chessgames.com

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Amber Blindfold Tournament

Alexander Morozevich9.5/11(+8 -0 =3)[view games]
Francisco Vallejo-Pons6.5/11(+4 -2 =5)[view games]
Viswanathan Anand6.5/11(+4 -2 =5)[view games]
Alexander Grischuk6/11(+3 -2 =6)[view games]
Peter Leko6/11(+4 -3 =4)[view games]
Boris Gelfand5.5/11(+2 -2 =7)[view games]
Peter Svidler5.5/11(+4 -4 =3)[view games]
Loek Van Wely4.5/11(+3 -5 =3)[view games]
Veselin Topalov4.5/11(+3 -5 =3)[view games]
Peter Heine Nielsen4/11(+1 -4 =6)[view games]
Levon Aronian4/11(+2 -5 =4)[view games]
Vassily Ivanchuk3.5/11(+1 -5 =5)[view games]

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Topalov vs Vallejo-Pons 0-123 2006 Amber BlindfoldC67 Ruy Lopez
2. Anand vs Morozevich 0-168 2006 Amber BlindfoldB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
3. Van Wely vs Aronian 1-053 2006 Amber BlindfoldB06 Robatsch
4. Ivanchuk vs Topalov 0-132 2006 Amber BlindfoldD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
5. Leko vs P H Nielsen 1-057 2006 Amber BlindfoldB91 Sicilian, Najdorf, Zagreb (Fianchetto) Variation
6. Vallejo-Pons vs Svidler 1-058 2006 Amber BlindfoldD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
7. Gelfand vs Grischuk ½-½43 2006 Amber BlindfoldE15 Queen's Indian
8. Van Wely vs Leko  ½-½31 2006 Amber BlindfoldA30 English, Symmetrical
9. Morozevich vs Gelfand ½-½20 2006 Amber BlindfoldA04 Reti Opening
10. P H Nielsen vs Ivanchuk ½-½53 2006 Amber BlindfoldD87 Grunfeld, Exchange
11. Aronian vs Topalov 1-051 2006 Amber BlindfoldA03 Bird's Opening
12. Svidler vs Anand  ½-½23 2006 Amber BlindfoldC77 Ruy Lopez
13. Grischuk vs Vallejo-Pons ½-½39 2006 Amber BlindfoldB92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
14. Morozevich vs Grischuk ½-½37 2006 Amber BlindfoldB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
15. Gelfand vs Svidler ½-½23 2006 Amber BlindfoldD10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
16. Topalov vs P H Nielsen 1-039 2006 Amber BlindfoldA35 English, Symmetrical
17. Anand vs Vallejo-Pons  ½-½34 2006 Amber BlindfoldC83 Ruy Lopez, Open
18. Ivanchuk vs Van Wely 1-029 2006 Amber BlindfoldB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
19. Leko vs Aronian  ½-½39 2006 Amber BlindfoldC63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defense
20. Leko vs Ivanchuk  ½-½36 2006 Amber BlindfoldC42 Petrov Defense
21. Van Wely vs Topalov 0-141 2006 Amber BlindfoldD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
22. Anand vs Gelfand 1-051 2006 Amber BlindfoldC42 Petrov Defense
23. Svidler vs Grischuk 1-039 2006 Amber BlindfoldB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
24. Vallejo-Pons vs Morozevich 0-150 2006 Amber BlindfoldE92 King's Indian
25. Aronian vs P H Nielsen ½-½19 2006 Amber BlindfoldA07 King's Indian Attack
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 11 OF 11 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  sisyphus: <Ragh: Now, that does not answer to what I asked.> Relax; it's an answer to the issue <DCP23, percyblakeney,> and <dimradil> raised.
Mar-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ragh: <sisyphus>..I was just kidding.

All - See the <Amber Rapid> page for details on this issue.

Mar-30-06  Mameluk: Congratulations for Moro madgic, even if IŽd love to see him winning some non-blindfold tournament. This time he was very conservative, but Aronian made a show. Anand is a classic, someone should really try to calculate some rapid ratings- he may well be 2900 or so.
Mar-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ragh: Yes. Anand almost all the time wins every rapid tournament that he participates in.

He got the nickname of 'The Lightning Kid' when he was very young.

Mar-30-06  yalie: <Mameluk: Congratulations for Moro madgic, even if IŽd love to see him winning some non-blindfold tournament. This time he was very conservative, but Aronian made a show. Anand is a classic, someone should really try to calculate some rapid ratings- he may well be 2900 or so.>

check out stefan Fischl's page at

http://members.aon.at/sfischl/rrati...

other stats at

http://members.aon.at/sfischl/stat....

Mar-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  cade: Morozevich scored a rating of over 3000 in the Blindfold. Impressive.
Mar-30-06  Illogic: Amazing how much Moro dominated this...
Mar-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: <cade: Morozevich scored a rating of over 3000 in the Blindfold. Impressive.>

Yes, that is what a 3000 rating means: you go +8 =3 -0 against the 2700s!

Mar-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Appaz: I'm surprised Ivanchuk are doing so bad in blindfold, as he has a reputation for playing "blindfolded" even in ordinary games (looking everywhere but the board). He doesn't seem to have succeeded in the blindfold of Melody Amber with an overall score of 54.5%. He might have showed signs of improving in '04 (3rd/+3) and '05 (2nd/+1), but then came '06 (12th / -4).
Mar-30-06  yalie: I think Ivanchuk has played too much chess the past year and a half .. he needs to take a break and work on his chess to get it back to 2750+ level
Mar-30-06  drnooo: Well while everyone is going on about Mr Lightning..... Carlsens two recent victories over senor Anand may be a, what, fluke. But then , it just might be that Carlsen is the best speed player in the world right now. Incredible as that sounds. Does anyone have other recent results of his speed play, that is, were not some of his playoff games in other tourneys speed that he lost.
Mar-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  iron maiden: <But then , it just might be that Carlsen is the best speed player in the world right now.> I highly doubt that. I understand that any accomplishment of Carlsen's is always going to receive an extra amount of attention (where was all the hype when Vadim Milov beat Vishy 2-0 in blitz last year at Corisca?), but of all the rapid events that Magnus has played in his career, this one stands out as the only truly great result. Remember last year he lost to Anand at Leon and Kamsky at the World Cup. Let's be objective here: two blitz wins against Anand do not make somebody "the best speed player in the world."
Mar-30-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ragh: Yes <iron maiden>, I agree. Moreover, it is worthy to stress that Anand lost in Blitz chess and not in Rapid chess.

The kids these days play a lot of blitz on the internet - playchess.com, chessclub.com, ICC etc. as opposed to Anand. Anand himself acknowledged of this fact before the start of this tourney.

Hence, it is no surprising that a wonder boy like Carlsen beat Anand in blitz. It is to be remembered, however, that chess greats are not made instantly. Carlsen has a loooong way to go before he can even equalize what Anand has achieved until now.

Mar-31-06  mohankumar: <Morozevich scored a rating of over 3000 in the Blindfold. Impressive.>see!cade!one tournament win will not get you over 3000!U need to be consistent in your performance to become a great.Finishing the fide championship with the poor show and getting win in amber doesn't sounds great as for as myself is concerned!
Mar-31-06  TheBB: <as for as myself is concerned!>

Tsk tsk. Perhaps you mean:

<as far as I am concerned!>

Mar-31-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  EmperorAtahualpa: Ok so Morozevich and Anand shared first place. Morozevich won the blindfold games and Anand the rapid games.

The question is now: Who would win if the games were RAPID AND BLINDFOLD SIMULTANEOUSLY? :)

Mar-31-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: <rapid and blindfold simultaneously> Are Blindfolds under classical time controls ? silly question .. i should have probably looked that up .. however the week end laziness has set in.. but a RAPID, BLINDFOLD SIMUL display now that would be fun
Mar-31-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  suenteus po 147: <Open Defense> The blindfold games are rapid.

I don't know how they determine the overall winner of the tournament, but Vallejo-Pons was robbed! He came in second in BOTH events. That should be worth something.

Mar-31-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: <Vallejo-Pons was robbed! He came in second in BOTH events. That should be worth something> Imagine if by applying some tie break system out there he actually was adjudged the winner!
Mar-31-06  Illogic: Vallejo finished in a tie for fourth in the rapid.

<TheBB> You think, just maybe, that his first language isn't English? And that your grammar knowledge doesn't impress anyone?

Mar-31-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ragh: <Open Defense> that is true. Perhaps <suenteus po 147> should come up with some sort of tie-break rule that can make Vallejo-pounce as the winner ahead of Anand and Moro.
Mar-31-06  yalie: with an alternative scoring system vallejo can finish ahead of Moro only not Anand .. Anand dominates Vallejo - tied in blindfold and ahead in rapid.

By the way, when Anand won the tournament in 2003?, he won the combined, but was second in both rapid and blindfold.

Mar-31-06  yalie: There was a spanish website someone had posted a few days ago which gives the results of all tournaments to date in Spain and the rest of Europe. Does anybody remember the site?
Apr-03-06  blingice: Ooh, Aronian would've done better at the 66th Armenian Championship (2006).
Apr-28-06  JordanKwiatek: Forgot to congradulate you on your supremly convincing result here in the Blindfold section at Amber. ***Morozevich*** CLEARLY THE GREATEST BLIDFOLD PLAYER IN THE WORLD!!!
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 11)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 11 OF 11 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies