chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆
TOURNAMENT STANDINGS
Amsterdam Tournament

Hendrik van Hartingsvelt0/1(+0 -1 =0)[games]
Richard Reti4.5/6(+3 -0 =3)[games]
Geza Maroczy4/6(+2 -0 =4)[games]
Savielly Tartakower4/6(+2 -0 =4)[games]
Max Euwe3.5/6(+3 -2 =1)[games]
Max Marchand2.5/6(+2 -3 =1)[games]
Henri Weenink2/6(+0 -2 =4)[games]
Willem Andreas Theodorus Schelfhout0.5/6(+0 -5 =1)[games]
*

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
Amsterdam (1920)

Three European chess masters were invited to compete against four Dutch players in an international tournament organized in Amsterdam, the Netherlands from May 25th to the 31st, 1920. Among the participants were Hungarian chess master Géza Maroczy, Czechoslovakian master Richard Réti, Hypermodern chess master Savielly Tartakower, and talented amateur Max Euwe, leading the Dutch contingent. The seven players competed in a round robin event. Several exhibition matches with Euwe were played around the tournament, including one with the eventual winner Réti. His win here was the start of a string of successes for the young hypermodern master that would span the 1920's.

The final standings and crosstable:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Réti * ˝ ˝ 1 1 ˝ 1 4˝ =2 Maroczy ˝ * ˝ 1 ˝ ˝ 1 4 =2 Tartakower ˝ ˝ * ˝ 1 ˝ 1 4 4 Euwe 0 0 ˝ * 1 1 1 3˝ 5 Marchand 0 ˝ 0 0 * 1 1 2˝ 6 Weenink ˝ ˝ ˝ 0 0 * ˝ 2 7 Schelfhout 0 0 0 0 0 ˝ * ˝

Original collection: Game Collection: Amsterdam 1920, by User: suenteus po 147.

 page 1 of 1; 22 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Maroczy vs Reti  ½-½471920AmsterdamC11 French
2. W A T Schelfhout vs Euwe  0-1611920AmsterdamC12 French, McCutcheon
3. Tartakower vs Weenink  ½-½391920AmsterdamA03 Bird's Opening
4. Weenink vs W A T Schelfhout  ½-½481920AmsterdamC42 Petrov Defense
5. Reti vs Tartakower  ½-½311920AmsterdamD08 Queen's Gambit Declined, Albin Counter Gambit
6. M Marchand vs Maroczy  ½-½231920AmsterdamC01 French, Exchange
7. M Marchand vs Weenink  1-0371920AmsterdamE10 Queen's Pawn Game
8. Maroczy vs Euwe 1-0391920AmsterdamC83 Ruy Lopez, Open
9. Tartakower vs W A T Schelfhout  1-0341920AmsterdamB18 Caro-Kann, Classical
10. Weenink vs Reti  ½-½341920AmsterdamA52 Budapest Gambit
11. W A T Schelfhout vs Maroczy 0-1231920AmsterdamC30 King's Gambit Declined
12. Euwe vs M Marchand 1-0261920AmsterdamA84 Dutch
13. M Marchand vs W A T Schelfhout  1-0471920AmsterdamD02 Queen's Pawn Game
14. Maroczy vs Tartakower  ½-½471920AmsterdamB18 Caro-Kann, Classical
15. Reti vs Euwe 1-0301920AmsterdamD34 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
16. Tartakower vs M Marchand 1-0601920AmsterdamA13 English
17. W A T Schelfhout vs Reti  0-1411920AmsterdamC29 Vienna Gambit
18. Euwe vs Weenink 1-0281920AmsterdamC66 Ruy Lopez
19. Euwe vs Tartakower  ½-½361920AmsterdamD51 Queen's Gambit Declined
20. Reti vs M Marchand  1-0461920AmsterdamD51 Queen's Gambit Declined
21. Weenink vs Maroczy ½-½341920AmsterdamB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
22. Euwe vs H van Hartingsvelt  1-0311920AmsterdamD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
 page 1 of 1; 22 games  PGN Download 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  


TIP: You can make the above ads go away by registering a free account!

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-17-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Remind me again, between Tartakower and Réti, which one merits the appellation "hypermodernist"?

Maybe both?

Jan-17-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Gyula Breyer
Jan-17-18  Retireborn: <z> Reti is usually listed amongst the hypermoderns, but it was Tartakower who wrote the book on these openings "Die Hypermoderne Schachpartie".

Probably he also considered himself to be one, but the truth about good old Tarta is that he would play almost any opening. He never lost his affection for the Dutch defence & Bird's opening.

Jan-17-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: But Reti wrote "Modern Ideas in Chess" (1922) before Tartakower's "The Hypermodern Chess Game" (1924).

Both beat out Nimzowitsch's "My System" (1925-1927).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper...

I don't like the bio's clear bias towards Tartakower. Just saying...

Jan-17-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Oh yeah, Breyer is on the list too, at least according to Averbakh:

<Leading members were Aron Nimzowitsch, Richard Réti, Savielly Tartakower, Gyula Breyer, and Ernst Grünfeld, who all came from Central Europe>

(ibid)

Jan-17-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Is the Bird a hypermodern opening?

Hmmm...

Henry Edward Bird

.

Jan-17-18  Retireborn: <z> The Bird probably wouldn't be thought of as hypermodern back in the 20s, as it occupies the centre with a pawn. Hypermodern pretty much meant flank openings for White and new, un-Tarrasch like defences (Alekhine, Gruenfeld etc) for Black.

I agree that it's slightly odd to characterize Tarta as "hypermodern". One notes that the other players are described by their nationalities, so perhaps the writer was uncertain about which nationality to ascribe to him and just picked another word at random.

Jan-21-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Reti has an article in the Dutch chess periodical analyzing the tournament play which looks to be interesting. It's in Dutch, unfortunately for me. But if I can pile through it I might come back with excerpts + refs.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC