|Feb-07-06|| ||Autoreparaturwerkbau: Since Steinitz marks 6.Ng4 as "original and strong", I wonder why noone else in history won with that line. Or was Steinitz joking?|
|Feb-07-06|| ||LoFarkas: Oh, wow, this is the same opening I played a couple of times in blitz, basically with the half-assed hope that the opponent won't see the way to win back the pawn on move 5. CM9000 immediately suggests Ng4 as move 6, presumably to avoid the king being stranded in the middle of the board after, say, 6.Nf3 Qxe4 7. Qe2 Qxe2.|
As to the note, I don't know. It certainly doesn't look like a complicated move to find
|Jan-01-07|| ||HoopDreams: Whats the correct continuation after 6...Qxe4+ 7.Ne3|
|Aug-04-07|| ||Cactus: There doesn't seem to be a strong refutation. I'm surprised this isn't more common.|
|Jun-07-08|| ||algol: Chessbase has 65 games with the position after 7. Ne3. 40 wins for black, 19 for white and 6 draws. There are few games from before 1990.|
|May-01-10|| ||tpstar: Black had just Removed the Guard of the Pd5 with 22 ... Nxe3 23. Bxe3 but then erred with 23 ... Qxd5?! as the Black Queen became Overloaded defending the Be4. 24. Rd1 Qe6 25. f5 Qe8 26. Qc4+ won the Be4 and White won.|
6. Ng4 Qxe4+ 7. Ne3 leads to an interesting game with the KN on e3 versus f3, much more than the routine 6. Nf3 does. Modern players would favor 7 ... Be6 intending ... 0-0-0 over 7 ... Bd6 & ... 0-0.
|Jun-10-10|| ||WhiteRook48: seeing a white win with 5 Nxe5 is kind of startling|
|Jun-14-10|| ||vonKrolock: After <25.f5> |
click for larger view
Since black arrived here, a lesser evil - still not enough to save the game - was 25...♗xg2 26.fxe6 ♗xf1 27.♘xf1 ♖ae8 etc
|Sep-13-12|| ||Llawdogg: Agree that 7 ... Be6 intending 0-0-0 is the way to go.|
|Jan-23-13|| ||Abdel Irada: Bad enough to lose to a fish, but a bottom feeder?|
|Jan-23-13|| ||JimNorCal: Good pun, but Pollack could uncork some good moves. Here's a speed bump for the eventual winner of NY1889.
Max Weiss vs W Pollock, 1889|
|Jan-23-13|| ||Abdel Irada: I trust the game went swimmingly for him.|
|May-15-14|| ||ljfyffe: Pollock, representing Canada, defeated Steinitz at Tarrasch at Hastings 1895. Some fish.|
|May-15-14|| ||ljfyffe: Steinitz AND Tarrasch. MacLeod won the Canadian championship twice, and became champion of Minnesota, and later moved to Spokane, USA.|
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC