chessgames.com

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Tal Memorial Tournament

Levon Aronian5.5/9(+2 -0 =7)[view games]
Magnus Carlsen5.5/9(+2 -0 =7)[view games]
Sergey Karjakin5/9(+1 -0 =8)[view games]
Ian Nepomniachtchi5/9(+1 -0 =8)[view games]
Vassily Ivanchuk5/9(+2 -1 =6)[view games]
Viswanathan Anand4.5/9(+0 -0 =9)[view games]
Peter Svidler4.5/9(+2 -2 =5)[view games]
Boris Gelfand3.5/9(+0 -2 =7)[view games]
Vladimir Kramnik3.5/9(+0 -2 =7)[view games]
Hikaru Nakamura3/9(+0 -3 =6)[view games]

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Ivanchuk vs Svidler 1-056 2011 Tal MemorialD80 Grunfeld
2. Aronian vs Carlsen ½-½57 2011 Tal MemorialE15 Queen's Indian
3. Nakamura vs Gelfand ½-½34 2011 Tal MemorialD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
4. Anand vs Karjakin ½-½42 2011 Tal MemorialE32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
5. Kramnik vs I Nepomniachtchi 0-153 2011 Tal MemorialA37 English, Symmetrical
6. Karjakin vs Nakamura ½-½43 2011 Tal MemorialB92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation
7. Carlsen vs Gelfand 1-038 2011 Tal MemorialD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
8. Svidler vs Anand ½-½23 2011 Tal MemorialB12 Caro-Kann Defense
9. I Nepomniachtchi vs Ivanchuk ½-½76 2011 Tal MemorialB32 Sicilian
10. Aronian vs Kramnik ½-½49 2011 Tal MemorialD40 Queen's Gambit Declined, Semi-Tarrasch
11. Anand vs I Nepomniachtchi ½-½27 2011 Tal MemorialD97 Grunfeld, Russian
12. Ivanchuk vs Aronian 0-157 2011 Tal MemorialC67 Ruy Lopez
13. Kramnik vs Carlsen ½-½41 2011 Tal MemorialA20 English
14. Nakamura vs Svidler 0-148 2011 Tal MemorialD86 Grunfeld, Exchange
15. Gelfand vs Karjakin 0-159 2011 Tal MemorialE06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3
16. I Nepomniachtchi vs Nakamura ½-½85 2011 Tal MemorialB72 Sicilian, Dragon
17. Kramnik vs Ivanchuk ½-½57 2011 Tal MemorialD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
18. Aronian vs Anand ½-½60 2011 Tal MemorialD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
19. Svidler vs Gelfand ½-½40 2011 Tal MemorialA13 English
20. Carlsen vs Karjakin ½-½67 2011 Tal MemorialE12 Queen's Indian
21. Nakamura vs Aronian ½-½53 2011 Tal MemorialD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
22. Gelfand vs I Nepomniachtchi ½-½62 2011 Tal MemorialD80 Grunfeld
23. Anand vs Kramnik ½-½36 2011 Tal MemorialD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
24. Karjakin vs Svidler ½-½26 2011 Tal MemorialB42 Sicilian, Kan
25. Ivanchuk vs Carlsen ½-½74 2011 Tal MemorialD82 Grunfeld, 4.Bf4
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 47 OF 47 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-27-11  anandrulez: The complaint I have is addressed in your first line , otherwise its a pleasure reading always :)
Nov-27-11  anandrulez: Initial release May 15, 2010; 18 months ago
Stable release 2.0b / October 7, 2011

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houdini_(chess)
Its relatievly new engine besides the authors needs to participate in the contest I think not sure.

Nov-27-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: <anandrulez> Did you mean to post to the Computer World championship page?!
Nov-27-11  Everett: Nov-26-11    <serenpidity.ejd: Hey guys, can someone give information as to what category is this tournment?>

The Inflated category

It is much better to determine the strength of the tournament by the number of ranked players at the top, not by ELO.

Ex. If everyone from the top 10 show up in a DRR tournament, then there can never be a stronger 10-man tournament. It would be nice if this was switched one of these days...

Nov-27-11  Everett: <Meatwad: Topalov never plays in the same tournament as Kramnik (and vice versa), so organizers have to make a choice> Sounds like a divorced couple fighting over who gets the kids.

<fisayo123> Nepo was indeed joint 3rd, as the first two positions are filled by Aronian and Carlsen. One cannot come in second if two people have outperformed him. The next available place is 3rd.

Nov-27-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Rolfo: <polarmis: Better late than never? :)> As usual to the point! Thanks
Nov-27-11  Davolni: I guess i am the last to find out, but there are no blitz games this year after Tal?

Thanks

Nov-27-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pedro Fernandez: +1 for <voyager39> good post. I also make mention of <Kinghunt> and <virginmind> because the ambiguities arising from this outcome. For me Tal Memorial 2011 was a tie. Carlsen is the chessbase winner, but the opinions claimed by the above guys are legitimate too! Let me please compliment these opinions by making the observation that there was 6 (0-1) and just only 4 (1-0).
Nov-27-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Rolfo: Davolni, no blitz this year. Lack of sponsors or lack of Russian results previous years?
Nov-27-11  Davolni: ohhh that's a shame... we all could have enjoyed some blitz games i'm sure!

Thanks Rolfo!

Nov-27-11  jussu: <Davolni> - Okay, just subtract one from "all". There are peole who find nothing exciting in blitz.
Nov-27-11  bishopone: I cant find nowhere the tiebreak's games between Carlsen and Aronian? How mnay games was played? How Carlsen win place nr 1? Thx!
Nov-27-11  Blunderdome: First tiebreak was number of games played with black.
Nov-27-11  The Rocket: Its a shame Topalov is one of the true great tactical players of our time endless creative insight and calculations when positions get sharp.
Nov-28-11  serenpidity.ejd: I have a theory on why the string of draws <Sokrates&SimonWebbsTiger.> The culprit is MR. COMPUTER. Are the players using computers as primary analytical tool? Are the computers similar or of the same level in strength? If yes, then I have substantiated my theory.
Nov-28-11  knighterrant999: Carlsen wins. The fix is in.
Nov-28-11  The Rocket: <"If yes, then I have substantiated my theory.">

you sir are correct in your assesment, I salute you

Nov-28-11  EXIDE: In the summary of "tournament standings" what does,for instance next to leaders (+2-0=7) mean. What is =7 ?
Nov-28-11  King Death: <EXIDE> Those numbers results are (in order) wins, losses, and draws. Therefore, both Kramnik and Gelfand had 0 wins, 2 losses and 7 draws.
Nov-28-11  serenpidity.ejd: To <The Rocket>: The check is in the mail.
Dec-03-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Capablanca on faster time controls>:

From an interview with Herman Helms,
page 6C in the Brooklyn
Daily Eagle of March 27, 1927:

<Helms>: "There are so many drawn games nowadays. Especially is this so between grand masters. What's the remedy? A faster time limit?"

<Capablanca>: "That's all nonsense." (a favorite expression with the champion.) "Those who know good chess will not complain. Faster chess means poorer chess. I'm not in that business. Leave that to the duds."

http://www.chesscafe.com/text/urcan...

Dec-03-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  brankat: ''The increased percentage of draws in many strong international tournaments does not illustrate an eventual decline of fighting spirit but rather the growth of competitors in quality and number--a phenomenon which puts new standards into grandmasters' practice.

A vast knowledge of openings which reaches deep stages of the middlegame, a well specialized individual repertory and high technics of defense are very commonly met today even among players of lesser reputation.

Gradually, the strongest grandmasters are becoming accustomed to having to wear down every day a stubborn resistance which defies their powers and forces them to find ever keener weapons whereby to achieve victory.''

Svetozar Gligoric, writing for Chess Review, <1967>

The words sound as true today as they did then, 44 years ago. Even more so today.

Dec-04-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Drawing is the new sexy?
Dec-04-11  frogbert: don't know if it's new. have you forgot kramnik's painter & artist period? :o)
Jun-10-12  SharpAttack: Drawnand drew every single game! Too solid to lose, too lazy to fight for an advantage!
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 47)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 47 OF 47 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies