chessgames.com

MATCH STANDINGS
Kramnik-Topalov World Championship Match

Vladimir Kramnik8.5/16(+5 -4 =7)[view games]
Veselin Topalov7.5/16(+4 -5 =7)[view games]

  WCC Overview
 
  << previous HISTORY OF THE WORLD CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP next >>  
Kramnik vs Topalov, 2006
Toiletgate in Elista

In 2006, the schism which began with the Kasparov-Short World Championship was to finally end, unifying the World Championship title after 13 long years. Bulgarian grandmaster Veselin Topalov, the winner of the 2005 FIDE World Championship in San Luis was due to play Vladimir Kramnik, the Classical World Champion, and the winner was to emerge as the single, unified, World Chess Champion.

 Kramnik-Topalov 2006
 Kramnik and Topalov, Elista 2006
The contest began with Kramnik winning both of the first two games, and due to the extreme brevity of the match (a mere 12 games) this established an early commanding lead. After two more drawn games, on a rest day, Topalov's manager Silvio Danailov, issued a press release which threatened to abort the match. The press release read, in part:

The careful study of the video recordings from the rest rooms done by the technical experts of the Bulgarian team revealed the following facts which we would herewith like to bring to your attention:

  1. After each move Mr. Kramnik immediately heads to the rest room and from it directly to the bathroom. During every game he visited the relaxation room 25 times at the average and the bathroom more than 50 times - the bathroom is the only place without video surveillance.
  2. Unlike Mr. Kramnik, the World Champion Veselin Topalov spends his time mainly at the playing table. The average number of times he visited the rest room and the bathroom is 8 and 4 respectively.
In our opinion these facts are quite strange, if not suspicious. ... Should this extremely serious problem remain unsolved by 10.00 o'clock tomorrow (September 29th, 2006), we would seriously reconsider the participation of the World Champion Veselin Topalov in this match. 1

The FIDE Appeals Committee, after viewing the video tapes, found that the frequency of Kramnik's visits to the toilet had been exaggerated, but nevertheless took these allegations seriously, and decreed that the private toilets would be closed and a common toilet opened for both players.

Kramnik Forfeits Kramnik's team rejected this decision, declaring: "The protests of the Topalov team and the suspicions in the press release of Mr. Topalov are utterly disgraceful and are touching Mr. Kramnik's privacy."2 Kramnik refused to play under the altered conditions, and as a result, Kramnik forfeited game 5.

In a state of chaos, the match was placed on hold while FIDE President Kirsan Ilyumzhinov flew to Elista in the hope for bringing a solution to this crisis, which by this time had been given the pejorative name, "Toiletgate." After several days of strife and intense negotiations, Ilyumzhinov declared that the match would continue. The members of the Appeals Committee had been replaced, the access to the toilets was restored, and the forfeited game 5 would remain a loss for Kramnik.

As the match continued, Topalov won both game 8 and game 9, giving him a one point lead with only three games left to play. His lead was not to last long, as Kramnik scored a brilliant victory in game 10, thereby tying the score, and after two more draws the match was sent into overtime.

The first phase of the tiebreaks was a four game mini-match played with 25 minutes per side, and a 10 second increment. Kramnik's victory in game 16 allowed him to win the mini-match. Vladimir Kramnik, after 13 years of chaos in the chess world, had thus become the the solitary undisputed World Chess Champion.

click on a game number to replay game 12345678910111213141516
Topalov00½½1½½110½½½010
Kramnik11½½0½½001½½½101

FINAL SCORE:  Kramnik 8½;  Topalov 7½
Reference: game collection WCC Kramnik-Topalov Elista 2006

NOTABLE GAMES   [what is this?]
    · Game #2     Topalov vs Kramnik, 2006     0-1
    · Game #10     Kramnik vs Topalov, 2006     1-0
    · Game #5     Kramnik vs Topalov, 2006     0-1

1 Topalov threatens to abandon the World Championship Match, Chessbase, Sep. 9 2006.
2 Kramnik may stop playing the match, Chessbase, Sep. 9, 2006.

 page 1 of 1; 16 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Kramnik vs Topalov 1-075 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchE04 Catalan, Open, 5.Nf3
2. Topalov vs Kramnik 0-163 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD19 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
3. Kramnik vs Topalov ½-½38 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchE04 Catalan, Open, 5.Nf3
4. Topalov vs Kramnik ½-½54 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD47 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
5. Kramnik vs Topalov 0-10 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchA00 Uncommon Opening
6. Topalov vs Kramnik ½-½31 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD17 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
7. Topalov vs Kramnik ½-½60 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD27 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical
8. Kramnik vs Topalov 0-152 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD47 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
9. Topalov vs Kramnik 1-039 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
10. Kramnik vs Topalov 1-043 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchE00 Queen's Pawn Game
11. Topalov vs Kramnik ½-½66 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
12. Kramnik vs Topalov ½-½47 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
13. Topalov vs Kramnik ½-½47 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD19 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
14. Kramnik vs Topalov 1-045 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
15. Topalov vs Kramnik 1-050 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
16. Kramnik vs Topalov 1-045 2006 Kramnik-Topalov World Championship MatchD47 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
 page 1 of 1; 16 games  PGN Download 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 149 OF 1162 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-18-06  shr0pshire: If I had the chance to play for a world championship, in addition to seconds, and a chef, I would find a hot massuse to ease the tension.

I mean I can only imagine playing for a world championship would be a strenuous endeavor, and I would probably like something to ease the tension.

Ahhh... I can only think about the day.

Sep-18-06  PeerGynt: I just read something very disturbing. Kramnik's manager clearly said in 64.ru that, if Kramnik wins the match, he won't be playing in the WC 2007, because he does not like the system. He said this is his opinion and Kramnik's opinion as well.

If this is true I am afraid Kirsan has the full rights to cancel the match and disqualify Kramnik.

Sep-18-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hesam7: <PeerGynt> could you provide a link?
Sep-18-06  ClubplayerGOLD: <blingice>

I know your a clown just by what you say in posts.

I thought it was funny how Kramnik was just laughing while Topalov sitting there stareing at him:)

I'm sure if I saw you the picture would be much the same:)

Sep-18-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  suenteus po 147: It will be FIDE's title to do with as they will. If Kramnik didn't like the cycle FIDE proposed he shouldn't have agreed to the match in the first place. If he wins and then declines to play of 2007 he will be in for a nasty surprise when FIDE strips the title from him and gives it Topalov.
Sep-18-06  fevered cheek: <I just read something very disturbing. Kramnik's manager clearly said in 64.ru that, if Kramnik wins the match, he won't be playing in the WC 2007, because he does not like the system. He said this is his opinion and Kramnik's opinion as well.> kramnik should be shot if he tries to pull something like that. that's ridiculous, you don't unify the title just to divide it again.
Sep-18-06  whatthefat: <fevered cheek>
Even if he does want to maintain the match systen (which I think a lot of people would welcome, incidentally), the situation after this match can only be better than the current one. There will at least be agreement on who is champion (unless it goes to tiebreaks of course...), and that individual can hopefully make progress in reforming the system.
Sep-18-06  positionalgenius: <whatthefat>yes.Kramnik should unify,and demand matches only.
Sep-18-06  fevered cheek: i also prefer match play, but IF Kirsan says no to kramnik and kramnik breaks off again, were on chaos again. maybe kramnik can convince kirsan and find a way to fund the match.
Sep-18-06  whatthefat: <feveredcheek>
I think we're in less chaos, but FIDE is essentially ruined at that point though.
Sep-18-06  BIDMONFA: Kramnik-Topalov World Championship Match (2006)

New link inquest winner Topalov-Kramnik
http://www.interrogantes.com/pregun... _

Sep-18-06  lazydaisy: <i also prefer match play, but IF Kirsan says no to kramnik and kramnik breaks off again...>

i think if kramnikg breaks off again he and his title will have no importance to anyone from the chess world. nobody likes a running coward.

Sep-18-06  lazydaisy: <messachess: prediction: there will be one decisive game in the match and many hard-fought draws.>

"i don't need hard-fought draws, i can easily draw anyone when i am playing white" - kramnik, on <messachess> prediction and the world championship match.

Sep-18-06  GEORGIE: Wouldn't it be cool if Kramnik and Topalov ended up falling in love...
Sep-18-06  whatthefat: <Georgie>
You mean something like...

Topalov: This is pretty tense, isn't it, Vladimir.

Kramnik: Yeah, my knees are shaking, I got butterflies in my stomach...

Topalov: But I guess this builds character.

Kramnik: Who wants to build character? Let's quit!

Topalov: Okay.

The two announce that they wish to declare the match a draw. After a brief consultation of the rule book, the judge agrees.

Announcer (tearful): This is the most stirring display of gallantry and sportsmanship since Mountbatten gave India back to the Punjabs.

Sep-18-06  Confuse: Kramniks team has a chef? thats interesting =)
Sep-18-06  messachess: I think Kramnik will win. Presumably he's healthy now. His successes aginst Kasparov point to that. He'll just absorb Topa's onslaughts, neutralize him. Topa will be at a loss what to do, lose confidence, get slightly risky. Then Kramnik will close the deal. I still predict one decisive game in the match.
Sep-18-06  porkfloyd85: Kramnik is right! The new fide system is stupid. How can you decide who the best player is without a 1 on 1 championship match?
Sep-18-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  virginmind: three days to go until the formal beginning of match and still no official site - apart from that page on fide.com/news. that's a bit weird.

as of kramnik not wanting to play in wc 2007, i guess it's understandable: if i play now this reunification match with the fide world champion, why should i agree with that 2007 wc? what then was this reunification match all about? just to give me the chance to play in 2007 wc? and after that, to keep that system? well, if fide wants to keep it, then why the reunification match? and if, on the contrary, fide wants the classic candidates system from now on, why still organizing that 2007 wc?

Sep-18-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  jamesmaskell: hahaha, thats one of my fave Simpson episodes, <whatthefat>!
Sep-18-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hesam7: I will wait for proper confirmation of what Hensel has said. But if this is true then it contradicts what Kramnik has said before. This type of inconsistency (which we have not seen from Kramnik) is very disappointing.

Anyways all this only matters if Kramnik wins the match.

Sep-18-06  polgy: topalov is very brave!!!
1:he risks his place in 2007 champinocip
2:he is not afraid to play a strong opp like kramnik, while kramnik himself refused to give kasparov a rematch.

although i am kramnik fan, i confess that tpalov atittudes is of a true hero.

Sep-18-06  percyblakeney: Hensel does say approximately (according to 64.ru) that after the match there will be only one World Champion, and <he shouldn't have to participate in a cycle with a tournament> (in the way that has been previously agreed). Hensel underlines that this is <not only his own opinion but that Kramnik shares it>.

According to Hensel a win for Kramnik means <negotiations concerning what will happen in the future>. According to Hensel most people would still consider Kramnik as the World Champion even if he failed to win the tournament championship, so it's not the best of ideas. Hensel also says that

<we want to use this match in order to raise shielding mechanisms and standards to the new level! I hope that subsequently similar measures, directed toward the fight with the dishonest players, will be introduced and at other tournaments>

even if he also is quick to point out that <Kramnik does not believe in the rumours about Topalov being a cheater>.

http://64.ru/?/ru/magazine/year=200...

Sep-18-06  polgy: so if kramnik win, the coas is on

i hope topalov win to end the confusion completely!

Sep-18-06  polgy: topalov said " i consider mymself the only true champion as holder of Fide’s title. “But the world champion should be ready to show that he is the best at all times and this is why I accepted the match. There was a lot of interest and there was money, so I thought ‘why not?’ “Things should be decided on a chess board and if you try to hide it doesn’t work. The point is not only the title but to show everyone that you are the best.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/articl...

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 1162)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 149 OF 1162 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies