chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Amber Tournament (Blindfold) (2008)

Player: Vladimir Kramnik

 page 1 of 1; 11 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Anand vs Kramnik ½-½23 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)C42 Petrov Defense
2. Kramnik vs Leko ½-½25 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)B10 Caro-Kann
3. Mamedyarov vs Kramnik ½-½29 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)C43 Petrov, Modern Attack
4. Kramnik vs Morozevich 1-057 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)E51 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3
5. Topalov vs Kramnik ½-½38 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)C42 Petrov Defense
6. Gelfand vs Kramnik ½-½24 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)D12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
7. Kramnik vs Van Wely  ½-½34 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)E97 King's Indian
8. Ivanchuk vs Kramnik ½-½89 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)C42 Petrov Defense
9. Kramnik vs Carlsen 1-044 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)E17 Queen's Indian
10. Aronian vs Kramnik ½-½23 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)E06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3
11. Kramnik vs Karjakin  ½-½52 2008 Amber Tournament (Blindfold)D44 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Kramnik wins | Kramnik loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 52 OF 52 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-27-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Karpova: <hovik2003: So now only Kramnik can be a sole winner if he wins in blindfold.> Today's round started earlier - Kramnik already drew Karjakin.
Mar-27-08  percyblakeney: Topalov did well to share first in the blindfold section, he didn't have much luck with the computer failure against van Wely and missing some wins in earlier rounds, as in the amazing missed mates game against Carlsen.
Mar-27-08  minasina: Rapid LIVE GAMES about to start NOW. See
Amber Tournament (Rapid) (2008)

http://www.amberchess2008.com/pgnvi...
http://www.amberchess2008.com/

Mar-27-08  hovik2003: <Karpova>
So Aronian should buy a drink for Karjakin!
Mar-27-08  mikejaqua: So there's a four-way tie for first in the blindfold. Anyone know if they use a tiebreaker system?
Mar-27-08  Knight13: Poor Gelfand, doing sooo well in this tournament.
Mar-27-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  Karpova: <Levon Aronian is the glorious winner of the 17th Amber Blindfold and Rapid Tournament. The 25-year-old Armenian already secured first place in the rapid section and overall tournament victory in yesterday’s round. Today he drew both his games against Peter Leko to finish on 14½ points.

The blindfold competition ended in a four-way tie for first. Aronian, Kramnik, Morozevich and Topalov all scored 6½ points from 11 games.

In the overall standings four players finished in second place. According to the Sonneborn-Berger tiebreak Vladimir Kramnik won second prize, while Peter Leko took third prize. The tiebreak decided on the trophies, the prize-money for second place Kramnik and Leko shared with Veselin Topalov and Magnus Carlsen.> http://www.amberchess2008.com/

Mar-27-08  percyblakeney: Not much separating Kramnik and Morozevich in blindfold chess over the years.

First places in the blindfold section in Amber:
Morozevich 4 in 7 starts
Kramnik 7 in 14 starts

Head to head:
+2 -2 =2

Elo performance up until 2008:
Morozevich 2874
Kramnik 2821

The biggest difference between them is their results against the other players to have reached first at least three times in the blindfold section.

Against Anand:
Morozevich: 5-0
Kramnik: 4-3

Against Topalov:
Morozevich: 4-1
Kramnik: 3-3

Mar-27-08  slomarko: <Elo performance up until 2008: Morozevich 2874
Kramnik 2821 >

i'd say +53 points at that level is a collosal difference.
Mar-27-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: Cmón percy , I may say that <slomarko> has got a point here.
Mar-27-08  chessmoron: The +53 point gap doesn't really mean anything since Moro is 0-2 in Blindfold play against Kramnik's comeback.
Mar-27-08  KamikazeAttack: Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. ~Aaron Levenstein

Having said that it is safe and accurate to say that Kramnik has the best achievement in blindfold chess. He has won the strongest blindfold competition more than anyone and he is still winning it.

Mar-27-08  slomarko: eh no. Morozevich has a higher winning, percentage, a higher performance rating and a higher points scoring percentage. so he's the boss. Kramnik is number 2
Mar-27-08  KamikazeAttack: <Kramnik is number 2>

I'll say he is number 4.

Mar-28-08  hedgeh0g: No wins for Gelfand and a final score of 3/11...ouch!
Mar-28-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  notyetagm: <percyblakeney: Kramnik's latest blindfold loss was actually three whole years ago, so to get a winning position against him with black wasn't bad, even if it doesn't exactly change the result.>

Yes, that Carlsen is one impressive chess player. He beat Kramnik using the Black pieces at Corus and here at the Amber Blindfold event Carlsen gets another winning position with the Black pieces against Kramnik. And blindfold is supposed to be Kramnik's forte!

Mar-29-08  KamikazeAttack: <He beat Kramnik using the Black pieces at Corus and here at the Amber Blindfold event Carlsen gets another winning position with the Black pieces against Kramnik. And blindfold is supposed to be Kramnik's forte!>

Yeah, I agree too that Carlsen has now proven beyond doubt that he is in fact much stronger than Kramnik.

Mar-29-08  Xaurus: <Yeah, I agree too that Carlsen has now proven beyond doubt that he is in fact much stronger than Kramnik.>

I think using the term "much stronger" is somewhat misleading, or, optimistic.

I think Carlsen is perhaps the strongest elite player except for Anand and Kramnik.

When he sorts out his problems, like those he gets when facing certain players (like Leko or Anand), and if he can improve his opening skills, he will become the strongest player in the world.

Right now he must be one of the best endgame players, and that is no small achievement at 17 years of age.

Just try to count the number of games he has saved because of his endgame skills. You won't be able to calculate that far. :P

Seriously though, he shouldn't need to make these miracle saves if he would play the opening/early middlegame better.

Mar-29-08  Blackreptile: a lot of comments on the results of the players of this tournament but strangely enough very few on the amazing victory of Aronian who dominated clearly all the world champions and young or not geniuses.In any case, after his rankings in Corus, Linares and Nice it will be time to re-assess the evaluation of the strongest players of the world.
Mar-29-08  rogge: I believe the new april FIDE ratings pretty much reflects the actual strength of the top players. In order Anand, Kramnik, Moro, Topalov, Carlsen, Aronian.
Mar-29-08  Blackreptile: yes you are right but remember that the Amber tournament does not count for official rating.Aronian would be better placed.may be a specialist of Elo could calculate what the ranking would be if the last Amber counted normally?
Mar-29-08  rogge: My guess is that Aronian would be 3rd, moving Moro, Topa and Carlsen one place down.
Mar-30-08  Davolni: <Kamikazeattack><Yeah, I agree too that Carlsen has now proven beyond doubt that he is in fact much stronger than Kramnik>

Tell me you ARE joking!!!!!

You gotta be dreaming!!!

<much stronger> !!!! LOL, that's a BIG LOL right there!!!

Mar-30-08  Augalv: <<Kamikazeattack><Yeah, I agree too that Carlsen has now proven beyond doubt that he is in fact much stronger than Kramnik>

Are you kidding ?!

Oct-31-08  you vs yourself: Really cool videos from opening and closing ceremonies here: http://www.macauleypeterson.com/Bio...
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 52)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 52 OF 52 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies