The 12th Annual Linares Super Tournament held from February 23rd to March 14th, 1994 was the first Category XVIII event ever held. Fourteen of the world's best players, including both World Champions, competed in a round robin format. The participants were (in order of Elo): Garry Kasparov (2805), Anatoli Karpov (2740), Alexey Shirov (2715), Vishwanathan Anand (2715), Vladimir Kramnik (2710), Vassily Ivanchuk (2710), Gata Kamsky (2695), Boris Gelfand (2685), Evgeny Bareev (2685), Alexander Beliavsky (2650), Veselin Topalov (2640), Judit Polgar (2630), Joel Lautier (2625), and Miguel Illescas-Cordoba (2590). When asked about the strength of the tournament, Kasparov famously stated that the winner could consider himself the world champion of tournament chess. Ironically, it was to be Karpov, his longtime rival, who would be the man of destiny, culminating in the greatest single tournament performance of all time! Karpov won the whole ball of wax, undefeated with an astonishing 11/13!! The final standings and crosstable are as follows:
Original collection: Game Collection: Linares 1994, by User: suenteus po 147.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4
1 Karpov * = = 1 1 1 = = 1 1 1 1 1 1 11.0
2 Kasparov = * = 1 0 0 1 1 = 1 = 1 1 = 8.5
3 Shirov = = * 0 0 1 1 = 1 1 = 1 1 = 8.5
4 Bareev 0 0 1 * = = = = 1 1 0 1 = 1 7.5
5 Lautier 0 1 1 = * = 0 1 1 0 = 0 1 = 7.0
6 Kramnik 0 1 0 = = * = = 0 = = 1 1 1 7.0
7 Kamsky = 0 0 = 1 = * 0 = = = 1 = 1 6.5
8 Anand = 0 = = 0 = 1 * 0 0 = 1 1 1 6.5
9 Topalov 0 = 0 0 0 1 = 1 * 1 1 = 0 1 6.5
10 Ivanchuk 0 0 0 0 1 = = 1 0 * = 1 = 1 6.0
11 Gelfand 0 = = 1 = = = = 0 = * 0 = = 5.5
12 Illescas-Cordoba 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 = 0 1 * 1 1 4.5
13 Polgar 0 0 0 = 0 0 = 0 1 = = 0 * 1 4.0
14 Beliavsky 0 = = 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 * 2.0
| page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91
|1. Anand vs Beliavsky
|| ||1-0||39||1994||Linares||B65 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack, 7...Be7 Defense, 9...Nxd4|
|2. Bareev vs Kasparov
||0-1||31||1994||Linares||A58 Benko Gambit|
|3. Judit Polgar vs Topalov
||1-0||48||1994||Linares||A46 Queen's Pawn Game|
|4. Topalov vs Kasparov
||½-½||44||1994||Linares||E76 King's Indian, Four Pawns Attack|
|5. Beliavsky vs Kramnik
|| ||0-1||31||1994||Linares||B65 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack, 7...Be7 Defense, 9...Nxd4|
|6. Illescas Cordoba vs Karpov
|7. Shirov vs Lautier
|| ||0-1||60||1994||Linares||D31 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|8. Shirov vs Illescas Cordoba
|| ||1-0||31||1994||Linares||B33 Sicilian|
|9. Karpov vs Bareev
||1-0||36||1994||Linares||C07 French, Tarrasch|
|10. Illescas Cordoba vs Judit Polgar
|| ||1-0||40||1994||Linares||B40 Sicilian|
|11. Kramnik vs Lautier
|| ||½-½||61||1994||Linares||D17 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|12. Kasparov vs Illescas Cordoba
||1-0||43||1994||Linares||D34 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch|
|13. Kasparov vs Ivanchuk
||1-0||39||1994||Linares||D44 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav|
|14. Kamsky vs Beliavsky
||1-0||31||1994||Linares||E47 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3 O-O 5.Bd3|
|15. Ivanchuk vs Judit Polgar
|| ||½-½||24||1994||Linares||E97 King's Indian|
|16. Lautier vs Kamsky
|17. Topalov vs Ivanchuk
||1-0||54||1994||Linares||B13 Caro-Kann, Exchange|
|18. Anand vs Kamsky
||1-0||39||1994||Linares||B90 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|19. Kramnik vs Anand
|20. Anand vs Gelfand
||½-½||44||1994||Linares||B90 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|21. Kamsky vs Bareev
|| ||½-½||43||1994||Linares||D15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|22. Beliavsky vs Shirov
|| ||½-½||56||1994||Linares||B33 Sicilian|
|23. Karpov vs Topalov
||1-0||39||1994||Linares||A32 English, Symmetrical Variation|
|24. Lautier vs Karpov
||0-1||49||1994||Linares||A29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto|
|25. Bareev vs Shirov
||1-0||40||1994||Linares||D47 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav|
| page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91
|Jan-09-14|| ||Samuel David: karpov a truly brilliant chess player and one of the most misunderstood world champions.It is an honour to be able to play through your games.|
|Sep-07-14|| ||AngeLa: kudos' to GM Karpov, boa constrictor :P
ahihihi cheers guys :P
|Sep-07-14|| ||Penguincw: Karpov started out the tournament 6/6. His streak was snapped when he drew Kasparov with black, who was champion at the time. Fast forward 20 years to Sinquefield Cup (2014), Caruana started out 7/7 before he drew Carlsen, the current world champion with white to snap the streak. Anyone predicting something like this to happen in 2034?|
Anyway, it's amazing how many players in this tournament are still active, including Topalov who participated in both tournaments.
|Sep-29-14|| ||SpiritedReposte: What a score and against that field...Maybe the best tournament performance ever?|
|Dec-09-14|| ||Fusilli: <Samuel David> <one of the most misunderstood world champions> Hmm... why this statement?|
|Mar-10-15|| ||OhioChessFan: It is mind boggling to see what Karpov did in the tournament. Shirov was the only player with Black able to hold Karpov to a draw.|
|May-22-15|| ||Benzol: Another tournament with past, present and future World Champions with Kramnik, Anand and Topalov having only middling results and Karpov showing what he could do when he put his mind to it. Kasparov might have regretted his earlier comment about the winner being regarded as the World tournament champion.|
|Jun-27-15|| ||PawnSac: < Penguincw: Karpov started out the tournament 6/6. His streak was snapped when he drew Kasparov with black, who was champion at the time. Fast forward 20 years to Sinquefield Cup (2014), Caruana started out 7/7 before he drew Carlsen, the current world champion with white to snap the streak. Anyone predicting something like this to happen in 2034? > |
The Karpov / Linares - Caruana / Sinquefield comparison is interesting, and in the Singuefield post game commentary and closing ceremony there was the same discussion.
I do not wish to detract from either player, as the performance of both was superb, providing some wonderful games for chess fans! And overall the win/draw ratio is as equal as possible given the 10 to 13 game ratio.
There are however some distinct differences. Sinq.. was a small field double round robin, so everyone played everyone once with each color. Linares was a larger field with everyone playing once. The bottom ranked players (Bareev, Polgar and Cordoba) all lost to both current champ Kaspy and Karpov, and frankly, Polgar was an easy win. Tho a creative and aggressive player, Judit was never in the same class as the KK's. Whereas the low man out at Sinque.. (MVL) actually managed to draw champ Magnus! This suggests a slightly stronger field. And lastly, there were some errors at Sinque, but NOBODY blew a drawn game, or even a lost game with a gross blunder like Bareev's ..Ba7?? That was an amazing blunder gift game that should have drawn. These factors seem to tip the vote in Caruana's favor, especially from a non-WCC champ or challenger, tho I must say I have enjoyed Karpov's games immensely over the decades, and see him still as beyond what Fab has yet to demonstrate. Karpov was for a long time the leader of the pack in every rite. The clash of the titans raged from 1978 to 1998. During the KK battles those two were a whole other level above the rest. But Fab will get his fair shot.
|Jul-07-15|| ||Zhbugnoimt: This is the second best tournament performance of all time. Caru in 2014 Sinquefield Cup was the best. The field was stronger, and THERE WAS ONLY ONE REST DAY FOR 10 GAMES. I am therefore not surprised he didn't beat naka in a winning position. 9/10 would have been too much. Also, Caru got 85% of possible points, Karpov about 84.6%.|
|Jul-07-15|| ||nok: But sustained over more games.|
|Jul-07-15|| ||perfidious: Re <PawnSac>'s post: Eric Schiller went so far as to write that Karpov's sterling achievement was possible due, in large part, to the fact that most players had to face Karpov, then Kasparov in successive rounds; believe the phrase used by Schiller was 'softened up'.|
|Jul-08-15|| ||Troller: <perfidious> I have seen that theory put forward also. It is a difficult claim to verify - one might also say that the players had instead been "toughened up" to play better.|
The Bareev game has one of the worst blunders in modern top level chess (although of course it decided ½ point, not from 1 to 0). Also Ivanchuk played quite bad vs Karpov and resigned prematurely. On the other hand, in 3 out of Karpov's 4 draws he was actually pushing for the win with an extra pawn, but his opponents (Kasparov, Shirov and Kamsky) defended stubbornly. So his 11 pts seem well deserved and not the result of opponents blundering away their games.
|Nov-06-15|| ||Mr. V: <perfidious>
And also on that subject, it's a pretty empty claim because Karpov even performed quite well against the players who were not "softened up" by Kasparov - those who beat Kasparov or managed a draw.
Karpov beat the two players in the tournament who beat Kasparov: Kramnik and Lautier.
Karpov had a good score against the players who drew Kasparov: Beliavsky, Gelfand, Topalov. He only managed to draw against Shirov. None of those players can be said to be "softened up" by Kasparov, especially not the two who beat him.
|Jan-12-16|| ||Mr 1100: BTW, wondering if anyone's got any newspaper reports on this tournament?|
Most online newspaper archives don't seem to go that far back...
There was no Chessgames.com back then... nor even a Chessbase.com, if I'm not mistaken...
Just curious to look back and see how it was reported back then...
|Aug-07-16|| ||tonim: Great performance by Karpov is certanly main feature of this tournament, but there are 2 other amazing facts:
- very low percentage of draws (33/91), cca 36%
- worst tournament for Beliavsky ever, only 2/13(+0 -9 =4)
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC