chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Russian Chess Championships Higher League Tournament

Dmitry Andreikin7.5/11(+4 -0 =7)[view games]
Nikita Vitiugov7.5/11(+5 -1 =5)[view games]
Daniil Dubov7.5/11(+5 -1 =5)[view games]
Vladimir Potkin7/11(+5 -2 =4)[view games]
Sanan Sjugirov7/11(+4 -1 =6)[view games]
Evgeny Alekseev7/11(+6 -3 =2)[view games]
Anton Demchenko7/11(+4 -1 =6)[view games]
Dmitry Bocharov6.5/11(+5 -3 =3)[view games]
Jaroslav Prizant6.5/11(+3 -1 =7)[view games]
Roman Ovetchkin6.5/11(+5 -3 =3)[view games]
Boris Grachev6.5/11(+2 -0 =9)[view games]
Artyom Timofeev6.5/11(+3 -1 =7)[view games]
Ildar Khairullin6.5/11(+2 -0 =9)[view games]
Mikhail Panarin6.5/11(+2 -0 =9)[view games]
Maxim Matlakov6.5/11(+4 -2 =5)[view games]
Ian Nepomniachtchi6/11(+3 -2 =6)[view games]
Aleksandr Shimanov6/11(+4 -3 =4)[view games]
Alexander Khalifman6/11(+2 -1 =8)[view games]
Igor Kurnosov6/11(+5 -4 =2)[view games]
Daniil Lintchevski6/11(+3 -2 =6)[view games]
Vadim Zvjaginsev6/11(+2 -1 =8)[view games]
Andrey Stukopin5.5/11(+3 -3 =5)[view games]
Dmitry Jakovenko5.5/11(+1 -1 =9)[view games]
Oleg Yuzhakov5.5/11(+3 -3 =5)[view games]
Vladislav Artemiev5.5/11(+2 -2 =7)[view games]
Pavel Maletin5.5/11(+2 -2 =7)[view games]
Ivan Popov5.5/11(+2 -2 =7)[view games]
Denis Khismatullin5/11(+3 -4 =4)[view games]
Alexandr Ulanov5/11(+4 -5 =2)[view games]
(46 players total; 18 players not shown. Click here for longer list.)

 page 1 of 11; games 1-25 of 253  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. R Ovetchkin vs B Grachev  ½-½64 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueB48 Sicilian, Taimanov Variation
2. V Artemiev vs M Matlakov  ½-½40 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueA37 English, Symmetrical
3. D Khismatullin vs A Mokshanov 1-041 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueA20 English
4. N Matinian vs I Kurnosov  0-151 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
5. Khalifman vs A Petrov  ½-½40 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueA14 English
6. V Sergeev vs Potkin 0-155 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
7. A Timofeev vs A Ulanov 1-031 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueD18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
8. R Makhmutov vs I Khairullin  ½-½40 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
9. D Shishigin vs A Demchenko  0-146 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueB06 Robatsch
10. T Nazaretyan vs D Frolyanov 0-148 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueD30 Queen's Gambit Declined
11. P Maletin vs O Rychkov  1-060 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueA14 English
12. E Alekseev vs N Kabanov  1-037 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueC64 Ruy Lopez, Classical
13. O Yuzhakov vs A Shimanov 1-033 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueB11 Caro-Kann, Two Knights, 3...Bg4
14. V Zvjaginsev vs A Stukopin  ½-½41 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueB40 Sicilian
15. S Sjugirov vs D Yuffa 1-043 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueB50 Sicilian
16. D Lintchevski vs Jakovenko  ½-½40 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueB47 Sicilian, Taimanov (Bastrikov) Variation
17. D Temirkanov vs I Popov 0-158 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueA57 Benko Gambit
18. D Bocharov vs R Ganzhurov  1-041 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueA46 Queen's Pawn Game
19. D Dubov vs M Popov 1-031 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueA41 Queen's Pawn Game (with ...d6)
20. I Nepomniachtchi vs M Panarin  ½-½52 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueA18 English, Mikenas-Carls
21. D Yevseev vs E Inarkiev  ½-½59 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
22. N Vitiugov vs J Prizant 1-050 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
23. A Bezgodov vs D Andreikin  ½-½24 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueB11 Caro-Kann, Two Knights, 3...Bg4
24. M Panarin vs Khalifman  ½-½41 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueC45 Scotch Game
25. A Ulanov vs T Nazaretyan 0-156 2012 Russian Chess Championships Higher LeagueD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
 page 1 of 11; games 1-25 of 253  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: Interesting that the two near elite players Nyepomnyashchiy and Yakovenko finished well down in this, indicating both the limited predictive value of past performance ratings and also the breadth of high class,particularly young, chess talent in Russia.
Jun-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  haydn20: Lots of nonsense out there re Einstein's education.
1. Age 2-5 he was thought "slow" by some of family due to a mild speech difficulty (echolalia). By age 5, no one thought this any more. 2. Einstein himself, quoted in Isaacson's bio: "I never failed in mathematics. Before I was 15, I had mastered...calculus." 3. Einstein was an ideal student--smart, open-minded, eager. He was reading and understanding Kant at age 13, e.g. 4. He hated the authoritarian regime at the school he attended as an adolescent and left before he could be kicked out. This is why his teachers there considered him a "poor student" even though he was in our terms a 4.0. 5. He tried to get into the equivalent of MIT at 16. However, he flunked the parts of the entrance exam on French, life-sciences and politics, for the simple reason that he had never studied the subjects. 6. He then spent two years at a private high school, where he graduated 2nd in his class. He loved this school. (Too bad no one knows who graduated first!)
Jun-27-12  rilkefan: <<parmetd>: I have no idea>

Yeah. Owls to Athens.

Jun-27-12  fisayo123: I wonder how long it takes before Dubov stops playing the Richter-Rauzer. I don't get the point of that variation; weaking your kingside even for the bishop pair that early in the game is very questionable, especially when white undermines blacks solid pawn cover with a timely f5. Even Houdini thinks its suspect as with perfect play fromboth sides whites advantage keeps rising. As for Nepo, he needs to work more on his openings with both colors esp black. Playing the Grunfeld everytime won't cut it.
Jun-27-12  BUNA: <Kinghunt: Was Morozevich's 8/11 last year some kind of record for this event?>

In 2009 Tomashevsky also won with 8/11.
> 62nd Russian Championship Higher League (2009)

But I couldn't find any information about earlier tournaments.

Btw. in this years edition of the "higher league" (actually in russian it's "highest league") there were the last three european champions: Jakovenko (2012), Potkin (2011) and Nepo (2010). Only one of them got through to the "superfinal".

Jun-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <parmetd: How did they do tiebreaks?>

Judging by the final crosstable at the official site (http://www.russiachess.org/download..., rankings-11) it was by Buchholz (sum of opponents' scores) - see the BH column.

Jun-27-12  onur87: Very interesting performance from Alekseev! +6 -3 =2 !!
Jun-27-12  polarmis: Big report on the event:

http://www.whychess.org/en/node/2124

Jun-27-12  visayanbraindoctor: <fisayo123: I wonder how long it takes before Dubov stops playing the Richter-Rauzer.>

There are some players who think that the whole Sicilian set up is somewhat positionally dubious. However, practically speaking, it gives good dynamic counterplay and leads to asymmetrical tension-filled middlegames. From my old playing days, I began as a Sicilian player as a child when I first occasionally ventured into tournaments, but then I soon became suspicious that giving White the initial initiative in the center was not positionally right. When I came to that conclusion, on principle I stopped playing it.

If one wishes to play for an all out win with Black, the Sicilian is a weapon of choice.

Regarding the essence of the Siclian from a positional point of view, Capablanca famously condemned it as 'full of holes'. Larsen on the other hand opined that it was White that was being disadvantaged positionally as he exchanges a center pawn for a flank pawn.

The last two World champions before Anand, Kasparov and Kramnik played the Sicilian well, highlighting its dynamic nature. It was Kasparov's main weapon with Black against e4 throughout his career. Kramnik who also began as a Siclian player on the other hand stopped playing it way back in the 1990s, probably because it may not have suited the highly positional style that he seems to have been determined to develop. Now he plays the more solid Berlin.

Karpov is another Sicilian player in his early youth, but like the positional Kramnik, he also eventually stopped playing it for the most part, preferring the more sold Caro-Kann.

Fischer on the other hand, probably confident of his prep and with his play to win with Black attitude, like Kasparov, played the Siclian throughout his career.

Jun-27-12  visayanbraindoctor: <polarmis> Thanks for the link.
Jun-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: Btw, for Vitiugov it's the 5th time out of 6 tries that he qualifies from the "higher league" to the championship - he already did it in 2006, 2007, 2008 & 2009 (in 2010 he didn't have to, since he finished at the top 3 in the 2009 championship and so was seeded directly; only last year he failed).
Jun-27-12  fisayo123: <Visayan> I was referring to s particular variation in the Sicilian not the entire defense as a whole. You can get good positional games playing the Kan or Taimanov as I do. Most club players I play seem not to know the difference though as they treat this variations like a Najdorf i.e castle queen side and a pawn storm kingside. But imo black gets the best chances against e4 playing c5. The Richter-Rauzer on the other hand, I dunno.
Jun-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: At the top levels the Sveshnikov is also doing rather well as a solid variation. In the recent WC match Anand didn't get anything against it in game 5 and then decided to switch to the Rossolimo (though there it probably had something to do with simply wanting to minimize Gelfand's advantage in preparation once he managed to surprise Anand with this variation - he's been a Najdorf player throughout most of his career).

Here's what Shipov, Dubov's trainer, said about the Richter-Rauzer according to that report by <polarmis>: <I didn't manage to convince Danya to play this variation immediately, but it's surely not the time for learning the Berlin! He's young, his blood's boiling. It's when you enter the elite that there's nothing for it but to learn the Berlin. Moreover, I consider the Rauzer to have solidity in reserve.>

Jun-27-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pedro Fernandez: It is very curious to me that his coach, GM Shipov, declared that the Dubov's style of game is like Petrosian's style. Hard to believe that, under these conditions, being at the first place, Petrosian plays a Sicilian.
Jun-27-12  fisayo123: Thanks <Eyal> Where are you getting these quotes from btw? <Pedro> the Sicilian was Petrosians' main weapon against e4. I don't think it was a matter of openings for Tigran. His positional awareness combined with tactical brilliance when necessary meant that he could draw in just about any playable opening!
Jun-28-12  polarmis: <fisayo123: Where are you getting these quotes from btw?> I translated the Shipov quote here: http://www.whychess.org/en/node/2124 The original is in one of Dmitry Kryakvin's highly recommended reports: http://russiachess.org/news/report/... The title is "His Majesty Rauzer".

Shipov continues after "...solidity in reserve":

<Actually the moves Nc6, Nf6, d6 are logical, are they not? Is that really much worse than instead of knight to c6 playing a6? You can even take the game P Smirnov vs D Dubov, 2012. Smirnov was wonderfully well prepared, made a lot of moves according to his analysis and landed a beautiful blow, but in the ending Danya could still have made a draw until he played a one-move blunder. The position in the Rauzer often seems dubious, but the trend now is to recheck all the lines with the computer. And modern practice confirms that Black is ok. The decisive proof was that I told my pupil: "Look, even Boris Gulko, a veteran player, wasn't afraid of learning it all carefully and arming himself with it!" Although it's curious - during the round lots of strong grandmasters came up to me and said that Daniil had a thoroughly bad position. But then everything fell into place...>

Jun-28-12  Everett: <Haydn20> thank for the information on Einstein. I was part of the great unwashed regarding his education.

<Polarmis> thank you for the notes on Shipov and Dubov. It reminds me yet again that we must each come to our own conclusions, and let the subsequent play and result inform us on the value of our choices.

Also, I've grown to really appreciate the role of trainer in a chessplayers life. The relationship is a big part of what makes chess special. Tal-Koblentz, Karpov-Furman, Petrosian-Boleslavsky, Spassky-Bondarevsky...

Jun-28-12  visayanbraindoctor: Glad to see the young dragons Andreikin, Dubov, and Sjugirov qualify. Add the veterans- many times Russian Championship qualifier Vitiugov and former European champion Potkin. Plus Svidler, Morozevich, Grischuk, Karjakin, and Kramnik (common Vlad please participate!).

Fascinating mix worth watching.

Jun-28-12  King Death: < Pedro Fernandez: ...his coach, GM Shipov, declared that the Dubov's style of game is like Petrosian's style. Hard to believe that, under these conditions, being at the first place, Petrosian plays a Sicilian.>

Here's one time Petrosian played a dubious variation in the Sicilian Najdorf in a big spot and you'll see what happened: Spassky vs Petrosian, 1969.

Jun-28-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: This daniil dubov kid has a ton of talent for chess! It's too bad that he lost on tiebreaks to andreikin since he was leading the standings solely by himself for most of the tournament. Still it's impressive that he qualified for the Russian super finals. He's a new name to me but I'm sure he will make a huge impact in the russian chess scene & eventually create some big waves in foreign tournaments. 
Jun-29-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pedro Fernandez: < fisayo123: Thanks <Eyal> Where are you getting these quotes from btw? <Pedro> the Sicilian was Petrosians' main weapon against e4. I don't think it was a matter of openings for Tigran. His positional awareness combined with tactical brilliance when necessary meant that he could draw in just about any playable opening!> I know that <fisayo>; I mean, under that condition (first place), I think hardly Petrosian would play a Sicilian to make a draw. Let's recall he was a really wise to making draws. Maybe a Caro-Kann or a Petrov defence where he is a Master.
Jun-30-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <fisayo123> For what it's worth, Alexander Khalifman agrees with you about Dubov's opening repertoire...

<Above all, his problem will be the opening, because the elite guys in the Superfinal [Kramnik, Karjakin, Morozevich, Svidler and Grischuk are all invited] will do terrible things to the Rauzer and the Volga Gambit. It's obvious, though, that if Dubov does a great deal of work on improving his battle readiness in the opening Russia will soon have a new and strong 2700-player.> (http://whychess.org/en/node/2132)

Jun-30-12  Jason Frost: Easy to criticize Dubov for playing the Rauzer instead of the amazing and kibitzer favorite 1...e5! 2. Nf6!! with perfect 20-20 hindsight. Now extrapolating that game to the future, it's undoubtedly clearly that if Dubov doesn't switch to full-time Petrov he'll lose every game.

Of course had he won or drawn the all important final game (it's not like top 5 qualified from this tournament or anything), then I'm sure Khalifman and others criticizing his opening would <capitulate in the face of ...[overwhelming] evidence>

Jun-30-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: Strictly speaking, Khalifman isn't criticizing Dubov's choice of openings in <this> tournament. He's talking about what awaits him against the likes of Kramnik, Karjakin & Grischuk, and thinks that it won't be good enough against them (or more generally, if Dubov wants to move up to the next level).
Jun-30-12  Jason Frost: Somewhat true, though I think he was criticizing his entire opening prep/repertoire as a whole more than just the Rauzer. Not the best translated interview nor really the clearest, since he seems to go from praising his tactical skill to criticizing his openings without pause, but translating from Russian (http://www.russiachess.org/news/rep...)

<In the first place, his problem is with openings. In my opinion, the elite players in the super-final will do scary things to rauzer and volga gambit. But it's obvious that if Dubov does a lot of work on preparing his opening repertoire, then Russia will have a new and very strong 2700>

None of which I'm really sure is justified by this tournament, though as Shipov said, he had Dubov play the rauzer to work on his tactics, so I wouldn't be surprised if he switches openings anyway. But, in my opinion, his opening prep looked rather good all tournament.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies