chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 October Revolution 60th Anniversary (1977)

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
Leningrad was host to an international chess tournament to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the October Revolution. The round robin event was held from June 24th to July 19th, 1977. Eighteen grandmasters, including the current world champion and two former world champions, participated in the top event. They were (in order of ELO): Anatoli Karpov (2690), Mikhail Tal (2620), Zoltán Ribli (2595), Oleg Romanishin (2595), Vasily Smyslov (2595), Jan Smejkal (2575), Yuri Balashov (2565), Alexander Beliavsky (2 ... [more]

Player: Lothar Vogt

 page 1 of 1; 17 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Vogt vs A Kochyev  ½-½311977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryB83 Sicilian
2. Smejkal vs Vogt 0-1421977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryE60 King's Indian Defense
3. Vogt vs Vaganian  ½-½181977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryC07 French, Tarrasch
4. Beliavsky vs Vogt  ½-½551977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
5. Vogt vs G Kuzmin  ½-½381977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryC63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defense
6. Vogt vs Karpov  ½-½301977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryB46 Sicilian, Taimanov Variation
7. Ribli vs Vogt  ½-½191977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryB08 Pirc, Classical
8. Vogt vs M Knezevic  0-1491977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryC67 Ruy Lopez
9. I Radulov vs Vogt  ½-½201977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryA10 English
10. Vogt vs S Mariotti  0-1611977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryC64 Ruy Lopez, Classical
11. Tal vs Vogt  ½-½461977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryC95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
12. Vogt vs Balashov  ½-½501977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryC91 Ruy Lopez, Closed
13. Smyslov vs Vogt  1-0401977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
14. Vogt vs G Garcia Gonzalez  1-0461977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryC24 Bishop's Opening
15. Gheorghiu vs Vogt  ½-½131977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryA55 Old Indian, Main line
16. Vogt vs Romanishin  0-1431977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryC00 French Defense
17. Taimanov vs Vogt  1-0601977October Revolution 60th AnniversaryB08 Pirc, Classical
 page 1 of 1; 17 games  PGN Download 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Vogt wins | Vogt loses  


TIP: You can make the above ads go away by registering a free account!

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-15-13  say it with a smile: Above tournament description says "in the wake of Fischer's absence", Since when did Bobby ever play in all Soviet "OCTOBER Revolution" games? Who writes this non-sense?
Dec-15-13  RedShield: A smile is nice, but a brain is better. Go back to sleep.
Dec-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: The full sentence:

<"As usual, Soviet dominance was on full display in the wake of Fischer's absence and the string of successes Karpov had been earning in the void.">

Refers to the general chess scene at the time, not just this particularl tournament. And, by the way, it was not quite an all-Soviet tournament, nor even all-Iron Curtain.

Dec-16-13  FSR: Taimanov had a funny record in this tournament. He had nine decisive games (including beating world champion Karpov and tournament co-winner Romanishin). Black won the first six of those games, and a total of seven of the nine games.
Dec-16-13  RookFile: I'm sure that if Fischer wanted to play in this tournament, they would have made a slot for him.
Sep-21-14  siggemannen: The tourney was kind of "behind the iron curtain", since all foreign players came from Soviet-friendly states of East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Cuba, Bulgaria, Italy, Yugoslavia and Hungary. On the other hand, it was probably a good way to celebrate the Revolution Anniversary
Sep-21-14  Karposian: <siggemannen: The tourney was kind of "behind the iron curtain", since all foreign players came from Soviet-friendly states of East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Cuba, Bulgaria, Italy, Yugoslavia and Hungary.>

Italy?? The NATO member nation Italy?? One of America's closest allies?? I suspect international politics is not your field of expertise...

Sep-21-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Karposian> It is well known that Italy was then filled with millions upon millions of Comminist sympathisers.... (rolls eyes)
Sep-21-14  Karposian: <perfidious: <Karposian> It is well known that Italy was then filled with millions upon millions of Comminist sympathisers.... (rolls eyes>

LOL These Italians may not be Commies anymore, but they're at least Socialists, the whole bunch of 'em :)

Sep-21-14  nok: Right time to recommend the movie "We all loved each other so much".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_All...

Stefania Sandrelli was a total knockout.

Sep-21-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <nok> Not bad at all.
Sep-24-14  siggemannen: Well, Italy might've been in Nato, but had close ties to Soviet in the Togliatti days at least, with Russians licensing those Fiats, and the communist party in Italy was quite strong for many years
Sep-24-14  HeMateMe: In the 70s Italy was the sick man of Europe. That spot is now held by Greece, the fragmented Balkan states and Romania-Moldova.

Italy is a super power, compared to the aforementioned.

Sep-24-14  Absentee: Some of the stuff one reads here on history and politics is enough to give the most sensitive of us a heart attack.
Sep-24-14  Karposian: <Absentee> Well said. I don't even bother to comment further on <siggemannen>'s alternative history lectures.

<HeMateMe> <In the 70s Italy was the sick man of Europe.>

Where does this come from? I'm sorry <HMM> but that is complete nonsense.

You probably confuse Italy with the UK.

<Throughout the 1970s United Kingdom was sometimes called the 'sick man of Europe' by critics of its government at home, because of industrial strife and poor economic performance compared to other European countries culminating with the Winter of Discontent of 1978–1979.> (From Wikipedia)

Sep-24-14  HeMateMe: Surely you can't believe the historically strong U.K. was in worse shape than the politically fragmented Italy? a completely stalemated, ineffective government, corruption up to the very highest office, runaway inflation, high unemployment...Italy in the 70s was only good if you were born there, and didn't know that other people lived differently, in other countries.

I realize that the U.K. was stagnant in the '70s due to the power of the labor unions and its socialist government, but they could never have been worse off than Italy.

Sep-25-14  Karposian: <HeMateMe> <I realize that the U.K. was stagnant in the '70s due to the power of the labor unions and its socialist government, but they could never have been worse off than Italy.>

You are right about the fact that Italy struggled with major political and social turmoil in the 70s.

In addition to the things you mention they also had problems with political extremism, both from the far left and the far right.

My point was though, that despite these problems the term 'the sick man of Europe' was not at all used to describe Italy.

I think that term has little to do with political and social problems. It is used to describe a country going through major economic difficulties. And strictly economically speaking, Italy actually fared better in the 70s than many other major European countries. They were definitely not 'the sick man of Europe' in that way.

Sep-25-14  HSOL: Being too young to know firsthand about the late 70s, from what I've read and seen I've always considered the UK being in a worse state than Italy despite Italy throughout it's history being politically unstable. (Of course it might have to do with my sources having higher expectations on UK than Italy)
May-07-15  paavoh: Smyslov had a solid showing without any losses in this respectable company. His four wins against the tail-enders mostly was not enough to win it all.
Nov-29-16  Howard: Just noticed that the just-deceased Taimanov was the only person to beat Romanishin.
Nov-29-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Gonzales, too...
Nov-30-16  Howard: Think you mean Garcia, but you're quite right! My mistake---Romanishin actually lost two games, not just one.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC