chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Amber Tournament (Rapid) Tournament

Viswanathan Anand7/11(+4 -1 =6)[view games]
Levon Aronian7/11(+5 -2 =4)[view games]
Gata Kamsky7/11(+5 -2 =4)[view games]
Vladimir Kramnik6.5/11(+3 -1 =7)[view games]
Sergey Karjakin6/11(+4 -3 =4)[view games]
Magnus Carlsen6/11(+3 -2 =6)[view games]
Veselin Topalov5/11(+1 -2 =8)[view games]
Peter Leko4.5/11(+2 -4 =5)[view games]
Vassily Ivanchuk4.5/11(+1 -3 =7)[view games]
Alexander Morozevich4.5/11(+2 -4 =5)[view games]
Teimour Radjabov4/11(+1 -4 =6)[view games]
Wang Yue4/11(+1 -4 =6)[view games]

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Kamsky vs Carlsen 1-049 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)B73 Sicilian, Dragon, Classical
2. Leko vs Anand 1-068 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)D12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
3. Ivanchuk vs Aronian 0-139 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)B13 Caro-Kann, Exchange
4. Wang Yue vs Karjakin ½-½52 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)D11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
5. Morozevich vs Kramnik 1-043 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)D12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
6. Topalov vs Radjabov  ½-½40 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)B30 Sicilian
7. Karjakin vs Topalov 1-046 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)C43 Petrov, Modern Attack
8. Wang Yue vs Morozevich 0-144 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)A15 English
9. Radjabov vs Kramnik ½-½26 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)C42 Petrov Defense
10. Carlsen vs Ivanchuk ½-½45 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)E33 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
11. Aronian vs Leko 1-029 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)E15 Queen's Indian
12. Anand vs Kamsky 1-049 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)C95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
13. Kamsky vs Aronian 1-051 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)D02 Queen's Pawn Game
14. Ivanchuk vs Leko 1-059 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)C53 Giuoco Piano
15. Carlsen vs Anand ½-½38 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)B12 Caro-Kann Defense
16. Morozevich vs Radjabov ½-½46 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)B32 Sicilian
17. Kramnik vs Karjakin ½-½30 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)D11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
18. Topalov vs Wang Yue  ½-½76 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)D18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
19. Topalov vs Morozevich 1-043 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)C93 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Smyslov Defense
20. Wang Yue vs Kramnik 0-149 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)D45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
21. Leko vs Carlsen ½-½58 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)E60 King's Indian Defense
22. Aronian vs Anand  ½-½32 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)A31 English, Symmetrical, Benoni Formation
23. Ivanchuk vs Kamsky ½-½59 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)C95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
24. Karjakin vs Radjabov 0-174 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)B31 Sicilian, Rossolimo Variation
25. Radjabov vs Wang Yue 0-141 2009 Amber Tournament (Rapid)C43 Petrov, Modern Attack
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 60 OF 61 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-26-09  AuN1: any doubts that topalov was not interested in winning either one of his games against aronian today just to guarantee that kramnik didn't get 1st place?
Mar-26-09  messachess: Congratulations to Aronian for winning in this very challenging format.
Mar-26-09  Kaspablanca: vesivialvy: what blitz chess are you talking about?
Mar-26-09  KamikazeAttack: <KingG: Topalov isn't that successful at rapid, and isn't particularly good at blindfold either, so it's no surprise that he doesn't do so well here.>

Topalov is quite good in Blindfold.

He won it 3 times in the past.

Mar-26-09  Vakus: <AuN1> - no need to crush a conspiracy theory, just read the articles on that issue in ChessVibes, ChessBase, ChessPro. And even if Topalov could win that, a draw in rapid section would be well enough for Aronian's first place (check the tie-break)
Mar-26-09  karoaper: From Amberchess2009.com :

Score after Round 11

Blindfold
---------------
1. Aronian 7
Carlsen 7
Kramnik 7
4. Anand 6
Morozevich 6
6. Leko 5
Topalov 5
8. Ivanchuk 5
Radjabov 5
10. Karjakin 4
11. Wang Yue 3
12. Kamsky 3

Rapid
---------
1. Anand 7
Aronian 7
Kamsky 7
4. Kramnik 6
5. Carlsen 6
Karjakin 6
7. Topalov 5
8. Ivanchuk 4
Leko 4
Morozevich 4
11. Radjabov 4
Wang Yue 4

Combined
----------
1. Aronian 14
2. Anand 13
Kramnik 13
4. Carlsen 13
5. Morozevich 11
6. Karjakin 10
Topalov 10
8. Kamsky 10
Leko 10
10. Ivanchuk 9
11. Radjabov 9
12. Wang Yue 7

Mar-27-09  KamikazeAttack: Congrats to Aronian, the Houdini of our time. He is the Lord of the Manor as far as Amber is concerned now.

2 srt8 wins in all categories is very, very impressive indeed - excellent.

However, old pros Anand and Kramnik continue to prove their mettle in their specialised categories.

Anand - 5 rapid wins in 6 years.
Kramnik - 3 BF wins in 3 years (Hat-trick).

Mar-27-09  vesivialvy93: kasablanca ....sorry , you're right , it's rapid chess , not blitz ...i need a good night sleep ;-)
Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: <why do they call Morozevich a blindfold expert?, what merits does he have that seperates him from for example Kramnik(who is not referred to as an expert)>

<I think Kramnik is the ral expert>

<there were only two exceptional results by Moro in blindfold, 2004 and 2006>

I don't really agree with the comparison that is supposed to show that Kramnik is the blindfold expert of the two... Morozevich's +7 in 2002 was also a rather exceptional result considering that that was the first time he participated.

Morozevich's blindfold scores: +7 +3 +6 +1 +8 +3 +2 +2. That's an average of +4. Kramnik's scores have been very slightly worse on average as can be seen above (but of course more or less just as excellent).

I think both Kramnik and Morozevich are excellent blindfold players, but I would consider Morozevich as the expert of the two since Kramnik always has been top five in all disciplines. He has performed very strong results in classical, rapid and blitz the last decade. Morozevich hasn't been top five in anything else than blindfold and there he has for much of the time been #1, or at worst #2, so I think it would be strange not to see him as a blindfold expert.

One could just look at his scores against Anand and Topalov, he is 12-1 against these strong blindfold players that both have an even score against Kramnik. He is 2-3 against Kramnik himself though, but that isn't too bad either.

Mar-27-09  anandrulez: http://members.aon.at/sfischl/blind...

Blindfold performance of players from 2000-2008

Mar-27-09  square dance: maybe someone who was into that sort of thing could calculate their updated blindfold ratings. :-)
Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: <updated blindfold ratings>

After Amber 2009 it should be

Morozevich: 2860 in 88 games

Kramnik: 2823 in 143 games

Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: The top five in rapid chess 2000-2009 should look like this (Fischl's stats plus Amber):

Anand 2816 in 406 games

Kasparov 2803 in 104 games

Aronian 2781 in 119 games

Kramnik 2767 in 209 games

Ivanchuk 2764 in 332 games

Mar-27-09  DCP23: <percyblakeney: <updated blindfold ratings>>

Thanks!

Mar-27-09  square dance: thanks pb.
Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: <DCP23> <square dance>

You're welcome!

Mar-27-09  KamikazeAttack: <anandrulez: http://members.aon.at/sfischl/blind...

Blindfold performance of players from 2000-2008
>

I wonder if Bu would be invited to Amber next year.

Mar-28-09  ILikeFruits: this is...
a man's...
world...
i said this...
is a man's...
world...
but it...
would be...
nothing without...
women or...
girl...
Mar-28-09  cuendillar: it would....
be easier...
to read if...
you...
wrote it...
on one line...
with ...
no...
dots...
Mar-28-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: I don't mind the dots or the one-word lines that much. What drive me nuts are the 400-word posts written in a single paragraph!

I gave up reading "Remembrance of Things Past" just because there weren't any paragraph breaks.

Mar-28-09  khursh: - .... .- -. -.- ... / .--- .. -- / -... .- .-. - .-.. . -.-.--

http://www.omnicron.com/~ford/java/...

Mar-28-09  Vakus: .-.. . ...- --- -. / .- .-. --- -. .. .- -. / .. ... / - .... . / -.-. .... .- -- .--. .. --- -.

:)

Mar-28-09  ILikeFruits: so many...
dots...
Mar-28-09  I Like Fish: dots are there...
to breathe in...
air...
Mar-28-09  ILikeFruits: indeed...
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 61)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 60 OF 61 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies