Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Norway Chess (Blitz) Tournament

Sergey Karjakin6.5/9(+6 -2 =1)[games]
Magnus Carlsen6/9(+5 -2 =2)[games]
Viswanathan Anand6/9(+5 -2 =2)[games]
Hikaru Nakamura6/9(+5 -2 =2)[games]
Peter Svidler5.5/9(+5 -3 =1)[games]
Teimour Radjabov5/9(+4 -3 =2)[games]
Jon Ludvig Hammer3.5/9(+2 -4 =3)[games]
Wang Hao3/9(+2 -5 =2)[games]
Levon Aronian2.5/9(+1 -5 =3)[games]
Veselin Topalov1/9(+0 -7 =2)[games]
* Chess Event Description
Norway Chess (Blitz) (2013)

Played 7 May 2013 at the University of Stavanger, Norway to determine the pairings and colors for Norway Chess (2013). Despite two losses, Sergey Karjakin won with 6.5/9.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 Karjakin 2873 * 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 6 2 Carlsen 2856 0 * 1 1 0 1 1 1 6 3 Anand 2783 1 * 0 1 1 0 1 1 6 4 Nakamura 2844 0 0 1 * 1 1 1 1 6 5 Svidler 2757 1 0 0 * 1 1 0 1 1 5 6 Radjabov 2755 0 1 0 0 * 1 1 1 5 7 Hammer 2608 0 0 1 0 0 * 1 3 8 Wang Hao 2698 0 0 0 1 0 0 * 3 9 Aronian 2817 0 0 0 0 0 * 1 2 10 Topalov 2666 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 1

ChessBase report:

Next edition: Norway Chess (Blitz) (2014). Main event: Norway Chess (2013)

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Aronian vs Nakamura 0-1532013Norway Chess (Blitz)A46 Queen's Pawn Game
2. Anand vs J L Hammer 0-1432013Norway Chess (Blitz)C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
3. Topalov vs Karjakin  0-1642013Norway Chess (Blitz)A06 Reti Opening
4. Radjabov vs Svidler  0-1542013Norway Chess (Blitz)A37 English, Symmetrical
5. Svidler vs Anand  0-1292013Norway Chess (Blitz)A30 English, Symmetrical
6. Nakamura vs Topalov  1-0392013Norway Chess (Blitz)A11 English, Caro-Kann Defensive System
7. Karjakin vs Radjabov  1-0502013Norway Chess (Blitz)B30 Sicilian
8. Aronian vs Carlsen 0-1292013Norway Chess (Blitz)A46 Queen's Pawn Game
9. J L Hammer vs Wang Hao  1-0462013Norway Chess (Blitz)D18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
10. Topalov vs Aronian  0-1332013Norway Chess (Blitz)A06 Reti Opening
11. Carlsen vs Nakamura 1-0622013Norway Chess (Blitz)A00 Uncommon Opening
12. Wang Hao vs Aronian  ½-½422013Norway Chess (Blitz)C45 Scotch Game
13. Carlsen vs Svidler 1-0462013Norway Chess (Blitz)B08 Pirc, Classical
14. Wang Hao vs Karjakin 0-1512013Norway Chess (Blitz)D11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
15. Topalov vs Anand  ½-½572013Norway Chess (Blitz)A04 Reti Opening
16. Radjabov vs J L Hammer  ½-½682013Norway Chess (Blitz)A15 English
17. J L Hammer vs Aronian  ½-½462013Norway Chess (Blitz)A56 Benoni Defense
18. Anand vs Radjabov 1-0332013Norway Chess (Blitz)B31 Sicilian, Rossolimo Variation
19. Karjakin vs Carlsen 1-0422013Norway Chess (Blitz)C41 Philidor Defense
20. Nakamura vs Wang Hao  1-0472013Norway Chess (Blitz)A20 English
21. Svidler vs Topalov  1-0472013Norway Chess (Blitz)B10 Caro-Kann
22. Svidler vs J L Hammer 1-0352013Norway Chess (Blitz)A00 Uncommon Opening
23. Carlsen vs Wang Hao  ½-½642013Norway Chess (Blitz)B50 Sicilian
24. Radjabov vs Nakamura  ½-½712013Norway Chess (Blitz)B06 Robatsch
25. Nakamura vs Karjakin 0-1322013Norway Chess (Blitz)A33 English, Symmetrical
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: <Karjakin won> Okay, got it.
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Why did Topey lose all of his games? Fatigue from the last tournament, which he played so well? Not a good omen...
May-07-13  badest: <HeMateMe> He probably doesn't mind having 5 blacks, and moreover he's a terrible blitz player.

Let's wait for the classical games to determine his form.

May-07-13  boz: Topalov has never been a blitz player but what happened to Aronian?
May-07-13  schweigzwang: There still seems to be a discrepancy between the results above, and those listed at the Norway Chess site, which lists the Blitz Round 9 result in Wang v. Karjakin as win for Karjakin (table above: Game 14, shown 1/2-1/2). The final position does seem to be advantageous for black.
May-07-13  voyager39: What I have never understood is how winning these inaugral blitz matches improve your draw and the final outcome? Or is it just a gimmick coz you eventually end up playing the same folks with both colours. Correct me if I am wrong.

Bigger question is whether FIDE is counting all these funny openers into its Blitz ratings?

And I'd also recommend that Chessgames creates a separate category for these casual encounters coz otherwise they drastically skew the "one on one" performance. I mean Aronian losing to Anand here counts for very little, but it goes to the scores here on CG and gives the impression as if Anand is catching up.

May-07-13  waustad: <voyager39>They do itemize as best they can for the won loss, by giving rapid/blitz/exhibition games separately from classical.
May-07-13  schweigzwang: Ok they seem to agree now, thanks!
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <hellopolgar: I am sure any of these 2700+ players will have no problem beating Jon Ludvig Hammer even with black. So an extra black against Jon Ludvig Hammer wouldn't really be all that bad.>

Hammer is rated 2608. Someone rated 100 points above him would be expected to score ~64% overall, ignoring color. Someone rated 200 points above him would be expected to score ~75% overall, ignoring color. So, I don't agree that any 2700+ player <will have no problem beating [him] even with Black>.

A lot of people seem to think that a 100 point rating advantage means you're expected to win almost every game. Not so.

Premium Chessgames Member
  LucB: <gromguten: Kramnik>

Am I the only one who thought that was funny, given who had asked the question?..

May-07-13  boz: No, I'm still laughing about it, Luc.
May-07-13  Just Another Master: The Topa program is not created for blitz apparently.
May-08-13  Rolfo: < Or is it just a gimmick coz you eventually end up playing the same folks with both colours. Correct me if I am wrong.>

In a SRR (single round robin) you play each opponent only once

May-08-13  anandrulez: Grand prix winner at 1 and only 2 draws and 7 losses I mean I really thought good players will be fast too but Topa is an exception he is more of the hard working guy who don't know to push pieces fast
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <Someone rated 100 points above him would be expected to score ~64% overall, ignoring color>

Or, to put it even more picturesque: if we assume the higher rated player to be unbeatable, 72% of the games will end in a draw.

May-08-13  Zenagg: I imagine to avoid psyching himself out by trying 100% and losing, Topa took another approach which is, play and win or play and lose. I imagine trying 100% and getting crushed is worse then playing decently and losing.

I am not a big Topa fan but against this prodigious field, I wouldn't waste energy on a sprint right before the boston marathon.

May-08-13  SirRuthless: <anandrulez> Not enough time for danailov to work his evil is why topolov played bad. Or he was tanking games due to good results with black in the grand prix.
May-08-13  pbercker: I'm surprised that no one has mentioned this yet, especially Anand's fans, but the final result of the blitz tournament is a bit of a (albeit small) milestone unto itself for Anand, and is worth noticing with respect to what it says about Anand's chess strength. Blitz of course favors the young, and indeed the final result generally reflects that as those at the top are younger (in their 20s) than those at the bottom (in their 30s and 40s), except for one glaring exception, namely Anand who, as the oldest, 44, should have been near the bottom!

That he tied for second place with Carlsen suggest that it's much too soon to predict his demise at the upcoming WCC as some people (like me) are wont to do, and that he is a force to reckon with.

And lest I make too much of this, it's well to remember what a famous Russian chess player once said:

"He who analyses blitz is stupid." Rashid Nezhmetdinov

May-08-13  usuario x: <The Topa program is not created for blitz apparently.>

or not enough time to check the toilet

May-08-13  Sularus: nice one, lightning kid!
May-08-13  NGambit: <pbercker> Vishy being a rapid/blitz virtuoso is no news. Look no further than Botvinnik Memorial Rapid (2011) for what he's capable of in faster time controls.

BTW, that success did not carry forward, to put it mildly, to the next three classical tournaments he played.

May-08-13  pbercker: <NGambit: <pbercker> Vishy being a rapid/blitz virtuoso is no news. Look no further than Botvinnik Memorial Rapid (2011) for what he's capable of in faster time controls.>

That he *continues* to be rapid/blitz virtuoso at the age of 44, competing against 20 something players, is, to me, somewhat news worthy if only in view of the biological realities of the aging brain, which of course has outliers, and he may be one of them (Lasker is the clearest example of this).

To my way of thinking, this merely reinforces that Anand is not just a very strong GM, but a World Champion of exceptional abilities.

(I also emphasize the point because, being a fan of Carlsen, I tend to underplay Anand's accomplishment, and this is by way of needed corrective, since I'm probably not the only one!)

I still think that Carlsen will ultimately win the WCC, but it will be no cakewalk.

May-08-13  usuario x: <nice one, lightning kid!>

lol i didnt read the comments before i posted

May-10-13  fisayo123: Its funny how the commentators completely ignored Radjabov's games in the first 5 rounds. Strange AND intentional.
Premium Chessgames Member
  LucB: <boz> :D
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC