chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Louis Paulsen vs John Owen
"Owen An Apology" (game of the day Sep-10-2005)
London (1862)
Formation: King's Indian Attack (A07)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 446 more games of Paulsen
sac: 16.fxe5 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jul-19-04  zb2cr: The "double sacrifice" 16 fxe5 and 17 Rxf1 is a terrific idea. If Black accepts the second sacrifice to go up by a whole Rook, 17 ... Rxf1+; 18 Bxf1 I see three variations:

(a) 18 ... d5; 19 exd6 (e.p.), Qd7; 20 Bc4+ looks like it wins Black's Queen.

(b) 18 ... Qe7; 19 Bc4+, Kh8; 20 e6+, Kg8; 21 exd7+, Qf7; 22 Bxf7+, Kxf7; 23 Qxc6 followed by Bg5 and Queening the Pawn.

(c) 18 ... Kf7; 19 Qf3+. Now some "sub-variations".

(c1) 19 ... Ke8??; 20 Qf8#. (Or 19 ... Ke7??; 20 Qf6+ driving Black into the same position.)

(c2) 19 ... Kg8; 20 Bc4+, Kh8; 21 Qf6+, Qxf6; 22 gxf6, Rg8 (only way to prevent 23 Bg7#); 23 f7! and Black will have to sac his Rook for the Pawn after it Queens, leaving White up by a clear minor piece.

(c3) 19 ... Ke6; 20 Bh3+, Kxe5 (...Ke7 leads to mate in 2 as in variation c1); 21 Bf4+! presenting Black with the unpleasant choices of 21 ... Kf6; 22 Bg5+ (mate in 3 if he takes White's Bishop or loss of Black's Queen if he doesn't) or 21 ... Kd5; 22 Qe3+, Kc4; 23 Bf1+, Kb4; 24 Qa3#.

Jul-19-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  akiba82: Nice analysis Zb2cr, to a pretty game.
Sep-10-05  humanehuman: poor quality game. Amateur hour.
Sep-10-05  Ezzy: <zb2cr> In variation (a) 20 Bc4+ Qf7 21 Qg7 mate!

Variation (b) 22 Qg7 mate!

Variation (c2) 20.Bc4+ Kh8 21.Qf7 Qg8 22.Qf6+ Qg7 23.Qxg7 mate!

Variation (c3) 19...Ke6 20.Bh3+ Kxe5 21.Qf4+ Kd4 22.Qd2+ Kxe4 23.Qe3+ Kd5 24.Bg2+ Kc4 25.Qc3+ Kb5 26.Bf1+ Ka4 27.Qa3 mate!

Sep-10-05  JohnBoy: <zb2cr> - this is an exchange sac, not a rook sac. Taking with 17...Rxf1+ does not leave black a rook up.

<humane> - you are way off base! I don't know if your comment is intended to be taken seriously, but this shows Paulsen as a VERY substantial player, not just Morphy's scratching post.

Sep-10-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheAlchemist: <Ezzy> Hello. Nice to see you back.
Sep-10-05  Professeur Y: No doubt about Paulsen being a player of great stature, but I think humanehuman might have been refering to his unknown opponent. Black seemed in trouble right after having initiated the series of exanchges on move 7, and as of move 10, there was no looking back for white, who won quite easily. Not a very exciting game in my opinion.
Sep-10-05  percyblakeney: Owen is maybe not the most well-known player of the 19th century (or playing his best game here), but he has a couple of draws and a win against Morphy: Morphy vs Owen, 1858
Sep-10-05  percyblakeney: ...even if the draws were in pawn odds games. He became a better player later, and Chessmetrics has a won match against Burn (then a top ten player) in 1888 as his best result.
Sep-10-05  JohnBoy: <Prof Y> - I wholeheartedly disagree with you. Owen got the worst of the opening, but defended fairly well. He did not stumble into any of the myriad mate threats until there was essentially no way out. You can find modern GM games which are comparable or worse. To me the lesson is in how Paulsen imposed his will with unflagging momentum. Rather impressive. This is key in chess - how to maintain initiative once established.
Sep-10-05  JohnBoy: Moreover, in reading Owen's bio on this site, he placed third at the tournament in which this game was played. Behind Anderssen and Paulsen. Maybe there were only three players, but I imagine this was not the case.
Sep-10-05  percyblakeney: Actually Owen finished ahead of some strong players in the tournament, like Steinitz and Blackburne, even if it was early in their careers:

http://www.mark-weeks.com/chess/w2l...

Sep-10-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: A fine combo from Paulsen and good battle overall. Owen defends well but he needed to play 21...c5. Then he has c4 if Qb3+ or if Bf4 then Nf7. Its probably lost anyway, but at least the game would continue
Sep-10-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Black has a mate-saving clause in 23...♖xd8 24 ♕xe7 ♘f7} the knight guards the rook,blocks the mate threat and also the key square g5. O♔,he is lost anyway,but I loved the knight move!
Sep-10-05  I Pawn You: YES. YES!!!
THOSE are the kinds of puns I want to see. This is great. Marvelous really.

Well, see now. This whole... puns area in humor is very tricky. Dangerous, if you will (though you probably won't). I believe that in humor, there's what you would call, say...a stepping stone, and then, the punch. Even if it's a long monologue or somesuch, it's consisted of those stones and punches. This also applies to puns, only in this case (and of course, in other areas, but that's irrelevent), the stepping stone is put in your mind retroactively. What you get is solely the punch. And now, the tricky part. Between the stepping stone and the pucnh, there is a certain distance (this applies not only to puns). That distance will count for how funny the joke is (along with other factors), and will also perhaps divide it into "genres", for lack of a better word. Say, a long distance one could be considered clever. A medium could be considered witty. A short could probably be considered silly, yet still be funny. I don't really know how to realte that to puns really, but I think this one (Owen An Apology) takes a great leap of courage. Because it's either a bullseye, or extremely lame. I personally think it's the former, though I also think most people would take it as the latter. Anywho, that's it.
...for now.
(MWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH)

Sep-10-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: After losing, Black was Owen one.
Sep-10-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: Black would have done better with 20...Qxd7. If 21. e5 then 21...Nd4, and now white can't play 22. Bxa8 or Bh3 because of 22...Ne2+. If 21. Bh3 then 21...Qd4+, forcing the ♕ exchange. The continuation might be 22. Qxd4 Nxd4 23. c3 Nf3+ 24. Kf2 Nd5 25. Bf4 Rd8.
Sep-10-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <al wazir> Nd4 doesn't work because Qc4+ prevents the fork.
Sep-10-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: White's 16. fxe5! "sacrfices" the exchange for a winning attack on the weakened kingside. Even stronger than the followup 17. Rxf1 is 17. Bxf1! Qe7 18. e6! Qxe6 19. Bc4+ .
Nov-15-07  nimh: Rybka 2.4 mp, AMD X2 2.01GHz, 10 min per move, threshold 0.33.

Paulsen no mistakes!

Owen 4 mistakes:
15...Ba6 2.47 (15...Qe7 0.61)
21...g5 3.29 (21...Rd8 1.97)
22...g4 #14 (22...Kf7 3.29)
23...Qxd8 #1 (23...Rxd8 #7)

Aug-19-08  ravel5184: Why does it say 22 ... g4 is a mate in 14 when White's best move 23. d8Q leads to at most a mate in 7?
Nov-25-10  ariel el luchador: Una gran partida de Paulsen después de filidor uno de los precursores de la escuela moderna de ajedrez y también de la hipermoderna podemos decir que esta partida es una de las 4 mejores del torneo de Londres de 1862,la jugada 2)P3CR CONTRA LA defensa owen es uno de sus sellos particulares
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
0.0% - 17.4%
from Blunderchecked games II by nimh
16. fxe5! "sacrifices" the exchange for a winning attack
from Weakened Castled Position by patzer2
24 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection X by PinkLedDoor
KIA/Hungarian vs Owen/Classical Dutch (A07) 1-0Double Sacrifice
from Spearheads A (Batteries involving the Queen) by fredthebear
Game 350
from Master Games - Chess (Tartakower/du Mont) by Jersey Joe
G350 in '500 Master Games of Chess' by Tartakower & Du Mont
from 25 collection A-D-E of Fredthebear by fredthebear
A great victory...
from Collections in Idleness 1 by kishchess
Reverend John Owen plays ...b6
by rudiv
G7 Summit
from Romantic era of chess by Calar
24 moves
from Chess Miniatures, Collection X by wwall
G350
from 500MGC2 by morwa
September 10: Owen An Apology
from Game of the Day 2005 by Phony Benoni
Natuurschakers/Nature chess
from H. Bouwmeester: Prisma schaakboek 5 by FRoeten
19th Century
by rea
Natural talent for chess.
from These were the greatest... by nikolaas
Paulsen
from underrated players by echector


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC