chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Mikhail Chigorin vs David Janowski
Berlin (1897), Berlin GER, rd 14, Sep-28
Spanish Game: Berlin Defense (C65)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 24 more Chigorin/Janowski games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can change the color of the light and dark squares by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page. Or, you can change it with the "SETTINGS" link in the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-29-03
Premium Chessgames Member
  fred lennox: Janowsky fondness for bishop pair is not the kind aiming for endgame advantage. It aims for middle game attack on the king. Once the middle game attack on the king is no longer real, his preference for the pair wanes.
Jun-27-06  Bartleby: A complete tactical disaster for Chigorin, almost as bad as his severe 16 move thrashing two years ago against the same opponent, same color:

Chigorin vs Janowski, 1895

Chigorin was a common pincushion of Janowski's, and a lot of it had to do with the Russian master's eccentric opening play. Chigorin was quite fond of these Qe2/d3 setups with white, particularly against the French Defence (He'd be the King's Indian Attack expert had he played today).

6. Be3 is more accurate. 6. ... Bg4 is not to be feared because 7. 0-0 NxB 8. PxN white can use the semi-open f-file for counterplay and his doubled e-pawns cover central squares (Duras often played Ruy Lopezes like this).

7. Nf1? Is a positional blunder. The position isn't a Breyer or a typical closed Ruy by any means and is too slow. 7. 0-0 followed by c3 is called for. 12. c3?! compounds the damage when white's d3 square is weakened, as well as 14. Qxe4? when white shouldn't clear the e-file in a position whilst still uncastled.

16. Kd2?? is the self-inflicted gunshoot blunder. Chigorin still could bail out at the loss of only a pawn with 16. 0-0 Bxc3 17. Ba3. Now Janowski's two "Jans" skewer what's left of the postition.

Nice, crisp play on Janowski's part.

Jul-12-06  Runemaster: <Bartleby> (good name, by the way. I like that Melville story. Is there a reason why the story appeals to you particularly? Life feels like that to me a lot of the time, I must admit).

Anyway, I'm glad somebody has pointed out Chigorin's poor record against Janowski.

I will speculate a bit on that statistic: C's record against both Steinitz and Tarrasch was about equal. Perhaps C was more comfortable against S and T who (like him) were great theorists and used their games to demonstrate their theories. That's for me what makes the C-T contest so interesting; Tarrasch trying to make the game fit a pattern, Chigorin trying to break out of the pattern.

Evidently, this didn't work against Janowski. While Chig. was experimenting with various things, often including more or less dodgy openings, Janowski just brought out his bishops and opened a big bottle of ass-whup, time and time again.

You might say that these were battles of two different ideas (C - knights, J - bishops), but I don't get the impression that J was much of a theorist, apart from shouting "bishops! attack!" during every game.

Feb-18-08  Knight13: Yeah, complete tactical massacre. Very disappointing for Chig!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Spanish Berlin Defense (C65) 0-1 Tactical massacre
from Pins Ins and Outs, All About Pins ECO C by fredthebear
Spanish Berlin Defense (C65) 0-1 Tactical massacre
from Spanish B Defense Bin Fed Fredthebear by fredthebear
3- Ruy Lopez
by classicalwin2
Wnner Normal v No
from Castle by c65win
Janowski's "Jans"
by capanegra
Challenger Janowski
by Gottschalk
Berlin 1897
by suenteus po 147


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC