Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 Capablanca - Marshall (1909) Chess Event Description
... [more]

Player: Jose Raul Capablanca

 page 1 of 1; 23 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Marshall vs Capablanca ½-½301909Capablanca - MarshallD33 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
2. Capablanca vs Marshall 1-0321909Capablanca - MarshallC63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defense
3. Marshall vs Capablanca ½-½361909Capablanca - MarshallD53 Queen's Gambit Declined
4. Capablanca vs Marshall ½-½191909Capablanca - MarshallC66 Ruy Lopez
5. Marshall vs Capablanca 0-1521909Capablanca - MarshallD53 Queen's Gambit Declined
6. Capablanca vs Marshall 1-0391909Capablanca - MarshallC62 Ruy Lopez, Old Steinitz Defense
7. Marshall vs Capablanca 1-0251909Capablanca - MarshallD53 Queen's Gambit Declined
8. Capablanca vs Marshall 1-0311909Capablanca - MarshallC62 Ruy Lopez, Old Steinitz Defense
9. Marshall vs Capablanca ½-½671909Capablanca - MarshallD53 Queen's Gambit Declined
10. Capablanca vs Marshall ½-½491909Capablanca - MarshallC63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defense
11. Marshall vs Capablanca 0-1431909Capablanca - MarshallD53 Queen's Gambit Declined
12. Capablanca vs Marshall 1-0551909Capablanca - MarshallC63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defense
13. Marshall vs Capablanca 0-1491909Capablanca - MarshallD53 Queen's Gambit Declined
14. Capablanca vs Marshall ½-½311909Capablanca - MarshallC74 Ruy Lopez, Modern Steinitz Defense
15. Marshall vs Capablanca ½-½311909Capablanca - MarshallD53 Queen's Gambit Declined
16. Capablanca vs Marshall ½-½561909Capablanca - MarshallC49 Four Knights
17. Marshall vs Capablanca ½-½451909Capablanca - MarshallC49 Four Knights
18. Capablanca vs Marshall ½-½241909Capablanca - MarshallC49 Four Knights
19. Marshall vs Capablanca ½-½151909Capablanca - MarshallD00 Queen's Pawn Game
20. Capablanca vs Marshall ½-½251909Capablanca - MarshallC42 Petrov Defense
21. Marshall vs Capablanca ½-½391909Capablanca - MarshallD53 Queen's Gambit Declined
22. Capablanca vs Marshall ½-½261909Capablanca - MarshallC42 Petrov Defense
23. Marshall vs Capablanca 0-1491909Capablanca - MarshallD33 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch
 page 1 of 1; 23 games  PGN Download 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Capablanca wins | Capablanca loses  

TIP: You can make the above ads go away by registering a free account!

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-16-13  Caissanist: It has always seemed to me that Marshall and Capablanca had a quid pro quo arrangment of some kind after Capablanca won this match. Perhaps Capablanca agreed not to pursue the US championship title, and in return Marshall committed to helping Capablanca get an invitation to a top European tournament. Marshall's lobbying campaign to get Capablanca invited to the 1911 San Sebastian tournament was rather unusual, and I have to think he had motives other than simple altruism.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Well, Capa was not interested in the U.S. title, but the world title.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Capablanca's response, quoted above from the <American Chess Bulletin> is spot on. Instead of arguing over whether he was or not U.S. champion, he set himself higher as the champion of the Americas (or the Western Hemisphere). Clever resolution to a dispute that would otherwise be a petty one for the future world champion.
Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: It makes sense. Marshall knew that if it came to another match against Capa he would almost certainly lose, but this way he could obtain and keep his US championship. Capa wanted to go ahead with his plans towards the ultimate goal of the WChampionship. San Sebastian was a logical and necessary step for him. But what neither one of them dreamed was that Capa would actually win San Sebastian...
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Capablanca comes out of this very well. He was initially led to believe that the match was "for the U.S. Championship". It would not seem to matter that he was a Cuban because "Cuba was at this time an American possession".

When a row starts he states, very diplomatically, that he is instead "Champion of the Americas" in the continental sense, and that seems to calm everyone down.

Within two years he would begin his long search for a match with Dr Lasker!

Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: This match was played at 8 venues, as far as I can make out.

The Brooklyn Chess Club hosted only games 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 & 20 and every one of them was drawn.

Game 19 was drawn in 15 moves!

Apr-25-17  sudoplatov: Actually, Cuba was independent since 1902. During the Spanish-American War, the US declared that Cuba would become independent after the war (it took about 4 years; probably to sign all the forms).

I assume that Marshall and Capablanca were friends until death; probably as there were few others in the Western Hemisphere who could talk chess to them.

Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: The match moved around perhaps even more than the intro indicates.

The first three games, beginning at 2pm, began in the large banquet room of the Ansonia, 2nd floor Broadway & 73rd.

Then the first two of a series of five at Manhattan Chess Club, etc.

Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <NYT>, Thursday, January 7th 1909, p.7:

<Frank J. Marshall, who is on board the steamship Batavia, due to-day, has been matched to play a series of three games against Jose R. Capablanca, the young Cuban expert, at the Rice Chess Club on Saturday, Sunday and Monday.>

<NYT>, January 10th 1909, Part IV p.3:

<In consequence of the indisposition of Frank J. Marshall, who returned from Europe on Friday, the series of three games between him and Jose R. Capablanca for a purse provided by Felix E. Kahn of the Manhattan Chess Club was not begun yesterday as scheduled. Capablanca was on hand and will be ready at 2 o'clock this afternoon, in case Marshall is in condition to proceed.>

I'm tempted to think that Marshall, who was always up for a fight, threw a sickie. Not that I'm suggesting he was scared; he was returning to America after a 20-month absence (so he could be forgiven for not having first-hand knowledge of Capa's strength), with his wife and child in tow, and the ship docked five days late due to hazardous weather. Perhaps Marshall deserves the benefit of the doubt - the <BDE> of January 15th reporting on his first public engagement, a simul in which he lost eight of thirty-two games, mentioned his 'suffering from a cold' and that he 'looked none too well physically'.

The <New York Tribune> of January 21st, p.5, details the agreement for a match between Marshall and Jaffe to start January 31st: <The backers of Marshall also announced yesterday that they had the sum of $600 ready to put on Marshall for a set match against any player in the United States, Jose R. Capablanca preferred. The latter, however, will not return from his tour until March.>

Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: The Sun (New York), July 4th 1909, p.7:

<There has been a great deal of criticism among chess players everywhere over the way in which the recently concluded Marshall-Capablanca match was managed, and especially among those whose financial aid made the contest possible.

The match was one of "eight games up, draws not to count," that is, the player first to win eight games would be the victor. The first three games were played in public for gate receipts, the remaining to be contested at clubs subscribing so much per game, the management to receive 10 per cent. of the profits.

The fact that Capablanca was able to win seven of the first thirteen games played, drawing five and losing but one, and should then be unable to score the final win necessary to terminate the match - drawing nine games in succession, gave rise to the widespread suspicion that these final games were "fixed," or at least that Capablanca was deliberately prolonging the match and refusing to win the final game for the purpose of making more money. Nothing could be more untrue. Nothing could place this young Cuban genius in a falser light, or do more to hurt his standing among chess players or his reputation generally. Such an offence if true would be sufficient to bar him from international tournaments, and a well known amateur expressed the opinion of many when he said that Capablanca's apparent inability to win the final game was doing less injury to his reputation as a player than to his reputation as a man.

The fact is that it was Marshall and not Capablanca who was playing for the draw. As Marshall himself openly and publicly asserted, toward the end of the match he had no chance of winning out against such a handicap, and consequently the best that he could do would be to draw as many games as possible, thereby prolonging the match, and owing to the terms of agreement making more out of it. And in this, for a time at least, he was successful; for it is no easy thing to give the odds of a draw to a master of the Marshall calibre, or in other words to win a game of chess from an opponent who is trying simply to draw the game and not win it.

Had the match been played for a side bet or "backing" or for a fixed purse subscribed to by clubs or individuals, or both, there would have been a settled amount for the winner and for the loser and neither side would have had anything to gain by playing for the draw or unnecessarily prolonging the match; both sides would have played for a win from start to finish and the subscribers would have received full value for their money.

It was not until all available funds were exhausted - the referee, Felix E. Khan, having ordered the players to continue even though without compensation - that Marshall lost the final game and with it the match.>

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC