Player: Rudolf Spielmann
| page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 26
|1. B Kostic vs Spielmann
|| ||½-½||56||1931||Bled||A12 English with b3|
|2. Spielmann vs Pirc
||1-0||42||1931||Bled||D43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav|
|3. Stoltz vs Spielmann
|| ||½-½||36||1931||Bled||A84 Dutch|
|4. Spielmann vs Flohr
||½-½||15||1931||Bled||B11 Caro-Kann, Two Knights, 3...Bg4|
|5. Tartakower vs Spielmann
|| ||½-½||92||1931||Bled||D30 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|6. Spielmann vs Bogoljubov
||1-0||54||1931||Bled||B80 Sicilian, Scheveningen|
|7. L Asztalos vs Spielmann
|| ||0-1||22||1931||Bled||C14 French, Classical|
|8. Spielmann vs Kashdan
|| ||½-½||42||1931||Bled||D31 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|9. Vidmar vs Spielmann
|| ||½-½||18||1931||Bled||A46 Queen's Pawn Game|
|10. Spielmann vs Maroczy
||0-1||48||1931||Bled||D62 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox, Rubinstein Attack|
|11. Colle vs Spielmann
||1-0||50||1931||Bled||D04 Queen's Pawn Game|
|12. Spielmann vs Alekhine
|| ||½-½||23||1931||Bled||D43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav|
|13. Nimzowitsch vs Spielmann
|| ||½-½||37||1931||Bled||A28 English|
|14. Spielmann vs B Kostic
|| ||½-½||40||1931||Bled||D08 Queen's Gambit Declined, Albin Counter Gambit|
|15. Pirc vs Spielmann
|| ||0-1||51||1931||Bled||E34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation|
|16. Spielmann vs Stoltz
||0-1||51||1931||Bled||D26 Queen's Gambit Accepted|
|17. Flohr vs Spielmann
|| ||1-0||55||1931||Bled||D55 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|18. Spielmann vs Tartakower
|| ||½-½||35||1931||Bled||C53 Giuoco Piano|
|19. Bogoljubov vs Spielmann
|| ||½-½||33||1931||Bled||D55 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|20. Spielmann vs L Asztalos
|| ||½-½||36||1931||Bled||C07 French, Tarrasch|
|21. Kashdan vs Spielmann
|| ||½-½||28||1931||Bled||D52 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|22. Spielmann vs Vidmar
||1-0||43||1931||Bled||C86 Ruy Lopez, Worrall Attack|
|23. Maroczy vs Spielmann
|| ||½-½||30||1931||Bled||C47 Four Knights|
|24. Spielmann vs Colle
||0-1||75||1931||Bled||B03 Alekhine's Defense|
|25. Spielmann vs Nimzowitsch
| page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 26
TIP: You can make the above ads go away by registering a free account!
|Nov-29-12|| ||Mrs. Alekhine: Contemporary Report:
<"This tournament yielded the victory for Alexander Alekhine which seemed inevitable from a very early stage. The World Champion, moreover won by a margin of 5½ points over his nearest rival, which is a record in a contest of such importance. The nearest parallel we can find is Dr Lasker's achievement in the London tournament of 1899 when he scored 22½, 4½ ahead of Janowski, Maroczy and Pillsbury who all tied on 18 points. It is indeed a great <<<triumph>>> for the champion, and was accomplished with consummate ease. He did not lose a game (Lasker in 1899 lost one, a famous game, to Blackburne), and of his eleven draws, eight occurred in the second half of the tournament, when he could afford to save himself too much exertion. He had some narrow escapes, notably in the first game with Asztalos, when he was lucky to draw; and in the second game with Kashdan he had to struggle for 74 moves to gain a half-point.>
-British Chess Magazine 1931, p499
Draw with <Asztalos>: L Asztalos vs Alekhine, 1931
Draw with <Kashdan>: Alekhine vs Kashdan, 1931
|Dec-30-12|| ||wordfunph: Bled 1931 1st Round as detailed in Chess Monthly 2003 #03: |
The playing area was covered in a cloud of tobacco smoke. The behaviour of some of the spectators was highly familiar. During play, one of the 'amateurs' came up to Bogoljubow with the words "Give me a light!"
|Aug-08-13|| ||jerseybob: wordfunph:When I smell cigar smoke I think of chess and the good ole Franklin Mercantile in Philly.|
|Sep-29-13|| ||GrahamClayton: Why was Round 19 held in Ljubljana?
Nimzowitsch said of Alekhine's performance - "He is playing with us as though with children".
|Aug-30-14|| ||Benzol: Surprisingly the bio of Akiba Rubinstein omits his involvement with this tournament. I wonder why?|
|Jul-27-15|| ||offramp: <Benzol: Surprisingly the bio of Akiba Rubinstein omits his involvement with this tournament. I wonder why?> Probably because he didn't play in it.|
|Jul-27-15|| ||Howard: Rubinstein was on the brink of retirement by the time this event took place. |
However, I have both volumes that Donaldson and Minev did on him---let me look that up this evening.
|Jul-27-15|| ||Benzol: I wonder if anybody actually reads the introductions to these tournament pages. Hmmm...|
|Jul-28-15|| ||offramp: I know that Rubinstein is mentioned in the intro - tangentially. |
It's like a story boring people tell:
"I nearly got invited to the Queen's tea party but when the invite turned up it was too late to reply."
|Jul-28-15|| ||OhioChessFan: <Benzol> do you know exactly what day Stoltz accepted and Rubinstein belatedly accepted only to be rejected? I think that would add an interesting point to the narrative.|
I did a little grammatical housekeeping, but noticed a substantial point I think deserves attention. To say that Rubinstein was "forced to bow out" is a little bit misleading, since he was never in, in the first place. I accept that may be splitting a semantical hair, but it was very noticeable in my reading.
|Jul-28-15|| ||thomastonk: <Ohio> The main source mentioned in the introduction ("Bled 1931 International Chess Tournament book published by Caissa Editions. ISBN 939433-03-6") has a main author: Hans Kmoch. Kmoch wrote the original manuscript in German, which seems to be unpublished. A Russian translation was published by S.O. Weistein and A.A. Smirnov in 1934. This work was translated by Jimmy Adams, some extra articles and analyses were added, and the book appeared in 1987.|
Kmoch wrote a chapter "The organisation of the tournament", and I quote from it.
<Several weeks before the Prague Chess Olympiad, I received an offer to take on the mangement of the tournament. Invitations to its particpants had already been distributed earlier by the tournament committee. At the beginning of the preliminary organisational work, only three places remaind unfilled; however the committee gave me rather more names of candidates for these.
I conducted negotiations with them, mainly by word of mouth, during the Prague Olympiad. Regrettably, Euwe declined [in a letter to me] because of lack of time. Sultan Khan also declined from participating, since the Bled tournament clashed with the British championship at Worcester. Rubinstein, not satisfied with the ordinary letter of invitation, wanted to receive the printed programme of the tournament and also required time for reflection. Tartakower, not long before having returned from South Africa, accepted the invitation at once. Before leaving Prague, I had received the agreement of the following persons: Alekhine, Asztalos, Bogoljubov, Vidmar, Kashdan, Kostich, Maroczy, Nimzovitch, Pirc, Tartakower, Flohr and Spielmann. One place continued to be provisionally allocated to Rubinstein, for the other, the candidates were Colle, Lajos Steiner and Stoltz. The choice between them, I had to leave to the tournament committee, and I was all the more willing to do this in that I did not want to offend one of my friends. On parting with Rubinstein in Prague, I gave him advance notice that I would send him a new invitation from Bled, but with this it would be necessary to fix a definite date for him to reply. When I arrived in Bled on the 10th August, I learned that Rubinstein had exchanged letters with Vidmar, who, in a very friendly way, had tried to persuade him to accept, whilst pointing out that he must give his final reply within a week, otherwise the committee would be forced to interpret this further hesitation as a refusal. This was necessary in order to have sufficient time available to find replacement. Meanwhile the burgomaster of Bled expessed the wish that the 14th place be given to Colle, as a representative of Belgium. For the second candidate, he put forward the Swede, Stoltz, with L.Steiner only third, since Hungary was already represented by grandmaster Maroczy. The fact of the matter is that to organise a tournament, where the ten places allocated to foreigners were for distribution amongst the representatives of ten different countries, required definite decisions. Thus, six days before the opening of the tournament, on the 16th August, the date of reply for Rubinstein expired. The next candidate, Stoltz, needed three days for travel from Sweden. No time could be lost. Therefore, on the 16th August at 11.30 in the evening, I sent an invitation by telegraph to Stoltz, and on the following morning received an affirmative reply from him. On the same day, in the evening, arrived a telegram from Rubinstein, expressing his agreement! In the circumstances, there was nothing left but to reply to him by telegraph that he was too late. Everyone, including of course myself, was very upset by this incident, which was the subject of keen discussion both before and also during the tournament. However, I had no right to act otherwise, if I did not want seriously violate the programme of the tournament. At the end of the tournament, it turned out that the invitation of the young Swedish master was a fortunate occurence, since he achieved an outstanding result.>
|Jul-29-15|| ||Benzol: <thomastonk> Many thanks. You've answered <OhioChessFan>'s query very well with that quote.|
|Aug-06-15|| ||OhioChessFan: All I can think is, "Poor Kmoch".|
|Dec-30-15|| ||thegoodanarchist: In my earlier, tournament, life I would play the Pirc Defense against 1.e4.|
Imagine my consternation to see Vasja Pirc finish last, behind a more relative unknown named Asztalos.
Consternation gave way to relief when I saw that V. Pirc dominated L. Asztalos by the score of 2 - 0.
|May-18-16|| ||offramp: Only two players managed a level score with Alekhine. Geeky Kashdan and tailender Aszolotolz.|
|Jan-21-17|| ||ughaibu: What about Spielmann?|
|Nov-08-17|| ||andrewjsacks: Never forget that Capablanca and Lasker were not here.|
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC