Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Howard Staunton Memorial Tournament

Michael Adams8/11(+5 -0 =6)[games]
Loek van Wely7.5/11(+4 -0 =7)[games]
Jan Smeets7/11(+5 -2 =4)[games]
Jan Timman6.5/11(+3 -1 =7)[games]
Erwin L'Ami6/11(+2 -1 =8)[games]
Ivan Sokolov6/11(+2 -1 =8)[games]
Nigel Short5.5/11(+2 -2 =7)[games]
Jonathan Speelman5.5/11(+2 -2 =7)[games]
Jan Werle5.5/11(+3 -3 =5)[games]
Peter K Wells5/11(+1 -2 =8)[games]
Alexander Sergeyevich Cherniaev3.5/11(+1 -5 =5)[games]
Robert Wade0/11(+0 -11 =0)[games]

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Van Wely vs Speelman 1-0592008Howard Staunton MemorialD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
2. Timman vs Wade 1-0232008Howard Staunton MemorialB00 Uncommon King's Pawn Opening
3. I Sokolov vs P K Wells  ½-½302008Howard Staunton MemorialE34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation
4. L'Ami vs Short  ½-½352008Howard Staunton MemorialE32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
5. J Werle vs Cherniaev 1-0322008Howard Staunton MemorialE94 King's Indian, Orthodox
6. J Smeets vs Adams 0-1282008Howard Staunton MemorialC45 Scotch Game
7. Speelman vs J Smeets  ½-½292008Howard Staunton MemorialD10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
8. Adams vs J Werle 1-0402008Howard Staunton MemorialC99 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin,
9. I Sokolov vs Van Wely  ½-½422008Howard Staunton MemorialD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
10. Cherniaev vs L'Ami  ½-½472008Howard Staunton MemorialC15 French, Winawer
11. P K Wells vs Wade 1-0352008Howard Staunton MemorialA41 Queen's Pawn Game (with ...d6)
12. Short vs Timman 0-1402008Howard Staunton MemorialC67 Ruy Lopez
13. L'Ami vs Adams  ½-½262008Howard Staunton MemorialE37 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
14. J Werle vs Speelman ½-½242008Howard Staunton MemorialE49 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Botvinnik System
15. Timman vs Cherniaev  ½-½312008Howard Staunton MemorialE17 Queen's Indian
16. Wade vs Short 0-1532008Howard Staunton MemorialA46 Queen's Pawn Game
17. Van Wely vs P K Wells  ½-½332008Howard Staunton MemorialE34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation
18. J Smeets vs I Sokolov  1-0452008Howard Staunton MemorialC92 Ruy Lopez, Closed
19. P K Wells vs Short  ½-½252008Howard Staunton MemorialD07 Queen's Gambit Declined, Chigorin Defense
20. Cherniaev vs Wade 1-0372008Howard Staunton MemorialC41 Philidor Defense
21. I Sokolov vs J Werle  ½-½332008Howard Staunton MemorialE17 Queen's Indian
22. Adams vs Timman 1-0492008Howard Staunton MemorialC80 Ruy Lopez, Open
23. Speelman vs L'Ami 1-0622008Howard Staunton MemorialD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
24. Van Wely vs J Smeets  ½-½472008Howard Staunton MemorialD18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
25. Timman vs Speelman  ½-½152008Howard Staunton MemorialA13 English
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: Games ended early today and we have an early start tomorrow at noon so here is the update. Games will follow in the morning.

Round 10
Wells 1/2 Speelman
Sokolov 1/2 Adams
Van Wely 1-0 Cherniaev
Smeets 1-0 Short
Werle 1-0 Wade
L'Ami 1/2Timman

Final Round
Adams (7.5) vs. Van Wely (7)
Timman (6) vs. Wells (4.5)
Cherniaev (3.5) vs. Smeets (6)
Speelman (5) vs. Sokolov (5.5)
Short (5) vs. Werle (5)
Wade (0) vs. L'Ami (5)

The Dutch side almost obliterated the British fleet today. After a hectic but on-time start after a UK memory contest forgot to finish by noon, there were tree bloody defeats. Chernaiev tried a Dutch Defense against Van Wely to no avail, Werle took out Wade's Cambridge Springs, and Smeets destroyed Short in spectacular fashion. Adams almost fell to Sokolov despite Sokolov's refusal to move his king's bishop or rook for the entire game, but he managed a draw. Timman played adventurously in the opening against his fellow countryman L'Ami but split the point, as did Wells and Speelman.

Tomorrow's final round pits the two leaders against each other, just like last year. The players can put plenty of effort into the game, as in the evening they will be treated to a big helping of Simpson's famous roast beef and a veritable lake of wine at the prizegiving where six thousand pounds, an artistic chess set valued at 850, and original artwork by the Staunton Society's renowned artist Barry Martin will be distributed.

Aug-17-08  Knight to f6: <ILikeFruits> Wade is in his mid-80's according to the database, so it's no wonder to me that he has 0/9.

The number of players here aged 40 and above (6!) makes me wonder if this tournament is as much a memorial to them as to Staunton.

Aug-17-08  ILikeFruits: knight to f6......
u r right.....
i like wade....
as much as i like korchnoi....
long live knight to f6
Aug-18-08  TommyC: Congratulations to Michael Adams - quick draw today, so he wins the tournament.
Aug-18-08  Octavia: <Wade is in his mid-80's according to the database, so it's no wonder to me that he has 0/9.> lol ! Bob Wade was very much outgraded - nothing to do with his age !
Aug-18-08  Knight to f6: <ILikeFruits> As a matter of fact, Korchnoi is one of my favourite players. I think he really deserved to become champion in '78.
Aug-18-08  Rawprawn: <Bob Wade was very much outgraded - nothing to do with his age !> Well his age did tell in a few places. He lost from some quite good positions and seemed to be tiring after 4 hours or so.
Premium Chessgames Member
  xenophon: <TommyC: Congratulations to Michael Adams - quick draw today, so he wins the tournament>-maybe so but does he lose Elo points?
Aug-19-08  Cibator: A rather belated addition to the debate about the best British chessplayers (I've just returned to this site after a longish absence).

Blackburne was undoubtedly a fearsome tournament player, but the real business end of top-class chess is match play - and he couldn't do that for toffee. Lost every game against Steinitz, and didn't fare a lot better when he took on Lasker. (The Oxford Companion to Chess, in its article on JHB, is curiously reticent about these encounters.)

Aug-19-08  Illogic: I bet my whole bankroll on Wade winning the tournament. My chances are fading..
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: Van Wely offered the draw. Don't blame Mickey.
Premium Chessgames Member
  xenophon: <Eric Schiller: Van Wely offered the draw. Don't blame Mickey>

no blame meant-but i still wonder despite winning does he lose points-and if so does this make it more difficult to attract high rated GMs to events like this?

Aug-20-08  protean: <but i still wonder despite winning does he lose points>

Yes, his rating performance was 2713 (-22).

Aug-21-08  Cibator: Interesting statistic, <protean>. Confirms what I've said before, somewhere else on this site, that Mr Adams shouldn't mess around with second-rate events like the HSM if he's serious about wanting to get back into the world top ten.
Premium Chessgames Member
  atticuscc: <Cibator: Adams shouldn't mess around with second-rate events like the HSM>

This is nonsense. Adams conceded a trivial number of rating points, but succeeded in supporting a British tournament. Good for him - and Short!

The HSM may be a second-rate tournament by Wijk-aan-Zee standards, but it's one of very few international events in Britain these days. I've been critical of specific aspects of this year's HSM, mainly because I think the event has been diminished by them.

But I'm highly supportive of the event in principle. It's based on a nice idea (Anglo-Dutch competition); and it's been developing on the right lines until this year's false steps. Long may the HSM prosper; long may Adams & Short be invited.


Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: There used to be a rule that the winner of a round-robin could not lose points. I don't now if it still holds.

In any case Mickey would have won points if he hadn't misplayed an endgame with the foolish ...Rh5 move so the event itself did not cause him to lose points. In any case 5-10 points means nothing at the elite level and would not cost any invitations. Being the winner of a prestige event is worth more.

Aug-21-08  mack: Also, who gives a tangerine toss about ratings?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Eric> I made the same point about tournament winners and ratings some time back, and was told that FIDE had dropped that rule.

Congratulations all round on a fascinating event. Personally I'd much rather see this kind of varied line-up than the same old unstoppable forces hitting immovable objects.

As for Bob Wade, obviously age is a huge factor. He was effectively GM strength in the late 60s, and was still rated near 2400 in the 70s. It's a sobering thought that here is a player who reached his peak before the introduction of the rating system.

Anyway, I still play the Wade Variation.

Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: thanks for your congrats-whatever may happen in the future we can be very proud of the fact that we have staged 6 staunton memorials now with such a varied and high powered line up of players-with participants and officials including russia, canada, new zealand, usa, scotland, england and holland---and top players such as adams short speelman timman king howell gawain jones and sokolov.
Aug-24-08  mack: 'Whatever may happen in the future' - a tad ominous eh, Ray?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: What happened to Robert Wade. 0% score?
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: You can't compete successfully at this level when you are 87 years old. Wade died several months after this tournament.
Mar-19-11  BobCrisp: <BobWade> couldn't have competed successfully at this level when he was 27 years old.

Actually, that's a bit harsh. Witness one of his best games, that I recently uploaded: A Zaitsev vs Wade, 1971

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: This tournament took place in August 2008. Bob Wade died in November of 2008. In the meantime he may have been slightly relieved that the Magistral Internacional Ruibal (2008) took place. Bent Larsen scored +0 =0 -9 in that tournament and deflected attention away from Wade's poor showing here.
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Duck egg after duck egg after duck egg.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC