| page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66
|1. Y Shulman vs Kaidanov
||½-½||84||2012||US Championship||E11 Bogo-Indian Defense|
|2. Lenderman vs Robson
||1-0||64||2012||US Championship||D97 Grunfeld, Russian|
|3. Akobian vs Seirawan
||1-0||56||2012||US Championship||D37 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|4. Kamsky vs A Ramirez Alvarez
||1-0||39||2012||US Championship||B42 Sicilian, Kan|
|5. Nakamura vs R Hess
||1-0||33||2012||US Championship||C51 Evans Gambit|
|6. Stripunsky vs Onischuk
||0-1||11||2012||US Championship||B11 Caro-Kann, Two Knights, 3...Bg4|
|7. Seirawan vs R Hess
||0-1||47||2012||US Championship||E32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical|
|8. Kaidanov vs Stripunsky
||1-0||53||2012||US Championship||D43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav|
|9. Akobian vs Y Shulman
|| ||½-½||42||2012||US Championship||D45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav|
|10. Onischuk vs Lenderman
|| ||½-½||39||2012||US Championship||D38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation|
|11. A Ramirez Alvarez vs Nakamura
||½-½||40||2012||US Championship||D76 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.cd Nxd5, 7.O-O Nb6|
|12. Robson vs Kamsky
||½-½||28||2012||US Championship||B27 Sicilian|
|13. Kamsky vs Onischuk
||1-0||48||2012||US Championship||D02 Queen's Pawn Game|
|14. Y Shulman vs Seirawan
||1-0||42||2012||US Championship||E17 Queen's Indian|
|15. R Hess vs A Ramirez Alvarez
|| ||½-½||41||2012||US Championship||B42 Sicilian, Kan|
|16. Stripunsky vs Akobian
||1-0||40||2012||US Championship||C03 French, Tarrasch|
|17. Nakamura vs Robson
||1-0||49||2012||US Championship||B76 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack|
|18. Lenderman vs Kaidanov
|| ||½-½||30||2012||US Championship||A33 English, Symmetrical|
|19. Y Shulman vs Stripunsky
|| ||½-½||77||2012||US Championship||D47 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav|
|20. Seirawan vs A Ramirez Alvarez
||1-0||93||2012||US Championship||D11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|21. Robson vs R Hess
||1-0||34||2012||US Championship||C54 Giuoco Piano|
|22. Onischuk vs Nakamura
||½-½||41||2012||US Championship||A10 English|
|23. Akobian vs Lenderman
|| ||½-½||33||2012||US Championship||D38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation|
|24. Kaidanov vs Kamsky
||1-0||48||2012||US Championship||D15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|25. Kamsky vs Akobian
||1-0||50||2012||US Championship||C67 Ruy Lopez|
| page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·
|May-19-12|| ||suenteus po 147: Pretty impressive performance by Nakamura. Not only did he finish first, undefeated with six wins, but he had two games over 100 moves, and only one draw under 40 moves. That's the kind of champion many American chess fans want: a fighter and a winner.|
|May-19-12|| ||Jim Bartle: "two games over 100 moves"
Just to be picky, one of those was because he was just goofing around toward the end instead of taking the draw several moves earlier.
|May-19-12|| ||BlackSheep: Congrats Naka noone was even near you the wins against Kamsky and Seirawan were great games of accuracy and style .|
|May-19-12|| ||Atking: Yes it was great! Thanks and congratulations to Naka for his fighting spirit and his wonderful result. (No lost! And I keep the impression the one with Lenderman was to Nakamura's advantage. In brief not a 11/0 but still a Fischer like performance).|
|May-19-12|| ||solskytz: <Suenteus> Agreed!!|
Although he would have to overcome his nemesis Carlsen before he can actually reach that height.
well yes - but that's already a point of style. A little bit like sleeping with a teddy bear at 25... but still cute
only did 11:0 in ONE US championship - now in each one of the eight he played and won.
|May-19-12|| ||ooda: Congrats to Naka, this was a thoroughly enjoyable tournament.|
Nakamura has had a great run for the past 18 months or so and I think he is showing more and more that he has the potential to become a WC challenger and perhaps even champ.
|May-19-12|| ||paulalbert: Congratulations, Hikaru. This victory certainly reinforces your position as #1 in the U.S. and also a world class contender. Chess fans certainly appreciate your fighting style.|
|May-19-12|| ||parmetd: Congrats to Hikaru.
My final score was 28/66
|May-20-12|| ||LIFE Master AJ: "Nak" played fighting chess all the way. He has all my kudo's and I have nothing negative to say ... CONGRATS!!!!!|
Let us hope - in a year or two - that he will be on the stage in Moscow (or where-ever that it is to be held) ... playing for the World Championships.
|May-20-12|| ||LIFE Master AJ: Six wins ... versus only five draws ... that's just whacked.|
|May-20-12|| ||PinnedPiece: In a 3-0-1 scoring system, the final results are somewhat changed:|
Nakamura _ _ _ 23
Kamsky _ _ _ _ 21
Onischuk _ _ _ 16
Akobian _ _ _ _16
Lenderman _ _ 14
Robson _ _ _ _ 14
Shulman _ _ _ _13
Lee _ _ _ _ _ _ 13
Kaidanov _ _ _ _10
Stripunsky _ _ _ 9
Seirawan _ _ _ _ 9
|May-20-12|| ||parmetd: No one cares about 3-1-0. Yury tied for 4th. Live with it.|
|May-20-12|| ||dx9293: Amen, <parmetd>!
I have long said that 3-1-0 is an abomination and a crime against chess.
|May-20-12|| ||parmetd: so what was everyone's favorite games?
Mine was 1. Lenderman-Robson 2. Kamsky-Seirawan
|May-20-12|| ||dx9293: <parmetd> Seirawan simply was caught, so I'll go with my man Alex L!|
|May-21-12|| ||Riverbeast: <I have long said that 3-1-0 is an abomination and a crime against chess>|
Beg to disagree
I think it may be the greatest antidote to 'draw death' in chess, to come around in the last 100 years
Since Capablanca was complaining about it...
But throughout history, revolutionary ideas have always met resistance from the 'purists'
|May-21-12|| ||dx9293: <Riverbeast> I am most definitely a purist when it comes to the scoring system in chess!|
3-1-0 is just for people who hate draws.
|May-21-12|| ||Fusilli: <Riverbeast> <I think it may be the greatest antidote to 'draw death' in chess, to come around in the last 100 years>|
Is there statistically significant evidence that the +3 =1 -0 system does really lead to fewer draws than the classical +1 =0.5 -0 system?
I mean, some systematic comparison between tournaments with the new system and tournaments of equal strength played at around the same time using the old system...
By now, enough tournaments have been played with the alternative system for a comparable statistical record to exist, right?
|May-21-12|| ||MORPHYEUS: No, the greatest antidote will be my "punt" system. |
It also uses the 3 1 0. That is 3 points for classical win, 1 point for the armageddon blitz "punt" win, and 0 for the loss. This is incorporated in the London Rule, that is no agreed draw till move 40.
|May-21-12|| ||Illogic: <RiverBeast> What has been revolutionary about it? Plenty of tournaments have used it now.|
|May-22-12|| ||LIFE Master AJ: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...|
|May-22-12|| ||apple scruffs: <parmetd> my favorites were Nakamura-Robson and Lenderman-Kamsky.|
|May-22-12|| ||diceman: When do they announce “Best Game” prizes?|
|May-22-12|| ||paavoh: <But throughout history, revolutionary ideas have always met resistance from the 'purists'> |
Ditto for stupid ideas ;-)
|May-22-12|| ||Riverbeast: <By now, enough tournaments have been played with the alternative system for a comparable statistical record to exist, right?>|
I think the 3-1 scoring system is still relatively new
I first saw it used in the London Chess Classic several years ago
But it does seem to lead to a lot of decisive games
More importantly, it makes players play out positions as long as there's any play left...I think it works better than Sofia rules, because the entire risk/reward calculation is drastically altered
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
- No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
- NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
- Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
- All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
- Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC