chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
US Championship Tournament

Hikaru Nakamura8.5/11(+6 -0 =5)[view games]
Gata Kamsky7.5/11(+6 -2 =3)[view games]
Alexander Onischuk6.5/11(+3 -1 =7)[view games]
Aleksandr Lenderman6/11(+2 -1 =8)[view games]
Varuzhan Akobian6/11(+4 -3 =4)[view games]
Yury Shulman6/11(+1 -0 =10)[view games]
Ray Robson5.5/11(+3 -3 =5)[view games]
Robert Lee Hess5/11(+3 -4 =4)[view games]
Alejandro Ramirez-Alvarez4/11(+2 -5 =4)[view games]
Gregory Kaidanov4/11(+2 -5 =4)[view games]
Alexander Stripunsky3.5/11(+2 -6 =3)[view games]
Yasser Seirawan3.5/11(+2 -6 =3)[view games]

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Y Shulman vs Kaidanov ½-½84 2012 US ChampionshipE11 Bogo-Indian Defense
2. Lenderman vs Robson 1-064 2012 US ChampionshipD97 Grunfeld, Russian
3. Akobian vs Seirawan 1-056 2012 US ChampionshipD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
4. Kamsky vs A Ramirez 1-039 2012 US ChampionshipB42 Sicilian, Kan
5. Nakamura vs R Hess 1-033 2012 US ChampionshipC51 Evans Gambit
6. Stripunsky vs Onischuk 0-111 2012 US ChampionshipB11 Caro-Kann, Two Knights, 3...Bg4
7. Seirawan vs R Hess 0-147 2012 US ChampionshipE32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
8. Kaidanov vs Stripunsky 1-053 2012 US ChampionshipD43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
9. Akobian vs Y Shulman  ½-½42 2012 US ChampionshipD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
10. Onischuk vs Lenderman  ½-½39 2012 US ChampionshipD38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation
11. A Ramirez vs Nakamura ½-½40 2012 US ChampionshipD76 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.cd Nxd5, 7.O-O Nb6
12. Robson vs Kamsky ½-½28 2012 US ChampionshipB27 Sicilian
13. Kamsky vs Onischuk 1-048 2012 US ChampionshipA45 Queen's Pawn Game
14. Y Shulman vs Seirawan 1-042 2012 US ChampionshipE17 Queen's Indian
15. R Hess vs A Ramirez  ½-½41 2012 US ChampionshipB42 Sicilian, Kan
16. Stripunsky vs Akobian 1-040 2012 US ChampionshipC03 French, Tarrasch
17. Nakamura vs Robson 1-049 2012 US ChampionshipB76 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav Attack
18. Lenderman vs Kaidanov  ½-½30 2012 US ChampionshipA33 English, Symmetrical
19. Y Shulman vs Stripunsky  ½-½77 2012 US ChampionshipD47 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
20. Seirawan vs A Ramirez 1-093 2012 US ChampionshipD11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
21. Robson vs R Hess 1-034 2012 US ChampionshipC54 Giuoco Piano
22. Onischuk vs Nakamura ½-½41 2012 US ChampionshipA10 English
23. Akobian vs Lenderman  ½-½33 2012 US ChampionshipD38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation
24. Kaidanov vs Kamsky 1-048 2012 US ChampionshipD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
25. Kamsky vs Akobian 1-050 2012 US ChampionshipC67 Ruy Lopez
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-19-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  suenteus po 147: Pretty impressive performance by Nakamura. Not only did he finish first, undefeated with six wins, but he had two games over 100 moves, and only one draw under 40 moves. That's the kind of champion many American chess fans want: a fighter and a winner.
May-19-12  Jim Bartle: "two games over 100 moves"

Just to be picky, one of those was because he was just goofing around toward the end instead of taking the draw several moves earlier.

May-19-12  BlackSheep: Congrats Naka noone was even near you the wins against Kamsky and Seirawan were great games of accuracy and style .
May-19-12  Atking: Yes it was great! Thanks and congratulations to Naka for his fighting spirit and his wonderful result. (No lost! And I keep the impression the one with Lenderman was to Nakamura's advantage. In brief not a 11/0 but still a Fischer like performance).
May-19-12  solskytz: <Suenteus> Agreed!!

Although he would have to overcome his nemesis Carlsen before he can actually reach that height.

Interesting times!

<Jim Bartle>

well yes - but that's already a point of style. A little bit like sleeping with a teddy bear at 25... but still cute

<Fischer>

only did 11:0 in ONE US championship - now in each one of the eight he played and won.

May-19-12  ooda: Congrats to Naka, this was a thoroughly enjoyable tournament.

Nakamura has had a great run for the past 18 months or so and I think he is showing more and more that he has the potential to become a WC challenger and perhaps even champ.

May-19-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: Congratulations, Hikaru. This victory certainly reinforces your position as #1 in the U.S. and also a world class contender. Chess fans certainly appreciate your fighting style.
May-19-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  parmetd: Congrats to Hikaru.

My final score was 28/66

May-20-12  LIFE Master AJ: "Nak" played fighting chess all the way. He has all my kudo's and I have nothing negative to say ... CONGRATS!!!!!

Let us hope - in a year or two - that he will be on the stage in Moscow (or where-ever that it is to be held) ... playing for the World Championships.

http://www.uschesschamps.com/nakamu...

May-20-12  LIFE Master AJ: Six wins ... versus only five draws ... that's just whacked.
May-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  PinnedPiece: In a 3-0-1 scoring system, the final results are somewhat changed:

Nakamura _ _ _ 23
Kamsky _ _ _ _ 21
Onischuk _ _ _ 16
Akobian _ _ _ _16
Lenderman _ _ 14
Robson _ _ _ _ 14
Shulman _ _ _ _13
Lee _ _ _ _ _ _ 13
Ramirez-Alvarez 10
Kaidanov _ _ _ _10
Stripunsky _ _ _ 9
Seirawan _ _ _ _ 9

May-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  parmetd: No one cares about 3-1-0. Yury tied for 4th. Live with it.
May-20-12  dx9293: Amen, <parmetd>!

I have long said that 3-1-0 is an abomination and a crime against chess.

May-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  parmetd: so what was everyone's favorite games?
Mine was 1. Lenderman-Robson 2. Kamsky-Seirawan
May-20-12  dx9293: <parmetd> Seirawan simply was caught, so I'll go with my man Alex L!
May-21-12  Riverbeast: <I have long said that 3-1-0 is an abomination and a crime against chess>

Beg to disagree

I think it may be the greatest antidote to 'draw death' in chess, to come around in the last 100 years

Since Capablanca was complaining about it...

But throughout history, revolutionary ideas have always met resistance from the 'purists'

May-21-12  dx9293: <Riverbeast> I am most definitely a purist when it comes to the scoring system in chess!

3-1-0 is just for people who hate draws.

May-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <Riverbeast> <I think it may be the greatest antidote to 'draw death' in chess, to come around in the last 100 years>

Is there statistically significant evidence that the +3 =1 -0 system does really lead to fewer draws than the classical +1 =0.5 -0 system?

I mean, some systematic comparison between tournaments with the new system and tournaments of equal strength played at around the same time using the old system...

By now, enough tournaments have been played with the alternative system for a comparable statistical record to exist, right?

May-21-12  MORPHYEUS: No, the greatest antidote will be my "punt" system.

It also uses the 3 1 0. That is 3 points for classical win, 1 point for the armageddon blitz "punt" win, and 0 for the loss. This is incorporated in the London Rule, that is no agreed draw till move 40.

May-21-12  Illogic: <RiverBeast> What has been revolutionary about it? Plenty of tournaments have used it now.
May-22-12  LIFE Master AJ: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail...
May-22-12  apple scruffs: <parmetd> my favorites were Nakamura-Robson and Lenderman-Kamsky.
May-22-12  diceman: When do they announce “Best Game” prizes?
May-22-12  paavoh: <But throughout history, revolutionary ideas have always met resistance from the 'purists'>

Ditto for stupid ideas ;-)

May-22-12  Riverbeast: <By now, enough tournaments have been played with the alternative system for a comparable statistical record to exist, right?>

I think the 3-1 scoring system is still relatively new

I first saw it used in the London Chess Classic several years ago

But it does seem to lead to a lot of decisive games

More importantly, it makes players play out positions as long as there's any play left...I think it works better than Sofia rules, because the entire risk/reward calculation is drastically altered

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 14)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 14 OF 14 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies