chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Aron Nimzowitsch vs Savielly Tartakower
Baden-Baden (1925), Baden-Baden GER, rd 19, May-11
Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack: General (A06)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 23 more Nimzowitsch/Tartakower games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-30-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: A strange game.

On move 14, Nimzowitsch probably perceives that his position is too exposed on the queenside, so he steers for an opposite-colored bishop ending instead of trying to hold on with 14. b5 .

It looks like he can try 20. ♖xb7!? ♖xc2 21. ♗b4 ♖b2 22. ♖b6 . Can Black exploit White's awkward piece positions?

Similarly, 21. ♖xb7 ♖xc2 22. ♗b4 f6 23. ♖b1 ♗c8 24. ♖b6 ♖aa2 25. ♗e1 . Does Black have anything there?

And if White plays 25. ♗e1 b5 26. c3 and defends passively, refraining from f3 , how would Black attack?

After move 25, it looks like Black's winning.

Nov-30-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <And if White plays 25. e1 b5 26. c3 and defends passively, refraining from f3 , how would Black attack?>

Against the passive defense, Black would probably gradually advance the f-pawn toward f3 and position his rook and bishop to play against the cramped White king. It might be enough to win, but it would take a lot of work to prove this.

Nov-30-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Tartakover delighted in using a blockade against Nimzo. "a favorite strategy of Nimzovich himself and one to which he has even devoted a special book"

LOL!

Elsewhere he recommends 14.Rb1 instead of 14.0-0? Don't know what Nimzo was thinking on that one. Tartakower also thinks 25.f3 is too weakening and perhaps 25.h3 is better.

Dec-01-04  Minor Piece Activity: It looks like black already has a clear advantage before 25. f3 though. I think Nimzo's opening play was too passive. 11. o-o looks better than giving black the pawn nail, but I still don't like Nimzo's opening setup. 11. c4 also looks possible, but is more ambitious and risky. Black has (probably unsound) attacking chances. For example 11. c4 dxc4 12. Bxc4 (Nxc4 Nxf2 seems good for black) Nxb4!?
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
43_R+B -opp.col. (wonderful attacking weapons)
by whiteshark
Baden Baden 1925
by Benzol
Two hypermoderns duke it out in Nimzo's line.
from Losing At Their Own Game by Bears092
Two hypermoderns duke it out in Nimzo's line.
from Losing At Their Own Game by Nimzophile
Baden Baden 1925
by JoseTigranTalFischer


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC