|Jan-02-09|| ||Travis Bickle: Capa and Marshall in a 60 move fight that ends in draw.|
|Jul-27-09|| ||visayanbraindoctor: This is the game where the Knight maneuver Nd2 followed by Nc4 is introduced, by none other than the founder of the Modern Benoni himself, Capablanca.|
|Jul-27-09|| ||AnalyzeThis: Did Capa play the Modern Benoni with black? Marshall certainly did.|
|Jul-27-09|| ||visayanbraindoctor: <AnalyzeThis: Did Capa play the Modern Benoni with black? Marshall certainly did.>|
Probably not on purpose from the first move. Certainly Capablanca steered this game from round 5 Alekhine vs Capablanca, 1927 into a Modern Benoni by transposition when he had the opportunity. This particular game itself (Capablanca vs Marshall, 1927) occurred in Round 11. Marshall thought to use Capa's own weapon against him. However, it's possible that Marshall already got interested in the Modern Benoni in the New York 1924 tournament when Capa employed it for the first time in chess history with colors reversed in this game Capablanca vs Janowski, 1924. Please see my little research in Benoni (A61).
Because of Capa's role in the Modern Benoni's founding, I believe it should properly be named as the Capablanca Benoni (or the Capablanca System or the Capablanca Opening or the Capablanca Game).
Even after the thrashing Nimzo gave him in a later round (Round 17) in this game Nimzowitsch vs Marshall, 1927 Marshall did not give up.
He once again employed it against Capablanca (of all people!) this time in this game Capablanca vs Marshall, 1928.
Capablanca who had an uncanny sense of danger must have suspected that Marshall had prepared a novelty against the Knight maneuver to c4 (Nf3 - Nd2 - Nc4), which Capa himself employed for the first time in chess history in this particular game itself (Capablanca vs Marshall, 1927) and which Nimzowitsch later also used (Nimzowitsch vs Marshall, 1927 - click on the link above). So he sidestepped any Marshall prep by employing an entirely different strategy. This time he developed his KB to d3, his KN to e2, buttressed his c4 square with b3, opened up the center and the d-file by dxe6, retreated his KB on d3 to c2 thereby allowing the use of the d-file, and then transferred his major pieces to the d-file as rapidly as possible. Marshall got caught off-guard and quickly lost a pawn, and eventually the game. After the thrashing that Nimzo and Capa gave him, Marshall seemed to have given up on the Modern Benoni.
Ironically, it was Capablanca himself who probably ruined his creation's reputation.
|Feb-05-12|| ||Naniwazu: <visayanbraindoctor: This is the game where the Knight maneuver Nd2 followed by Nc4 is introduced, by none other than the founder of the Modern Benoni himself, Capablanca.>|
Then why does the chessgames database have games dating back to 1899 where the Modern Benoni was played?
|Feb-05-12|| ||King Death: <visayanbraindoctor: ...Certainly Capablanca steered this game from round 5 Alekhine vs Capablanca, 1927 into a Modern Benoni by transposition when he had the opportunity.>|
The game you mention isn't a Modern Benoni, it's a line of the Queen's Indian that was unpopular for Black although Capablanca managed to win this game anyway. In the 1980s then in the 2000s the variation was revived but Black has scored poorly in it.
Games Like Alekhine vs Capablanca, 1927
|Feb-05-12|| ||fokers13: Why on earth did Capa drop a pawn and didn't play either 34.Bd3 or d6 both of which are probably winning?:(|
|Feb-05-12|| ||visayanbraindoctor: <Naniwazu: Then why does the chessgames database have games dating back to 1899 where the Modern Benoni was played>|
Most of these games were Czek/ Hromadka Benoni. It was only in the 1920s that the Modern Benoni was played regularly and treated in the modern manner, beginning with Capablanca vs Janowski, 1924. (Note that this was a reverse modern Benoni, but one can just imagine that White is Black and Black is White.)
<King Death: The game you mention isn't a Modern Benoni, it's a line of the Queen's Indian that was unpopular for Black although Capablanca managed to win this game anyway. In the 1980s then in the 2000s the variation was revived but Black has scored poorly in it.>
You are right in that it begins as a QID. Chess sources would thus classify it as such. My belief is that Capablanca deliberately steered it into a Benoni type set-up a bit later, hoping to steer away from Alekhine's prep and into an opening terrain in which he was more at home.
|Feb-05-12|| ||Penguincw: Marshall defended well in this endgame.|
|Jan-03-16|| ||Jonathan Sarfati: Marshall was a very good endgame player; below Lasker and Capablanca but better than most of his peers. This is documented in Soltis's biography http://www.amazon.com/Frank-Marshal...|
|Jan-03-16|| ||TheFocus: Oh great. Now we have Marshall as an endgame genius?|
Sorry, but his games show that he was weak in the endgame.
|Jan-03-16|| ||TheFocus: Perhaps he should have studied Fine's or Smyslov's books.|
|Jan-03-16|| ||Jonathan Sarfati: Marshall had justifiable confidence in his ability to outplay most European masters in the endgame. Here are some examples:|
Teichmann vs Marshall, 1911
Tarrasch vs Marshall, 1914
Nimzowitsch vs Marshall, 1925
Marshall vs G Marco, 1904
I haven't got the Soltis book with me at present.
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC