The 19th European Individual Championship took place from 16-29 March in Batumi, Georgia. It was organized by the government of Georgia, the government of the Adjara Autonomous Republic, Tbilisi City Hall, and the Georgian Chess Federation, under the auspices of the European Chess Union. The championship was open to all players representing the chess federation members of the European Chess Union regardless of their title or rating. ... [more]
Player: Arman Pashikian
| page 1 of 1; 11 games
TIP: You can make the above ads go away by registering a free account!
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·
|Mar-25-18|| ||PhilFeeley: It's good to see Bologan back in it, even though he doesn't make the list here yet.|
|Mar-25-18|| ||PhilFeeley: <Tell me... how many times did Karpov face Fischer when they were top players???> Fischer was a one off. These days, any 2600 can beat a 2700.|
|Mar-26-18|| ||Appaz: <alexmagnus: The expected score of 2600 against 2700 is the same as 1600 against 1700 (only that the 2600 and 2700 will have a higher draw rate).>|
So <not> the same score then?
You could as well said that all players, no matter rating difference, will have the same expected score - it's just the number of games that varies.
|Mar-26-18|| ||WorstPlayerEver: <alexmagnus>
Yeah, because Aronian plays against 2450 players in the Candidates... he did lose only 20 points... ★le sigh★
|Mar-26-18|| ||alexmagnus: <So <not> the same score then?>|
Same score, different distribution of decisive games. The expected score is in both cases 6.5-3.5 for the higher rated player. But while the 1700 against the 1600 with realize it as +6 -3 =1, the 2700 against 2600 will more likely play it +3 -0 =7.
|Mar-26-18|| ||alexmagnus: By the way, this also shows why <WPE>'s "never beat a 2600" remark means nothing. A 2700 is more likely to draw against a 2600 than to beat him - without violating any rating laws. Occasionally he will lose too (after all, there are many ways for the 2600 to score those 3.5 points).|
|Mar-26-18|| ||alexmagnus: If you are unbeatable, your opponent must be rated ~200+ points lower than you for you to be more likely to win than to draw.|
|Mar-26-18|| ||frogbert: Also, two of the 2500-players Ivanchuk beat, were only rated 150 points below him. And he's had two draws against 2600-players rated 100 points below.|
Anyway, if this event would've been typical for Ivanchuk, he would've been rated below 2650 within a year. The rating system works pretty well. In order to improve your rating, you must perform above it. If you perform below it, your rating goes down.
Increasing the K (which basically is what <wpe> suggests) only makes the system more volatile and ratings less reliable as a measure of strength.
|Mar-26-18|| ||keypusher: <alexmagnus> <frogbert> Thanks.|
<wpe> If you actually want to say something, maybe try jotting down your ideas first? A coherent post would be nice. If it wasn't for Frogbert I would never have grasped what you were trying to say.
|Mar-26-18|| ||aporia: Does anyone know what happens with the Portuguese players who missed round 1 due to travel complications? Ferreira currently has 6 points with two rounds to go, but he acquired them all in eight rounds instead of nine.|
|Mar-26-18|| ||waustad: I said at the beginning I was hoping that Andreas Diermair would manage to get his final GM norm, and he may. He has a tpr of 2581, but his first round opponent was rated about 2000, so it would be higher for norm purposes. With 1.5/2 in the last rounds, he'll be there. If he wins next round, the last round won't matter, though he's black against GM Mikhail Kobalia, 2599. Playing 6 GMs so far, he is +2 =2 -2.|
|Mar-26-18|| ||waustad: After reading the official Austrian chess blog, it seems that Diermair already got a 9 game norm, but one of his earlier norms was a 7 game norm, so he needs an 11 game norm for the title. Perhaps even 2 draws will do it, depending on the ratings of his opponents.|
|Mar-27-18|| ||alexmagnus: The "bad" Ivanchuk is actually above his rating now). Which once more illustrates that his previous performance was not that bad - it cannot be too bad if it can be fixed literally with two games.|
|Mar-27-18|| ||Olavi: Or else it illustrates that Ivanchuk's rating is too low, i.e. his performance over a longer period of time has been bad, considering who he is.|
|Mar-27-18|| ||PhilFeeley: Huge traffic jam for the last round: 8 with 7.5/10.|
Who will win? Is there a play-off, if necessary?
|Mar-27-18|| ||et1: Ivanchuk's "too low" rating is still number 31 in the world at 49. 99.99999 percent of chess players would love to do anything similar.|
|Mar-27-18|| ||PhilFeeley: Interesting trivia: The World Champion is from Norway, yet there's no one from Norway in this tournament. It's not like they don't have players who could be there.|
|Mar-28-18|| ||siamesedream: Conratulations to <GM Ivan Saric> for winning the title!|
|Mar-28-18|| ||whiteshark: Conratulations to Ivan Saric for winning <European Individual Chess Championship> this time!|
|Mar-28-18|| ||PhilFeeley: Some top boards managed to sneak back into contention, only to be outsmarted by Ivan Saric. Well done, sir!|
|Mar-28-18|| ||csmath: Difficult technical win against Navarra in the last round. Very instructive ending and well played.|
|Mar-28-18|| ||GlennOliver: Strange but true.
Despite the Swiss format, Ivan Saric, the winner, played only one of the seven players who finished joint-second on 8/11, and he lost that one game.
|Mar-30-18|| ||Tabanus: Correction report: two players each under two different names, and three obviously wrong game results (slips sent). Not so bad. |
And Chess-Results has Khazar Babazada vs S Ter-Sahakyan, 2018 <0-1>
|Mar-31-18|| ||gomila: "Despite the Swiss format, Ivan Saric, the winner, played only one of the seven players who finished joint-second on 8/11, and he lost that one game."|
He played two out of top three rated players on the tournament. Also he had a rating performance of 2796. What is your point?
|Apr-30-18|| ||GlennOliver: gomila,
If you are Mr Saric, or a friend of his, then no offence is intended.
Mr Saric clearly had a very good tournament, playing some fine chess, and was not responsible for the players against whom he was (and was not) drawn to play.
My point is that a Swiss tournament runs under rules intended to ensure that each competitor plays opponents with a similar running score.
So I found it surprising that Mr Saric had only been drawn to play one of the seven players with the most similar running score (8/11).
In fact, now I look further, Mr Saric was also only drawn to play a couple of the twenty-four players with the next most similar running score (7.5/11).
So the Swiss rules seem to have created an anomaly in this case.
But once again, congratulations to Mr Saric on an excellent performance.
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
- No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
- NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
- Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
- All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
- Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC