chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
MTel Masters Tournament

Veselin Topalov6.5/10(+5 -2 =3)[view games]
Gata Kamsky6/10(+4 -2 =4)[view games]
Viswanathan Anand5.5/10(+3 -2 =5)[view games]
Peter Svidler5/10(+2 -2 =6)[view games]
Etienne Bacrot3.5/10(+0 -3 =7)[view games]
Ruslan Ponomariov3.5/10(+1 -4 =5)[view games]


official site

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 30  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Svidler vs Topalov ½-½71 2006 MTel MastersB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
2. Bacrot vs Anand 0-154 2006 MTel MastersE12 Queen's Indian
3. Ponomariov vs Kamsky ½-½64 2006 MTel MastersC88 Ruy Lopez
4. Kamsky vs Bacrot 1-0103 2006 MTel MastersC88 Ruy Lopez
5. Topalov vs Anand 0-136 2006 MTel MastersC88 Ruy Lopez
6. Svidler vs Ponomariov 1-043 2006 MTel MastersB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
7. Anand vs Kamsky 0-157 2006 MTel MastersC88 Ruy Lopez
8. Bacrot vs Svidler ½-½32 2006 MTel MastersD85 Grunfeld
9. Ponomariov vs Topalov ½-½66 2006 MTel MastersD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
10. Anand vs Ponomariov 1-056 2006 MTel MastersB19 Caro-Kann, Classical
11. Bacrot vs Topalov ½-½29 2006 MTel MastersE21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
12. Kamsky vs Svidler 1-024 2006 MTel MastersB83 Sicilian
13. Topalov vs Kamsky 1-042 2006 MTel MastersD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
14. Svidler vs Anand ½-½38 2006 MTel MastersC88 Ruy Lopez
15. Ponomariov vs Bacrot ½-½47 2006 MTel MastersC88 Ruy Lopez
16. Anand vs Bacrot ½-½50 2006 MTel MastersC89 Ruy Lopez, Marshall
17. Topalov vs Svidler 0-161 2006 MTel MastersD86 Grunfeld, Exchange
18. Kamsky vs Ponomariov 1-041 2006 MTel MastersC88 Ruy Lopez
19. Anand vs Topalov 0-161 2006 MTel MastersB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
20. Bacrot vs Kamsky ½-½52 2006 MTel MastersD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
21. Ponomariov vs Svidler 1-053 2006 MTel MastersB42 Sicilian, Kan
22. Kamsky vs Anand ½-½39 2006 MTel MastersC69 Ruy Lopez, Exchange, Gligoric Variation, 6.d4
23. Svidler vs Bacrot ½-½37 2006 MTel MastersC88 Ruy Lopez
24. Topalov vs Ponomariov 1-065 2006 MTel MastersC88 Ruy Lopez
25. Kamsky vs Topalov 0-129 2006 MTel MastersB97 Sicilian, Najdorf
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 30  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 150 OF 151 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-22-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: <percyblakeney> Yes, he has performed like a 2850 in almost all of his recent tournaments. At this rate it is only a matter of time before his rating catches up to his actual ability.

May-22-06  SnoopDogg: I don't know how many tournaments Topalov has to win to be considered "consistent" <percy> What would be your definition?
May-22-06  percyblakeney: <What would be your definition?>

I think Topalov has been consistent, but to surpass 2851 he'll have to play close to San Luis chess in every tournament, and that's a bit much to ask of him. As a Topalov fan I'd like to see it, but when comparing with the best results of other players it's clear how hard it is.

For example Kramnik did well when sharing first in Linares 2003 and as sole winner in 2004, but still these his best performances in many years were 15-20 points below 2800. So it's not easy to line up 2850+ performance after 2850+ performance, especially not with Topalov's very hard schedule, defending his World Champion title three times in a year, but we'll see...

May-22-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Maatalkko: This tournament has convinced me - I'm now a Topalov fan. Winning the last four games in a row isn't easy, but Topalov made it look easy - and he saved face in front of his home crowd too. Going from a semi-disaster to an excellent tournament in four games is quite impressive.

Topalov isn't as consistent as other top players from game to game, and that prevented me from realizing his great strength for some time. But he takes risks and almost like a skilled poker player his wins will go far beyond his losses, given a long enough period of time.

Topalov is also the only player right now who has consistently been able to win 4-5 games in a row against super-GM competition (which of course means winning some with black). Only truly great players such as Fischer and Kasparov have been able to do this consistently in the past (not even Karpov did this very often), and I think it is more convincing than any numerical measure of Topalov's strength.

May-22-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Maatalkko: 2851 is an astounding record. I am inclined to predict that Topalov will not break it because of the consistency it would require, but if anyone can do it sometime soon it will be him.
May-22-06  SnoopDogg: 2851 is actually inevitable due to inflation. So Kasparov's 2851 back then would actually be somewhere around 2900 give or take a few years in the future.
May-22-06  CapablancaFan: <SnoopDogg><2851 is actually inevitable due to inflation. So Kasparov's 2851 back then would actually be somewhere around 2900 give or take a few years in the future.> I agree, oh, I mean fashizzle my nizzle.
May-23-06  lopium: " tzanov: <Daodejing>, Kasparov is 2812 now. Topalov is 2813. " Kasparov WAS 2812 when he left, he is now not rated anymore.
May-23-06  Bobak Zahmat: Suppose Topalov will beat Kramnik, Hydra and Radjabov, then it is realistic to think he would reach a rating of 2825+!!!
May-23-06  babakova: Or not...If Kramnik goes into the match with the rating he has now-- And it is a close contest with Topalov winning by say 1 point. Then he will lose rating points. Same goes for the match with Radjabov, but in that match at least he can be expected to do better than +1.
May-23-06  percyblakeney: I'm not so sure that Kramnik is better than Radjabov at the moment, just look at Radjabov's +2 in Linares and 2773 performance over the last six months...
May-23-06  babakova: If Kramnik gets into his old usual shape to the match with Topalov, which I think he will, he is vastly superior to Radjabov. Perhaps Radjabov has slightly better form than Kramnik right now, since the latter hasnt been playing for quite some time. But this will change when he does get down and push some pawns.
May-23-06  GrandMasterP: Topalov will pass 2851 with sure!
May-23-06  percyblakeney: <If Kramnik gets into his old usual shape> from 6-7 years ago he is vastly superior to all active players except Topalov. But it can't be easy to return to such a high level after many years of worse results. We'll just have to wait and see, also when it comes to Radjabov and if he will improve 50 points also the upcoming year...
May-23-06  babakova: I would consider the Kramnik who drew Leko in Brissago in 2004 ,though not at his best, to be vastly superior to Radjabov. The point is Kramnik is a much tougher opponent in a match than Radjabov for Topalov, even if Radja has had decent results lately.
May-23-06  devilwolfdog: I just noticed an interesting pattern on wins at the 2006 MTel Masters tournament. The number of wins correlated directly with the finishing order:

Topalov: 5 Wins
Kamsky: 4 Wins
Anand: 3 Wins
Svidler: 2 Wins
Ponomariov: 1 Win
Bacrot: 0 Wins

May-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Maatalkko: Bacrot had no wins? He's not getting invited back for sure.
May-23-06  Bobak Zahmat: <devilwolfdog> So the anti-draw rule works after all :)!
May-24-06  ikipemiko: The anti-draw rule works really, 50% of the games were decisive, that's very high percentage for a supertournament.
May-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Hopefully, they will start using this format in more tournaments.
May-25-06  jaime gallegos: Ponomariov finished 6th with the same score Bacrot did ( 3,5 points ) ... however Pono won 1 game and Bacrot none !!! Why is Pono on the last position ???
May-25-06  Topzilla: Congratulations again to the World Champion Topalov for winning again Mtel Sofia.
May-25-06  Trouble: I don't think rating inflation is as bad as people think. Main reason is most of the guys playing the supertourneys only play the super tourneys, so the points get recycled for the most part. I think its safe to say that the players of today are stronger than the players of the past...just like in athletics simply because the training methods have improved so much.
Jun-09-06  MagnaPsygnosis: I would love to see the real masters play in the Mtel 2007. They are off- coarse:

Gary Kasparov
Boris Spassky
Bobby Fischer
Topalov
Leko
Rybka 64Bit

Jun-13-06  Rocafella: Off topic I know, but I really like your profile <MagnaPsygnosis> Very thought provoking
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 151)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 150 OF 151 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies