| page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 28
|1. Yifan Hou vs Caruana
||1-0||40||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||C67 Ruy Lopez|
|2. M Vachier-Lagrave vs Naiditsch
||0-1||43||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||C11 French|
|3. Aronian vs G Meier
||½-½||41||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||A06 Reti Opening|
|4. M Bluebaum vs Carlsen
||½-½||59||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||E90 King's Indian|
|5. G Meier vs Yifan Hou
||0-1||34||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||E01 Catalan, Closed|
|6. M Vachier-Lagrave vs M Bluebaum
||1-0||74||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||A06 Reti Opening|
|7. Naiditsch vs Caruana
||0-1||40||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||C28 Vienna Game|
|8. Carlsen vs Aronian
||½-½||70||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||C84 Ruy Lopez, Closed|
|9. Yifan Hou vs Carlsen
||½-½||38||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||B90 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|10. Aronian vs M Vachier-Lagrave
||1-0||42||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||A04 Reti Opening|
|11. Caruana vs G Meier
||1-0||35||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||C10 French|
|12. M Bluebaum vs Naiditsch
||0-1||44||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||E04 Catalan, Open, 5.Nf3|
|13. Naiditsch vs G Meier
|| ||½-½||68||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||D02 Queen's Pawn Game|
|14. M Bluebaum vs Aronian
||0-1||46||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||D10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|15. Carlsen vs Caruana
||½-½||40||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||C01 French, Exchange|
|16. M Vachier-Lagrave vs Yifan Hou
||1-0||68||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||C65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense|
|17. Aronian vs Naiditsch
||1-0||58||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||A13 English|
|18. G Meier vs Carlsen
||0-1||41||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||D90 Grunfeld|
|19. Yifan Hou vs M Bluebaum
||½-½||48||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||D38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation|
|20. Caruana vs M Vachier-Lagrave
||½-½||43||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||B96 Sicilian, Najdorf|
|21. M Bluebaum vs Caruana
||½-½||79||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||D27 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical|
|22. Naiditsch vs Carlsen
|| ||½-½||42||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||A45 Queen's Pawn Game|
|23. M Vachier-Lagrave vs G Meier
|| ||½-½||40||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||C10 French|
|24. Aronian vs Yifan Hou
||1-0||42||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||D37 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|25. Carlsen vs M Vachier-Lagrave
||½-½||59||2017||GRENKE Chess Classic||B92 Sicilian, Najdorf, Opocensky Variation|
| page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 28
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 10 OF 10 ·
|Apr-23-17|| ||activechess55: |
Did the teeth lose their sharpness? Were the nails missing from his claws? Had he grown too old to hunt? There were doubts abound.
But last week proved all these speculations wrong. The tiger from Armenia had all hunting tools intact and working! His appetite was as voracious as ever! He gorged on a bagful of preys for four days on end! This was a good news for his fans, who awaited similar performance from him for long.
Kasparov says,“Chess world is a better place when Aronian is in form.” His games reminds us of an artist with a canvass and the brush!
Carlsen, Caruana, Aronian, Yifan and MVL were vying for the top spot. All of them sported glasses. It is befitting, Aronian won the event. His glass-frames happen to be the trendiest!
|Apr-23-17|| ||scholes: In the last 10 years, Apart from Carlsen, Aronian super tournament record is way ahead of other players . Unfortunately he choked at all important tournaments. Was not even second at any candidates tournament.|
|Apr-23-17|| ||scholes: If two top 5 players of the world cannot find a move after thinking for 50 minutes then should it be called a blunder. Engines have become too strong.|
|Apr-23-17|| ||zanzibar: <<scholes> If two top 5 players of the world cannot find a move after thinking for 50 minutes then should it be called a blunder. Engines have become too strong.>|
This is indeed a very good point.
But I think two is too low a bar - after all, Anand and Carlsen both missed a fairly basic tactic, once upon a time.
But the gist of the point remains...
|Apr-23-17|| ||BOSTER: A lot was said about game Caruana vs Aronian, but nobody didn't show how to win after 36.h5.|
|Apr-23-17|| ||plang: <but nobody didn't show how to win after 36.h5.>|
I'm calling double negative
|Apr-23-17|| ||perfidious: <plang: <but nobody didn't show how to win after 36.h5.>|
I'm calling double negative>
Far as I tell, <N0B0DY> made no post on this....
Now there is <another> double negative!
Of a sort.
|Apr-23-17|| ||BOSTER: My mistake.
|Apr-23-17|| ||plang: l in fun - I remember learning in math class that as long as there are an odd number it is still a negative - always looking for the precious triple negative|
|Apr-23-17|| ||AylerKupp: <Gregor Samsa Mendel> No, I never learned Spanish descriptive notation. I came to this country when I was 11 years old (a loooong time ago) and I didn't get interested in chess until a few years later, so my first exposure to chess notation was English Descriptive.|
My Spanish is somewhat rusty since I seldom get a chance to practice it. But I still add, subtract, and multiply in Spanish, particularly the latter, because that's how I learned the multiplication tables.
|Apr-23-17|| ||AylerKupp: <saffuna> I'm glad that you liked AKC2ML. I don't think that it's brilliant, but I do think that it is remarkably accurate.|
|Apr-24-17|| ||Sokrates: Fortunately, the chess world abandoned the odd English notation form - was it in the early 70s? Because of that notation, I only acquiered German (and Scandinavian) books in my early chess-playing days. |
Perhaps a re-introduction of the system is on Theresa May's agenda, now that she will restore the British Empire to its former glory?
|Apr-24-17|| ||perfidious: <Sokrates....Perhaps a re-introduction of (English descriptive notation) is on Theresa May's agenda, now that she will restore the British Empire to its former glory?>|
MAGA? (Make Albion Great Again)?
|Apr-24-17|| ||Petrosianic: <Fortunately, the chess world abandoned the odd English notation form - was it in the early 70s?>|
1980. But anyone who can play chess should be able to handle any of the notations out there.
|Apr-24-17|| ||TheFocus: <Petrosianic: <Fortunately, the chess world abandoned the odd English notation form - was it in the early 70s?>|
<1980. But anyone who can play chess should be able to handle any of the notations out there.>
There are many coaches who refuse to use books that used English notation.
And many juniors do not even know how to read it.
|Apr-24-17|| ||Petrosianic: <TheFocus>: <There are many coaches who refuse to use books that used English notation.>|
Then they aren't very good coaches, to voluntarily alienate themselves from large sections of chess literature. Fischer learned Russian just to be able to read their chess books. If he had arbitrarily decided he wasn't going to read any book that wasn't published in the US, written in English Descriptive, and written by a US Citizen, he'd never have become World Champion.
|Apr-24-17|| ||zanzibar: <<Petrosianic> But anyone who can play chess should be able to handle any of the notations out there.>|
Mostly agreed - I don't have much problem reading algebraic notation in Russian, German, Spanish, etc.
English Descriptive notation has two advantages:
1) The symmetry of the board is respected.
Rooks on the 7th vs. Rooks on the 2nd/7th, etc.
2) Because it's out of fashion the used chess books in descriptive notation tend to be a lot cheaper than their counterparts.
(And they're often printed with better quality)
Spanish Descriptive is a little challenging because it's "backwards" - putting the piece last (iirc).
But the absolute most challenging notation was Kieseritzky's (this is indeed a concern - I can now spell his name by rote!) in La Regence.
I can't find some of the somewhat caustic historical comments on his notation - but they're out there, and often the most scalding the more humorous.
|Apr-25-17|| ||Sokrates: Great link, thanks <Zanzibar>.|
I am sure books with the descriptive system are quite cheap - just like a pair of shoes with two lefts. :-)
Yeah, <perfidious>, let's become first movers (literally) and introduce the MAGA system! I am in!
|Apr-25-17|| ||Amulet: Has Magnus reached his peak and he's on his way descending down?|
|Apr-25-17|| ||Petrosianic: <mrkaic>: <I have made a superb case for the need to retire on top of the game.>|
Is your argument then that all world champions should retire with the title?
<Kasparov, for example, timed his retirement almost perfectly.>
For Kasparov, perfect timing would have been in the Summer of 2000. OR immediately after getting the title back.
<Feel free to disagree, but I don't understand your need to censor me.>
You're using the word "censor" as a synynom for "disagree", but they do not mean the same thing.
|Apr-25-17|| ||saffuna: I would say it's the player himself who can best decide when to retire. It's his choice.|
|Apr-26-17|| ||Pedro Fernandez: <<AylerKupp>: My Spanish is somewhat rusty since I seldom get a chance to practice it. But I still add, subtract, and multiply in Spanish, particularly the latter, because that's how I learned the multiplication tables.> LOL! +1!|
|Apr-26-17|| ||Pedro Fernandez: Good article by <Sokrates>, thank you!|
|Apr-26-17|| ||Pedro Fernandez: My impression about Caruana is that he does not end up finding himself. Indeed it is remarkable how GM Caruana lost, won and tied a lot of his games.|
|Apr-26-17|| ||Pedro Fernandez: <<scholes>: If two top 5 players of the world cannot find a move after thinking for 50 minutes then should it be called a blunder. Engines have become too strong.> Such a qualification (a bit radical) of "a blunder" is (IMO) still uncertain but, overall, you're right! Now my dear <scholes>, dealing with machines is not so trivial!|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 10 OF 10 ·
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
- No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
- NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
- Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
- All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
- Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC