chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Movsa Feigin vs Salomon Flohr
"Flohral Arrangement" (game of the day Feb-23-2017)
Kemeri (1937), Kemeri LAT, rd 10, Jun-27
Gruenfeld Defense: Russian. Accelerated Variation (D81)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1 more M Feigin/Flohr game
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: Crap -- I hadn't missed a Tuesday puzzle in a long time. So much for that streak. :-(

My tendency to dismiss sacrifice moves when the opponent has more than one way to capture did me in today. I only gave Nf2 nominal attention after seeing that black could take it with Q or R.

Oh well, live and (hopefully) learn.

May-06-08  Justawoodpusher: One of the Thuesday puzzles that I solved quite fast. Sometimes it's just easy and on another day seems so complicated...
May-06-08  kkshethin: I got this one but i admit that most of time i do not
May-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: Reg6--any takers? Going once, going twice...
May-06-08  TrueBlue: Qe5 = 1/2
May-06-08  Whitehat1963: I'm right there with you, Jim. That was the move I missed as well.
May-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  johnlspouge: <<playground player> wrote: Reg6--any takers? Going once, going twice...>

Much to my surprise (which is why I like to check my mental meanderings with a computer), Toga II 1.3.1 declares 39...Reg6 a draw. I also thought it a good fallback, in case I found nothing else.

[ply 15/44, time 00:15, value -0.01]

40.Qe5+ Qxe5 41.dxe5 Rg2 42.Bg5 Nxg5 43.Kxg2

<<YouRang> wrote: [snip] My tendency to dismiss sacrifice moves when the opponent has more than one way to capture did me in today. I only gave Nf2 nominal attention after seeing that black could take it with Q or R.>

I like to think that I write up Monday and Tuesday to warm up for the tough puzzles later in the week. I was a little taken aback today, probably for the same reason you were. Fortunately, I have repeated Reinfeld's advice about checks, captures, and threats to myself frequently enough that I actually took it to heart...

I believe very much in the power of developing a method, and it barely saved me today. In addition, I almost missed the check Qb1+ (Qb8+, a typo in my post). In examining X-rays as a medical student, eventually I never missed a recognizable feature, because I trained myself to scan from top to bottom methodically (noting especially bone margins and other important features, etc.). On the puzzle chess board in future, I plan to look at <every> piece in some order (probably left to right, top to bottom) and note <every> square to which it can move.

May-06-08  SickedChess: I missed this :(
May-06-08  nateinstein: First time I missed a Tuesday puzzle and I've been looking at these for close to 2 years. For some reason I kept looking at Rg1+. I considered Nf2+ but it just didn't look right with the two recaptures and I quit early on the move. It would be hard to classify this as a Thursday puzzle because of its short solution, but it's definitely not Tuesday material in my own opinion. I'm with those on Reg6, but I felt that wasn't right either.
May-06-08  number 23 NBer: Nf2+! looks dead won.
May-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: For today's puzzle solution, the decoy sham sacrifice 39...Nf2+! gives Flohr a quick mate. For the details, see <Zooter>'s post on page one of the kibitzing here.
May-06-08  wals: how easy that was -

39....Nf2+ 40.Rxf2 ...Qb1+ 41.Bc1 ...Qxc1 + 42.Rf1 ...Qxf1 + 43.Qg1 ...Qxg1#

the only trouble was that I didn't get anywhere near it. Damn and blast.

May-06-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Today's puzzle solution might also be classified as a deflection (removing the guard or defender). What's unusual here, as noted by <YouRang> is that Black is targeting two separate defenders guarding two separate critical squares. The White Queen is guarding h3 and the White Rook is guarding b1. Black mates if either piece gives up its guard of those squares. The winning move 39...Nf2+! forces the removal of one of those guards, giving Black a choice of two mates (depending on how White captures it).
May-06-08  Billy Vaughan: I guess this one's a tricky Tuesday. I missed it - like some other people, I dismissed Nf2 because of the two captures.
May-06-08  LivBlockade: Took me a while. I think the <Black to play> factor adds about one day's worth of difficulty to a puzzle (makes Tuesday seem like Wednesday) because we're so used to looking at the board from 'our side'. Do others feel the same way?
May-06-08  zooter: <LivBlockade: Took me a while. I think the <Black to play> factor adds about one day's worth of difficulty to a puzzle (makes Tuesday seem like Wednesday) because we're so used to looking at the board from 'our side'. Do others feel the same way?>

In case you find it difficult to visualize this way, you can turn the board around by clicking on the "up down" arrows at the bottom left corner of the board

May-06-08  sleepyirv: Oh yeah, queens can move diagonally.
May-07-08  TheaN: 3/3

Har. Actually, after I opened the PGN (I had to solve this today (Wednesday)), I thought of 39....Nf2+ WITHOUT the diagram or board, at my education: I actually pictured:

40.Qxf2 (Rxf2 Qb1+ 41.Bc1 Qxc1+ 42.Rf1 Qxf1+ 43.Qg1 Qxg1#) Qh3+ (which I missed initially) 41.Qh2 Qxf1+ 42.Qg1 Qxg1#. I consider it solved as I had this in mind :).

Feb-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Flohred.
Feb-23-17  The Kings Domain: Nice steady build-up to victory by Flohr.

The pun's corny.

Feb-23-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: White gets mate in a box
Feb-23-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: We have another contender for the most non-sensical, irrelevant game title of the year, driven by the fact this isn't even an actual pun, much less shallow word-play

I don't know what it is, hence the well-deserved nomination

*****

Sep-05-18  Saniyat24: Flohr's knight moves were brilliant, before giving the deadly blow, to bring the knight in position he played 4 consecutive knight moves from 18-21...! also the simple 35th move of taking the knight with the bishop to open up the g-file was important...
Mar-07-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  fiercebadger: Black pieces work together, improving position and provoking weaknesses, white pieces never work together just make idle threats or defend things a thematic ..f4 breaks down the fortress a classic
Mar-07-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Not sure I ever remember seeing a Gruenfeld where the bishop never reached g7, but this middlegame came to resemble an Exchange QGD in which everything went horribly awry for White: his good bishop was swapped off, the minority attack never got off the ground and he forced his great opponent to play for the kingside bash which is typically Black's only means of counterplay against the Exchange.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
[The Centre] F. Control of the Central Squares
from Pachman's Modern Chess Strategy by medisynergi
Slowly But Surely
from Chess Mastery by The Kings Domain
Round Ten, Game 90
from Kemeri 1937 International Tournament by JoseTigranTalFischer
Slowly But Surely
from Chess Mastery by Jaredfchess
Tue 2008.05.06 - 39...? dismissed sac since 2 ways to take
from Puzzles I should have solved, but didn't :-( by YouRang
Game 79 in Modern Chess Strategy by Ludek Pachman
from Published Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source 4 by fredthebear
39...?
from Insane moves by tommy boy
Gruenfeld Defense: Russian. Accelerated Variation
from MKD's Gruenfeld Defense by MKD
maneuvering and improving minor pieces
from fiercebadger's favorite games by fiercebadger
39...? (May 6, 2008)
from Tuesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
Game 79
from Modern Chess Strategy (Pachman) by Qindarka
sleepyirv's favorite games
by sleepyirv
87.Control of the Central Squares
from Modern Chess Strategy II by Ludek Pachman by Del ToRo
39...? (Tuesday, May 6)
from POTD Grunfeld by takchess
pf1450's favorite games
by pf1450
39...Nf2+! is a decoy sham sacrifice leading to a quick mate
from Mating Attack Compiled by patzer2 by fredthebear
February 23: Flohral Arrangement
from Game of the Day 2017 by Phony Benoni
Modern Chess Strategy
by BlueMooner
Round Ten, Game 90
from Kemeri 1937 International Tournament by Resignation Trap
Art on the board
by 5nizza
plus 19 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC