|London Chess Classic (2016)|
The London Chess Classic, held from December 9th to 18th at the Olympia Conference Centre in Kensington, London, was the fourth and final leg of the Grand Chess Tour 2016. The format was a ten-player round-robin including eight of the current top ten players in the world. The field featured Viswanathan Anand, Levon Aronian, Fabiano Caruana, Anish Giri, Vladimir Kramnik, Hikaru Nakamura, Wesley So, Veselin Topalov, Maxime Vachier-Lagrave and wild card Mickey Adams.
The prize fund was $300,000 (about €280,000) with a first prize of $75,000, plus another $100,000 and $50,000 respectively for the top two in the overall 2016 Grand Chess Tour standings. Players received 120 minutes to make 40 moves then 60 minutes for the rest of the game with an additional 30 seconds added per move starting from move 41. In the event of a tie for first, tiebreak matches (25 mins + 5 seconds) would be played, beginning 30 minutes after the end of the last classical game. (1)
Official site: http://www.londonchessclassic.com
(1) chess24: London Chess Classic: https://chess24.com/en/watch/live-t...
| page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45
|1. M Vachier-Lagrave vs A Giri
||½-½||24||2016||London Chess Classic||B90 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|2. Nakamura vs W So
||0-1||29||2016||London Chess Classic||D85 Grunfeld|
|3. Caruana vs Anand
||½-½||44||2016||London Chess Classic||A21 English|
|4. Kramnik vs Topalov
||1-0||28||2016||London Chess Classic||D77 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.O-O|
|5. Aronian vs Adams
||1-0||41||2016||London Chess Classic||C53 Giuoco Piano|
|6. A Giri vs Nakamura
||½-½||43||2016||London Chess Classic||A49 King's Indian, Fianchetto without c4|
|7. Topalov vs Caruana
||0-1||38||2016||London Chess Classic||C02 French, Advance|
|8. W So vs Adams
||1-0||40||2016||London Chess Classic||E06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3|
|9. Anand vs M Vachier-Lagrave
||1-0||33||2016||London Chess Classic||B90 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|10. Kramnik vs Aronian
||½-½||32||2016||London Chess Classic||A14 English|
|11. Adams vs A Giri
||½-½||62||2016||London Chess Classic||B51 Sicilian, Canal-Sokolsky (Rossolimo) Attack|
|12. Nakamura vs Anand
||1-0||43||2016||London Chess Classic||D37 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|13. Caruana vs Kramnik
||½-½||46||2016||London Chess Classic||C53 Giuoco Piano|
|14. M Vachier-Lagrave vs Topalov
||½-½||44||2016||London Chess Classic||C67 Ruy Lopez|
|15. Aronian vs W So
||½-½||37||2016||London Chess Classic||A34 English, Symmetrical|
|16. Caruana vs Aronian
||½-½||31||2016||London Chess Classic||C77 Ruy Lopez|
|17. Anand vs Adams
||½-½||32||2016||London Chess Classic||C53 Giuoco Piano|
|18. A Giri vs W So
||½-½||56||2016||London Chess Classic||D02 Queen's Pawn Game|
|19. Topalov vs Nakamura
||0-1||53||2016||London Chess Classic||B12 Caro-Kann Defense|
|20. Kramnik vs M Vachier-Lagrave
||½-½||61||2016||London Chess Classic||A49 King's Indian, Fianchetto without c4|
|21. Nakamura vs Kramnik
||½-½||61||2016||London Chess Classic||D37 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|22. Adams vs Topalov
||1-0||33||2016||London Chess Classic||C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense|
|23. Aronian vs A Giri
||½-½||20||2016||London Chess Classic||D78 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.O-O c6|
|24. M Vachier-Lagrave vs Caruana
||½-½||34||2016||London Chess Classic||C42 Petrov Defense|
|25. W So vs Anand
||½-½||30||2016||London Chess Classic||D37 Queen's Gambit Declined|
| page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 33 OF 34 ·
|Dec-24-16|| ||chessalem: 7 CONCLUSIONS FROM THE 2016 LONDON CHESS CLASSIC:|
|Dec-24-16|| ||blackdranzer: Chessalem would sleep with so if he could...|
|Dec-24-16|| ||chessalem: In hindsight a significant date was July 16th, when Wesley was crushed in 26 moves by Carlsen in the Bilbao Masters. He didn’t lose another classical game all year: |
Bilbao Masters (Round 5 onwards): 6 games, +1
Sinquefield Cup: 9 games, +2
Olympiad: 10 games, +7
Isle of Man Open: 9 games, +4
London Chess Classic: 9 games, +3
Total: 43 games, +17
Such a run of form and dominance of a big series of events inevitably started talk about Wesley’s potential, with some high praise for the US no 2. You can watch all the interviews on the live coverage, including Vishy's:
Here are some quotes:
Anand: Simply I had the impression let’s say in June that he was up and coming but subsequently his play in Leuven, St. Louis and here… I guess the word that comes to mind is effortless. He doesn’t even seem to be trying too hard.
MVL: I’m not counting myself out yet, but Wesley is definitely the main man to watch. He’s won the last two very big tournaments in St. Louis and London. He’s shown even better play here in London than he did in St. Louis. We’ll see what the New Year gives him – if he can confirm his status, because that’s also not going to be easy.
Kramnik: To win two of the strongest tournaments in a year, St. Louis and London, two in a row is a huge achievement – I don’t even mention about his performance at the Olympiad as well. Yes, he’s really strong. I’m just happy and quite surprised that I’m still overtaking him by rating, but probably it’s not going to last for too long. He’s improving a lot and yes, he’s a very strong player. He was already a Top 10 player for some time but now he really belongs to the Top 5 players. As I said before, he’s a serious contender to the world title, though I didn’t still completely lose hope myself as well.
Nakamura: He’s the hottest player right now.
Maurice Ashley kept asking every player in every interview about Wesley, which began to rile them (Caruana: “I don’t think anything has changed since yesterday or the day before…”) and led to some less diplomatic responses than we might otherwise have expected.
Wesley sure he'd done enough when he drew with MVL in the final round | photo: Lennart Ootes, official website
As we mentioned after Round 8, Nakamura and Aronian cautioned about getting carried away, with Levon saying he preferred “more aggressive players” and “more blood on the board”. After the tournament ended similar comments were made:
Caruana: He doesn’t make any mistakes at all, and even the mistakes he makes aren’t so significant… I don’t see anything terrifying in his play as well. What he’s doing, avoiding mistakes, is not something that’s impossible to overcome.
Giri: I wonder where he stole that idea [of playing solidly and picking up points] from. He’s playing very risk-free and very, very good. I only wonder how he will create chances if the opponents also play the same way as him, but this way it worked very well. He scored a great result +3, but things also fell into place… If you look at the first round there have been some supernatural forces intervening obviously.
Anish was referring to Nakamura’s strange blunder against So in Round 1 (13.Ne2?), something that also happened in Round 1 of the Sinquefield Cup. In both events Veselin Topalov also self-destructed against Wesley in decent positions, while the extra half point in London came when Mickey Adams committed an uncharacteristic blunder. That meant that in both tournaments Wesley could take things very easily in the other games, but then again, as Vishy suggested, there’s nothing easy about preventing the world’s Top 10 from getting any chances against you! You might also add, for instance, that So was close to beating Giri with the black pieces in Round 4, while he showcased brilliant defensive skills to hold a difficult position against Aronian in Round 3.
It was Magnus Carlsen who had the difficult task of handling multiple trophies in 2015 | photo: Ray Morris-Hill
In short, the New Year will tell us much more about whether Wesley So is ready to challenge Magnus Carlsen, who was the notable absentee in London – after all, last year it was Magnus who won it all, and even without playing in the classical events he finished in an unofficial 4th place in the tour. They meet in Wijk aan Zee for the Tata Steel Masters starting on the 14th January.
|Dec-24-16|| ||diceman: <Sokrates:
Giri-jokes, utterly tiresome, repeating themselves>
For Giri it's:
tie-ersome, 3 fold repeating themselves.
|Dec-24-16|| ||Absentee: <Sokrates: Giri-jokes, utterly tiresome, repeating themselves, but apparently persistant.>|
It's time to draw the line.
|Dec-24-16|| ||not not: Giri contribution to chess is popularizing chess on internet by drawing endlessly: feeding trolls like me is his biggest contribution!|
|Dec-24-16|| ||not not: Giri doesnt draw, he skillfully keeps his options open!|
|Dec-24-16|| ||chessalem: well, if he was a female I would sleep with him...who wouldn't when such copulation would undoubtedly sire a hybrid (i.e. half man half God ). Please remember Wesley is the son of Chess God, Caissa . Such an offspring would have the potential to become the most powerful being (just like his parent) to have ever pushed wood equivalent to mutant jean gray - the Pheonix.|
|Dec-24-16|| ||chessalem: <It's time to draw the line.>|
the time of reckoning is January the 14th at the Tata Steel Tourney when Wesley will prove to all and sundry that he belongs in another plane of existence. He will once again emerge on top leaving the field behind and looking at him with awe murmuring:
|Dec-24-16|| ||diceman: <not not: Giri doesnt draw, he skillfully keeps his options open!>|
He doesn't draw, he lives to split the point another day.
|Dec-24-16|| ||chessalem: Grandmaster at 14. Check.
National champion at 15. Check.
Breaks the 2600 Elo rating at 16. Check.
Surpasses 2700 at 20. Check.
Crashes the world’s top 10 at 22. Check.
Breaches 2800 at 23. Check.
CHECK THIS OUT!
SO LET IT BE WRITTEN, SO LET IT BE DONE.
|Dec-25-16|| ||LucB: <Sally>: interesting fact about Kasparov. I would never have guessed, but when you consider whom he was playing, perhaps it's not so surprising.|
|Dec-25-16|| ||WorstPlayerEver: Anyway, it's not relevant: Giri never will able to make 12 draws with Magnus if he's going on like this. NB Next WCC cycle he will be about as old as Karjakin already was in a match vs Magnus recently. Same goes for Caruana and So. Because for every 3 top candidates of today there will be 30 possible candidates 3 years ahead. If one considers chess peak age becomes younger and younger: 23-28, more specialized due to the use of software; it's no coincedence. Because the 90s were the decade of the PC. And the downfall of the GM.|
Carlsen and Karjakin are both born in 1990. It's unheard of that the two best match players are born in the same year.
"In 1989, Levy was defeated by Deep Thought in an exhibition match. Deep Thought, however, was still considerably below World Championship Level, as the then reigning world champion Garry Kasparov demonstrated in two strong wins in 1989.
It was not until a 1996 match with IBM's Deep Blue that Kasparov lost his first game to a computer at tournament time controls in Deep Blue - Kasparov, 1996, Game 1. This game was, in fact, the first time a reigning world champion had lost to a computer using regular time controls. However, Kasparov regrouped to win three and draw two of the remaining five games of the match, for a convincing victory.
In May 1997, an updated version of Deep Blue defeated Kasparov 3½–2½ in a return match."
|Dec-25-16|| ||not not: Giri enters the bar;
half of Giri orders a shot;
the other half gets a taxi home;
what a split night out!
|Dec-25-16|| ||chessalem: <If one considers chess peak age becomes younger and younger>|
Wesley has not peaked yet...Kasparov would comment this is bad news for his opponents- Wesley is still improving.
If his level of performance continues, Wesley will be 2900 before the end of 2017...3000 by 2018 and approximate top engine strength in the succeeding years to battle Stockfish, Houdini and Komodo for the unified and undisputed human and engine world championship.
|Dec-25-16|| ||activechess55: |
Merry Christmas to everyone!
|Dec-25-16|| ||Clemens Scheitz: What a great opportunity for <chessalem> to lose a ton of money by gambling on Wesley to reach 3OOO ( or even 2900). It's just as juicy as gambling on <Overgod> to win the Noble prize...too bad I'm not a gambling man. With all due respect to Wesley, of course, an extremely talented player, and I guess a little respect to <Overgod> as well. Happy Holidays everyone, and Merry whatever...|
|Dec-25-16|| ||perfidious: <Clemens Scheitz: What a great opportunity for <chessalem> to lose a ton of money by gambling on Wesley to reach 3OOO ( or even 2900). It's just as juicy as gambling on <Overgod> to win the Noble prize...>|
<chessalem> may win the 3000 bet twenty years on, when rating inflation has done its number, despite the deniers' claims to the contrary.
<overwad> is cold to win a Nobel in maths--in his mind, anyway.
We just do not know which decade will feature that formidable genius' run for the big one.
|Dec-25-16|| ||Clemens Scheitz: <perfidious>, yes, but the incurable and annoying optimism of <chessalem> has Wesley at 3000 in 2018, and that's where the money would be made.|
|Dec-25-16|| ||perfidious: Incurable and annoying idiocy from <tolengoof>'s latest incarnation is more what I had in mind.|
|Dec-25-16|| ||morfishine: <not not> Your jokes about Giri drawing are not funny, never were funny and never will be funny|
Obnoxious yes, funny no
|Dec-25-16|| ||Nina Myers: So drawing jokes aren't funny? Think again!|
|Dec-25-16|| ||moronovich: <morfishine: <not not> Your jokes about Giri drawing are not funny, never were funny and never will be funny
Obnoxious yes, funny no>
The jury is till out.
It may be a split decission .
Merry Christmas to all.
|Dec-25-16|| ||tuttifrutty: <perfidious: Incurable and annoying idiocy from <tolengoof>'s latest incarnation is more what I had in mind.>|
Your mind???? Hmmmmm, the world would be a better place without it.
|Dec-25-16|| ||activechess55: |
Agreed. These draw-jokes aren't funny. Because they're HALF-funny!
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 33 OF 34 ·
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC