chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆
TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Corus Tournament

Magnus Carlsen8.5/13(+5 -1 =7)[games]
Vladimir Kramnik8/13(+4 -1 =8)[games]
Alexey Shirov8/13(+5 -2 =6)[games]
Hikaru Nakamura7.5/13(+4 -2 =7)[games]
Viswanathan Anand7.5/13(+2 -0 =11)[games]
Vassily Ivanchuk7/13(+2 -1 =10)[games]
Sergey Karjakin7/13(+2 -1 =10)[games]
Leinier Dominguez Perez6.5/13(+1 -1 =11)[games]
Peter Leko6.5/13(+2 -2 =9)[games]
Fabiano Caruana5.5/13(+1 -3 =9)[games]
Loek van Wely5/13(+3 -6 =4)[games]
Nigel Short5/13(+0 -3 =10)[games]
Jan Smeets4.5/13(+2 -6 =5)[games]
Sergei Tiviakov4.5/13(+1 -5 =7)[games]

 page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Tiviakov vs Carlsen ½-½272010CorusC77 Ruy Lopez
2. Leko vs Shirov 0-1642010CorusC78 Ruy Lopez
3. Van Wely vs Short 1-0462010CorusD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
4. Caruana vs Ivanchuk ½-½342010CorusB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
5. J Smeets vs Nakamura ½-½342010CorusB98 Sicilian, Najdorf
6. L Dominguez vs Kramnik ½-½232010CorusC42 Petrov Defense
7. Karjakin vs Anand ½-½402010CorusC78 Ruy Lopez
8. Ivanchuk vs Tiviakov ½-½572010CorusB01 Scandinavian
9. Anand vs Short ½-½572010CorusD38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation
10. Karjakin vs L Dominguez ½-½312010CorusB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
11. Kramnik vs Leko ½-½332010CorusE15 Queen's Indian
12. Carlsen vs J Smeets 1-0412010CorusD44 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
13. Nakamura vs Van Wely 1-0392010CorusB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
14. Shirov vs Caruana 1-0642010CorusC80 Ruy Lopez, Open
15. L Dominguez vs Anand ½-½772010CorusC78 Ruy Lopez
16. Short vs Nakamura 0-1432010CorusB58 Sicilian
17. Van Wely vs Carlsen 0-1402010CorusD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
18. J Smeets vs Ivanchuk 0-1362010CorusB96 Sicilian, Najdorf
19. Caruana vs Kramnik ½-½312010CorusC42 Petrov Defense
20. Leko vs Karjakin ½-½362010CorusE15 Queen's Indian
21. Tiviakov vs Shirov 0-1312010CorusB23 Sicilian, Closed
22. Nakamura vs Carlsen ½-½592010CorusC77 Ruy Lopez
23. L Dominguez vs Leko ½-½362010CorusC89 Ruy Lopez, Marshall
24. Karjakin vs Caruana ½-½452010CorusC69 Ruy Lopez, Exchange, Gligoric Variation
25. Kramnik vs Tiviakov ½-½362010CorusE21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
 page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 131 OF 131 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-08-10  wanabe2000: <Ezzy> Thank you for your spot on comments. Magnus Carlsen has re-juvinated chess in 2008-2010, if not before, to the extent that people look forward to his tournaments. Much like Tiger Woods, if he's in I watch golf, if not, my interest level is low. Now, having said that, I was watching the Moscow Open with interest, but when MC plays I'm glued. Unfortunally I am not a writer but MC did get a nice article in January 11, 2010 Time Magazine "Prince of the Chessboard: The Youngest No.1 in History". It is a start.
Feb-08-10  ycbaywtb: Ezzy was a little funny in the post, but the point is fairly accurate. Where is the praise for Magnus, being the winner of these tournaments?

After reading Ezzy's post, i have become curious how long Magnus may dominate events like these, because he certainly has been dominating lately, winning everything in sight

Feb-08-10  storbondemongoen: Thank you Ezzy for putting it all into perspective. I wonder, when will Slo-off-the-marko come to the same conclusion?
Feb-08-10  badest: <Ezzy> You have a very good point. But ... the comparison with Kasparov (and Fischer, which some other fans use) is weak. Both K and F were very charismatic players/people both at and off the board. Magnus will never be that.
Feb-08-10  Shams: <badest> Carlen's lack of megalomania is a feature, not a bug.
Feb-08-10  frogbert: shams, hehe :o)
Feb-09-10  badest: <Shams: <badest> Carlen's lack of megalomania is a feature, not a bug.> LOL ... but honestly ... got to have some megalomania ... it goes with the territory ;)
Feb-09-10  Rolfo: Thanks Ezzy
Feb-09-10  messachess: I am surprised to see it reported that Carlsen hasn't been getting the praise he deserves. I seem to recall having seen abundant praise on these pages. Of course he deserves praise. Any reservations would probably have to do with all the help that players get today from computers. And, of course, there is the special perceived advantage of his coach. Presumably past top players had a tougher time of it.
Feb-09-10  Bdellovibrio: <messachess> Perhaps everybody is getting used to Carlsen constantly winning tournaments.
Feb-10-10  The Rocket: "i have become curious how long Magnus may dominate events like these, because he certainly has been dominating lately, winning everything in sight"

you think he dominated this tournament??? he won it by a half point!! and wasnt even really leading the tournament untill the very end.

Feb-11-10  Billy Vaughan: It did feel like Magnus just stumbled his way into first place.

But I mean, really. The fact that I can, with a straight face, say he "stumbled his way into first place" means that Magnus Carlsen really does dominate. We hold Carlsen to such a high standard that we treat <winning a super-tournament> as something he can do almost by accident.

Feb-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Petrosianic: Yes, but what does that mean? Really, it was Kramnik who stumbled, not Carlsen. If all you mean is that Carlsen wasn't in first place all the way through, that's true, but so what? If the person in First Place after Round 5 always won, there'd be no point in playing the rest of the tournament.
Feb-11-10  SetNoEscapeOn: <Even Kasparov thinks it's a shame that Shirov didn't share first.>

Notice that he didn't say anything about Kramnik :)

Feb-11-10  The Rocket: "If the person in First Place after Round 5 always won, there'd be no point in playing the rest of the tournament"

well the point was about domination... and you are not dominating a tournament if you end up winning it in the final round!!! and especially with half a point!!.. dumbass!(sorry love that word).

Feb-11-10  ycbaywtb: i kind of meant Carlsen is dominating because of everything rolled into one: he shot to the top of the ratings, and has stayed there, he's winning all of his tournaments, nobody seems to be able to come ahead of him, despite a +5 start, or beating him in an individual game, he is dominating because he is the best, #1 rated, and a winner overall, not because of leading a tournament throughout, BUT i see your point that dominating a single tournament can be viewed differently, he may not have dominated Corus, but he won, and in combination with the chess events of last few months, Magnus Carlsen , to me, is very dominating when it comes to CHESS
Feb-23-10  eraserhead: Guys, I completely missed this tourament. Can someone point me towards the most entertaining games? Were there any classic ones? Seems like people are a little disappointed.

Also, being Norwegian I gotta ask, did Carlsen show any awesomness, or was it more of a grind?

Mar-24-10  The Rocket: "Also, being Norwegian I gotta ask, did Carlsen show any awesomness, or was it more of a grind?"

Why not just watch the games and decide for yourself?!

Jun-10-10  Blunderdome: It's worth going page to 1 to see the very first post ever made on this forum, hchrist's prediction from 9 Jan 2010.
Jul-21-10  LarsenBentYou: Somebody please give me some background... what "history" do Kasparov and Shirov have?
Jul-22-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Kasparov never lost to Shirov.

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

Sep-09-10  e4d4: http://schaaksite.nl/page.php?id=1197

Looks like Corus will no longer be called Corus.

- A/B/C group lists to be released October after the Olympiad.

- Magnus Carlsen, Vishy Anand, and Vladimir Kramnik's participation is confirmed.

Dec-27-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: I can't wait for next year's tournament.
Dec-28-10  Blunderdome: Corus/Tata is definitely the best tournament of the year.
Mar-16-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Wow.Nakamura did better at the Tata Steel (2011) tournament than Carlsen did at the Corus (2010) tournament.But nevertheless,Carlsen still finished very strong,with a plus 4 score.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 131)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 131 OF 131 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC