|Fischer - Larsen Candidates Semifinal (1971)|
Two weeks after Fischer's sensational 6-0 shutout streak in the Fischer - Taimanov Candidates Quarterfinal (1971) at Vancouver, he met at Temple Buell College, Denver, Colorado USA to play a 10-game candidates match against Bent Larsen starting on July 6, 1971. Larsen had qualified from the Larsen - Uhlmann Candidates Quarterfinal (1971). Prior to the match, Fischer said to a reporter:|
"Been traveling for a year, match to match. I need a personal life. I'm not as narrow as some people think, you know. But right now all I think of is the world championship. Chess is my whole life.
(Larsen)'s good. But I think I'm the best around. I don't say that to brag. I think it's true. I love the game - and I hate the Russians because they've almost ruined it. They only risk the title when they have to, every three years. They play for draws with each other but play to win against the Western masters. Draws make for dull chess, wins make for fighting chess."(1)
And fighting chess is exactly what Fischer delivered. After 6 consecutive wins, he dispensed with Denmark's best, repeating another amazing 6-0 performance. Fischer soon prepared to face Boris Spassky to a World Championship match. Meanwhile, before the Fischer - Petrosian Candidates Final (1971), Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian scored a victory over Viktor Korchnoi previously in their semifinal and the winners of each would first have to prepare for one another.
(1) Life, July 23, 1971, p. 61.
Original Collection : Game Collection: WCC Index (Fischer-Larsen 1971), by User: Hesam7.
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·
|Aug-01-14|| ||diceman: <john barleycorn:
Fischer kept his jacket on as did some of the spectators.>
Notice Larsen is in his shirt.
...but I think its because
Fischer was the Fisch-er, and Larsen was the Fisch-ee.
|Aug-01-14|| ||diceman: <Petrosianic: Fischer would have won easily at that time, but it still would have been fun to watch the soap opera.>|
...there may have even been a good game or two.
|Aug-01-14|| ||diceman: <SpiritedReposte: Which also brings to mind something I've wondered about...Fischer seemed to have psychological warfare on his side along with superb chess skill.>|
I think this is way overblown.
If you call being down two games with
Spassky as white <psychological warfare> please don't give me any.
Only Fischer would lose an unfinished match in 72.
Only Fischer lost the match to Reshevsky.
Only Fischer left the Sousse Interzonal.
Only Fischer lost the title in 75.
Only Fischer was denied a reign at the top, because of Fischer in the late 70's.
Fischer sure had a strange way of "winning" thru his antics and protests.
|Jan-02-15|| ||SpiritedReposte: Well <dice> I meant Fischer most likely got into his opponents heads. And if I had to guess he wasn't doing it intentionally, he was just a control freak.|
Either way it probably unnerved a lot of his adversaries.
|Feb-24-15|| ||offramp: What must have annoyed Larsen during the match, among other things, was that if Petrosian won the other semi-final (as he did), then Larsen would have great winning chances against him.
Larsen had done very well recently against Petrosian. Fischer also had done well but without as much éclat.|
|Feb-24-15|| ||Petrosianic: Larsen's record against him at the time was +3-6, he had lost the last two decisive games. His most recent win against Petrosian had been 5 years previously. That's not to deny, of course, that the ever-optimistic Larsen would have rated his chances at anything less than 100%.|
|Feb-24-15|| ||keypusher: <offramp: What must have annoyed Larsen during the match, among other things, was that if Petrosian won the other semi-final (as he did), then Larsen would have great winning chances against him. Larsen had done very well recently against Petrosian. Fischer also had done well but without as much éclat.>|
This strikes me as pretty eclatful.
USSR vs. Rest of the World (1970)/Robert James Fischer
Must have been quite a shock for Petrosian; he'd only lost once to Fischer in thirteen games up to that time, on a blunder.
|Feb-24-15|| ||RookFile: Let's talk for a moment about Fischer vs. Reshevsky. Fischer had a contract stating what time the games would be played. A rich guy says he needs the game played at 11 AM so that he can go to a piano recital. You're playing a dangerous opponent and you know that time is no good for your body. What would you do?|
|Feb-24-15|| ||chancho: <RookFile> Wasn't it Mrs Piatigorsky the one who requested the time change?|
|Feb-24-15|| ||RookFile: I don't remember. Maybe, it was the husband, maybe the wife. Make it the wife if you want.|
|Feb-24-15|| ||chancho: I think it was the Wife.
From Petrosianic's link:
<However, Mrs. Gregor Piatigorsky, one of the sponsors of the match, had a Sunday afternoon commitment that she didn't want to miss, and so intervened to have the game scheduled for Sunday morning instead of Sunday afternoon. Reshevsky agreed to play then, Fischer didn't want to, and so sat in his hotel room as his clock ran out, deliberately forfeiting the game>
|Feb-24-15|| ||RookFile: That's fine. Mrs. Piatigorsky. She wanted to go see somebody play the piano. Anyway, what would you do?|
There's no right or wrong answer. For example, Reshevsky knew which side his bread was buttered on, they had probably been giving him money in various forms for years.
|Feb-24-15|| ||keypusher: <RookFile> I know you know there's a page for the Fischer-Reshevsky match, because you've posted on it.|
Fischer - Reshevsky (1961)
|Feb-24-15|| ||Petrosianic: It was a messy match. Granted, Fischer didn't handle it very well, but Mrs. P was the primary villain, scheduling a public match by pros around her own social schedule, as though it was a trained seal act or something.|
Fischer had tried to argue that it was too early to play, but he'd played even earlier at Leipzig. More likely it was the indignity of taking a back seat to the sponsor's whims.
It was Reshevsky's (obviousy biased but possibly partly true) view that Fischer had simply had enough of the match and used it as an excuse to get out. Reshevsky thought that Fischer was embarrassed by his failure to win the adjourned Game 11, after boasting so publicly that he was going to.
|Feb-24-15|| ||RookFile: Well, I'll answer my question. I think there were 5 games left in the match. Under the unfair conditions, this is what I would have done:|
With white, I would have played and repeated the Maroczy Bind setup from game 10. Reshevsky would have allowed that, because he was betting the whole match on the Accelerated Dragon.
You play this, and just take a look. If there's nothing there, you just offer a draw around move 30, and Reshevsky accepts it.
I quite agree with Petrosianic's comment that it is insulting to be treated as trained seals.
Anyway, that's what I would have done, but I can understand Fischer saying that a contract is a contract.
|Feb-25-15|| ||Eyal: http://www.chess.com/blog/Spektrows...|
Translated materials from old <64> volumes
|Feb-27-15|| ||keypusher: <Eyal> Thanks for posting these here and on Fischer - Taimanov Candidates Quarterfinal (1971). I was struck by this from Krogius:|
<They say that Fischer won 13 games against Larry Evans. Zarubin concludes that Balashov has great knowledge of Fischer's body of work, and Fischer himself has a phenomenal memory.
I think that the 13-0 score cannot be used as a proof for the author's conclusions. A well-known game between two American grandmasters in the 1962/63 US Championship ended in a draw at move 33 (Grunfeld Defence, Evans played White). This game was published in foreign magazines, mentioned by Fischer in his book My 60 Memorable Games and even published in the Shakhmatniy Bulleten' #5, 1963. There were other drawn games: Fischer - Evans, 1958/59 US Championship (Sicilian), published in Shakhmatniy Bulleten' #6, 1959, and Evans - Fischer, 1966/67 US Championship (English opening), published in Shakhmatniy Bulleten' #6, 1967.>
Amazing that we can look up all the games between them now with a couple of mouse clicks.
|Feb-27-15|| ||Petrosianic: He won 2 games from Evans. 13 is the number he won from Bisguier.|
|Feb-27-15|| ||RookFile: Now keypusher, you should know that there is a different page for a post like that. :)|
|Feb-27-15|| ||keypusher: <RookFile: Now keypusher, you should know that there is a different page for a post like that. :)>|
Actually, the quoted language comes from Eyal's link, which is stuff from <64> about the Fischer-Larsen match. Sort of an souped-up internet version of <Russians v. Fischer>. Well worth a look.
It's going to be tougher and tougher for chess-book authors with all the amazing things now available on the internet.
|Dec-18-15|| ||thegoodanarchist: <RookFile: Now keypusher, you should know that there is a different page for a post like that. :)>|
Don't be so sure that guy would know.
|Jun-24-16|| ||offramp: The games of this match were outstanding.
Some of the games in the Taimanov match were a bit substandard (not Fischer's fault) but both players played very well in this match.
Larsen, sadly, was too optimistic before it began and too fatalistic at the end.
|Jun-24-16|| ||cwcarlson: I saw all six games. Larsen was hard to recognize in games 3 and 4, but the others were unforgettable, especially the first. Bobby played quickly and confidently while Larsen sweated and ran low on time. Hard to believe it was 45 years ago!|
|Jun-24-16|| ||parisattack: Tempus fugit <cwcarlson>. It was indeed a memorable match and we were there!|
Hope all is well your way.
|Jun-24-16|| ||brankat: Bobby was just Lucky. As always :-)|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC