chessgames.com

MATCH STANDINGS
Kramnik-Leko World Championship Match

Vladimir Kramnik7/14(+2 -2 =10)[view games]
Peter Leko7/14(+2 -2 =10)[view games]

  WCC Overview
 
  << previous HISTORY OF THE WORLD CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP next >>  
  << previous FIDE CHAMPIONSHIPS next >>  
Kramnik vs Leko, 2004
Brissago, Switzerland

In 2002, the annual Dortmund Sparkassen Chess Meeting had an added significance: it also functioned as a Candidates Tournament, for the winner would earn the right to play Vladimir Kramnik for the title. Seven of the top ten players competed in Germany, and emerging as winner was the Hungarian chess prodigy, Peter Leko.

 Kramnik-Leko 2004
 Leko (left) playing Kramnik in Switzerland, 2004
The financial backing for the match (a prize fund of $1.2 million) was contributed by the the cigar manufacturer Dannemann, the latest in a line of corporate sponsors (Intel, Braingames, and Einstein) for the non-FIDE World Championship title. The match was only 14 games, one of the shortest in World Chess Championship history. Kramnik was to retain the title in the event of a tie match, a detail which was to prove very important.

The very first game illustrated Kramnik's incredible defensive techniques. Leko, by most accounts, had the advantage by move 23; but Kramnik's masterful handling of the ending, combined with an error by Leko, enabled the Russian to take the full point. Not until the fifth game was Leko able to accomplish what Garry Kasparov could not: beat Kramnik in a World Championship match. Then in the eighth game, Leko was able to take the lead, when he achieved victory with the Black pieces by alertly finding over the board a serious flaw in Kramnik's immense opening preparation. Games 9 through 13 were all draws, leaving Leko ahead in the match with only one game left.

Come game 14, Leko needed only one more draw to secure the title of World Chess Champion. Kramnik was faced with the task of winning, at all costs, in order to save his title. Chess author and grandmaster Raymond Keene wrote of this phenomenal game:

Kramnik, the defending world champion, scored a brilliant victory in the 14th and final game; Peter Leko resigned after 41 moves when faced with checkmate. This is only the third time in the entire history of the World Championship that the defending champion has saved his titled by winning in the final game.

The game itself was a jewel of controlled aggression. Despite consistent exchanges throughout the game, Kramnik maintained an iron grip on the position and ultimately blasted his way into the black camp via the dark squares. Taking no account of material sacrifices it was Kramnik's king that dealt the fatal blow when it marched right into the heart of the opposing position.1

After 14 games, with a tie score of 7 to 7, Vladimir Kramnik defended his title of World Chess Champion.

click on a game number to replay game 1234567891011121314
Kramnik1½½½0½½0½½½½½1
Leko0½½½1½½1½½½½½0

FINAL SCORE:  Kramnik 7;  Leko 7
Reference: game collection Kramnik - Leko WCC Brissago,2004

NOTABLE GAMES   [what is this?]
    · Game #14     Kramnik vs Leko, 2004     1-0
    · Game #8     Kramnik vs Leko, 2004     0-1
    · Game #1     Leko vs Kramnik, 2004     0-1

1 World Chess Championship: Kramnik vs Leko by Ray Keene, 2004, Hardinge Simpole, p. 145.

 page 1 of 1; 14 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Kramnik vs Leko ½-½18 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchC88 Ruy Lopez
2. Leko vs Kramnik ½-½23 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchC42 Petrov Defense
3. Kramnik vs Leko ½-½43 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchC88 Ruy Lopez
4. Leko vs Kramnik 1-069 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
5. Kramnik vs Leko ½-½20 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchC88 Ruy Lopez
6. Leko vs Kramnik ½-½21 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchD16 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
7. Kramnik vs Leko 0-132 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchC89 Ruy Lopez, Marshall
8. Leko vs Kramnik ½-½16 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchE15 Queen's Indian
9. Kramnik vs Leko ½-½35 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchC78 Ruy Lopez
10. Leko vs Kramnik ½-½17 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchE15 Queen's Indian
11. Kramnik vs Leko ½-½34 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchB19 Caro-Kann, Classical
12. Leko vs Kramnik ½-½65 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchA61 Benoni
13. Kramnik vs Leko 1-041 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchB12 Caro-Kann Defense
14. Leko vs Kramnik 0-165 2004 Kramnik-Leko World Championship MatchC42 Petrov Defense
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 59 OF 72 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-13-04  iron maiden: <acirce> Kramnik will probably play out both of his whites, but Leko will want to go for a quick draw in the thirteenth if he's still ahead.
Oct-13-04  ConLaMismaMano: Will Kramnik switch to d4 or maybe even Nf3?
Oct-13-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: re length of title match

24 games is long and expensive

open ended is now impossible

for the 2000 kasparov-kramnik match in london i looked at the history of all world title matches and a magic number emerged. it was 16. with only one exception-alekhine euwe 1935-if you stopped the match after game 16 then the person who emerged as champion in fact wd still have done it.

therefore 16 games seemd a highly reasonable test-not too long and not too short. i am surprised they went down to 14 in brissago.

Oct-13-04  clocked: <ray keene> How about the match in 1984?
Oct-13-04  MICHAEL COOLCAT: helloooo ray peter parr in sydney said to say hellooo to you ,hope to play a chess game with you 1 time ray will you be going to the chess olympiad in spain
Oct-13-04  I sacrifice like Tal: Seeing as how 1.e4 has not served Kramnik at all well, and I just don't like 1.d4, I think Kramnik will play 1.Nf3

*he said clinging to his 3 'Opening for White according to Kramnik 1.Nf3' books*

Oct-13-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: <clocked> good point-technically that match remained unfinished and the player in the lead after game 16 was still in the lead after game 48. so-one cd either discount it as unfinished or regard it as confirmation of the 16 game lead rule. i dont think it contradicts it-in any case the point of the exercise was to reduce the number of games not expand them.
Oct-13-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: <michael c> hi-i wont be going to spain-much too busy! is peter parr team captain again?
Oct-13-04  ruylopez900: <JimR> Scheduling for Kasparov-Kasimdzhanov has already started. It takes place January 2005. At least that's the idea. Pono-Kasparov was supposed to happen but then Pono started thingking that winning a KO title meant more then it did. Don't think Kasim will the same mistake.
Oct-13-04  MICHAEL COOLCAT: ray please hop down to australia again i dont think peter parr will be the capt would love to play a game of chess with you 1 time
Oct-13-04  Rawprawn: Why is the order of the games above so mixed up? Wouldn't order played be appropriate?
Oct-13-04  offramp: They are sorted in the order of the inverse of the number of the move in which black first moves his h-pawn.
Oct-13-04  offramp: <MICHAEL COOLCAT> Who was that Australian chess player who was thought to be a major Nazi war criminal?
Oct-13-04  ajile: SInce Kramnik is behind eventually he will have to try something new and potentially risky to win a game. Leko used a Marshall. What will Kramnik employ?
Oct-13-04  offramp: The final, crucial game will probobly follow Lasker vs Schlechter, 1910 in terms of tenor.
Oct-13-04  MICHAEL COOLCAT: off ramp i rember the name karlos olzins or some thing like that he lived in melbourne victoria he dies a few yrs ago he played correspondence chess
Oct-13-04  WMD: His name was Karlis Ozols. Strictly speaking, I wouldn't call him either a major war criminal or a Nazi. He was a member of the Latvian militia which collaborated with the Germans.
Oct-13-04  HalfOpenFile: I think someone has created a handle of "www.chessgames.com" which is a tad naughty really when you consider the site spokesperson is "chessgames.com". Maybe the officials can have a word in www's ear.
Oct-13-04  Dillinger: <WMD> I guess that's why "war crimes investigators concluded he was personally responsible for the slaughter of thousands of Jews from this ghetto in Beylorus." http://www.gaiaguys.net/Nazis_20_20...

"The indictment against Ozols included an allegation that he commanded a unit that between July 1942 and September 1943 assisted in the transportation, guarding and execution of Jews at the Minsk ghetto, more than 10,000 of whom were murdered."

http://www.auschess.org.au/columns/...

Considering that the case against him in Australia was only shut down because of budgetary constraints, I am highly skeptical of your portrayal. Of course you are free to believe he was "just" a lieutenant with the fascist militia.

Oct-13-04  pawn52: <cu8sfan: <pawn52> Maybe the username is different from yours only when you're logged in as <pawn52>? > This doesn't make any sense.
Oct-13-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  cu8sfan: <pawn52> Yes it does. <chessgames.com> asked if you posted it. You said no as you have another handle. However you can always logout, create a new handle and then post a message like this. Not that I think you did it... The guys at cg.com can find out who did, though.
Oct-13-04  WMD: A major war criminal would be someone like 'Gestapo' Muller or Alois Brunner.

I don't know what is meant by the expression 'personally responsible' in the above context.

Oct-13-04  aragorn69: For those who, like me, find the 11th game draw boring and disapointing - not to say a big gamble on Leko´s part since he has only one White left -, take a look at Tim Krabbe's hilarious photomontage : http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/...
Oct-13-04  Dillinger: <WMD> To me he seems slightly more than the "ordinary" war criminal, but I guess it's all relative.
Oct-13-04  pawn52: <<pawn52> Yes it does. <chessgames.com> asked if you posted it. You said no as you have another handle. However you can always logout, create a new handle and then post a message like this. Not that I think you did it... The guys at cg.com can find out who did, though.> How can I do it if I need a password to log in and I don't even know it? And anyway, my parents would freak if I had created a new handle. They've restricted me to one and only one handle and they got tabs on my internet so they can make sure I don't break that rule.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 72)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 59 OF 72 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies