chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Tata Steel Group B Tournament

David Navara8.5/13(+6 -2 =5)[view games]
Luke McShane8.5/13(+6 -2 =5)[view games]
Zahar Efimenko8/13(+4 -1 =8)[view games]
Gabriel Sargissian7.5/13(+3 -1 =9)[view games]
Wesley So7.5/13(+4 -2 =7)[view games]
Le Quang Liem7.5/13(+5 -3 =5)[view games]
Vladislav Tkachiev7/13(+4 -3 =6)[view games]
Radoslaw Wojtaszek6.5/13(+4 -4 =5)[view games]
Li Chao6/13(+4 -5 =4)[view games]
Laurent Fressinet6/13(+3 -4 =6)[view games]
Surya Shekhar Ganguly5.5/13(+4 -6 =3)[view games]
Wouter Spoelman5/13(+4 -7 =2)[view games]
Jon Ludvig Hammer4/13(+1 -6 =6)[view games]
Friso Nijboer3.5/13(+0 -6 =7)[view games]

 page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Efimenko vs Navara 1-035 2011 Tata Steel Group BB84 Sicilian, Scheveningen
2. G Sargissian vs Li Chao  ½-½42 2011 Tata Steel Group BD85 Grunfeld
3. R Wojtaszek vs Nijboer  1-044 2011 Tata Steel Group BE97 King's Indian
4. Ganguly vs W So 0-130 2011 Tata Steel Group BC11 French
5. McShane vs Fressinet  ½-½37 2011 Tata Steel Group BA06 Reti Opening
6. J L Hammer vs W Spoelman 1-036 2011 Tata Steel Group BD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
7. Le Quang Liem vs Tkachiev  ½-½35 2011 Tata Steel Group BD55 Queen's Gambit Declined
8. McShane vs W Spoelman 1-069 2011 Tata Steel Group BB51 Sicilian, Canal-Sokolsky (Rossolimo) Attack
9. Nijboer vs Li Chao  ½-½33 2011 Tata Steel Group BC42 Petrov Defense
10. R Wojtaszek vs Navara 0-158 2011 Tata Steel Group BD90 Grunfeld
11. Le Quang Liem vs W So ½-½36 2011 Tata Steel Group BE06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3
12. G Sargissian vs Ganguly  1-038 2011 Tata Steel Group BD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
13. J L Hammer vs Efimenko 0-178 2011 Tata Steel Group BD38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation
14. Tkachiev vs Fressinet  ½-½33 2011 Tata Steel Group BA09 Reti Opening
15. Fressinet vs Efimenko  ½-½30 2011 Tata Steel Group BC51 Evans Gambit
16. Navara vs Le Quang Liem  ½-½58 2011 Tata Steel Group BD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
17. Ganguly vs J L Hammer  1-067 2011 Tata Steel Group BC67 Ruy Lopez
18. W So vs G Sargissian ½-½26 2011 Tata Steel Group BC45 Scotch Game
19. Li Chao vs McShane 0-155 2011 Tata Steel Group BE71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)
20. W Spoelman vs R Wojtaszek  ½-½34 2011 Tata Steel Group BE32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
21. Tkachiev vs Nijboer  ½-½35 2011 Tata Steel Group BE60 King's Indian Defense
22. Nijboer vs Fressinet  ½-½32 2011 Tata Steel Group BC91 Ruy Lopez, Closed
23. Efimenko vs Ganguly ½-½99 2011 Tata Steel Group BB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
24. J L Hammer vs W So ½-½63 2011 Tata Steel Group BD56 Queen's Gambit Declined
25. R Wojtaszek vs Li Chao  1-033 2011 Tata Steel Group BD72 Neo-Grunfeld, 5.cd, Main line
 page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <kellmano> If I'm not mistaken, the first tiebreak is head-to-head result and the second is Sonneborn-Berger Points. The only way it can matter is, of course, if Navara-McShane is drawn. In that case, if Efimenko wins he should be 1st because he won against the other two. If he doesn't win this should depend on Navara's and McShane's SB points, which you can't know in advance because it's calculated according to the overall results of their opponents (but right now McShane's is better).

Even though Navara is playing White I would pick McShane as favorite, because somehow he seems more mentally tough. I actually like Navara, though, so hopefully he will prove me wrong...

Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  ketchuplover: Navara appears winning...so far.
Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <47. ... Kf7> by McShane (instead of 47. ... Kf6) is surprising. Seemingly, it gives up the g- and h-pawns for the sake of eliminating White's advanced passer on the b-file, but it does not look like his best chance to hold.
Jan-30-11  fixingguru: <Peligroso Patzer: <47. ... Kf7> by McShane (instead of 47. ... Kf6) is surprising. Seemingly, it gives up the g- and h-pawns for the sake of eliminating White's advanced passer on the b-file, but it does not look like his best chance to hold.> you are a patzer indeed. the idea behind Kf7 is to "trap" the rook with Nf6 after Rg5.
Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: After <50. Bb5>, the minor piece ending in Navara-McShane now looks drawn. The only winning idea I see for White is to trade off the minors and then bring his King to the 6th rank (a6, b6, or c6), but Black should be able to prevent this.
Jan-30-11  crazybird: And Luke, welcome to group A
Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: Re: Navara-McShane:
< *** the idea behind [47. ...] Kf7 is to "trap" the rook with [48. ...] Nf6 after [48.] Rg5.>

But would that really have worked since (after 48. Rxg5 Nf6) White could have played 49. Rf5 followed by 50. g5, opening a line (through the g4-square) for the LSB to use eventually?

Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: The following line seems to confirm that if Navara-McShane had continued <48.Rxg5 Nf6>, the result would still have been a draw: 49.Rf5 Kg6 50.Kf2 [but not 50.g5? Nxd5! 51.Rf8 Ne3! (only move) 52.Kf2 Rxb7 53.Rf6+ Kxg5 54.Rxd6 Rb1 55.Be2 Rh1 ] 50...Rxb7 51.Bh3 Rb2+ 52.Kg1=.
Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <And Luke, welcome to group A>

Yes, McShane wins on Sonneborn-Berger points - his win over So in the penultimate round turned out to be decisive in this regard (Navara didn't score a win against any of the other top 6 - those that finished with 7.5 points and more).

Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: Here are the actual final standings for the "B" Group:

1-2. L. McShane 8-1/2
1-2 D. Navara 8-1/2
3. Z. Efimenko 8
4-6. L. Liem 7-1/2
4-6 G. Sargissian 7-1/2
4-6 W. So 7-1/2
7. V. Tkachiev 7
8. R. Wojtaszek 6-1/2
9-10. L. Fressinet 6
9-10. Li Chao 6
11. S. Ganguly 5-1/2
12. W. Spoelman 5
13. J. Hammer 4
14. F. Nijboer 3-1/2

Jan-30-11  AdrianP: Well done to Luke. He deserves a good tournament win after missing out a little after a very good start at the London Chess Classic.
Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  me to play: It's a bit of a shame that both McShane and Navara can't get the invite to the "A" group. You could reasonably, I think, reduce the "local" players down to two and make room for Navara.
Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  siamesedream: Congratulations to Luke McShane!
Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: In fact, both McShane and Navara will be invited to Group A next year:

<McShane was declared Group-B winner on Sonneborn-Berger but the tournament organizers decided both players would receive an invitation to compete in Group A next year.> (http://www.tatasteelchess.com/tourn...)

Btw, the same thing happened when Motylev & Carlsen finished at the top of Group B with the same number of points in 2006.

Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: ...So congrats to Navara as well!
Jan-30-11  virginmind: congratulations to both winners.
Jan-30-11  Everett: Will McShane and Navara replace the Dutch or Grishuk and Shirov?

Is there anyone besides Giri coming up in the Dutch ranks? I know he's older, but isn't Ivan Sokolov tough?

Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: Grischuk and Shirov don't have any "spots" of their own, the organizers can invite them or not each year as they please... The only "officially" certain invitees to next year are Nakamura (as the winner of Group A), McShane & Navara. Among the Dutch Giri is practically certain as well, I suppose. In recent years they consistently had 3 Dutch players, though this year Giri actually earned his place as the winner of Group B, rather than playing on a "Dutch ticket".
Jan-30-11  Everett: Thanks <Eyal>

Who are the other top Dutch players besides the recent one's we've seen? I'll assume the organizers will insist on at least two.

Jan-30-11  waustad: <Everett>See: http://ratings.fide.com/topfed.phtm...
Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Why not put Smeets or Van Wely in the B group and let both Navara and McShane play group A?
Jan-30-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  me to play: <Eyal: In fact, both McShane and Navara will be invited to Group A next year:

<McShane was declared Group-B winner on Sonneborn-Berger but the tournament organizers decided both players would receive an invitation to compete in Group A next year.>> That seems fair. Thanks for the info !

Jan-30-11  pulsar: Skywalker marches to Group A, a well deserved opportunity. Same goes for David who managed to crawl back to the top after a shaky start.
Jan-30-11  Don Cossacks: Nice comeback by McShane and Navara.Congratulations to both!!
Feb-01-11  Troller: <Who are the other top Dutch players besides the recent one's we've seen? I'll assume the organizers will insist on at least two.>

If Daniel Stellwagen would do a "McShane" and turn to chess full-time, he would be a natural choice. He seemed stronger than l'Ami and Smeets some years back and has played the A group before. Of course VW & Sokolov are known names as well; among the up-and-coming one should mention Benjamin Bok (apart from obviously Giri).

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC