SuperGM (2001) (games of Junior (Computer))

SuperGM (2001)

page 1 of 1; 2 games

Game Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening
1. Junior vs Piket 0-1 34 2000 SuperGM B06 Robatsch

2. Leko vs Junior 0-1 60 2000 SuperGM C48 Four Knights

REFINE SEARCH: White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Junior wins | Junior loses

Oct-21-04		Knight13: Wow. These games are totally amazing! Maybe everybody knows, Kasparov has won the match. But why did the coatch of this Match put a computer program? That's retarted. Thanks, <chessgames.com>, for posting these great games!

Jan-21-06		hidude: Only one Kibitz; amazing!!!

Jan-22-06		EmperorAtahualpa: Two now. :) No, three!

Jan-31-06		Bobak Zahmat: FOUR NOW! :)

May-24-06		suenteus po 147: How did this tournament work? It spans two years???

May-24-06		Karpova: This wasn't one tournament but several different ones. The SuperGM 2001 for example was Linares (with Kasparov winning ahead of Polgar, Karpov, Grishuk, Leko and Shirov while all the latter had the same amount of points and a score of -1). I'm 100% sure about that. The Kasparov-Karpov closed Caro-Kann with g4 is the proof. Yeah, and that Polgar didn't loose to Kaspy. The one with Junior in it may have been a tournament in Dortmund (maybe Mainz)

May-24-06		suenteus po 147: <Kaprova> Thanks. That helps make sense of senselessness. My next question is why lump the tournaments together? Why not just separate them into their collected wholes?

Jun-06-06		suenteus po 147: <chessgames.com> Is there a way to split up the different tournaments into their proper collections? I see Dortmund 2000, Linares 2001, and Linares 2002 here (although a couple of the Dortmund games are missing). I'm no computer expert but the problem probably has to do with each game being designated the same, as "SuperGM" instead of by it's individual event. If you could change the event name maybe they would be grouped together properly?

Jan-31-07		Dr.Lecter: No wonder I've never heard of this tournament.

Jan-31-07		JointheArmy: Junior could only finish with an even score +2 -2 and one of the wins was against punching bag Huebner and Leko who blundered in a drawn position. I think computers would have less success in a tournament where a player would have to play a computer only once instead of 7 games of perfect play.

Sep-14-08		ravel5184: <SuperGM> What's up with your tournament page? Only 10 kibitzes? (well 11 now).

Sep-14-08		whiteshark: Just append <&crosstable=1> and you will see who was the Best in 2001.

Oct-18-08		artyom2008: YO WASSUP

Mar-16-11		Penguincw: Is this the Linares or the SuperGM tournament?

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!

If you already have an account, you should login now.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
No personal attacks against other users.
Nothing in violation of United States law.

See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!