chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

David Janowski vs Oscar Chajes
"Havana Good Time" (game of the day May-17-2014)
Havana (1913), Havana CUB, rd 4, Feb-19
Four Knights Game: Spanish. Symmetrical Variation (C49)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 31 more Janowski/O Chajes games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can make these tips go away by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Simply check the option "Don't show random tips on game pages." and click the Update Profile button at the bottom.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-14-09  WhiteRook48: let's make it game of the day people
Feb-21-09  WhiteRook48: underpromote and skewer- great!
Dec-26-09  Whitehat1963: Yes, agree! Excellent game!
Jan-07-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: White puts up great defense then just throws everything at black.
May-17-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Good pun for today, and a good game.
May-17-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: This ups my estimation of Janowski quite a bit.
May-17-14  ThumbTack: A game this long I usually don't even like to start. And Four Knights Symmetrical..how boring! But I'm glad I had the patience to play it through. Beautiful chess.
May-17-14  Conrad93: Ah, the days when you could get away with playing like crap in the opening...
May-17-14  Shams: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hgz...
May-17-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: One of the most interesting games I've seen in awhile

On a side-note, One of my old chess buddies is the spitting-imgae of Janowski: mustache, hairline, glasses, everything

So we nicknamed him 'Janowski'

May-17-14  goodevans: Lots of little gems in here, like <85.Kg8> breaking the pin for the f-pawn advance. At first sight this hangs a pawn, but of course <85...Rxf6> is answered by <86.Rxf6 Qxf6 87.Rf7> with a pin of his own.

What stamina these guys must have to keep playing inventively for so many moves.

May-17-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: Titanic struggle!!
May-17-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <Check It Out: This ups my estimation of Janowski quite a bit.>

We tend to think of Janowski as a joke, largely due to the horrific beatings Lasker gave him in Lasker - Janowski (1909) and Lasker - Janowski World Championship Match (1910), and perhaps also his last-place finish at New York (1924) and his notorious loss in Janowski vs Reshevsky, 1922. However, he was a very strong player at his peak. Chessmetrics actually rates him the No. 1 player in the world from May to September 1904. http://www.chessmetrics.com/cm/CM2/... (I think that Lasker got knocked down on the list for inactivity, which Chessmetrics "punishes" by taking away rating points - on the theory that inactivity makes a player weaker, although in point of fact that rarely seemed to be true for Lasker.)

May-17-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR> Maroczy also ascended to the top spot for a time during Lasker's reign after the latter was penalised, under Sonas' system. This, thankfully, did not last overlong and order was restored.
May-17-14  RookFile: Lasker would have been amused, and probably would have found a way to get a sponsor to set up a match.
May-17-14  Eusebius: Fantastic play.
May-17-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Both sides promote...but only white UNDERpromotes!
May-17-14  Howard: FSR has a point in that Janowski has gone down in chess history as an underrated player---no question about that. His two devastating losses to Lasker were mainly because Lasker was in a class all by himself back in those days. As for his last place finish at New York 1924, let's bear in mind that the man was in his 50's by then and way past his prime.

But, on the other hand, I find it hard to believe he ever deserved to be ranked #1 in the world---regardless of what criteria chessmetrics uses. Janowski might very well have been in the world's top-5 at various points in his career, but not Numero Uno.

May-17-14  RookFile: I guess he played five (!) matches against Marshall. My impression is that Marshall and Janovsky were roughly the same strength, although of course this fluctuated during their long careers.
May-17-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  SteinitzLives: Part of what may have hurt Janowskis reputation is that he was often described as self-centered, a dandy and pathetically addicted to the roulette wheel, known to be a sucker's game, compared to most games of chance.

-Personally, I find his games to be joyfully optimistic and his tactical style as exciting as that of any tactician out there during the time he played.

May-17-14  Rookiepawn: I also have read Janowski was very attracted to gambling, and always coming up with new "secret methods" to win.
May-17-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <SteinitzLives: Part of what may have hurt Janowskis reputation is that he was often described as self-centered, a dandy and pathetically addicted to the roulette wheel, known to be a sucker's game, compared to most games of chance.>

If you are speaking of the American version of roulette, with an immutable 5.26 per cent house edge, agreed; but across the ocean, where one finds only 0 (not 00) and the <en prison> rule, different story, as the house edge can be reduced to 1.35%, compared to 1.40/1.36 per cent at craps, which is reduced when free odds bets are offered.

<-Personally, I find his games to be joyfully optimistic and his tactical style as exciting as that of any tactician out there during the time he played.>

Same as Larsen or Bogoljubov, this optimism helped him succeed in tournament play to a point, but he ultimately foundered against the cold-bloodedness of the very greatest players.

May-17-14  rookending: What a fascinating game! Rybka says Black can draw as late as 96 ... Rxf7! 97. Rxf7 Qa8+ (or even 97. ... Qc4) with a tablebase draw.
May-17-14  psmith: <rookending> "With a tablebase draw" may be accurate but it is not very instructive to a human being who will have to play without tablebases. Isn't it really that there is a perpetual check? Or am I missing something?
May-17-14  rookending: <psmith> Your point is a good one! Over the board Black's clearest drawing plan would be to continue giving Queen checks on the white squares (a8, a2, e4 and h1) until the cows come home, for example 96...Rxf7 97.Rxf7 Qa8+ 98.Kh7 Qe4+ 99.Kh8 Qh1+ 100.Kg8 Qa8+ 101.Rf8 Qa2+ 102.Rf7 Qa8+ DRAW by threefold repetition.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
oxxo's favorite games
by oxxo
ryszard ochodzki's favorite games
by ryszard ochodzki
99.f8=N+
from Promotion: Knight by Penguincw
white queens and "cavaliers" two pawns
from polygamy or what's an extra Q among friends? by kevin86
Another timely knight-check.
from Underpromotions by Sneaky
underpromote and skewer!
from chess strategems ii - under construction by gauer
Alekinemaster31's favorite games
by Alekinemaster31
Riferrari's favorite games
by Riferrari
Challenger Janowski
by Gottschalk
99.f8=N+ ftw
from yy underpromotion = N by whiteshark
white underpromotes and forks!
from underpromotion by kevin86
Everyone Needs a Hero
by Mr. V
QR:RRpp - RR wins!
from 49_Other endgames by whiteshark
bummerluck's favorite games
by bummerluck
Gawain's favorite games
by gawain
May 17: Havana Good Time
from Game of the Day 2014 by Phony Benoni
78...a1=Q, 99.f8=N+, 105.g8=Q+
from Promotion: Three by Penguincw
Round 4 -- 19 Feb 1913
from Havana 1913 by crawfb5
Four Knights Spanish. Symmetrical (C49) 1-0 Underpromotion+
from yUndrwear Serves A Purpose Butt Not 4Fredthebear by fredthebear
Great endgame play
from Games of the Day by c3230
plus 13 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC