chessgames.com

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
(SPECIAL SCORING IN EFFECT: 3 POINTS PER WIN; 1 POINT PER DRAW)
London Chess Classic Tournament

Magnus Carlsen13(+4 -2 =1)[view games]
Luke McShane11(+2 -0 =5)[view games]
Viswanathan Anand11(+2 -0 =5)[view games]
Vladimir Kramnik10(+2 -1 =4)[view games]
Hikaru Nakamura10(+2 -1 =4)[view games]
Michael Adams8(+1 -1 =5)[view games]
David Howell4(+0 -3 =4)[view games]
Nigel Short2(+0 -5 =2)[view games]

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 28  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Adams vs D Howell 1-028 2010 London Chess ClassicC67 Ruy Lopez
2. Short vs Kramnik 0-138 2010 London Chess ClassicC24 Bishop's Opening
3. McShane vs Carlsen 1-039 2010 London Chess ClassicA37 English, Symmetrical
4. Anand vs Nakamura ½-½74 2010 London Chess ClassicC67 Ruy Lopez
5. Kramnik vs Nakamura 0-154 2010 London Chess ClassicA17 English
6. Short vs McShane 0-152 2010 London Chess ClassicB76 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack
7. D Howell vs Anand ½-½50 2010 London Chess ClassicB52 Sicilian, Canal-Sokolsky (Rossolimo) Attack
8. Carlsen vs Adams 1-049 2010 London Chess ClassicA29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto
9. McShane vs Kramnik ½-½139 2010 London Chess ClassicC67 Ruy Lopez
10. Nakamura vs D Howell ½-½42 2010 London Chess ClassicD72 Neo-Grunfeld, 5.cd, Main line
11. Adams vs Short ½-½50 2010 London Chess ClassicB17 Caro-Kann, Steinitz Variation
12. Anand vs Carlsen 1-077 2010 London Chess ClassicC95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
13. Short vs Anand 0-143 2010 London Chess ClassicB23 Sicilian, Closed
14. Carlsen vs Nakamura 1-059 2010 London Chess ClassicA10 English
15. McShane vs Adams ½-½44 2010 London Chess ClassicA07 King's Indian Attack
16. Kramnik vs D Howell 1-042 2010 London Chess ClassicD85 Grunfeld
17. Anand vs McShane ½-½41 2010 London Chess ClassicC67 Ruy Lopez
18. Adams vs Kramnik ½-½45 2010 London Chess ClassicC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
19. Nakamura vs Short 1-034 2010 London Chess ClassicC89 Ruy Lopez, Marshall
20. D Howell vs Carlsen 0-155 2010 London Chess ClassicB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
21. Kramnik vs Carlsen ½-½86 2010 London Chess ClassicD07 Queen's Gambit Declined, Chigorin Defense
22. Anand vs Kramnik ½-½39 2010 London Chess ClassicC67 Ruy Lopez
23. Adams vs Anand ½-½54 2010 London Chess ClassicB92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
24. McShane vs Nakamura ½-½50 2010 London Chess ClassicA00 Uncommon Opening
25. Short vs D Howell ½-½41 2010 London Chess ClassicC39 King's Gambit Accepted
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 28  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 12 OF 81 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-09-10  messachess: Carlsen bounces back consistently in a tournament of this stature. McShane is super talented, but if he's now a full time chess pro, at his age he has to get to upper status of 2700s-level players soon and start getting invited to top tournaments. That would likely be very good for chess, if he could do it.

Carlsen likely will win tomorrow (unless he's playing Vishy or Vlad.)

Dec-09-10  siamesedream: <Magnus Carlsen`s Blog

London Chess Classics 2010 Round 1

My first tournament not being a teenager. Many thanks to my sponsors for birthday presents. The excellent tennis racket I got from Arctic Securities has already had some practice! The 7-round London Chess Classics is even stronger this year with V.Anand replacing Ni Hua compared to the field last year. Defending my victory from 2009 looks difficult as I started with a loss to local hero Luke McShane today. I had black and in a somewhat tricky position I probably overestimated my counterplay. After my mistaken queen move Luke played very well and won around the first time control. With Bilbao score, Kramnik, Adams and McShane are leading with 3 points. Tomorrow I�m white against Adams and the rounds starts at 4 pm local time. Magnus Carlsen, London, December 8th, 2010

2010-12-09 04:42:03>

http://www.arcticsec.no/index.php?b...

Dec-09-10  Kazzak: Enjoyable first day. Is it 3-1-0 that leads to such interesting chess?
Dec-09-10  Mr. Bojangles: < Kasparov in his prime would have obliterated McShane with the black pieces in classical chess. There is absolutely no question about it. Losses like this only proves that Carlsen's current level of play is still clearly inferior to Kasparov at his peak, when it comes to games played with classical time controls.>

Why compare Kasparov to Carlsen? What is the relevance?

Kasparov this, Kasparov that...

U need to stop tossing the guy's salad.

Dec-09-10  anandrulez: Magnus is 20 and he still has time to be serious about chess as a career :)
Dec-09-10  Mr. Bojangles: <I don't think Kasparov in his tenure as champion had a stretch where he lost as many games to near-elite players as Carlsen has in recent months.>

Carlsen is not champion, is he?

Dec-09-10  Mr. Bojangles: <why can't you digest the plain fact that McShane's play and conduct during this game was remarkable and he performed way above his expectations. >

Exactly...

Dec-09-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  lionel15: Tournament leaders above
Luke McShane 3 (+1 -0 =0) [view games]
Vladimir Kramnik 3 (+1 -0 =0) [view games]
Michael Adams 3 (+1 -0 =0) [view games]

Im no expert, but shouldnt Kramnik be shown as leader in the list above as he won ith black. No of black wins is one of the tie breaks. Adams and McShane are 2nd equal.

Dec-09-10  Hovik2009: <My first tournament not being a teenager. Many thanks to my sponsors for birthday presents. The excellent tennis racket I got from Arctic Securities has already had some practice!>

Magnus, welcome to both fields of adulthood and Corporate World at once!

Dec-09-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <My first tournament not being a teenager.> hehe
Dec-09-10  kackhander: I'm going to pop down there today and yell "Use the force Luke!" every time McShane makes a move, I think everyone would appreciate that.
Dec-09-10  kackhander: More football style chanting in chess is the way forward.

He's tall! He's rude! He used to be quite good Nigel Shooooort, Nigel Shooort

Dec-09-10  siamesedream: Kramnik - Nakamura 0-1
Howell - Anand 0-1
Carlsen - Adams 1/2
Short - McShane 1/2
Dec-09-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  SetNoEscapeOn: <Shams>

<2004 is way too late, though. Wasn't that the year Kasparov lost to the guy who didn't even know how the pieces move?

I jest, but I don't think he was even a GM.>

Well, that never happened. He blundered against GM Huzman in 2003 which was the worst upset of GK I can remember.

That says a lot considering Huzman was a 2574 member of the Israeli National Team.

He was still the #1 player in the world by a nice margin in 2004 and the same age Anand is now, so I don't think it's too late.

Maybe you are thinking somehow of Anand vs O Touzane, 2001. That gets my vote for upset of the decade.

Dec-09-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Harvestman: <He's tall! He's rude! He used to be quite good Nigel Shooooort, Nigel Shooort>

Excellent! Made me laugh, and now I keep chanting it to myself!

Dec-09-10  Chessforeva: 3D games: http://chessforeva.appspot.com/C0_t...
Dec-09-10  turbo231: I wonder how much longer Naka can go before he loses a game? Right now he seems to be unbeatable.
Dec-09-10  polarmis: Shipov's going to be commentating on Nakamura's game again today (against Kramnik):

http://www.chessintranslation.com/l...

Dec-09-10  siamesedream: Naka: <"Shipov's comments are always incredibly amusing to read! Oh well, I guess it is time to go play some game called chess?!">

http://twitter.com/GMHikaru

Dec-09-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: I like this one better: <Having a lovely Indian lunch to celebrate my birthday! Who needs to prepare for Kramnik with Black anyway!>
Dec-09-10  Troller: <turbo231: I wonder how much longer Naka can go before he loses a game? Right now he seems to be unbeatable.>

Well, Drawamura is certainly solid, but he still has some way to go before he can compare himself with the legendary Drawnik & Drawko in their prime. I wouldn't expect him to go undefeated in this tournament; still, holding that game yesterday showed that he might just do that.

Dec-09-10  turbo231: Naka didn't lose a game at the
Tal Memorial. How much longer can he go?
Dec-09-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: <I wonder how much longer Naka can go before he loses a game?> A few hours.
Dec-09-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Kinghunt: <lionel15: Im no expert, but shouldnt Kramnik be shown as leader in the list above as he won ith black. No of black wins is one of the tie breaks. Adams and McShane are 2nd equal.>

Chessgames score tables do not incorporate tiebreaks. There are simply too many different systems used by different tournaments to make it worth the effort. But yes, you are correct that if the tournament were to end right now, or if the rest of the games were to be all drawn, Kramnik would finish first.

Dec-09-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Kinghunt: In the two games Kramnik and Nakamura have played where Kramnik had white, Kramnik won one of them (Kramnik vs Nakamura, 2010) and came very close to winning the other (Kramnik vs Nakamura, 2010). It will be interesting to see what happens today.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 81)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 12 OF 81 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies