chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Richard Reti vs Heinrich Wolf
"Wolf Whistle" (game of the day Mar-29-2009)
Teplitz-Schönau (1922), Teplice-Sanov CSR, rd 6, Oct-07
Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense. Rubinstein Attack (D64)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Reti/H Wolf games
sac: 17...Nfg4 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-29-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Maybe White can survive after 17. Qxf2 Kxh7 18. O-O Nd3 19. Nxc8 Qe4 20. Nd6 Nxf2 21. Nxe4 Nxe4 22. Rxf7 Rab8 23. a3 Ng5 24. Rd7 Rxe3 25. Nf5 Re5 26. g4 Ne6 27. Rf1 Re4 28. h3 b6 29. cxb6 Rxb6 , when Black's advantage (even with an extra pawn) is clearly not yet decisive.
Mar-30-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Alternate puns: "Don't cry Wolf" OR "Reti or not,here I come!"
Mar-30-09  WhiteRook48: brilliant...
Apr-08-09  Hugh the Drover: Ok, I wanna revive a past idea, which went unanswered. We need a chess statistician. But first, a pun: The swamp was Reti and shallow with other hazards in Wolf's pawnnet. (I mean, look at Black's pawn line from moves 13-27 (reeds), a real snare, but if you have to explain a joke ...) Anyway.

Does this game set a record for castling closest to enemy forces, as in White's 17th move (see my comment of 3/29/09)? Perhaps Mr. Krabbe could inquire. Is this a concept or idea of any quality? (I have also thought it would be neat to take a pawn count at the end of every chess game, purely for the purpose of statistics, much like the LOB (left on base) stat in baseball.)

Jun-11-12  Cemoblanca: I only say: "Der Wolf hetzt die Meute!!!" AKA Tightrope! ;0)

http://www.imdb.de/title/tt0088272/

Feb-17-16  jerseybob: With the dubious 9.c5?! Reti eyes b6. Wolf's 9..e5! eyes the king.
Nov-09-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Reti resigned after 25...Qb2+, game played 7 Oct 1922, according to Norsk Schakblad vol. 4, Aug-Dec 1922, p. 89:

https://drive.google.com/drive/fold....

Dec-20-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Once: But what is a wolf whistle? To me, a wolf whistle is a the whistle that (usually) men use to denote that a woman is attractive....>

A notorious case of racial violence in the Deep South in 1955 centred round a wolf whistle supposedly made by a young visitor:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmet...

Dec-25-16  Paarhufer: Not everything printed is reliable.
Jan-27-17  Paarhufer: By coincidence, I looked at this game at the same time as at the tournament in which it was played. Based on <Tabanus>'s find in <Norsk Schakblad> the game was shortened from 32 to 25 moves, and the additional 7 pairs of moves are given now as analysis. These moves are in my view no analysis, because if the game had been finished after 25 moves, there was little left to analyse. Therefore I begun to double-check the gamescore.

The game received the first brilliancy prize in Teplitz-Schönau and was therefore frequently published. I have found it in newspapers and chess magazines from Czechoslovakia, Germany, the Netherlands, Austria and the Baltic states, and every time the game had 32 moves! Therefore, I made a brief comment about a month ago, but seemingly it wasn't noticed.

All of the sources I've found were published before the game appeared in the <Norsk Schakblad>. My earliest source is <Berliner Tagblatt>, 15 Oct 1922, where the game appeared with Mieses's comments. The most relevant source is <Deutsche Schachzeitung>, November 1922, pages 256-7, where the game was reprinted with Wolf's comments from the <Teplitz-Schönauer Anzeiger>.

I don't claim that the case is already closed, but currently I think 32 moves are almost certain. Reti probably omitted the remaining moves and send it with comments to <Norsk Schalblad>, where a hint for the additional moves could be lost in translation. Since Reti wrote for several newspapers and magazines, a confirming source is very likely to exist.

Jan-27-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Interesting case.

Just to be explicit, NS notes that Reti provided the annotations. And it clearly states that White gave up after move 25.

Here's a direct link to the PDF:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6... (Tab's link is to a directory of pdf's).

See p90 for the final notes (in NO, on 2nd page of PDF).

A counter-argument against the longer game are that there are often games which get extended in publication to show the prettiest finish explicitly.

It sure would be nice to find that longer version published by Reti, if indeed it does exist.

Jan-27-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: OK, I played it over and can add a couple of observations...

From 15...Nxf2! until 25...Qxb2+, Black is playing very, very precisely. By that I mean it's clearly well calculated, and essentially agrees with engine.

After move 25 it's an entirely different matter.

Now, if the extension were somebody's analysis that might be expected, as few writers will actually spend the time analyzing that a player does otb, as least not typically.

And after move 25 both sides begin playing "imprecisely", when compared to engine play.

These kinds of arguments are far from conclusive, but rather, suggestive.

Jan-28-17  Paarhufer: <z: A counter-argument against the longer game are that there are often games which get extended in publication to show the prettiest finish explicitly.> I think you observed yourself in the second post that the additional seven moves are no such pretty finish. Wolf begun realizing his overwhelming material advantage, and Reti played on for a more moves. That's exactly what I felt when I played through these moves for the first time, and that is why I started my own search.

Let me describe what we have in different words: One player published the game with 32 moves at an unknown date, and it was reprinted in November 1922 in <DSZ>. There are lots of other sources in October and November 1922 all having 32 moves. And finally in December 1922, the other player published it with 25 moves. Wolf's 32-move-version in <DSZ> is unambiguous (his last comment is on 21.. ♘ef3+), but Reti's version was probably translated.

Jan-28-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: http://www.schack.se/tfsarkiv/histo... p. 171-172.

Probably the 32-move version is from Wolf in Teplitz-Schönauer Anzeiger. Hard to say which is correct.

Jan-29-17  Paarhufer: <T: Hard to say which is correct.> If you speak of 100% certainty, yes. But for a smaller value, say 98%, I say no.

Whoever believes that 25 moves are correct, must also believe in the following. One person has added the 7 pairs of moves, and all others except Reti have copied them. This person must have been Wolf himself, because he would not have copied the moves. So, Wolf played first a brilliancy, and then he added a random line for publication. And no one else got the real game-score. Absurd, isn't it?

---

Reti had good reason to conceal these embarrassing moves. (Btw, within these moves, White moves both knights into opposite cornes of the board; unfortunately, they are not there at the same time - that would at least have made a nice picture.)

---

From the rules section of the tournament book: <Spätestens eine Stunde nach Beendigung der Partie haben beide Partner dem Turnierleiter oder dessen Stellvertreter eine richtige und lesbare Partieaufzeichnung abzuliefern. Die Partien sind Eigentum des ,,Deutschen Schachklub[sic] Teplitz-Schönau-Turn''.>

So, the tb should give the answer. As you maybe know, I gave my copy of that book away. But possibly <Olavi> can help.

Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: <Paarhufer> CG uses to put up "Alternate scores" for the games. The 7 moves can be added as such via the Correction slip (or 32 moves and 25 as the alternative). The newspaper may have "helped" Wolf in adding the moves. The tournament book should settle the issue. I think <Pawn and Two> has it.
Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: <Tabanus> The tournament book shows 32 moves for this game, with the game score matching the 32 moves in CG. No indication was given the moves 25-32 are analysis moves. The last tournament book move analysis is after 25.Ng3: <Falls 25.Kh1, so 25...Qe2; 26.Nc8; 27.Qf3+ nebst Turmgewinn.>; and after 32...Bf5; <Es droht 33...Qh3+ 34.Kg1 Be4 35.Rh2 Qe3+>. White is shown as resigning after 32...Bf5.
Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: <Pawn and Two> Thanks! I asked CG to add the moves, and to keep the current Editor note.
Jan-29-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Another irrelevant and failed game title

*****

Feb-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sargon: The current editor's note definitively states: <Reti resigned after 25...Qb2+, according to Reti's own report in Norsk Schakblad vol. 4, Aug-Dec 1922, p. 89>. Therefore, the remaining moves were not part of the game. They are analysis.

If Reti himself states that he resigned after Black's move 25, is his personal testimony to be deemed less reliable than the tournament book for some reason?

Feb-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: <Sargon> Yes, according to Paarhufer, and he may be right.

Possible solution: add to Editor Note that the tournament book also has 26. Rc2 Qxb1 27. Re2 Be6 28. f4 g6 29. Na8 h5 30. Nc7 h4 31. Nh1 Qd3 32. Rf2 Bf5 0-1

Feb-16-17  Paarhufer: <Sargon> It's not a decision between Reti and the tournament book. It is a decision between Reti on the one side and Wolf, the tournament book and half a dozen further sources predating Reti's publication on the other side. And I have given additional arguments bla, bla, bla. You can simply read everything above.

<Tabanus> Do you know why CG has not yet added the moves?

Feb-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: <Paarhufer> No, and I'm happy to let others settle this issue.
Feb-16-17  Paarhufer: <Tabanus: and I'm happy to let others settle this issue.> Okay, I'll give it a try and suggest a more balanced editor's note.
Dec-20-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  zanzibar: Lasker published a 32-move version of the game, fairly contemporaneously:

<De Telegraaf
11-11-1922 p2>

https://resolver.kb.nl/resolve?urn=...

Lasker annotates, but he just piles through moves 18-32 without comment, ending with "Wit geeft op.".

search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Gearing
from Les Prix de Beauté aux Echecs (II) by Sleeping kitten
Very few comments here...
from They were surprised by Calli
Direct attacks
by TheDestruktor
Brilliancy Price
from yy_WILD + CRAZY TACTICAL BATTLES insane by whiteshark
Ch1 Attack against the uncastled King- the e7 square pg 25
from Art of Attack in Chess Vladamir Vukovic & Chess by takchess
From "The Attack on the Square KB7"
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by nakul1964
32
from 99 Schönheitspreise (Steinkohl) by Chessdreamer
G25: Great Brilliancy Prize Games of Chess Masters by Reinfeld
from Nolan's Road Crew by fredthebear
Game collection: d4
by savya2u
Game 25
from Brilliancy Prizes (Reinfeld) - Thanks Quindarka! by fredthebear
Fine Forgotten Game
from andrewjsacks' favorite games by andrewjsacks
Mil y Una Partidas 1914-1931
by K9Empress
Teplitz-Schonau it GER 1922 (1st Brilliancy)
from Favorite Games from (1917-1943) by wanabe2000
Wolf does sac after sac
from alex97's favorite games by alex97
From "The Attack on the Square KB7"
from The Art of Attack - By Vladimir Vukovic by ksadler
Once in a Lifetime
from Great Brilliancy Prize Games of the ChessMasters by SirIvanhoe


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC