Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 World Chess Cup (2007)

  PARTICIPANTS (sorted by highest achieved rating; click on name to see player's games)
Magnus Carlsen, Levon Aronian, Shakhriyar Mamedyarov, Alexander Grischuk, Teimour Radjabov, Sergey Karjakin, Vassily Ivanchuk, Peter Svidler, Ruslan Ponomariov, Leinier Dominguez Perez, Pentala Harikrishna, Pavel Eljanov, Gata Kamsky, Michael Adams, Dmitry Jakovenko, Evgeny Tomashevsky, Wang Yue, Alexey Shirov, Wang Hao, David Navara, Etienne Bacrot, Nikita Vitiugov, Evgeny Ilgizovich Bareev, Le Quang Liem, Arkadij Naiditsch, Vladimir Malakhov, Ernesto Inarkiev, Bu Xiangzhi, Zoltan Almasi, Evgeny Alekseev, Andrei Volokitin, Francisco Vallejo Pons, Krishnan Sasikiran, Laurent Fressinet, Lazaro Bruzon Batista, Rustam Kasimdzhanov, Loek van Wely, Vladimir Eduardovich Akopian, Ivan Cheparinov, Nigel Short, Sergei Zhigalko, Maxim Rodshtein, Alexander Motylev, Rauf Mamedov, Liviu Dieter Nisipeanu, Evgeny Najer, Sergei Vladimirovich Rublevsky, Viktor Laznicka, Emil Davidovich Sutovsky, Alexander Khalifman, Alexander Onischuk, Bassem Amin, Sergei Tiviakov, Julio Ernesto Granda Zuniga, Sergey Volkov, Gregory Kaidanov, Kiril Dimitrov Georgiev, Mikhail Gurevich, Vadim Zvjaginsev, Michael Roiz, Konstantin Yuryevich Landa, Mateusz Bartel, Predrag Nikolic, Varuzhan Eduardovich Akobian, Eduardo Patricio Iturrizaga Bonelli, Robert Markus, Vladislav Ivanovich Tkachiev, Konstantin Rufovich Sakaev, Csaba Balogh, Surya Shekhar Ganguly, Zhou Jianchao, Boris Avrukh, Bartosz Socko, Ngoc Truongson Nguyen, Grzegorz Gajewski, Boris Savchenko, Bartlomiej Macieja, Anton Filippov, Jan Gustafsson, Rafael Duailibe Leitao, Zhang Pengxiang, Yury Markovich Shulman, Zaven Andriasian, Alexander Shabalov, Gilberto Milos, Vladimir Belov, Zdenko Kozul, Ahmed Adly, Valerij Filippov, Zhao Jun, Ehsan Ghaem Maghami, Fernando Peralta, Wen Yang, Emanuel Berg, Alexander Galkin, Diego Flores, Merab Gagunashvili, Imre Hera Jr, David Baramidze, Dusko Pavasovic plus 27 more players.

 page 1 of 16; games 1-25 of 376  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. E Iturrizaga vs Svidler 0-102007World Chess CupA00 Uncommon Opening
2. Motylev vs B Savchenko 1-0392007World Chess CupB77 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack
3. B Socko vs V Georgiev 1-0402007World Chess CupC78 Ruy Lopez
4. G Gajewski vs S Volkov  0-1492007World Chess CupD11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
5. Kiril D Georgiev vs S Megaranto 1-0372007World Chess CupD17 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
6. D Baramidze vs Short ½-½252007World Chess CupC45 Scotch Game
7. Bareev vs J Becerra Rivero 1-0582007World Chess CupE73 King's Indian
8. D Flores vs Fressinet 0-1542007World Chess CupA09 Reti Opening
9. Sutovsky vs Zhou Jianchao  ½-½262007World Chess CupC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
10. Alexander V Ivanov vs Navara  ½-½432007World Chess CupB91 Sicilian, Najdorf, Zagreb (Fianchetto) Variation
11. P Nikolic vs A Iljin 1-0692007World Chess CupD58 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tartakower (Makagonov-Bondarevsky) Syst
12. Kudrin vs F Vallejo Pons 0-1412007World Chess CupC53 Giuoco Piano
13. Sasikiran vs S Zhigalko  ½-½602007World Chess CupE15 Queen's Indian
14. C Balogh vs Tkachiev  ½-½392007World Chess CupC91 Ruy Lopez, Closed
15. Nisipeanu vs B Amin 1-0562007World Chess CupC81 Ruy Lopez, Open, Howell Attack
16. M Gagunashvili vs Zhang Pengxiang  ½-½352007World Chess CupD11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
17. M Roiz vs Akobian  ½-½312007World Chess CupD55 Queen's Gambit Declined
18. A Galkin vs M Bartel 1-0962007World Chess CupC11 French
19. Z Kozul vs L Bruzon Batista  ½-½222007World Chess CupD46 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
20. Macieja vs V Laznicka 1-0182007World Chess CupC10 French
21. M Rodshtein vs J Gustafsson ½-½512007World Chess CupC78 Ruy Lopez
22. Leitao vs Y Shulman  ½-½752007World Chess CupD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
23. Shabalov vs Pavasovic 0-1422007World Chess CupE04 Catalan, Open, 5.Nf3
24. Kaidanov vs M Gurevich  ½-½192007World Chess CupD63 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense
25. Sakaev vs Vitiugov  ½-½962007World Chess CupD38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation
 page 1 of 16; games 1-25 of 376  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

TIP: You can make the above ads go away by registering a free account!

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 205 OF 206 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-17-07  bgkuzzy: I'm rather surprised that no one has raised the kinds of questions that were raised after Topalov's upsurge in performance in 2005. It was NOT possible that Topalov achieved his successes in 2005 without cheating, yet Kamsky demolishes everyone after a relatively long, and recent, break from chess, and yet it is all good. I'm not suggesting that he used any help, as I don't believe any of the top GM's do and had been, or merely trying to belittle or discredit Kamsky's extraordinary success in the WC. People and media's behavior is just so peculiar and baffling.
Dec-17-07  parisattack: <KamikazeAttack: Yes, I didn't think much of Kamsky before this world cup. Well, I ain't laffing anymore.
Kamsky's challenge is real and a threat to anyone. >

Just about my thoughts, also. The proof is in the pudding. He has time to prepare but can he hold the awesome edge he has right now? He seems to be adopting a Kramnik-style - very steady play, wait for the opponent to get too agressive, make a mistake. Its the winning way in classical chess now - like it or not.

I don't care much for Danialov much myself but seriously doubt Top cheats, really. He made a major change in his opening style and I think that was the difference.

Dec-17-07  Youjoin: <bgkuzzy> That happens because Topalov is from Bulgaria and Kamsky is an "American"...
Dec-17-07  square dance: i think the only thing that is peculiar and baffling is the absurd comments that some bulgarians, and/or topalov fans seem to come up with, although i thought most of that was in the past. topalov's lybia performance was only ever questioned retroactively after san luis. kamsky, meanwhile, has been back for at least two full years now. its not as if he reappeared fresh from law school to play in this world cup. if you'd like to maintain some credibility, <bgkuzzy>, you may want to consider not distorting the facts at your whim.
Dec-17-07  SetNoEscapeOn: <bgkuzzy>
Just 2 thoughts:

1. The view that Topalov is a cheater is not one that is held by the mainstream chess community. If anything, there may be a sentiment out there that, if the Topalov camp accused Kramnik of cheating, they should look at themselves first, because it is more likely that Topalov cheated than Kramnik. But there has never been any evidence that Topalov cheated.

2. Kamsky has not really "demolished everyone" just yet. The world cup win was great, but Anand, Kramnik, Gelfand, Morozevich, and other top players did not compete. Not that I doubt Kamsky can beat them too (he already won 2 games against Anand in the same tournament), but you cannot really compare his accomplishments to Topalov's run in 2005/2006- at least, not yet.

Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Khanty-Mansiysk doesn't respond anymore.
Dec-17-07  SetNoEscapeOn: Besides, this is not really an "upsurge" for Kamsky, so much as a "getting back" (he beat Anand and Kramnik in matches in the mid 90's). Topalov's climb brought him to new heights.
Dec-17-07  skrzypczyk: well kamsky won..he will beat Topalov,,
Dec-17-07  rover: I think some people overestimate the significance of Kamsky's performance. It's a great result and he played well to achieve it but really it's only one tournament. For now he's the weakest of the 4 remaining players by far and the match format probably hurts rather than helps him.

Yes, he <could> win but Topalov is a huge favourite. I actually think Topalov was happy to see Kamsky win instead of someone like Svidler, Ivanchuk or Aronian.

Dec-17-07  cotdt: <rover> Not sure Kamsky is the weakest of the 4 remaining WC contenders. The quality of his World Cup games is higher than that of the typical Topalov, Kramnik, or Anand game. Have you seen the "super-solid" Kramnik's actual games? There are a lot more mistakes than in Kamsky's recent games. My engine agrees with me. The quality of Kamsky's games have been exceptionally high, except for the 1st game against Ponomariov. In my opinion Kamsky would only be considered the weakest if you look at the ratings and past results rather than the actual moves played in his recent games.
Dec-18-07  rover: How about his whites against Adly and Svidler? Neither looked very impressive to me.

In any case the number mistakes doesn't tell much IMO. Some positions are more difficult to play perfectly than others.

That's not to say he didn't play well. He did. I just don't think you can determine the quality of his play just by running his games through blunder check.

<In my opinion Kamsky would only be considered the weakest if you look at the ratings and past results rather than the actual moves played in his recent games.>

Well, ratings and past results predict future results better. Basically his performance is comparable to Naiditsch or Bologan winning in Dortmund.

Dec-18-07  keres777: May the best man win!
Dec-18-07  TIMER: <rover> You should also bear in mind past results before Kamsky retired to see that this is not a one-off like Naiditsch or Bologan, but rather him recovering to his old level.
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: Just like he recovered to his old level in MTel Masters last year?

Certainly that was a more significant achievement than this one. Clear 2nd place in such a tournament! 1.5-0.5 against everyone except Topalov, including Anand.

Then he went back to so-so results, not bad but not that good either. I see no particular reason to think it's going to be different this time, although it's always extremely difficult to predict. What's clear is that we are once again seeing a lot of exaggerated hype after someone doing well in one single event.

On the other hand... Topalov is hard to predict as well these days. Since MTel last year he has only rarely shown anything like his best form. I'd want to wait for Corus to see just how well he will be doing on that level now.

Dec-18-07  KamikazeAttack: <The quality of his World Cup games is higher than that of the typical Topalov, Kramnik, or Anand game. >


Dec-18-07  AdrianP: My impression is that Kamsky has been playing extremely high level chess ever since his return, comparable with any of the top 5. As <acirce> points out, Kamsky demonstrated his class at the MTel Masters last year. He's been held back by an innocuous opening repertoire with White and having to suffer for a considerable time in the opening with Black. In middlegames with equal chances, he's shown how danagerous he continues to be. Again, my subjective view is that he's made very very few mistakes even in complicated positions and, as he was when he left chess, he's extremely strong practically and psychologically. I find his play and approach at the moment not dissimilar to Korchnoi's when Korchnoi was at his best.

In this world cup, he seems to have shown that he has done some serious work on his openings (I think I'm right that he's had some help from, query, Sutovsky on his openings) - e.g. against Ponomariov, Kamsky was happy to play the main line of the poisoned pawn 6 bg5 Najdorf, whereas previously he'd been playing the innocuous Nb3, and, in fact, it was Ponomariov who deviated from the critical line. Still, I think that this is the area in which he'll be most vulnerable to Topalov, who will be hoping to blow him away with home preparation.

Dec-18-07  AdrianP: As a contrast to Kamsky's success here and at e.g. the MTel Masters, one can look to Candidates Match: Gelfand vs Kamsky (2007) where Kamsky simply couldn't get started against a player with really top-class preparation, struggling to get winning chances even with white.
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: <AdrianP> I think you're right to a large extent.

His openings have improved a bit, but he still has a long way to go. If he works very hard on that for the next 10-12 months, he should have reasonable chances against Topalov, otherwise it's hard to see. The match against Gelfand is a case in point. But, of course, everything can happen.

<against Ponomariov, Kamsky was happy to play the main line of the poisoned pawn 6 bg5 Najdorf, whereas previously he'd been playing the innocuous Nb3, and, in fact, it was Ponomariov who deviated from the critical line.>

Yes, and the latter means that he wasn't really tested. What would happen against someone who is willing and able to enter the mainline? The same against Carlsen who is not exactly an opening specialist either.

Dec-18-07  Marvol: <acirce: Since MTel last year he has only rarely shown anything like his best form.>

I'd argue that even in Mtel last year he didn't show anything like his best form. He needed a last-round win against a nervous Sasikiran and his TPR was 2751, rather ordinary.

Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: <Marvol> that was this year, wasn't it? I fully agree he played rather badly this year.
Dec-18-07  AdrianP: <What would happen against someone who is willing and able to enter the mainline?> Quite. I think I'm right that Shirov, who plays the Najdorf quite a bit and has done some serious work on the new critical line in the poisoned pawn, also did not want to see Kamsky's preparation, playing a Sicilian with 2. ...Nc6. But maybe Shirov was trusting *his own* preparation of the white side of this line rather than Kamsky's!
Dec-18-07  KamikazeAttack: Kamsky has been ordinary for most of his comeback. In fact some of his games have been downright terrible. It is ridiculous to hype where none is necessary.

He showed significant improvement in the world cup thx to Emil. From the just concluded WC tournament, he has shown that he can still play high quality chess.

But is he ready for the big boys?? Not in this backyard. I have no doubt that he would be crushed if they played right now. Kamsky is not gonna close the gap with months of work compared to years of work that the big boys have put in at this level. U delude urself if u think otherwise.

But can Kamsky be ready for the big boys? Oh yes. He has time to close the gap if given the right preparation.

The main point is he has the potential, nothing more.

Dec-18-07  AdrianP: <[Shirov] has done some serious work on the new critical line in the poisoned pawn> ... for this, I had in mind this game, which is not in the database.

Shirov,A (2715) - Guliyev,N (2545) [B97]
Calatrava op rapid 2nd Calatrava (4), 06.04.2007

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Qb6 8.Qd2 Qxb2 9.Rb1 Qa3 10.e5 h6 11.Bh4 dxe5 12.fxe5 Nfd7 13.Ne4 Qxa2 14.Rd1 Qd5 15.Qe3 Qxe5 16.Be2 Bc5 17.Bg3 Bxd4 18.Rxd4 Qa5+ 19.Rd2 0-0 20.Bd6 Nc6 21.0-0 f5 22.Bxf8 Nxf8 23.Nd6 b5 24.Bf3 Bd7 25.Nxf5 exf5 26.Rxd7 Nxd7 27.Bxc6 Rd8 28.Bxd7 1-0

Dec-18-07  AdrianP: The last 3 games here also suggest that Shirov is keen to go in for this line 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Qb6 8.Qd2 Qxb2 9.Rb1 Qa3 10.e5 h6 11.Bh4 dxe5 12.fxe5 Nfd7 13.Ne4 Qxa2 14.Rd1 Qd5 but no-one wants to see what he's got up his sleeve!

Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: Right, so it seems Shirov plays that line as White, but rarely, if ever, with Black. Then it shouldn't mean anything that he didn't want to play it against Kamsky either.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 206)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 205 OF 206 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC