chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Emanuel Lasker vs Mikhail Botvinnik
Nottingham (1936), Nottingham ENG, rd 9, Aug-20
Gruenfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation. Petrosian System (D91)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Alexander Alekhine.      [77 more games annotated by Alekhine]

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Lasker/Botvinnik games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you missed a Game of the Day, you can review the last year of games at our Game of the Day Archive.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  James Demery: A draw between 2 chess giants.
Jan-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: So Lasker played at least three games against Botvinnik. And there are still a number of active players, such as Korchnoi, Speelman and Larsen, who played against Botvinnik. So with just one intermediate step there's a connection back into the 19th century.
Jan-02-06  Caissanist: Larsen has a direct connection, since he played Ossip Bernstein.
Jan-18-06  erimiro1: After the sealed move was given by Lasker, when the 2 sides where analizing the position, he offerd Botvinik a draw. Botvinik answered, that it's O.K. only if Lasker wrote down a certain move. Lasker answered that he played another move, and he's certain about the draw. But suddenly the sealed move was no longer a secret!. So Botvinik offered Lasker his pocket chess set in order to prevent himself from continue analyzing the position. Lasker refused and said that he completely trust Botvinik. In the end Lasker was right and the game was drawn. Few years later, in Moscow 1941, it was Botvinik who offered a draw to Smyslov, who made the same problematic move (agreed under condition). Again, the sealed move was not the one that Smyslov thought about, but the game was also drawn.
Feb-17-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Botwinnik describes it roughly this way:

The game was adjourned after <36...Bxf8> for the lunch-break.


click for larger view

He (Botvinnik) realised than that black doesn't have any good prospects after a certain move (he couldn't remember which exactly it was. So 20 minutes before resumption of the game he went to Lasker and (he!) offered a draw if that certain move had been sealed.

<Lasker> was a bit embarrassed and <answered that he played another move, and he's certain about the draw. But suddenly the sealed move was no longer a secret!. So Botvinik offered Lasker his pocket chess set in order to prevent himself from continue analyzing the position....>

Apr-22-14  GumboGambit: A game between two WCs, playing a line named after a third, and being annotated by a fourth.
Dec-29-14  bachbartok: In his notes, Alekhine isn't too complimentary, although he concedes that the game is "well played". Botvinnik, on the other hand, is very complimentary of Lasker's play. See his notes in game 17 of The Gruenfeld Defense, which Botvinnik co-authored with Yakov Estrin.
Jul-11-17  RookFile: Lasker's play made sense. Black was able to trade knight for g5 bishop. Therefore Lasker made sure he put his pawns on the dark squares, to improve the prospects of his remaining light squared bishop and to fight for the dark squares too.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
204
from Middlegame Strategy by Sudgon
Round 9
from Nottingham 1936 by Hesam7
204
from Middlegame Strategy by Del ToRo
All Hail Emanuel
by iron maiden
204
from Middlegame Strategy by Patca63
Selected Lasker
by LaBourdonnaisdeux
a draw between two giants
from fav Botvinnik & Alekhine games by guoduke
Noted-Games of The Patriarch-n-The Tiger
by saveyougod
204
from Middlegame Strategy by jakaiden
Round 9
from Nottingham 1936 by JoseTigranTalFischer
GRUENFIELD
from ANIL RAJ.R'S QUEEN PAWN GAMES by ANIL RAJ.R
Seven Grunfelds
by Pawn N Hand
Grunfeld 5th collection
by Justs99171
BOTVINNIK"S BEST GAMES VOL 1: 1925-1941
by Malacha
On the shoulders of giants
by ughaibu
5.Bg5 Petrosian System
from mapearson1990's Gruenfeld games by mapearson1990
Round 9
from Nottingham 1936 - Alekhine by vantheanh
Across the generations
by Minor Piece Activity
brainiac9129's favorite games
by brainiac9129


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC