chessgames.com

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Tal Memorial Tournament

Magnus Carlsen5.5/9(+2 -0 =7)[view games]
Teimour Radjabov5/9(+2 -1 =6)[view games]
Fabiano Caruana5/9(+3 -2 =4)[view games]
Alexander Grischuk4.5/9(+2 -2 =5)[view games]
Vladimir Kramnik4.5/9(+2 -2 =5)[view games]
Alexander Morozevich4.5/9(+3 -3 =3)[view games]
Levon Aronian4.5/9(+2 -2 =5)[view games]
Luke McShane4/9(+3 -4 =2)[view games]
Hikaru Nakamura4/9(+1 -2 =6)[view games]
Evgeny Tomashevsky3.5/9(+1 -3 =5)[view games]

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Grischuk vs McShane 1-063 2012 Tal MemorialA29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto
2. Aronian vs Nakamura 1-053 2012 Tal MemorialA29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto
3. Radjabov vs E Tomashevsky 1-031 2012 Tal MemorialC45 Scotch Game
4. Carlsen vs Kramnik ½-½23 2012 Tal MemorialE32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
5. Morozevich vs Caruana 1-056 2012 Tal MemorialC81 Ruy Lopez, Open, Howell Attack
6. Caruana vs Nakamura ½-½107 2012 Tal MemorialD22 Queen's Gambit Accepted
7. Kramnik vs Grischuk 1-029 2012 Tal MemorialE97 King's Indian
8. E Tomashevsky vs Aronian ½-½25 2012 Tal MemorialE06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3
9. Morozevich vs Carlsen ½-½59 2012 Tal MemorialE34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation
10. McShane vs Radjabov 0-148 2012 Tal MemorialB30 Sicilian
11. Grischuk vs Morozevich 0-160 2012 Tal MemorialA09 Reti Opening
12. Nakamura vs E Tomashevsky ½-½41 2012 Tal MemorialC36 King's Gambit Accepted, Abbazia Defense
13. Carlsen vs Caruana ½-½30 2012 Tal MemorialD85 Grunfeld
14. Aronian vs McShane 0-138 2012 Tal MemorialD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
15. Radjabov vs Kramnik ½-½25 2012 Tal MemorialC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
16. Carlsen vs Grischuk ½-½40 2012 Tal MemorialC78 Ruy Lopez
17. McShane vs Nakamura ½-½79 2012 Tal MemorialB84 Sicilian, Scheveningen
18. Morozevich vs Radjabov ½-½37 2012 Tal MemorialC80 Ruy Lopez, Open
19. Caruana vs E Tomashevsky 1-032 2012 Tal MemorialC84 Ruy Lopez, Closed
20. Kramnik vs Aronian ½-½40 2012 Tal MemorialC47 Four Knights
21. Nakamura vs Kramnik ½-½40 2012 Tal MemorialA33 English, Symmetrical
22. E Tomashevsky vs McShane ½-½48 2012 Tal MemorialA54 Old Indian, Ukrainian Variation, 4.Nf3
23. Aronian vs Morozevich 0-140 2012 Tal MemorialD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
24. Grischuk vs Caruana ½-½31 2012 Tal MemorialD92 Grunfeld, 5.Bf4
25. Radjabov vs Carlsen 0-159 2012 Tal MemorialC45 Scotch Game
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 64 OF 73 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-18-12  KKDEREK: Agreed <frogb> Is insane to see Aronian as "tail-ender"..That's how crazy this tourney was. Tomashevsky (so *weak*) is a 2740 player! Actually long time don't see him fare so bad in a supertourney.. I expected bit more from Naka..As for him, at least he will get a feast from <jombar> this week. ;o)
Jun-18-12  frogbert: <
loss win draw loss win loss win draw win loss
(ignore the actual order of opponents)
>

sorry, that was supposed to reflect his actual score, 50%. hence exchange it with this:

loss win draw loss win loss draw win draw

in this case, he would never have been "the leader" but his performance the same, obviously.

Jun-18-12  frogbert: <That's how crazy this tourney was.>

i.e. not crazy at all. consider this, in terms of performances:

carlsen 2849 (r: 2835, d: +14)
caruana 2820 (r: 2770, d: +50)
radjabov 2818 (r: 2784, d: +34)
morozevich 2777 (r: 2769 d: +8)
aronian 2771 (r: 2825 d: -54)
kramnik 2773 (r: 2801 d: -28)
grischuk 2778 (r: 2761 d: +17)
nakamura 2733 (r: 2775 d: -42)
mcshane 2741 (r: 2706 d: +35)
tomashevsky 2700 (r: 2738 d: -38)

r = rating
d = tpr - rating

all performances were within 150 points. ratings were (initially) within 130 points. everything is normal as far as i can tell. :o)

Jun-18-12  edbermac: So MC wins the Tal Memorial with 2 wins and 7 draws? Mischa is spinning in his grave. Maybe it should be renamed the Petrosian Memorial.
Jun-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <frogbert...taking a different angle: both the lost chance against tomashevsky and the near-disaster against kramnik (missing the critical continuation after Qxd4) can be put down as <errors of calculation>. being able to play "superficially" and fast based on intuition serves carlsen well most of the time, but his play is still not perfectly tuned when it comes to understanding exactly *where & when* it's critical to calculate lines extremely precisely. hence, this is an area in which he can still improve.>

The danger I see is that Carlsen escaped two situations where only his edge starting with White provided enough drawing margin to rescue him.

So if he does not want to put in the opening work, or more likely, distrusts working with computers so closely, he will effectively be giving himself a handicap going forward.

Jun-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Sometimes things don't change and history repeats itself!
Jun-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <edbermac: So MC wins the Tal Memorial with 2 wins and 7 draws? Mischa is spinning in his grave. Maybe it should be renamed the Petrosian Memorial.>

Here's Tal going +2-0=13

Game Collection: Bugojno 1978

Here's Tal's 433 draws of 20 moves or less.

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...

Ignorance is contemptible. Especially when information is so easy to come by.

Jun-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Strongest Force: For those who feel Carlsen earned his victory via "superior" play I ask you: what do you think would have been the result if Carlsen had the opposite side in his first two games? Be honest.
Jun-18-12  eternaloptimist: I figured that Carlsen would probably win this tournament. He didn't play as great in this tournament as he normally does but he still won it & got through it w/o a single loss!! In fact he was the only player to get through it w/o a loss!! That's one of the main reasons why he's won so many tournaments; he keeps making forward progress by getting draws or wins & not getting many losses.
Jun-18-12  voyager39: Hopefully we'll have less people cursing drawn games now. Exciting maverick chess doesn't get you the trophy - consistency does.
Jun-18-12  Kanatahodets: Rajabov and Aronian speak Russian without a slightest accent. It's quite surprising given more than 20 years break-up of Soviets. I guess their English is also close to perfection but not to the extent of Russian of course.
Jun-18-12  nok: <<Kasparov did not have so many high (ELO)rated players to play against in his time. He had to achieve better plus scores in his tournament victories.> it's a total myth that it's easier achieve high performances against highly rated players.>

Well if people had been found closer to Kasparov's rating, he'd have performed lower against them. Bottom line is that these people did not exist.

Jun-18-12  hellopolgar: I don't know about russian but Rajabov and Aronian definitely don't speak perfect English.
Jun-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bobwhoosta: <voyager39>

Uh, did you see Carlsen's games? The fact that they were mostly draws does not contradict with his style of consistently taking risks in search of a winning position. He plays long games, takes every opportunity, and defends passionately. It's not the draws we curse, it's the passionless tepid insipidly boring draws. Take our recent World Championship for instance... Carlsen would have played on in almost EVERY position, especially where he had even the slightest advantage. It's the attitude we don't like, not the draws themselves. Chess being a draw (theoretically, though unproven) does not excuse grossly drawish play.

Jun-18-12  King Death: < hellopolgar: I don't know about russian but Rajabov and Aronian definitely don't speak perfect English.>

I can say the same thing for plenty of folks I've met whose first language is English so what does this prove? Besides, English isn't an easy language to learn.

Jun-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bobwhoosta: btw, kudos to Carlsen for another Super Tourney win. I didn't think he would be able to do it with Caruana having draw odds in the last round. Caruana and some others also played a great tournament. In fact this is the most exciting tournament I've seen in a very long time. Thank you to all the participants for your fighting chess!!!
Jun-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  virginmind: congratulations to carlsen for winning this great tournament. special mention goes to caruana and mcshane. and bravo for the organisers - keeping the high class video relay and the general tournament atmosphere.
Jun-18-12  King Death: Wasn't there somebody here that posted about how Caruana had this event in the bag going into today? It must be that Aronian didn't see the memo. Maybe it's because his English isn't perfect or at least that's what <hellopolgar> would tell us.
Jun-18-12  eternaloptimist: I figured that Carlsen would probably win this tournament. He didn't play as great in this tournament as he normally does but he still won it & got through it w/o a single loss!! In fact he was the only player to get through it w/o a loss!! That's one of the main reasons why he's won so many tournaments; he keeps making forward progress by getting draws or wins & not getting many losses. Someone like mcshane wins a good many games but he tries too hard to win when he doesn't even have much of a chance to win (instead of agreeing to a draw) & ends up losing & doesn't make forward progress. I will have to admit that I enjoy decisive games more than draws but if u r trying to win a tournament sometimes it's better just to take what u can get, be patient & try to win when u have a good chance (or at least a legitimate chance) to win or when u have to win to have a chance to win the tournament.
Jun-18-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bobwhoosta: <King Death>

English may be the sole language wherein there are more exceptions than rules. It gives us enormous flexibility in speaking, but is insane to try to explain or learn.

If you ever want to learn more about English, just take everything you know about English and contradict it. Then you will know moreer

Jun-18-12  magnuschess: if radjabov speaks english perfectly also , anyway we would not understand him bec of speed of his speech.
Jun-18-12  Kanatahodets: < King Death: < hellopolgar: I don't know about russian but Rajabov and Aronian definitely don't speak perfect English.> I can say the same thing for plenty of folks I've met whose first language is English so what does this prove? Besides, English isn't an easy language to learn.> My initial point was the correlation between language and chess abilities. In general does the ability to learn languages help to excel in exact sciences. Probably not.
Jun-18-12  voyager39: Not a single player covered themselves with any glory here. Maybe we can excuse McShane coz he's a part timer - though today he seemed to be in a hurry to go back and report to his boss at Goldman Sachs.
Jun-18-12  Petrosianic: Except Carlsen, who added another clear 1st Place in a strong international tournament to his resume.
Jun-18-12  voyager39: <Bobwhoosta> <Take our recent World Championship for instance... Carlsen would have played on in almost EVERY position, especially where he had even the slightest advantage> We can fantasize once Carlsen reaches that stage. I don't have much hope of Carlsen or Aronian qualifying in the next candidates if Tal is any indicator. You never know it maybe Gelfand again in 2013!
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 73)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 64 OF 73 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies