|Steinitz - Zukertort (1872)|
Played in London from August 6th to September 5th. This is the match later described as being played when "Zukertort was not yet Zukertort". Steinitz dominated the entire way, reaching the needed 7 wins within 12 games and suffering only a single loss.|
Zukertort had White in the odd-numbered games.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2
Steinitz 1 1 = = 1 1 = 0 1 1 = 1 9
Zukertort 0 0 = = 0 0 = 1 0 0 = 0 3
Original collection: Game Collection: WCC Index ( Steinitz - Zukertort 1872 ), by User: Benzol.
| page 1 of 1; 12 games
TIP: You can make the above ads go away by registering a free account!
|Jun-12-13|| ||brankat: From the intro: <"..this is the match later described as being played when "Zukertort was not yet Zukertort."">|
Somehow the timing of Zuckertort's matches was not in his favour. After 1886 WC match it was then added: "..Zuckertort was no longer Zukertort." :-)
|Mar-31-14|| ||Tal1949: He lost in 1872 and 1886, so perhaps Zukertort was never Zukertort. Lol.|
|Mar-31-14|| ||Poulsen: In London 1883 Zukertort was very much Zukertort.|
|Aug-09-15|| ||RookFile: By 1888 he would be dead Zukertort. A reminder to take care of your health.|
|Feb-21-17|| ||zanzibar: Zukertort was pretty close to being his best though, I wouldn't say he was playing truly subpar chess relative to his peak:|
He probably was still acclimating himself to the English styles, both on and off the board.
At the very end of his life, however, the decline due to health and nerves is quite apparent.
Year - Rating
1872 - 2586
1878 - 2678 (peak)
1886 - 2544
1888 - 2468 (very end)
His 2600+ years were lasted a little over a decade, 1873-1884.
According to EDOchess, 1883 would have been the most competitive year for a match between these two players.
|Feb-21-17|| ||zanzibar: I'd like to know more about the circumstances of these match - i.e. who arranged it, and whether a purse was involved, etc., etc.|
Harding in his Victorian players seems to gloss over it with nary a mention (though at least one game is included).
|Feb-21-17|| ||zanzibar: Bird, on p11 of his <Steinitz & Lasker Match (1894)> lists the purse for a few selected matches, including this one (I think).|
It's given as £20.
(For the record, here's the entire footnote:
Note.—In former times such stakes were unheard of, and, we believe, not thought of. Prior to the debut of Mr. Steinitz in 1862, the highest amount ever played for in a chess match was £100 a side: the cases were (1) Staunton and St. Amant (Paris, 1843), Championship England and France; (2) Morphy and Lowenthal, 1858—exceptional, Morphy having been always willing to play for a nominal stake. With the match between Steinitz and Anderssen in 1866, the present system of high stakes was inaugurated. The Westminster Chess Club, then meeting at Paine's Gordon Hotel, Covent Garden, found £ 100 a side for this match.
Previously £10, £20, or at most £50 was considered a politic stake for a match. Bird and Falkbeer, 1859, was for £10; Steinitz and Blackburne, 1862, was for £10; Bird and Steinitz, December, 1866, £20; Steinitz and Zukertort, 1872, £20; Wisker and Bird, 1873, £5. Morphy had played both Harrwitz and Anderssen for nominal stakes. In 1885 lovers of chess heard with regret that Steinitz and Zukertort were to play for £400 a side. Lasker's first match in this country in 1889 was played at Liverpool against Bird; the total stake was £10.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC