chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

There is a clue unsolved right now on the Holiday Contest Clues Page!   [Official Contest Rules]
(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Adolf Anderssen vs Lionel Adalbert Bagration Felix Kieseritzky
London (1851), London ENG, rd 1
King's Gambit: Accepted. Kieseritsky Gambit Long Whip (C39)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 14 more Anderssen/Kieseritzky games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-05-03  Marnoff Mirlony: The "Immortal Game".
Dec-06-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  matey: This I believe is the real "Immortal game" Adolf Anderssen vs Kieseritzky, 1851
Sep-07-08  just a kid: Very amusing draw.
Nov-29-08  ganstaman: I don't get it. Why is this labeled a draw, or why does it show him playing 55. Rxc3? 55...Rxc3 is a tablebase win in 19.
Jul-22-09  Knight13: 17. Qd2!
Nov-03-09  WhiteRook48: 56 h5 what's the continuation there??
Nov-03-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <ganstaman> <anyone who cares>

This is interesting. In the actual game Anderssen had the black pieces even though he moved first. So I thought there must be some mistake in the game score. But these are the same moves Staunton's tournament book gives, including the fatal 55. Rxc3. Instead 55. h5 is a draw, so I am tempted to conclude that the score in Staunton's book is just wrong. But who knows? There were some real howlers at London 1851, and maybe this is just one more.

Going back a few moves, the tournament book shows the position after 51. Rb4 and says "I consider that if Mr. Kieseritsky had played with proper care from this point, he must have won the game easily." But no analysis is given.


click for larger view

(Colors are not reversed in the diagram, obviously.) Was Staunton right? Show your work!

Mar-21-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  David2009: <keypusher: <ganstaman> <anyone who cares>> An oversight by Kieseritsky - agreeing a draw in a won position.


click for larger view

(Andersen-Kieseritsky London IT 1851 G2 55...?) The "book" win starting 55...Rxc3 56.h5 Kf4 57.h6 Rc6+ is not difficult to find. Here's a Crafty End Game Trainer link to the position colours-reversed: http://www.chessvideos.tv/endgame-t.... Enjoy trying to mate the EGT as quickly as possible.

Thanks <User: suenteus po 147 > for this fine Game Collection: WCC Index [London 1851]

Dec-25-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  wwall: 51.Rb5? should have lost. White should play 51.Rf5+ and Re5.

After 51.Rb5, instead of 51...Kg3, Black wins after 51...c2! 52.Rb2 Kf3 53.Rb3+ Ke4 and Black queens the c-pawn.

After 51...Kg3, instead of 52.Rb1?, White can draw after 52.h5 c2 53.Rb3+ and 54.Rb2.

Instead of 53...Kf4, Black should simply play 53...Kxh4 54.Rc1 Kg4 which wins.

55.Rxc3?? Rxc3 should have won for Black. Almost any other White move draws.

Sep-23-15  Sally Simpson: Hi K.P.

"Going back a few moves, the tournament book shows the position after 51. Rb4 and says "I consider that if Mr. Kieseritsky had played with proper care from this point, he must have won the game easily." But no analysis is given. "

Staunton does give analysis to this ending, it appears after move 11 in the following game. (where else?)

The layout it confusing. You often see analysis to a previous game mixed in with opening moves of the next game.

see here: page 22

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id...

Anyway I had some fun with this game.

http://www.redhotpawn.com/chess-blo...

..and the 'Not an Immortal game.'

Kieseritzky vs Anderssen, 1851

The same link to my article gives Staunton's take on this game.

"...a sort of double-barrelled blunder I have hardly ever seen equalled, even amongst beginners games."

Mar-04-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: According to this site:

http://www.chesscentral.com/a-famou...

which looks very well researched, 55.Rxc3 is erroneous. The last moves should be

<55.a4 Rc4 draw>

The "definitive" work on K is cited:

1) Zagadka Kieseritzky'ego (The Mystery of Kieseritzky), Tomasz Lissowski and Bartlomiej Macieja, Warszawa 1996, 300 pages, ca 170 games, with diagrams, maps, drawings etc.

(Exclusively in Polish afaik)

May-30-16  sneaky pete: <keypusher> Staunton does give the analysis to support his claim that after 51.Rb5 .. "with proper care" K. should have wion. It's on the next page (page 22) of the book.

51... c2 52.Rb2 Kf3 53.Rxc2 Rxc2 54.h5 Rc5+ 55.Kg6 Kg4 56.h6 Rc6+ 57.Kg7 Kg5 58.h7 Rc7+ 59.Kg8 Kg6 60.h8=N+ Kf6


click for larger view

and wins.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Match Anderssen!
by amadeus
Match Anderssen!
by chessgain
historical KGA from Koneig book game 1
from KGA-Knight Gambit -.Older Style continuations by takattack
London 1851
by theArtist
historical KGA from Koneig book game 1
from KGA-Knight Gambit -.Older Style continuations by takchess
96d_The Unbearable Lightness of rook endgames 4
by whiteshark


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC