|San Antonio (1972)|
In 1972, while the world's gaze was fixed on Iceland, a company in America had plans to generate publicity for itself through the chess world. Church's Fried Chicken, a restaurant chain in the United States, organized an international tournament to be held in San Antonio, Texas. European and Soviet grandmasters were pitted against grandmasters and masters from the Americas in a round robin format. The sixteen participants were (in order of Elo rating): Tigran Petrosian (2645), Lajos Portisch (2640), Anatoli Karpov (2630), Bent Larsen (2625), Vlastimil Hort (2600), Paul Keres (2600), Svetozar Gligoric (2575), Henrique Mecking (2570), Larry Evans (2545), Walter Shawn Browne (2530), Donald Byrne (2470), Julio Kaplan (2470), Duncan Suttles (2470), Dr. Anthony Saidy (2425), Ken Smith (2395), and Mario Campos Lopez (2200). The tournament ended with the top three seeds sharing first place.
San Antonio, Texas USA, 19 November - 5 December 1972
Original collection: Game Collection: San Antonio 1972 User: suenteus po 147.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
01 Portisch * ½ 1 0 1 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 1 10.5
02 Petrosian ½ * ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 10.5
03 Karpov 0 ½ * 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 1 1 10.5
04 Gligoric 1 0 0 * ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 1 1 10.0
05 Keres 0 ½ ½ ½ * 1 ½ 1 1 1 0 ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 9.5
06 Hort 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 * ½ 1 0 ½ ½ 1 1 1 1 1 9.0
07 Suttles ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 1 1 1 9.0
08 Mecking ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ * 1 ½ ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 8.5
09 Larsen 0 0 ½ ½ 0 1 ½ 0 * 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 8.5
10 Byrne ½ ½ 0 0 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 * 1 0 ½ 1 1 1 7.0
11 Evans ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ 0 0 * ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 6.5
12 Browne ½ ½ 0 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 1 1 ½ * 1 0 0 1 6.5
13 Kaplan 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 0 0 0 ½ 1 0 * 1 ½ 0 5.0
14 Campos Lopez ½ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ½ 1 0 * 1 ½ 3.5
15 Saidy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ½ 0 0 ½ 1 ½ 0 * 1 3.5
16 Smith 0 0 0 0 ½ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ½ 0 * 2.0
| page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 120
|1. D Byrne vs Petrosian
||½-½||22||1972||San Antonio||A00 Uncommon Opening|
|2. Keres vs Hort
||1-0||60||1972||San Antonio||E14 Queen's Indian|
|3. Larsen vs K R Smith
||1-0||24||1972||San Antonio||D11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|4. Suttles vs Gligoric
|| ||0-1||48||1972||San Antonio||E81 King's Indian, Samisch|
|5. M C Lopez vs Portisch
|| ||½-½||33||1972||San Antonio||B42 Sicilian, Kan|
|6. Mecking vs J Kaplan
||1-0||31||1972||San Antonio||B44 Sicilian|
|7. Browne vs Larry Evans
|| ||½-½||25||1972||San Antonio||A43 Old Benoni|
|8. Saidy vs Karpov
||0-1||52||1972||San Antonio||A07 King's Indian Attack|
|9. Keres vs Mecking
||1-0||28||1972||San Antonio||D32 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch|
|10. K R Smith vs M C Lopez
||½-½||64||1972||San Antonio||C02 French, Advance|
|11. J Kaplan vs Saidy
|| ||½-½||69||1972||San Antonio||B92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation|
|12. Gligoric vs D Byrne
|| ||1-0||39||1972||San Antonio||D91 Grunfeld, 5.Bg5|
|13. Hort vs Petrosian
|| ||½-½||13||1972||San Antonio||B52 Sicilian, Canal-Sokolsky (Rossolimo) Attack|
|14. Portisch vs Suttles
|| ||½-½||40||1972||San Antonio||B08 Pirc, Classical|
|15. Larry Evans vs Larsen
||0-1||43||1972||San Antonio||A14 English|
|16. Karpov vs Browne
||1-0||59||1972||San Antonio||A30 English, Symmetrical|
|17. Petrosian vs Gligoric
||1-0||35||1972||San Antonio||E81 King's Indian, Samisch|
|18. Saidy vs Keres
||0-1||55||1972||San Antonio||D02 Queen's Pawn Game|
|19. D Byrne vs Portisch
|| ||½-½||32||1972||San Antonio||A22 English|
|20. M C Lopez vs Larry Evans
|| ||½-½||41||1972||San Antonio||B96 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|21. Larsen vs Karpov
|| ||½-½||33||1972||San Antonio||E17 Queen's Indian|
|22. Suttles vs K R Smith
||1-0||49||1972||San Antonio||A07 King's Indian Attack|
|23. Mecking vs Hort
|| ||0-1||87||1972||San Antonio||B68 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack, 7...a6 Defense, 9...Be7|
|24. Browne vs J Kaplan
||1-0||24||1972||San Antonio||B54 Sicilian|
|25. Mecking vs Saidy
|| ||½-½||41||1972||San Antonio||B90 Sicilian, Najdorf|
| page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 120
TIP: You can make the above ads go away by registering a free account!
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
|Oct-17-13|| ||TheFocus: So we can expect another GM tournament in 2054?
I ain't gonna live long enough to see it. I'm taking a dirt vacation by then.
|Jan-13-14|| ||EdZelli: I wish we could get some sponsorships like the old days. Lots of good players in the south ie. San Anton, Dallas, Houston etc.|
|Jan-14-14|| ||SChesshevsky: < EdZelli: I wish we could get some sponsorships like the old days. Lots of good players in the south ie. San Anton, Dallas, Houston etc.>|
Fischermania can probably be thanked for this tourney and his retirement can probably be thanked for the lack of interest by sponsors since.
I believe the idea of the 72 event came up from a suggestion by a GM or USCF official, I forget which, when having dinner with the Church's. Of course, it was hoped Fischer would show and if I remember right he did but only as a spectator for a very short time.
|Aug-15-14|| ||SteinitzLives: What a glorious window of chess sponsorship opportunity was open but for such a brief moment thanks to the Fischer boom. A shame organizers and Fischer himself could not or would not jump in to get more sponsors to participate, and bring big money to chess.|
Petrosian, Karpov and Keres all came to the U.S. to play in the San Antonio tourney, (which was rare, but there was a slight hope that Fischer might play in it). Kavalek would have played, but chose preparation for, and the Olympiad instead, maybe not a great choice, but understandable since there was hope Fischer would play on the Olympiad team too!
Kavalek had committed to the Olympiad, thinking that with Fischer possibly on the team, the U.S. had a real shot at a medal. This info. is per one of Kavalek's lectures in the D.C. metro area just a few years ago.
|Aug-15-14|| ||MissScarlett: Lubosh, still hanging on Fischer's coat-tails after all these years.|
|Nov-12-14|| ||waustad: The idea of a fried chicken tournament has continued: http://chess-results.com/tnr146254....|
|Nov-12-14|| ||waustad: Admittedly it doesn't have quite as big names.|
|Nov-12-14|| ||Petrosianic: <Of course, it was hoped Fischer would show and if I remember right he did but only as a spectator for a very short time.>|
He was in the audience for part of the final round.
|Nov-16-14|| ||Howard: Yes, Fischer did make a brief appearance at the event----Chess Life and Review (as it was called at the time) had a small picture of him, in fact, taken at the tournament.|
|Nov-16-14|| ||HeMateMe: How about a KFC speed tournament, just for all of the hustlers in the park, who like the extra crispy wings, smothered in ketchup or barbecue sauce? You know who you are...|
|Jul-17-15|| ||thegoodanarchist: <Phony Benoni: <FSR> Thanks for checking. Had a vague memory of some information being in the book.>|
I have that same memory about many of my college text books.
|Apr-15-16|| ||offramp: It's a shame there were no Fried Chicken Fried Livers.|
|Mar-23-18|| ||MissScarlett: Shortly after this tournament, on December 12th, a massive simultaneous display took place in the La Salle Hotel in Chicago, featuring the three Soviet players. |
The details aren't exactly clear, but a piece by Joel Havemann of the <Chicago Sun-Times Service> in the <Minnesota Star> of December 15th, reports a final score in favour of the Soviet Union of 186-12, suggesting each player faced 66 boards - Karpov drew 3; Petrosian lost 3 and drew 3; Keres lost 5 and drew 2.
Havemann gave his loss to Karpov (sample annotation: <At move 8, Joe Hopkins, a spectator, walks by and says Karpov has put me in a Mroczy [sic] bind. Thanks a lot. Who's Maroczy?>) but the score has a very glaring problem, so the only reliable game I could find is: Keres vs Paul R Little, 1972
Three of Karpov's games (all draws, vs Taylor, Mulberry and Markewycz), apparently from this simul, are in the DB. Did <Chess Life & Review > cover this event?
|Mar-23-18|| ||MissScarlett: From Kashdan's column in the <LA Times> of December 17th 1972, Sect.I, p.8:|
<World champion Bobby Fischer, now a resident of this area, visited the tournament during the last round. He stated that the playing conditions were very good, including the lighting.
Asked why he had not competed, Fischer replied that the prizes were well below what he would consider adequate. He intends to play in tournaments, but has no commitment at present.
The total prize fund was over $10,000. The three winners divided the top prizes of $4000, $2,000 and $1,000. All traveling and living expenses during the event were paid by the sponsor.>
|Mar-23-18|| ||offramp: I visualise the competitors dining 24/7 like Boss Hogg.|
|Sep-24-18|| ||keypusher: Ken Smith had black in all three of his games against the Soviet contingent. He played a total of 205 moves (nearly 70 moves per game!) and managed a draw against Keres.|
If he'd had white the games probably would have been a lot shorter. :-)
|Sep-25-18|| ||Troller: <Keres and I started out well, but when I for no reason lost a pawn-up adjournment against him I lost some spirit, and hereafter it almost looked like the oldest participant was going to win. But in the last rounds he played poorly while Portisch pulled out a sprint. Before last round Petrosian and Karpov were half a point ahead of the Hungarian but they offered draws against Suttles and Mecking before the games. Pussies! Maybe too much money was at stake? The first 3 prizes were 4000, 2000 and 1000 dollars, a steep decline. The Russians suggested at the beginning of the tournament to cut 1000 dollars from first prize, add 500 dollars to third prize and distribute the remaining on lower prizes. The organizers were willing, if all players approved. I hurried to protest, I do not like changing the conditions that made me come. Although apart from that, it is true that such a big difference between the main prizes is unusual. (In Hastings 1967-68 the first prize was twice the size of second prize, and fourth prize was almost nothing. It has been suggested with great certainty that the four participating grandmasters were unhappy and from the beginning planned to share first which also succeeded.)>|
Bent Larsen 1973 - "Skakbladet" Feb 1973
|Sep-25-18|| ||Olavi: Among professionals in the old days it was agreed that the more the prizes are weighted in favour of the first prize, the more likely one gets lots of ultra short draws, particularly in the last rounds of Opens. This is a given, if you think about it just a little, but somehow organizers and sponsors never seemed to understand.|
|Sep-25-18|| ||Howard: Yes, but keep in mind that "opens" are almost always Swiss tournaments---not round robins.|
As for Larsen's protest, keep in mind that he was objecting (rightfully) towards changing the prize distribution at the last minute.
|Sep-25-18|| ||Olavi: You're right there.
However it happens in round robins too, off the top of my head I remember this shortie Nunn vs Adams, 1991
in the last round between the leader and the young man half a point behind. And the reason they gave was exactly this: the first prize was very big in proportion, so of course Nunn wouldn't take a risk (even if now Curt Hansen could have caught him), while for Adams, with a loss it would have been peanuts.
|Sep-25-18|| ||perfidious: At the 1984 Toronto International, I had my only meeting with the strong master Fred Lindsay, after which he told some interesting stories, one of which I recall to this day.|
Several years before, he had played one of the major American swisses which was won jointly by Gheorghiu.
In the last round, Gheorghiu quickly agreed to a draw on board one, but furtively looked about to make sure at least one other top board did so at the same time.
The droll way in which Lindsay related this has always stayed with me.
|Sep-26-18|| ||Howard: Met Lindsay several times in the late 80's/early 90's. Nice guy.|
Are you implying, by the way, that Gheorghiu had "conspired" with someone else, as far as agreeing to a draw ?
|Sep-26-18|| ||moronovich: <Are you implying, by the way, that Gheorghiu had "conspired" with someone else, as far as agreeing to a draw ?>|
I think it is well known that Gheorghiu did that occasionally.E.g. Larsen mentioned it a couple of times.
|Sep-26-18|| ||perfidious: Perhaps the kibitzing at Gheorghiu vs L Piasetski, 1977 will shed some light on the Roumanian grandmaster's tendencies for any doubting Thomases, past, present and future.|
|Sep-27-18|| ||Howard: The Oxford Companion to Chess (second edition, 1993) also states similar regarding Gheorghiu, as I recall. It said that he did have a reputation for rigging games.|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
- No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
- NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
- Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
- All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
- Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC