|Tata Steel Group B (2011)|
Played in Wijk aan Zee, Netherlands 15-30 January 2011. Crosstable (https://www.tatasteelchess.com/arch...) :
Luke McShane edged out David Navara on tiebreak. Both were invited to Tata Steel Group A (2012), but McShane did not play because of work commitments.
Elo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4
1 McShane 2664 * ½ 0 0 1 ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 1 ½ ½ 8½
2 Navara 2708 ½ * 0 ½ 0 ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 1 ½ 1 8½
3 Efimenko 2701 1 1 * ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 8
4 Le Quang Liem 2664 1 ½ ½ * ½ 1 ½ 0 0 1 ½ 0 1 1 7½
5 So 2673 0 1 ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ 0 1 1 1 ½ ½ 7½
6 Sargissian 2667 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ * ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 7½
7 Tkachiev 2636 0 0 1 ½ ½ ½ * ½ 0 ½ 1 1 1 ½ 7
8 Wojtaszek 2726 0 0 ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ * 1 1 0 ½ ½ 1 6½
9 Li Chao 2649 0 0 ½ 1 1 ½ 1 0 * 0 ½ 0 1 ½ 6
10 Fressinet 2707 ½ ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ 0 1 * 1 0 1 ½ 6
11 Ganguly 2651 0 0 ½ ½ 0 0 0 1 ½ 0 * 1 1 1 5½
12 Spoelman 2547 0 0 0 1 0 ½ 0 ½ 1 1 0 * 0 1 5
13 Hammer 2647 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 0 0 1 * ½ 4
14 Nijboer 2584 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ * 3½
Previous edition: Corus Group B (2010). Next: Tata Steel Group B (2012). See also Tata Steel Group A (2011) and Tata Steel Group C (2011).
| page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91
|1. Nijboer vs Li Chao
|| ||½-½||33||2011||Tata Steel Group B||C42 Petrov Defense|
|2. McShane vs W Spoelman
||1-0||69||2011||Tata Steel Group B||B51 Sicilian, Canal-Sokolsky (Rossolimo) Attack|
|3. R Wojtaszek vs Navara
||0-1||58||2011||Tata Steel Group B||D90 Grunfeld|
|4. J L Hammer vs Efimenko
||0-1||78||2011||Tata Steel Group B||D38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation|
|5. Le Quang Liem vs W So
||½-½||36||2011||Tata Steel Group B||E06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3|
|6. G Sargissian vs Ganguly
||1-0||38||2011||Tata Steel Group B||D20 Queen's Gambit Accepted|
|7. Tkachiev vs Fressinet
|| ||½-½||33||2011||Tata Steel Group B||A09 Reti Opening|
|8. Tkachiev vs Nijboer
|| ||½-½||35||2011||Tata Steel Group B||E60 King's Indian Defense|
|9. Ganguly vs J L Hammer
|| ||1-0||67||2011||Tata Steel Group B||C67 Ruy Lopez|
|10. Fressinet vs Efimenko
|| ||½-½||30||2011||Tata Steel Group B||C51 Evans Gambit|
|11. Navara vs Le Quang Liem
|| ||½-½||58||2011||Tata Steel Group B||D12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|12. W So vs G Sargissian
||½-½||26||2011||Tata Steel Group B||C45 Scotch Game|
|13. Li Chao vs McShane
||0-1||55||2011||Tata Steel Group B||E71 King's Indian, Makagonov System (5.h3)|
|14. W Spoelman vs R Wojtaszek
|| ||½-½||34||2011||Tata Steel Group B||E32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical|
|15. Le Quang Liem vs W Spoelman
||0-1||73||2011||Tata Steel Group B||D16 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|16. J L Hammer vs W So
||½-½||63||2011||Tata Steel Group B||D56 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|17. Efimenko vs Ganguly
||½-½||99||2011||Tata Steel Group B||B90 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|18. McShane vs Tkachiev
||1-0||56||2011||Tata Steel Group B||C78 Ruy Lopez|
|19. G Sargissian vs Navara
|| ||½-½||27||2011||Tata Steel Group B||D85 Grunfeld|
|20. Nijboer vs Fressinet
|| ||½-½||32||2011||Tata Steel Group B||C91 Ruy Lopez, Closed|
|21. R Wojtaszek vs Li Chao
|| ||1-0||33||2011||Tata Steel Group B||D72 Neo-Grunfeld, 5.cd, Main line|
|22. W So vs Efimenko
||½-½||46||2011||Tata Steel Group B||E00 Queen's Pawn Game|
|23. Nijboer vs McShane
|| ||½-½||20||2011||Tata Steel Group B||C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense|
|24. Tkachiev vs R Wojtaszek
|| ||½-½||32||2011||Tata Steel Group B||A13 English|
|25. Navara vs J L Hammer
|| ||½-½||32||2011||Tata Steel Group B||C67 Ruy Lopez|
| page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·
|Jan-30-11|| ||Eyal: <kellmano> If I'm not mistaken, the first tiebreak is head-to-head result and the second is Sonneborn-Berger Points. The only way it can matter is, of course, if Navara-McShane is drawn. In that case, if Efimenko wins he should be 1st because he won against the other two. If he doesn't win this should depend on Navara's and McShane's SB points, which you can't know in advance because it's calculated according to the overall results of their opponents (but right now McShane's is better).|
Even though Navara is playing White I would pick McShane as favorite, because somehow he seems more mentally tough. I actually like Navara, though, so hopefully he will prove me wrong...
|Jan-30-11|| ||ketchuplover: Navara appears winning...so far.|
|Jan-30-11|| ||Peligroso Patzer: <47. ... Kf7> by McShane (instead of 47. ... Kf6) is surprising. Seemingly, it gives up the g- and h-pawns for the sake of eliminating White's advanced passer on the b-file, but it does not look like his best chance to hold.|
|Jan-30-11|| ||fixingguru: <Peligroso Patzer: <47. ... Kf7> by McShane (instead of 47. ... Kf6) is surprising. Seemingly, it gives up the g- and h-pawns for the sake of eliminating White's advanced passer on the b-file, but it does not look like his best chance to hold.> you are a patzer indeed. the idea behind Kf7 is to "trap" the rook with Nf6 after Rg5.|
|Jan-30-11|| ||Peligroso Patzer: After <50. Bb5>, the minor piece ending in Navara-McShane now looks drawn. The only winning idea I see for White is to trade off the minors and then bring his King to the 6th rank (a6, b6, or c6), but Black should be able to prevent this.|
|Jan-30-11|| ||crazybird: And Luke, welcome to group A|
|Jan-30-11|| ||Peligroso Patzer: Re: Navara-McShane:
< *** the idea behind [47. ...] Kf7 is to "trap" the rook with [48. ...] Nf6 after [48.] Rg5.>
But would that really have worked since (after 48. Rxg5 Nf6) White could have played 49. Rf5 followed by 50. g5, opening a line (through the g4-square) for the LSB to use eventually?
|Jan-30-11|| ||Peligroso Patzer: The following line seems to confirm that if Navara-McShane had continued <48.Rxg5 Nf6>, the result would still have been a draw: 49.Rf5 Kg6 50.Kf2 [but not 50.g5? Nxd5! 51.Rf8 Ne3! (only move) 52.Kf2 Rxb7 53.Rf6+ Kxg5 54.Rxd6 Rb1 55.Be2 Rh1 ] 50...Rxb7 51.Bh3 Rb2+ 52.Kg1=.|
|Jan-30-11|| ||Eyal: <And Luke, welcome to group A>|
Yes, McShane wins on Sonneborn-Berger points - his win over So in the penultimate round turned out to be decisive in this regard (Navara didn't score a win against any of the other top 6 - those that finished with 7.5 points and more).
|Jan-30-11|| ||Peligroso Patzer: Here are the actual final standings for the "B" Group:|
1-2. L. McShane 8-1/2
1-2 D. Navara 8-1/2
3. Z. Efimenko 8
4-6. L. Liem 7-1/2
4-6 G. Sargissian 7-1/2
4-6 W. So 7-1/2
7. V. Tkachiev 7
8. R. Wojtaszek 6-1/2
9-10. L. Fressinet 6
9-10. Li Chao 6
11. S. Ganguly 5-1/2
12. W. Spoelman 5
13. J. Hammer 4
14. F. Nijboer 3-1/2
|Jan-30-11|| ||AdrianP: Well done to Luke. He deserves a good tournament win after missing out a little after a very good start at the London Chess Classic.|
|Jan-30-11|| ||me to play: It's a bit of a shame that both McShane and Navara can't get the invite to the "A" group. You could reasonably, I think, reduce the "local" players down to two and make room for Navara.|
|Jan-30-11|| ||siamesedream: Congratulations to Luke McShane!|
|Jan-30-11|| ||Eyal: In fact, both McShane and Navara will be invited to Group A next year: |
<McShane was declared Group-B winner on Sonneborn-Berger but the tournament organizers decided both players would receive an invitation to compete in Group A next year.> (http://www.tatasteelchess.com/tourn...)
Btw, the same thing happened when Motylev & Carlsen finished at the top of Group B with the same number of points in 2006.
|Jan-30-11|| ||Eyal: ...So congrats to Navara as well!|
|Jan-30-11|| ||virginmind: congratulations to both winners.|
|Jan-30-11|| ||Everett: Will McShane and Navara replace the Dutch or Grishuk and Shirov?|
Is there anyone besides Giri coming up in the Dutch ranks? I know he's older, but isn't Ivan Sokolov tough?
|Jan-30-11|| ||Eyal: Grischuk and Shirov don't have any "spots" of their own, the organizers can invite them or not each year as they please... The only "officially" certain invitees to next year are Nakamura (as the winner of Group A), McShane & Navara. Among the Dutch Giri is practically certain as well, I suppose. In recent years they consistently had 3 Dutch players, though this year Giri actually earned his place as the winner of Group B, rather than playing on a "Dutch ticket".|
|Jan-30-11|| ||Everett: Thanks <Eyal>
Who are the other top Dutch players besides the recent one's we've seen? I'll assume the organizers will insist on at least two.
|Jan-30-11|| ||waustad: <Everett>See: http://ratings.fide.com/topfed.phtm...|
|Jan-30-11|| ||HeMateMe: Why not put Smeets or Van Wely in the B group and let both Navara and McShane play group A?|
|Jan-30-11|| ||me to play: <Eyal: In fact, both McShane and Navara will be invited to Group A next year:|
<McShane was declared Group-B winner on Sonneborn-Berger but the tournament organizers decided both players would receive an invitation to compete in Group A next year.>>
That seems fair. Thanks for the info !
|Jan-30-11|| ||pulsar: Skywalker marches to Group A, a well deserved opportunity. Same goes for David who managed to crawl back to the top after a shaky start.|
|Jan-30-11|| ||Don Cossacks: Nice comeback by McShane and Navara.Congratulations to both!!|
|Feb-01-11|| ||Troller: <Who are the other top Dutch players besides the recent one's we've seen? I'll assume the organizers will insist on at least two.>|
If Daniel Stellwagen would do a "McShane" and turn to chess full-time, he would be a natural choice. He seemed stronger than l'Ami and Smeets some years back and has played the A group before. Of course VW & Sokolov are known names as well; among the up-and-coming one should mention Benjamin Bok (apart from obviously Giri).
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
- No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
- NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
- Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
- All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
- Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC