chessgames.com

  WCC Overview
 
  << previous HISTORY OF THE WORLD CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP next >>  
  << previous FIDE CHAMPIONSHIPS next >>  
Karpov vs Kamsky, 1996
Elista

With Gary Kasparov showing no interest in rejoining FIDE, the world chess body continued with its normal qualification cycle to produce an opponent for its champion, Anatoly Karpov. An American grandmaster, 21 year old Gata Kamsky, emerged the winner of the process.

 Gata Kamsky
 Gata Kamsky
Kamsky, born in 1974 in Siberia, had defected to the United States in 1989. A genuine chess prodigy, he won the under-20 Soviet Championship at the age of 12. In July of 1990 he became the youngest player ever to appear FIDE's top ten rating list. He obtained his Grandmaster title at age 16. Driven strongly by his father, young Kamsky single-mindedly pursued his goal to be World Champion, participating in both the PCA and FIDE qualification cycles. He reached the finals of the 1994-1995 PCA Candidates' matches, eliminating Kramnik and Short before losing to Anand. The FIDE Candidates matches brought even greater success, defeating Van der Sterren, Anand, and then Salov to emerge as Karpov's challenger.

Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, president of the tiny Soviet republic of Kalmykia, had been chosen as the new FIDE president in 1995. He scheduled the match to be played in Baghdad, Iraq; but the US State Department refused to let Kamsky travel to that country. Ilyumzhinov then chose Elista, the capital of Kalmykia, as the match site. Kamsky was reluctant to play in a Soviet satellite but agreed when his safety was guaranteed.

The prize fund was 2 million dollars with approximately 1 million going to the winner, 500,000 to the loser and the rest split between FIDE and various charities. The match was scheduled for 20 games; if tied, the match would continue until a player won a two game mini-match.

The match began on June 6, 1996. Karpov won the first game, but Kamsky came back to win the second to even the score. But experience trumped youthful ambition: Karpov--then playing his ninth world championship match--won 4 of the next 7 games, to establish an all but insurmountable lead. On July 11, after 18 games, with a score of 10½ to 7½, Karpov retained the title of FIDE World Chess Champion. Immediately after the match, Kamsky gave up chess to pursue a medical career, but returned to chess in 2004 to resume his goal of becoming World Champion.

click on a game number to replay game 123456789101112131415161718
Kamsky01½0½00½01½½½0½1½½
Karpov10½1½11½10½½½1½0½½

FINAL SCORE:  Karpov 10½;  Kamsky 7½
Reference: game collection WCC Index [Karpov-Kamsky 1996]

NOTABLE GAMES   [what is this?]
    · Game #4     Kamsky vs Karpov, 1996     0-1
    · Game #2     Kamsky vs Karpov, 1996     1-0
    · Game #6     Kamsky vs Karpov, 1996     0-1

1 The World Chess Championships by Graeme Cree

 page 1 of 1; 18 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Karpov vs Kamsky 1-056 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipD97 Grunfeld, Russian
2. Kamsky vs Karpov 1-065 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
3. Karpov vs Kamsky ½-½49 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipE15 Queen's Indian
4. Kamsky vs Karpov 0-145 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
5. Karpov vs Kamsky ½-½23 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipD97 Grunfeld, Russian
6. Kamsky vs Karpov 0-129 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipC43 Petrov, Modern Attack
7. Karpov vs Kamsky 1-071 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipE97 King's Indian
8. Kamsky vs Karpov ½-½61 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipB17 Caro-Kann, Steinitz Variation
9. Karpov vs Kamsky 1-041 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipD97 Grunfeld, Russian
10. Kamsky vs Karpov 1-059 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipE12 Queen's Indian
11. Karpov vs Kamsky ½-½66 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
12. Kamsky vs Karpov ½-½54 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipB17 Caro-Kann, Steinitz Variation
13. Karpov vs Kamsky ½-½90 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipE15 Queen's Indian
14. Kamsky vs Karpov 0-161 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipE41 Nimzo-Indian
15. Karpov vs Kamsky ½-½42 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipA70 Benoni, Classical with 7.Nf3
16. Kamsky vs Karpov 1-049 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipE15 Queen's Indian
17. Karpov vs Kamsky  ½-½60 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipA13 English
18. Kamsky vs Karpov ½-½80 1996 Karpov-Kamsky FIDE World ChampionshipE15 Queen's Indian
 page 1 of 1; 18 games  PGN Download 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-08-07  Inf: boy gata sure looks young. but i think it was a shame he gave up chess after this WC... 10 years away from chess is too much, now its too late and hard to become a WC nowdays with that many years missing.
Jan-08-07  Karpova: The Caro-Kann served Karpov well in this match.
Especially game Nr.4 with very instructive play against an IQP.
Jan-11-07  Bobak Zahmat: <but returned to chess in 2004 to resume his goal of becoming World Champion> I think his goal to become World Champion is quite an impossible mission. Today, there are too many Super GM who are stronger than Kamsky.
Jan-12-07  positionalgenius: Karpov wins...again.
Jan-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Maatalkko: <Bobak Zahmat> Stronger. Not more talented. Kamsky never peaked.
Jan-15-07  sitzkrieg: Incredible amount of matches Kamsky won in that short period.
Jan-18-07  Dr.Lecter: I saw the Short vs Kasparov, when Kasparov won 12 1/2 to 7 1/2. Why didn't Kamsky and Karpov keep playing, just for the fun of it?
Jan-19-07  code13: Dr Lector - Short v Kasparov was a 24 game match, so they didn't keep playing all the games of the match (although they did play 4 games of rapid chess to fulfill the tv contract, which are not included in the 12.5-7.5 score).
Feb-17-07  Whitehat1963: This match served as a high-level exploration of the E15 QID (four games). We should be analyzing the @&%$* out of them.
Feb-25-07  Dr.Lecter: Oh, I see. Thanks.

Wow! This's my 400th kibitz!

Dec-15-07  cotdt: <I think his goal to become World Champion is quite an impossible mission. Today, there are too many Super GM who are stronger than Kamsky.>

Not impossible, but it's a tough road ahead.

Dec-24-07  Sibahi: This match format sounds nice : why don't they apply it in the next WCs ?
Feb-20-09  swarmoflocusts: <I think his goal to become World Champion is quite an impossible mission.>

He's only a few games away!

Feb-20-09  blacksburg: a few games against topalov and anand.
Feb-20-09  drkodos: He has zero wins thus far. That means he is really an infinity away because even if he multiples his efforts to win the WC, it will still amount to: ZERO

Good guy, excellent player. Not World Champion Calibre.

But then again, neither am I and I think I am just swell and so is Gata.

deal

beaches.

Feb-20-09  Jim Bartle: "He has zero wins thus far. That means he is really an infinity away because even if he multiples his efforts to win the WC, it will still amount to: ZERO"

True, but that can change quickly. I remember the Concorde was the world's safest plane, then had one crash and became statistically the most dangerous.

Feb-20-09  swarmoflocusts: <blacksburg>

True, true. Kamsky is at that level, though. Regardless of the result, I have been impressed with his play thus far, especially considering the length of his hiatus; drawing with black against one of the world's best is a good start. (Now he just needs those wins with white. That's the hard part.)

<drkodos>

That's a little bit ridiculous. If he wins this next game he's tied the match, and if he wins a few more he's IN THE CHAMPIONSHIP. I would argue that he is quite capable of playing at this level -- he's gotten this far, and he's not doing so badly.

Feb-21-09  blacksburg: <and he's not doing so badly.>

well, i'm rooting for kamsky, but he is losing. and it is a very short match. and he's never won a game against topalov.

doesn't matter anymore if you or i believe that he can beat topalov, the match is on. do or die, no excuses. if he is capable of winning a game against topalov, now would be the time to do so.

Feb-21-09  swarmoflocusts: <well, i'm rooting for kamsky, but he is losing. and it is a very short match. and he's never won a game against topalov.>

And I; yes, he is; it is, but one game <is> just one game -- he's got plenty of opportunity; that's the hard one to get around, but the past is past and so on and so forth.

Feb-21-09  swarmoflocusts: Haha! Yes!! Victory!
Jul-29-09  Troller: In 1984, after 18 games the score was 11-7 in Karpov's favour, when 22-year-old Kasparov was playing his first WC match.

In 1996, after 18 games the score was 10½-7½ in Karpov's favour, when 21-year-old Kamsky was playing his first WC match.

Just saying. Not comparing or anything...

Jul-29-09  AnalyzeThis: Very interesting point, Troller. Karpov didn't have the option of just running out the clock on Kasparov, like he did to Kamsky.
Dec-23-09  Pravitel: I really enjoyed going through Karpov's Elista Diaries. Very nice match and a big fight. Kamsky fought like a man to the very end, not giving up. Much better attitude than what Anand showed against Kasparov. Karpov was ruthless especially on the first part of the match and punished Kamsky accurately from the smallest mistakes.
Sep-23-10  Everett: In a sense, this was Karpov's swansong. Soon he would be ousted from his usual #2 position in the rankings and by 1998-9 be out of the top 5.

Still, through his 45th year, he was playing top level chess, over two consecutive decades of being either #1 or #2.

Apr-30-11  bronkenstein: Some usefull info + comments on key moments of the games @ http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour... .
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies