theirs." can be interpreted in different ways...

Example: Common saying "When in Rome, do as Romans do."

When I visited Japan, I followed their culture and custom, e.g. removing shoes at the door before entering living room, etc...

Why the fuss? Because it's gender specific, like men have to have head covering when entering a Jewish place of worship (see my above post.)

Now, this thing, can be said to be religion based, or modesty based, (In the old days, where European or American women wear head scarf, is to prevent hair from being wind blown and messed up, mostly).

To all others:

Again, I don't understand why members of CG.com continue to BANG THEIR HEAD on this issue???????

Tournament is over, protestors said their say, female players who accepted the invitation and the stipulation(s) had their say. What is the point of the/this discussion?

When it's no longer (really) chess related/relevant.

Mar-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <WannaBe>
The point is, should the chess world criticize FIDE and take measures to avoid such kind of controversy in future world title events?

But if not interested, skip this page. I don't think there will be much further discussion here about the actual chess.

Mar-30-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <beatgiant> Then my (final) comment & reply...

Should Olympics committee award future sites to China, or Russia that have no democracy and/or human rights abuse, when they are the only country or city to submit a bid?

My comment/opinion, if there is a (bidding) process and only Iran submitted a bid, or in the case of Olympics, Western countries pulled out because of cost, and only China or Russia bids, what you gonna do?

Winter Olympics in China... With man-made snow. Definitely looking forward to that one.

Mar-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <Wannabe> No one knew that Iran would be awarded the Women's Championship when they won the right to compete for it.

When you visit a synagogue as a Gentile, you lose nothing other than the right to visit that synagogue if you don't wear a head covering. (I don't know if it is mandatory, but assume so for this argument's sake)

Suppose they went further and said you can't play chess in our country if you don't wear that covering. Would it be as easy to laugh and say sure?

Mar-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <tamar>
So, do you agree that players should be allowed to play in chess tournaments barefoot? There must be lots of tournament sites in the US that won't allow that.
Mar-31-17  Lambda: In general, I think all countries should allow everyone to dress as they please, all the way from "burqa with eye slits" to "naked", because your clothing choices don't interfere with the freedoms of others in any way. If you were born in a country, any sort of illegal garb is good civil disobedience. (Unless the motivation is something bad, like to harass people.)

But if you choose to visit or move to a country, there's a far greater onus on you to respect their laws because you've promised to abide by them in return for admittance. So for most chess tournaments, having to wear the local dress code isn't much of an issue.

But a world championship is different, because people can be judged not world champion for failing to attend, so there's a degree of compulsion. This means the world championship should ideally happen somewhere with no dress laws. But if a country has dress restrictions which almost nobody strongly objects to following, then it's not worth making an issue over.

But many people strongly object to wearing headscarves under compulsion.

Mar-31-17  nok: Except it is no world championship but a woman only event, which is far harsher discrimination.
Mar-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <beatgiant> there have been restrictions based on modesty and health, but the hijab is associated with Islamic state religion, and is only required of women.

Many went and had no problem. It is also a reasonable choice to boycott such impositions of religion.

Mar-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <tamar>
<It is also a reasonable choice to boycott>

Agreed, but the real question is, should FIDE have rejected the bid on these grounds, given no other bid for the event?

To me, the key question is whether indeed it is a religious thing. Based on the fact that it predates Islam and has been widespread in non-Islamic societies in living memory, I'm inclined to say not.

Mar-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: To be even more specific: I think the core principle is, <every player should be allowed to participate regardless of politics or religion>.

For example, if someone was not able to participate because their own religion had a conflicting dress code, then the tournament sponsors would have had to come up with an accommodation.

Mar-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: beatgiant-it is easier decided when it is not an actual decision you or I will never have to make

I would be inclined to say nuts if some govt told me I could play only with a bucket on my head because it is their tradition.

Mar-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: ever have to make
Mar-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <tamar>
I've traveled abroad a lot and had to go out of my comfort zone many times, same as foreign visitors do when visiting my country.

<I could play only with a bucket on my head>

I think some Westerners have a real blind spot about the shoe thing. In a traditional match at go/weiqi/baduk in China, Japan and Korea, it's a good bet that bare feet were mandatory and anything else would be considered highly offensive.

The sanitary argument for indoor shoe is pretty weak, according to the source I cited above. I think the reality is that a culture that wears shoes indoors has conquered the world, so we all think it's normal without much real thought.

In short: "They're making us wear Christian foot coverings to play in a chess tournament!"

Mar-31-17  john barleycorn: <Premium Chessgames Member beatgiant: <tamar> ...

The sanitary argument for indoor shoe is pretty weak, ...>

It is about having unwanted room refreshing.

Mar-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <john barleycorn> <It is about having unwanted room refreshing.> That's myth #6 on the barefooters.org top ten list.
Mar-31-17  john barleycorn: < beatgiant: ... That's myth #6 on the barefooters.org top ten list.>

Only #6? I mean it is the smell for sure but also the burning eyes.

Mar-31-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <john barleycorn> New FIDE regulation for mandatory dark glasses?
Mar-31-17  john barleycorn: <beatgiant: <john barleycorn> New FIDE regulation for mandatory dark glasses?>

haha. dark glasses only when wearing black socks.

Mar-31-17  nok: <I think the reality is that a culture that wears shoes indoors has conquered the world> What about neckties? Now that's ideological clothing.
May-01-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bobby Fiske: FIDE: <The total prize fund of the Championship is US $450,000. Every player gets 3750$, those who make it to round two get 5500$, for round three it is 8000$, round four 12,000$, round five (semifinals) 20,000$, the silver medalist 30,000$, and the winner 60,000$.>

Reportedly the players didn’t get any money at all. FIDE hadn't secured the prize fund in advance, as they usually do (bank guaranty or advance payment), so after the tournament, Iran, the organizer, says something about they couldn’t pay because "money was blocked in some account bla bla".

Any news here?

FIDE is now really close to bankruptcy. I think this money scandal, and the fact that the upcoming FIDE Grand Prix in Moscow might get cancelled, fuelled the mutiny within FIDE organization, and the ultimate reason why Kirsan got kicked out of office recently.

May-01-17  JimNorCal: Kirsan is (finally) kicked out of office?
May-01-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bobby Fiske: Well, it's really a farse now:

LINK1 (March): https://www.chess.com/news/view/bre...

LINK2 (April): http://tass.com/sport/940443

May-01-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: A threat! :-)

https://www.chess.com/news/view/ily...

Nov-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Jeez. I'll try to update the bio later. It does not even say who won. Fun while it lasted, I suppose, and more fun next year.

For the onlookers.

Nov-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Ok, ready to rumble ;)

After seeing this I can't understand why not the winner of a Tan Zhongyi - Ju Wenjun match could be the challenger for Yifan for the WWC.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 33)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 33 OF 33 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC