chessgames.com

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Nanjing Pearl Spring Tournament

Magnus Carlsen7/10(+4 -0 =6)[view games]
Viswanathan Anand6/10(+3 -1 =6)[view games]
Etienne Bacrot5/10(+3 -3 =4)[view games]
Veselin Topalov4.5/10(+2 -3 =5)[view games]
Vugar Gashimov4.5/10(+0 -1 =9)[view games]
Wang Yue3/10(+0 -4 =6)[view games]

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 30  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Anand vs Wang Yue ½-½32 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentD10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
2. Topalov vs V Gashimov ½-½55 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentD16 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
3. Carlsen vs Bacrot 1-038 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentC45 Scotch Game
4. Anand vs Carlsen ½-½44 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentC95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
5. Bacrot vs Topalov ½-½36 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentE21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
6. Wang Yue vs V Gashimov ½-½60 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentE12 Queen's Indian
7. Carlsen vs Wang Yue 1-038 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentC43 Petrov, Modern Attack
8. V Gashimov vs Bacrot 0-145 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentA29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto
9. Topalov vs Anand 0-133 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentD57 Queen's Gambit Declined, Lasker Defense
10. V Gashimov vs Carlsen ½-½76 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentC95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
11. Topalov vs Wang Yue ½-½35 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentD17 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
12. Bacrot vs Anand 1-046 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentD17 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
13. Wang Yue vs Bacrot 0-143 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentE15 Queen's Indian
14. Carlsen vs Topalov 1-032 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentC84 Ruy Lopez, Closed
15. Anand vs V Gashimov ½-½25 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentD10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
16. Bacrot vs Carlsen ½-½48 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentE15 Queen's Indian
17. Wang Yue vs Anand 0-151 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentE00 Queen's Pawn Game
18. V Gashimov vs Topalov ½-½43 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
19. Topalov vs Bacrot 1-037 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentE15 Queen's Indian
20. V Gashimov vs Wang Yue ½-½67 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentC42 Petrov Defense
21. Carlsen vs Anand ½-½68 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentC67 Ruy Lopez
22. Wang Yue vs Carlsen ½-½28 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentE00 Queen's Pawn Game
23. Bacrot vs V Gashimov ½-½14 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentD10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
24. Anand vs Topalov ½-½31 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentE00 Queen's Pawn Game
25. V Gashimov vs Anand ½-½42 2010 Nanjing Pearl Spring TournamentC67 Ruy Lopez
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 30  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 45 OF 60 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-27-10  frogbert: well, there were <other> winning continuatinos both at move 61 and 63 that seemed "even easier" from a human point of view.

and i maintain that it wasn't about spotting the idea but rather about its execution.

Oct-27-10  iamsheaf: <and i maintain that it wasn't about spotting the idea but rather about its execution.> I entirely agree with you, as I mentioned in my post, As 61. ? , e6 is the first candidate move, perhaps for wrong reason but it is the most natural move that comes to your mind. <deflect the queen> from 7th rank and Rc7+ winning a piece.

Even without the necessary intermizzo, Qh6+, it's not at all obvious that black will manage to get perpetual checks. So the likelihood of black blundering after e6-Rc7-Qxh7 and losing is much higher than white blundering and taking a draw. So that makes e6 a good practical choice as well, even if you haven't seen the whole plan of evading checks.

Oct-27-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  achieve: <frogbert: well, there were <other> winning continuatinos both at move 61 and 63 that seemed "even easier" from a human point of view.> I agree there, and to be honest when I wrote my <61 e6> (also at the C-page) comment I was neither accurate nor thorough enough. Fascinating analysis by <eyal> and you btw.

<continuatinos> I actually prefer your spelling there.... It has a nice "mediterranean ring" to it ;)

Oct-27-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: thanks to all for their analysis, especially eyal, frogbert and whiteshark (I wouldn't have seen 61.Kg1 if I'd thought for 100 years).
Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hesam7: Anand went for another Catalan! This should be interesting!

Bacrot - Gashimov is an exchange Slav.

Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hesam7: Actually the 7. Rc1 Bacrot has chosen can lead to very sharp play in exchange slav.

Anand played 11. cxd5 which I think is not the main move. The world team in its current game chose 11. Nbd2 and another line theory recommends is 11. Ne5.

Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hesam7: Anand - Topalov after 14. ... Ng4:


click for larger view

Now the innocent looking 15. h3 runs into 15. ... Nxf2! 16. Kxf2 Bc5+ 17. Kf1?! (17. Be3 maybe better) 17. ... f6! 18. exf6? Qxf6


click for larger view

Oct-28-10  thathwamasi: IS Topa's Sac sound?????
Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hesam7: <thathwamasi: IS Topa's Sac sound?????>

Yes.

Oct-28-10  thathwamasi: Thanks Hesam
Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Hesam7: Anand - Topalov after 18. ... b5:


click for larger view

The position of the White king says it all!

Oct-28-10  Atking: few moves ago Wang Yue vs Carlsen and Anand vs Topalov offer more than one similarity.
Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  saurav4000: what is Rybka's evaluation of the Topa - Vishy game?
Oct-28-10  pamparana: Black seems better in Anad-Topa game. I think the sac is pretty sound. Does anyone have any engine evals?
Oct-28-10  LKor: Rybka 4 gives +0.14 for white after 21. Bxd5 - depth 18
Oct-28-10  Troller: The engine evals in Anand-Topalov are mainly telling us that there are no forced wins or perpetuals right now. The position is extremely difficult to play otb, but I have a feeling that Topalov could go overboard. He has done so before in similar situations, and he is not in his best shape in Nanjing.
Oct-28-10  mohitm: <saurav4000> now it's +0.90
Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  saurav4000: < mohitm: <saurav4000> now it's +0.90 > Rybka suggests Anand should have played 24. Qd6...it's now +0.53
Oct-28-10  mohitm: <saurav4000> yeah, he made a minor mistake
Oct-28-10  mohitm: wait, rybka suggested Qd4, while he played Qd6
Oct-28-10  thathwamasi: people say its a perpetual now.
Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  twinlark: Topalov is at his best when he has the initiative, and Anand is defending. You'd expect a draw, but Vishy has some defending.
Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  twinlark:

To exchange or not to exchange queens.
That is the question.
The pawns and pieces of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of checks,
And by opposing end them?

Oct-28-10  Skakalec: <Anand-Topalov>
It's headin' towards a draw.
If Kd2 now then Bb7 protecting h1.
Oct-28-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  twinlark:

To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this pretty play from day to day,
To the last move of a recorded game;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief game!
Chess is yet a stalking titan, the greatest of games, That struts and frets its hour upon the stage,
And then is heard ever more. It is a tale
Told by an genius, full of sound and fury,
Signifying everything.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 60)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 45 OF 60 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies