|Your Next Move (Rapid) (2016)|
The tournament is a part of the Grand Chess Tour (see Grand Chess Tour Paris Rapid (2016) and Grand Chess Tour Paris Blitz (2016) for the first stage). (1) This stage took place in Leuven, Belgium between the 15th-21st of June with two days of rapid games (25 minutes/player + 10 seconds/move in a single-round-robin) on the 17th and 18th, followed by another two days of blitz games (5 minutes/player + 2 seconds/move in a double-round-robin) on the 19th and 20th.
See the YourNextMove Blitz (2016) for the subsequent series.
Website: (1) http://grandchesstour.org/2016-your... , (2) http://www.yournextmove.be/
Rapid Blitz Total GCT points (total)
Carlsen 12 11 23 13 (23)
So 11 9.5 20.5 10 (17)
Aronian 10 10 20 8 (14)
Anand 10 9.5 19.5 7 (7)
Caruana 9 8.5 17.5 6 (9)
Vachier-Lagrave 8 9 17 5 (13)
Nakamura 7 9.5 16.5 4 (17)
Giri 8 8 16 2.5 (7.5)
Kramnik 7 9 16 2.5 (6.5)
Topalov 8 6 14 1 (3)
| page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45
|1. Kramnik vs A Giri
|| ||½-½||73||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||D78 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.O-O c6|
|2. Nakamura vs A Giri
|| ||0-1||34||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||D04 Queen's Pawn Game|
|3. Carlsen vs Caruana
||0-1||54||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||C77 Ruy Lopez|
|4. A Giri vs Topalov
|| ||½-½||39||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||C50 Giuoco Piano|
|5. Anand vs Nakamura
|| ||½-½||39||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense|
|6. W So vs Aronian
|| ||½-½||41||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||E32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical|
|7. M Vachier-Lagrave vs Kramnik
||1-0||32||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense|
|8. Caruana vs W So
||0-1||50||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||A09 Reti Opening|
|9. Topalov vs Anand
||0-1||43||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||A20 English|
|10. Nakamura vs Carlsen
||1-0||17||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||D38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation|
|11. Aronian vs M Vachier-Lagrave
|| ||½-½||61||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||D14 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Exchange Variation|
|12. M Vachier-Lagrave vs W So
|| ||½-½||42||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense|
|13. Kramnik vs Topalov
||0-1||68||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||A07 King's Indian Attack|
|14. Aronian vs Carlsen
|| ||0-1||45||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||A40 Queen's Pawn Game|
|15. W So vs Carlsen
||½-½||38||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||B90 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|16. Kramnik vs Nakamura
||1-0||43||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||A14 English|
|17. M Vachier-Lagrave vs Anand
||0-1||36||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense|
|18. Caruana vs Topalov
||1-0||51||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense|
|19. Aronian vs A Giri
|| ||1-0||57||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||A15 English|
|20. Anand vs Aronian
|| ||½-½||48||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||C67 Ruy Lopez|
|21. W So vs Kramnik
|| ||½-½||49||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||D50 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|22. Carlsen vs M Vachier-Lagrave
|| ||½-½||49||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||A20 English|
|23. A Giri vs Caruana
|| ||½-½||64||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||C50 Giuoco Piano|
|24. Topalov vs Nakamura
|| ||1-0||45||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||C53 Giuoco Piano|
|25. Caruana vs Anand
||½-½||57||2016||Your Next Move (Rapid)||A09 Reti Opening|
| page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·
|Jun-27-16|| ||chessalem: <All chess elites are eagles of varying breeds>|
Wesley is a Peregrine Falcon
Watch him in flight:
|Jun-27-16|| ||keypusher: <I have the highest respect and admiration for Mr Carlsen, and Iím not for a moment trying to take anything away from his accomplishments, but I wonder the results Mr So might produce if he had anything like that level of support.>|
Impossible to say how good he'd be. But one thing is certain. If he'd been born in Norway instead of the Philippines he wouldn't have a gang of fans and anti-fans going around pissing all over one page on cg after another.
|Jun-27-16|| ||beenthere240: I really don't understand the disparagement of So. He's clearly a world class player. To suggest he is a loser and mediocre is simply absurd. Some of the postings are dually absurd -- such as the suggestion that a draw should be counted as a win and a loss be counted as a character defect.|
|Jun-27-16|| ||Justin Flint: <Why it is pointless to argue with anonymous online trolls/cranks>|
|Jun-28-16|| ||Pulo y Gata: It is much more difficult to understand the adoration and worship of a cockroach as a majestic eagle, with several even saying that it is better than the latter.|
|Jun-28-16|| ||tuttifrutty: Majestic eagle what?
Cockroaches got what it takes to survive in the harshest conditions. One of the best.... Ever.
These 7 Animals Survived What Dinosaurs Couldnít.
3. Horseshoe Crabs
4. Green Sea Turtles
Are we clear yet? LOL.
|Jun-28-16|| ||HeMateMe: what about Amway salesmen? Did they survive the ice age? They seem pretty resilient.|
|Jun-28-16|| ||john barleycorn: <chessalem: ...
In contrast, Wesley has to make his own road. ... >
|Jun-28-16|| ||Jim Bartle: <Beep! Beep!
He ordered the Acme Chess Engine.
|Jun-28-16|| ||frogbert: The really amazing thing about Carlsen is that he declined an offer to work with Kasparov when he was 15. Carlsen preferred his own approach to chess training over the one offered by Kasparov and his team. That's unique confidence in one's abilities and methods by a 15 year old.|
(But why was he offered such a collaboration at 15? Due to Kasparov's great heart and altruism?)
So's a great talent and a very strong player. And I doubt he'll ever be world champion. It's about confidence and willingness to risk losing - which is required to go for the win. Unless Carlsen retires early, the same applies to Giri. IMHO.
|Jun-28-16|| ||MissScarlett: <Carlsen preferred his own approach to chess training over the one offered by Kasparov and his team.>|
That or Garry's fee was too high. When he was 18, he could afford it.
|Jun-28-16|| ||chessalem: <training over the one offered by Kasparov and his team.>|
Well, your trainer got squashed like a bug losing 3 games , drawing 2 and winning only once by <so>meone with no coach and trainer since birth.
And Magnus trails Garry losing 2 games drawing 1, and winning none.
and when he played his immortal game against Garry, Morphy came to mind....
beep...beep...Go Wesley "roadrunner" So.
|Jun-28-16|| ||Absentee: <MissScarlett: <Carlsen preferred his own approach to chess training over the one offered by Kasparov and his team.>|
That or Garry's fee was too high. When he was 18, he could afford it.>
I hope he had a money-back clause.
|Jun-28-16|| ||HeMateMe: kaspy wanted to latch onto the next Big Thing, to keep himself in the news as well. Let's get real here...|
|Jun-28-16|| ||chessalem: <So's a great talent and a very strong player. And I doubt he'll ever be world champion.>|
Well, Wesley easily trounced Garry dubbed by many as a great World Champion- this addition to his resume brings us to an inevitable conclusion- ...his time will surely come...
coming to a theater near you... <so>on.
< It's about confidence and willingness to risk losing - which is required to go for the win. >
Wesley emulates "Komodo" the chess engine. He'd rather be <so>lid and error free than wild and lucky.
<wanted to latch onto the next Big Thing>
that's why Magnus collaborated and trained with Wesley <so>me time ago. He paid for his travel expenses, board and lodging just to get his services...
How much did he pay him as professional fee?
|Jun-29-16|| ||tuttifrutty: <that's why Magnus collaborated and trained with Wesley <so>me time ago. He paid for his travel expenses, board and lodging just to get his services...|
How much did he pay him as professional fee?>
With no coach and trainer since birth, his services were sought. What could the reasons be??? hmmmmm....
Why on earth would an eagle needs help from a cockroach? hmmmmm....
Do you think it's a cunning, clever, conniving, and creative way to _______ a secret from unsuspecting competitor???? hmmmmmm
|Jun-29-16|| ||blackdranzer: Oh cmon... Wesley is a gud player but he still has a long way to go if he wants to become the best...case closed. ..y keep discussing the same thing when u guys know the answer|
|Jun-29-16|| ||frogbert: <That or Garry's fee was too high.>|
No, it was not about the money.
|Jun-29-16|| ||Kasparov Fan: OMG a 2016 Kasparov has a dismal score against Wesley"cockroach"so and this idiots are using that as an argument supporting his greatness.You wouldn't be screaming if he was so great.|
|Jun-29-16|| ||Jim Bartle: <It's about confidence and willingness to risk losing - which is required to go for the win. >|
Historical example: Peter Leko.
|Jun-29-16|| ||wordfunph: A cockroach may survive a nuclear holocaust, but after all the explosions and it comes out of its hole it would still be a mere cockroach.|
"Better one day like an eagle than a hundred years like a cockroach"-- B. Mussolini
|Jun-29-16|| ||tuttifrutty: An eagle better than a cockroach? You have been misinformed. hehe|
For certain, a cockroach disappearance will affect us all globally. We, the earthlings need cockroaches to survive. Their extinction could only mean one thing. We will not survive. Insects are a significant food source for many birds including but not limited to eagles. Humans on the other hand, need food. Please refer to the nitrogen cycle.
PS...In short, we really, really need cockroach poop.
Tell Mussolini to enjoy his day.
|Jun-29-16|| ||john barleycorn: <tuttifrutty: An eagle better than a cockroach? You have been misinformed. hehe>|
Mussolini was stroking the Italian one-eyed eagle.
|Jun-29-16|| ||chessalem: <a 2016 Kasparov>
Well, he beat naka (no. 2 best blitz player then) and fabiano ( no. 3 best in the world who just won the US Championship) in their individual blitz match...flashing his old form reminiscent of Kaspy of yore...
Garry's advance years and ring rust were not the cause of his loss to Wesley ...there was none to speak of- i.e. gauging from his performance against the two other participants...
When he came to face to face with Wesley he had consumed voluminous liters of water from the fountain of youth... armed with unlimited ammunition /gunpowder and protected by impenetrable armour made of adamantium molded from fires of Mt. Doom.
Even then, he was exposed as a mere mortal in the presence of the true chess God...
|Jun-30-16|| ||tuttifrutty: <Mussolini was stroking the Italian one-eyed eagle.>|
In that case he really was _________ He had really lost his pea size brain for if he knew that a one-eyed eagle that finds its way into captivity should be put out of its misery or relegated to life in a zoo. Why? Because to release such a bird is to condemn it to a slow death by starvation. In contrast. a one eyed cockroach when released will go see a doctor and will definitely survive. Heck, a cockroach can even survive within a week without its head..... Who is better now???,
You tell me.
If he knew that cockroaches are more valuable than an eagle to planet earth and humanity , he would have pick a day being one instead. BOBO. Such is a life of a know nothing. LOL.
By the way, eagles will scavenge and occasionally steal food from one another just like humans and cockroaches do.
Now that you know, which one would you prefer, an eagle or a cockroach.
You tell me.
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 7 OF 7 ·
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
- No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
- NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
- Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
- All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
- Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC