chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Jose Raul Capablanca vs Savielly Tartakower
Bad Kissingen (1928), Bad Kissingen GER, rd 1, Aug-12
Budapest Defense: Alekhine Variation. Tartakower Defense (A52)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 23 times; par: 84 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 14 more Capablanca/Tartakower games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-07-05  Poisonpawns: What a game by Capa ,Tartakower must have forgotten who he was playing
Apr-07-05  paladin at large: <Poisonpawns>Tartakower had already lost so many different ways to Capa, that he naturally tried something new. Capa is not known as "the gambit-killer of all time" for nothing. I like the way he plays 4.e4, keeping his focus on rapid development and positional advantage, and making no effort to hold the gambit pawn.
Apr-07-05  Poisonpawns: 4.e4 in the Budapest is alekhines fav line. I think it is the best way to take advantage of blacks time loss in this opening.
Apr-08-05  Whitehat1963: Capablanca always makes it look so incredibly easy -- especially with white -- as if he could never lose an even endgame.
Apr-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  nasmichael: I enjoy the opposite side castling fights. Does anyone know of a collection which focuses exclusively on opposite-side castling by master players?
Apr-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  nasmichael: Does anyone know about the circumstances of this match well enough to share with us? Tell me what you know.
Apr-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: It's interesting that in their first encounter Capablanca vs Tartakower, 1922 Capa attacked quite recklessly (well for him at least).
Apr-01-06  CapablancaFan: <nasmichael: I enjoy the opposite side castling fights. Does anyone know of a collection which focuses exclusively on opposite-side castling by master players?> The proper term is queenside castling.
Apr-01-06  ajg12: It would be queenside castling if both playes castled to the queenside but when one castles kingside and the other queenside I believe opposite-side castling is an appropriate term.
Apr-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  paulalbert: <CapablancaFan>I think you missed the point of nasmichael's term "opposite side castling". He means games where one side castled kingside and the other side castled queen side. Also for<nasmicael>, this game was played in the very strong 1928 Bad Kissingen, Germany Tournament won by Bogolyubov ahead of Capa and Nimzowitsch among others. It was Capa's first tournament after his loss of World Championship to Alekhine. This tournament has always interested me because I was stationed as an Army Officer in Bad Kissingen. They still play chess at a big set there in the Kurpark.I played there in the late sixties while in the Army and the last time I visited a few years ago. Bad Kissingen is a resort town based on the mineral springs there, similar to Baden Baden, etc.
Apr-01-06  Karpova: Tartakover missed 16....Qg6! (17.Qg6: hg and black threatens Bh2:+/cd)
Apr-02-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: Tartakower's move 14...c6 was a mistake, (Kb8 was better).

Capablanca would have had a strong winning advantage if he had played 15.Qxa7!. Fritz 9's evaluation: (3.46) (15 ply). Black's castled position is weak and he cannot afford to open the c file.

15.Bxf6 was also a strong move, (1.13) (15 ply), but not as good as 15.Qxa7 (3.46) (15 ply).

After 15.Bxf6, Black should first play 15...c5 (1.15) (15 ply) before playing gxf6.

16.Qxa7! was again a strong winning move (1.83) (17 ply).

After 16.Qxf6?, Tartakower had the chance, as Karpova notes, to play 16...Qg6!.

If 16...Qg6, Black would have a slight advantage. Fritz 9's suggested line and evaluation: 17.c5 Qxf6 18.Nxf6 Bxc5 (-.34) (16 ply).

Tartakower could have stayed in the game with 18...Bxg4 (.47) (17 ply). But after 18...Bxf6?, it was all Capablanca.

Oct-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <Karpova: <Tartakover missed 16....Qg6!>> and <Pawn and Two: <After 16.Qxf6?, Tartakower had the chance, as Karpova notes, to play 16...Qg6!.

If 16...Qg6, Black would have a slight advantage. Fritz 9's suggested line and evaluation: 17.c5 Qxf6 18.Nxf6 Bxc5 (-.34) (16 ply).>>

That's really impressive. Tartakower who wrote the fascinatiting tournament book didn't mention it in his annotations.

He thought that the critical point ('die Kampfkrise') in the game was 12...0-0-0 and suggested 12...0-0 instead.

Oct-06-08  Sleeping kitten: Earlier, there is another possible improvement. Doesn't 8.c5 win a piece, because of the threat 9.♕a4+?
Oct-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Thumbs up, <Sleeping kitten>!

Yes, <8.c5!! <>> wins a piece. This opportunity has been overlooked by both players.


click for larger view

Dec-24-09  Cushion: Doesn't 8...Be5 9. Bxg4 Bxb2+ 10. Ne2 Bxa1 win material after 8. c5? Are there any alternatives that I overlooked (besides not taking the knight)?
Dec-24-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  maxi: <Cushion> Yes. As a matter of fact the variation you pinpoint loses the exchange for White. The way White wins the piece is, instead, through 8.c5 ♗e5 9.♕a4+ ♘c6 10.♕xg4.
Feb-20-10  M.D. Wilson: A few weeks ago, I played a 5 min blitz game as white identical to this up to move 17. Nxf6. My opponent chose Rh8. I vaguely remembered this game while playing.
Sep-04-14  capafischer1: Amazing and accurate Capablanca does it again. he was an absolute beast with the initiative and almost never blundered
Sep-04-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Caruana-like play by Capa.
Feb-09-19  RookFile: Truth is, the game was over at move 22 and black could have resigned then.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or similar offensive language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, nonsense, or duplicate posts.
  3. No personal attacks, antagonism, name-calling or trolling of any member or their family, friends, associates, or business interests—including Admin and Owners.
  4. No posting of or linking to personal or negative information about any member or their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise.
  5. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal, at the sole discretion of the Moderators.
  6. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  8. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  9. Try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Alekhine Variation. Tartakower Defense
from adichess' A00-D09 by adichess
The Games of J. R. Capablanca
by mariofrisini
50
from Capablanca's Best Games (Golombek) by CherrylandCafe
Bad Kissingen 1928
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Capablanca!
by Sven W
50
from Capablanca's Best Games (Golombek) by Incremental
BAJones' Favourite Games
by BAJones
Budapest Alekhine variation
by cnoahsay
68. "A characteristically instructive ending"
from Immortal Games of Capablanca, F. Reinfeld by Incremental
Jose Raul Capablanca's Best Games
by KingG
68. "A characteristically instructive ending"
from Immortal Games of Capablanca, F. Reinfeld by mjk
Jose Raul Capablanca's Best Games
by ADopeAlias
50
from Capablanca's Best Games (Golombek) by Chessdreamer
Pawns march and bishop cannot stop it.
from Why endgames are studied. by nasmichael
Nicholson's favorite games
by Nicholson
The Attacking Machine - Game 56
from The Fabulous Budapest Gambit by Buddy Revell
The Games of J. R. Capablanca
by BAJones
Jose Raul Capablanca's Best Games
by dcruggeroli
4.e4 d6 5.exd6 Bxd6 6.Be2 f5 7.exf5 Qe7 8.Nf3 Bxf5 9.Bg5 Nf6
from 98_A52 Budapest Gambit by whiteshark
+5-0=7 Endgame planning with opposite bishops
from Capablanca's Imaginary Tournament by tud
plus 10 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC