Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 Amber Tournament (Rapid) (2009)

Player: Wang Yue

 page 1 of 1; 11 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Wang Yue vs Karjakin ½-½522009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
2. Wang Yue vs Morozevich 0-1442009Amber Tournament (Rapid)A15 English
3. Topalov vs Wang Yue  ½-½762009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
4. Wang Yue vs Kramnik 0-1492009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
5. Radjabov vs Wang Yue 0-1412009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C43 Petrov, Modern Attack
6. Wang Yue vs Ivanchuk ½-½692009Amber Tournament (Rapid)E12 Queen's Indian
7. Carlsen vs Wang Yue 1-0392009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D16 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
8. Wang Yue vs Leko  ½-½312009Amber Tournament (Rapid)E21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
9. Kamsky vs Wang Yue ½-½222009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D56 Queen's Gambit Declined
10. Wang Yue vs Aronian  ½-½462009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
11. Anand vs Wang Yue 1-0612009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Wang Yue wins | Wang Yue loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 59 OF 60 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-26-09  visayanbraindoctor: Excellent performance by Aronian. Winning blindfold, rapids, and combined!
Mar-26-09  Ragh: <percyblakeney: Anand took his ninth Amber rapid title here, this was the third time he had to share it.> Who won it most number of times after Anand?
Premium Chessgames Member
  amadeus: Congrats to Aronian, a deserved win.

Congrats to Anand, Carlsen, Kamsky and Kramnik too, for their shared prizes.

Mar-26-09  percyblakeney: <Who won it most number of times after Anand?>

Kramnik and Ivanchuk seem to have three wins each, but that was a while ago, Kramnik won in 1994, 1995 and 2001, Ivanchuk in 1992, 1996 and 1998.

Mar-26-09  Augalv: Wow!, I just logged in to find out that Karjakin also beat Ivanchuk at the rapid game!
Mar-26-09  jussu: <Augalv>, and it was again Ivanchuk who beat himself.
Premium Chessgames Member
  amadeus: Combined Standings, Amber 2009:

14.0 : Aronian [+9 -3 =10]
13.5 : Anand [+8 -3 =11]
13.5 : Kramnik [+8 -3 =11]
13.0 : Carlsen [+8 -4 =10]
11.0 : Morozevich [+7 -7 =8]
10.5 : Karjakin [+6 -7 =9]
10.5 : Topalov [+4 -5 =13]
10.0 : Kamsky [+5 -7 =10]
10.0 : Leko [+5 -7 =10]
9.5 : Ivanchuk [+4 -7 =11]
9.0 : Radjabov [+4 -8 =10]
7.5 : Wang Yue [+2 -9 =11]

Mar-26-09  arnaud1959: Unfortunately as I was guessing almost without doubt, Kramnik won 2-0 against Leko who, I think in his head had already admitted that he was inferior to Kramnik. And/or maybe his attitude was: "I will take risks and if I lose, anyway it will be my friend who will win"
Mar-26-09  The Rocket: why do they call Morozevich a blindfold expert?, what merits does he have that seperates him from for example Kramnik(who is not referred to as an expert).
Premium Chessgames Member
  JointheArmy: <The Rocket>

You must be a n00b. Morozevich is usually always near the top in blindfold. This year seems an off year.

Amber Blindfold (2006)

13th Amber Blindfold (2004)

Amber Tournament (Blindfold) (2008)

Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: So, congratulations to Aronian, Aronian, Aronian, Anand, Kamsky, Kramnik and Carlsen then... Aronian's 6th Amber victory in a row!
Mar-26-09  Absentee: How come the Drawnik trolls don't comment on the 17 moves draw between Drawnian and Drawpalov?
Mar-26-09  drnooo: Actually WHOM is right there. Would read those WHOM the economy has etc.:: Objective case.But dont worry nobody really cares about language anymore. If they did you would see it put to a lot better use here...and on the outside. Poor old WHOM is a dying commodity. Anymore everyone just slaps WHO on everywhere they go. Less thought needed that way.As Alfred E. Nuemann says, why worry.
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <JTA> Actually in terms of the score he did this year just as well as the last year and only half a point behind 2007. 2005 he scored even worse than this year. So there were only two exceptional results by Moro in blindfold, 2004 and 2006.

I think Kramnik is the ral expert, with an off year in 2005 and decline since 2008. Comparison:

2003: Kramnik +5, Moro +3 (placements: 1/2-3)
2004: Moro +6, Kramnik +5 (1/2)
2005: Moro +1, Kramnik = (2-6/7-9)
2006: Moro +8 (1), Kramnik didn't participate
2007: Kramnik +7, Moro +3 (1/2-3)
2008: Kramnik +2, Moro +2 (1-4)
2009: Kramnik +3, Moro +2 (1-3/4-5).

Premium Chessgames Member
  JointheArmy: <alexmagnus> I realized that as soon as I posted. Forgot Morozevich won Kamsky today.
Premium Chessgames Member
  JointheArmy: <I think Kramnik is the ral expert, with an off year in 2005 and decline since 2008.>

Well three first place finishes for Morozevich in 5 years in blindfold isn't too bad.

Mar-26-09  Vakus: Great performance for Levon Aronian. Kasparov should be proud of his compatriot's achievement :)

Winning two years on end in Blindfold/Rapid/Combined - a record?

Mar-26-09  vesivialvy93: Anand,Kamsky and Kramnik in the top 4 in this tournament...who said that blitz chess if not for old players...
Mar-26-09  jurado96: two Amber's in a row for Levon
any doubts about this guy
he is next to be on top
of the world
Mar-26-09  AuN1: any doubts that topalov was not interested in winning either one of his games against aronian today just to guarantee that kramnik didn't get 1st place?
Premium Chessgames Member
  messachess: Congratulations to Aronian for winning in this very challenging format.
Mar-26-09  Kaspablanca: vesivialvy: what blitz chess are you talking about?
Mar-26-09  KamikazeAttack: <KingG: Topalov isn't that successful at rapid, and isn't particularly good at blindfold either, so it's no surprise that he doesn't do so well here.>

Topalov is quite good in Blindfold.

He won it 3 times in the past.

Mar-26-09  Vakus: <AuN1> - no need to crush a conspiracy theory, just read the articles on that issue in ChessVibes, ChessBase, ChessPro. And even if Topalov could win that, a draw in rapid section would be well enough for Aronian's first place (check the tie-break)
Mar-26-09  karoaper: From :

Score after Round 11

1. Aronian 7
Carlsen 7
Kramnik 7
4. Anand 6
Morozevich 6
6. Leko 5
Topalov 5
8. Ivanchuk 5
Radjabov 5
10. Karjakin 4
11. Wang Yue 3
12. Kamsky 3

1. Anand 7
Aronian 7
Kamsky 7
4. Kramnik 6
5. Carlsen 6
Karjakin 6
7. Topalov 5
8. Ivanchuk 4
Leko 4
Morozevich 4
11. Radjabov 4
Wang Yue 4

1. Aronian 14
2. Anand 13
Kramnik 13
4. Carlsen 13
5. Morozevich 11
6. Karjakin 10
Topalov 10
8. Kamsky 10
Leko 10
10. Ivanchuk 9
11. Radjabov 9
12. Wang Yue 7

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 60)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 59 OF 60 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC