chessgames.com

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Reggio Emilia Tournament

Anish Giri6/10(+4 -2 =4)[view games]
Alexander Morozevich5.5/10(+4 -3 =3)[view games]
Fabiano Caruana5.5/10(+4 -3 =3)[view games]
Hikaru Nakamura5.5/10(+4 -3 =3)[view games]
Vassily Ivanchuk4.5/10(+3 -4 =3)[view games]
Nikita Vitiugov3/10(+2 -6 =2)[view games]

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 30  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Ivanchuk vs A Giri ½-½42 2011 Reggio EmiliaD55 Queen's Gambit Declined
2. N Vitiugov vs Nakamura 0-138 2011 Reggio EmiliaD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
3. Caruana vs Morozevich 0-149 2011 Reggio EmiliaC92 Ruy Lopez, Closed
4. A Giri vs Morozevich 0-133 2011 Reggio EmiliaD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
5. Ivanchuk vs N Vitiugov ½-½29 2011 Reggio EmiliaA46 Queen's Pawn Game
6. Nakamura vs Caruana ½-½43 2011 Reggio EmiliaA22 English
7. Caruana vs Ivanchuk 0-183 2011 Reggio EmiliaB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
8. N Vitiugov vs A Giri ½-½41 2011 Reggio EmiliaD70 Neo-Grunfeld Defense
9. Morozevich vs Nakamura ½-½24 2011 Reggio EmiliaD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
10. A Giri vs Nakamura 0-159 2011 Reggio EmiliaE99 King's Indian, Orthodox, Taimanov
11. N Vitiugov vs Caruana 0-146 2011 Reggio EmiliaA45 Queen's Pawn Game
12. Ivanchuk vs Morozevich 1-052 2011 Reggio EmiliaC78 Ruy Lopez
13. Caruana vs A Giri 0-133 2011 Reggio EmiliaC42 Petrov Defense
14. Morozevich vs N Vitiugov 1-041 2011 Reggio EmiliaE39 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Pirc Variation
15. Nakamura vs Ivanchuk 1-057 2011 Reggio EmiliaA22 English
16. Morozevich vs Caruana 0-144 2012 Reggio EmiliaD80 Grunfeld
17. A Giri vs Ivanchuk 1-051 2012 Reggio EmiliaE11 Bogo-Indian Defense
18. Nakamura vs N Vitiugov 1-066 2012 Reggio EmiliaC11 French
19. Morozevich vs A Giri ½-½17 2012 Reggio EmiliaD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
20. Caruana vs Nakamura ½-½21 2012 Reggio EmiliaB42 Sicilian, Kan
21. N Vitiugov vs Ivanchuk 1-031 2012 Reggio EmiliaE21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights
22. A Giri vs N Vitiugov 1-054 2012 Reggio EmiliaB28 Sicilian, O'Kelly Variation
23. Nakamura vs Morozevich 0-132 2012 Reggio EmiliaC11 French
24. Ivanchuk vs Caruana 0-134 2012 Reggio EmiliaA48 King's Indian
25. Morozevich vs Ivanchuk ½-½24 2012 Reggio EmiliaD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 30  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 11 OF 19 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  ganso: caruana-naka draw makes sense for Naka, perhaps for Caruana. What makes less sense is Moro-Giri draw for Moro. Agrees to draw with White after 17 moves (and against opponent he already beat in tournament) when a win would have brought him within two pts of first place in 3 pt scoring system.
Jan-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Harvestman: I knew I should have kept my mouth shut about the draws!
Jan-03-12  MORPHYEUS: They should have used Sofia Rules. London Classic rules are even better. No draws till move 40!
Jan-03-12  Manders: Well considering the high amount of decisive results we've been having sofar a round of draws isn't too bad.
Jan-03-12  AuN1: <The Rocket: Incredibly lucky tournament for Nakamura given that he won opposite Ivanchuk in a lost position after a big blunder.

that win was not worthy of a 2750 player, not to mention the positionally atrocious play from nakamura in the the middlegame were vassily played very well.>

agreed. nakamura is the type of flop who'll survive just long enough in an inferior or equal position then benefit from his opponents' errors.

<FrogC: <ex0duz: Moro who is Moro... Chucky who is Chucky...Then Naka, who is Naka...And then lastly, we have Vitiugov, who i don't know much about really> I hardly like to suggest this, but maybe he's Vitiugov?>

well said

Jan-03-12  Blunderdome: Some nice short draws today, very refreshing!
Jan-03-12  Blunderdome: Let's hope Vitiugov and Chucky don't drag theirs out too much longer...
Jan-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Marmot PFL: Ivanchuk lost a piece and resigned. Could have played on with 2 pawns for it, and slight chance to draw.
Jan-03-12  edbermac: Chucky blows it in his opponent's time pressure; brand New Year, same old Chucky.
Jan-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <kellmano: All hail my prediction skills. I didn't even specify who i thought would win, and yet i was wrong within 4 moves.>

Your prediction was for a "result". In the former colonies over here on the western side of the pond, that word does not have the same connotation as in British English. In American English, it would be standard usage to say that today's Morozevich - Giri game had a drawn "result". So maybe you can fall back on the claim that you were predicting an imminent conclusion to that game, which did, in fact, result not long after your comment was posted.

Jan-03-12  Penguincw: Nakamura running away with the tournament! :0 With 3 rounds left, Vitiugov is out of contention. Might as well discard this guy,

Reggio Emilia: WINNER : Vitugov [info] 5 LIVE BET 13:1 13.67 68 Jan-06-12

Makes me think. Why did I even bet on him?

Anyways, I havn't seen this exciting type of tournament since Bilbao.

Jan-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Shams: <Penguincw><Makes me think. Why did I even bet on him?>

I like to think my brief note of encouragement for him played a small role. But hey, he got a win today, great for him.

Jan-03-12  King Death: < Everett: Why say "lucky tournament" and the discuss one game? Your "lucky" you're not in debate class, for your arguments would not be "worthy" of an A.>

We all know why. He's straight out of the <frogbert> school. Nakamura can't do anything right on the best day of his life.

Jan-03-12  14DogKnight: These Naka-Haters always call him "lucky" when he wins; that he wins because his opponents make mistakes.

ALL games are decided by blunders. Otherwise, every game would end in a draw.

Jan-03-12  14DogKnight: <The Rocket:Incredibly lucky tournament for Nakamura ...that win was not worthy of a 2750 player>

I agree, but it is worthy of a 2775 player.

Jan-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Shams: <14DogKnight> All games are decided by mistakes, not necessarily blunders. If all mistakes are blunders then there is no point in having the word "blunder".

Leko made mistakes here, but blunders?
Kramnik vs Leko, 2004

Jan-03-12  Nezhmetdinov: One gets an impression of the changing of the guard here, this is an incredibly bloodthirsty tourney and the older generation (my two favourite players, Moro and Chucky) are facing a proper challenge. I wish Vachier-Lagrave were here too, but you can't have everything...
Jan-03-12  Penguincw: < Shams >

Yep. Ivanchuk didn't see that coming ( neither did I, but I decided to bet a wee little on him as a longshot ).

Jan-03-12  The Rocket: <Why say "lucky tournament" and the discuss one game? Your "lucky" you're not in debate class, for your arguments would not be "worthy" of an A.>

I guess they were since I study philosophy at university at candidates level which included a course in critical thinking.

And yes a single game can decide a tournament this was between two favourites to win and Nakmura escaped like a rat.

Jan-03-12  Everett: <Rocket> < I guess they were since I study philosophy at university at candidates level which included a course in critical thinking.>

Then why does your post show no indication of this schooling?

Jan-03-12  King Death: < The Rocket: ...I guess they were since I study philosophy at university at candidates level which included a course in critical thinking...>

This post looks more like an effort to show off your education than a try in critical thinking. I'm just an old vet who never got past high school but managed to learn plenty about critical thinking.

Jan-04-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: How many rounds are left?
Jan-04-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: <CIO> three.
Jan-04-12  The Rocket: <Everett> I have already explained the motivation behind my original post.
Jan-04-12  Kazzak: <Rocket> Let us know when you have assimilated the ability to think critically. Planting your ass in a seat is not the same as the brain having achieved intellectual osmosis with the subject at hand.

But you are in agreement with AuN1, who considers Nakamura a flop. Me, I would look somewhat below the world Top 10 for chess flops, quite a distance below.

Doesn't it worry you, <Rocket>, that you find agreement from people so clearly incapable of the critical thinking you are allegedly studying?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 19)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 11 OF 19 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies