chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Alexander McDonnell vs Louis Charles Mahe De La Bourdonnais
London m3 ;MAINB (1834), rd 44
King's Gambit: Accepted. Mayet Gambit (C38)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 86 more McDonnell/La Bourdonnais games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you register a free account you will be able to create game collections and add games and notes to them. For more information on game collections, see our Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-03-03  fred lennox: By move 19 most of the pieces are on the e-h files with the white king badly cornered. White's "useless" rook and Black's king are the only pieces on the a-c files. Alongside the bloodshed the pawns sneak up and siege the Lordship. A great pawn storm, almost comical, definitly brilliant.
Jul-04-03  drukenknight: the pawn storm makes no sense because white does not do the natural thing and simply exchange. But black is worse because he simply allows himself to be exchanged, so his game is falling apart faster.

Go to black's 19. A better move might be 19...Ng4 in order to put pressure on the K. ....Qh4 might be next. But even if white exchanges N. hxg4 will reconnect pawns and black will be ahead in material (not mention the h file is open and there is a pin). So that would okay for black.

21....Bxf3+ is insane because black is behind, he should not exchange.

23...Bh6 same thing. He is running out of good moves because he started to exchange and is now on a deadly downhill cycle.

These guys were actually good tactical players, the other game you posted was excellent. Theory was not well known back then.

Jul-07-03  fred lennox: Fisher played as if theory almost didn't exist, relying almost exclusively on calculating variations and he wasn't bad. What theory do you speak of? Throughout the last century theory has become more and more contradictoy and computors has made it more so. Computors do not know theory and has beaten Kasporov. Someone can know a lot more theory than Capablanca and be no match for him. You want to know how to really improve your chess? Take your last 20 annotated games and go over them with someone who has a 3-400 higher rating. He'll point out flaws in your thinking and you'll improve a lot quicker that way than reading a bunch of books however excellent. They talked a lot about chess in those days and did post-mortems. Books are written for profit and there was no profit in writing of chess then. That doesn't mean they didn't know theory. A story of Lasker visiting a chess club introduced himself and asked to play the strongest player. Lasker quick to note he wasn't so strong played...Qe3 expecting fxe3. The player didn't. Lasker asked "Why didn't you take my queen", "What! and have double pawns in front of my king??" Practicing calculation is the best way to improve your intuition and positional flair. To take one of your lines in this great attack counter-attack game 18...Ng4, he does this with better timing latter. 19 Nf5 gives black problems.
Jul-07-03  drunknight II: you should look to exchange when ahead in material and look to attack the K when behind. That is all. Of course the game is not so simple that every exchange will be good or that every check will be good, there is some subtlety to it. I just have no idea why black would want to exchange here.

You know you would think that thinking deeply would help you but sometimes I wonder. Korchnoi is a good example, did you see the game w/ Akopian we were looking at the other day? All the passed pawns at the end, must have caused some very deep calculations and yet at the end it looks that both sides were making mistakes. Korch. allowed another passed pawn when behind in material and akopian failed to break a pin. sometimes I wonder if all the calculations is worth it.

Jul-09-03  fred lennox: Never mine my last comment. I guess I don't see where black is behind. What I do see is a sort of hare and tortoise race between the wings. The only way the latter is going to win is by obstruction. Even so, it is not easy.
Jul-11-03  drukenknight: Fred I am counting connected pawns as 1, isolated and doubled pawns as 0. This may shed some light on this. Even if you disagree w/ this assignment of numbers, what value to you replace them with?
Sep-24-04  Knight13: I've learned this kind of attack on the Castle King with pawns. 25... b6 might helped. 26. axb6 cxb6 would leave white's king more spaces to escape. No wonder 25... Nxf5?! 26. exf5 Qd3 27. a6 b6 would help solve the problem, too. But 27. d5? that's a wasted move. 28. c4! black's got no way out. 29. axb7 Kb8... I don't know why black didn't take the b7 pawn. I need time to study this.
Feb-03-12  Knight13: 16...h5 is too slow and takes away the h5 square from the Black knight, blocking its most comfortable entrance into the attack. 16...Bf8 is more efficient.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
C38 King's Gambit Accepted [White]
by chess.master
the mayet gambit
from KGA-Knight Gambit -.Older Style continuations by takchess
Selected 19th century games
by atrifix
KGA. Mayet Gambit (C38) 1-0 Pawn roller opens a-file
from x( C38 ) KGA Hanstein, Philidor, Mayet Gambit et by fredthebear
the mayet gambit
from KGA-Knight Gambit -.Older Style continuations by takattack
KGA. Mayet Gambit.
from MKD's King's Gambit by MKD


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC