Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Alexander Alekhine vs Frank James Marshall
St. Petersburg (1914), St. Petersburg RUE, rd 4, Apr-26
Russian Game: Classical Attack. Marshall Variation (C42)  ·  1-0


Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 10 times; par: 108 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 13 more Alekhine/Marshall games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Dec-10-05  chessworm: Black's position is like a zugzugwang position where if king moves Rh2 mate.
If any of the pawns move, they will be lost.
Jun-10-08  micartouse: 19. Rg4 is an appealing if ultra-simple move. By forcing 19 ... g6, White softens up the kingside pawns considerably. If 20 ... h5 then 21. g4! would still win a pawn and rook invasion.

Another reason I admire the move is because of Vukovic' book Art of Attack in which he claims g7 is the most dangerous target in the kingside because threats there force weakenings. But that's the middlegame, and Alekhine shows it to be true here as well in a technical position.

Alekhine himself includes this in his best games of chess and gives 19. Rg4 an <!> and calls it "the winning maneuver".

Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: So is 18...f6 better?, i.e., 19.Rg4 g5 20.h4 h6 etc
Jun-10-08  micartouse: <Calli: So is 18...f6 better?, i.e., 19.Rg4 g5 20.h4 h6 etc>

The move goes unanalyzed by Alekhine (Book I, Game 24). It resolves the problem in the game, but it shouldn't be surprising if White can find another way to cash in on his initiative.

Fritz running at a shallow level evaluates both moves as and wants to push d5 and Nd4 as a way to take advantage of 18 ... f6. It looks very complicated and worth deeper analysis. White has diverse threats.

Jul-13-08  Touchdown: With some time, I also see that the endgame is not clearly winning fot White. 18... f6 and also the g pawn sacrifice and 36.d5. What happened after f5 instead of f6 ?
Jul-13-08  RookFile: This game shows the excellence in all aspects of the game that you need to become world champion. Marshall quite reasonably steers the game to a simplified position, so that Alekhine's gifts of tactics would be minimized. Alekhine then proceeds to outplay him anyway in the endgame.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: <Touchdown> After 18...f5 White would win at least one pawn after 19.Rf4 g6 20.Rh4 h5 21.Ne5
Jul-14-08  Touchdown: And after 36.d5 what happened after f5+ ? 37.Ke5 Ne3 38.Nb7 Ng4+. White can win the knight but Black will take many pawns and the endgame is not so easy to win.
Premium Chessgames Member
  NM JRousselle: Marshall afraid of Alekhine's tactical ability? I'm not so sure about that. Marshall was pretty good himself.

White's 29 Re2 certainly has to be an error. It allows Black time to get his pieces on better squares.

Alekhine, like many of his peers, had a pretty high opinion of himself. White's 19 Rg4! is a good move, but hardly a winning move. Black had lots of chances to successfully defend this ending after 29 Re2?

Marshall was actually a pretty good endgame player. See his 1st game vs Emanuel Lasker. He won a piece for 2 pawns and showed great technique in winning the game.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
from 26b_Rook vs Pawns by whiteshark
by Harmonicus
St Petersburg 1914
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game 57
from 150 Chess Endings by suenteus po 147
Game 24
from My Best Games of Chess (Alekhine) by SantGG
from Alekhine - My Best Games of Chess 1908-1937 by Incremental
41_R+N - TActical TAngos
by whiteshark
from Alekhine, A. MY BEST GAMES OF CHESS, 1908-1923 by superstoned
Game 24
from My Best Games of Chess (Alekhine) by Qindarka
Instructional Remedies Vs. Pirc & Petrov Defense
by southpawjinx
Game 24
from My Best Games of Chess: 1908 -1937 - Alekhine by vantheanh
alekhine best games
by brager
Game 193
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 1 by FRoeten
Game 24
from My Best Games of Chess (Alekhine) by brucemubayiwa
from Alekhine - My Best Games of Chess 1908-1937 by StoppedClock
Game 24
from My Best Games of Chess (Alekhine) by MSteen
St Petersburg 1914
by Benzol
Alekhine 1908-1923
by Chnebelgrind
Giant Play!!
by Antiochus
Alekhine's Best Games
by smirza15
plus 7 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC