|Dec-22-03|| ||marekg248: Comments on this game are at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy... (plus one Capablanca's game). |
|Aug-20-06|| ||Helios727: Why the resignation?|
|Aug-20-06|| ||Benzol: <Helios727>
Conel Hugh O'Donel Alexander in his book on Alyekhin says "A rather sudden resignation, but there is little to do. If 28...h6; 29.♗e3 ♘c4; 30.♗d4 (threat 31.♘f6+) 30...♖d8; 31.♘c5 (threat 32.♘d7 followed by ♘4f6+) 31...♔f8; 32.b3 ♘d6; 33.♗g7+ or 33.♘a6 winning easily in either case."
|Aug-17-12|| ||csmath: The whole opening was played with such a force it is hard to sustain the level of play, Podgorny was tired in a rather hapless ending. But what is more interesting is that Alekhine amazingly decided against|
which is obvious move.
That is a stroke of genius! Even though the move leads to a solid advantage the path he has chosen is simpler. Not too many times has Alekhine chosen simpler path unless it led to a forced win. This is one example. His ability to evaluate positions properly was just plain uncany. It is as god has been playing this game.
I think this was the impression of Podgorny "there is no way I can save this."
|Oct-24-13|| ||davide2013: I was stunned by the resignation. I let Houdini run for about 8 minutes, and this is the result:|
28...Na4 29.h3 h6 30.Ng3 Rc4 31.Nf5 Nc5+ 32.Nxc5 Rxc1 33.Nb3
Rg1 34.Ne3 f6 35.Nd4 Kf7 36.Kc2 h5 37.f4 g4 38.hxg4 hxg4 39.Kb3
Re1 40.Nef5 Rd1 41.Kxb4 Rd2 42.g3 Rxb2+ 43.Kc5 Rd2 44.Kxd5 Rd3
45.Ke4 Rc3 46.Nd6+ Ke7 47.N6b5 Rc4 $20 +0.43
At the end of this line there is an endgame of 2 knights and pawns, vs rook and pawns, if Black exchanges the pawns, white will never win.
|Oct-25-13|| ||aliejin: "I was stunned by the resignation. I let Houdini run for about 8 minutes, and this is the result:"|
IF you are going to be "stunned" every time that a real line of some game
has a different result than a computer ..... you will be "stunned" the rest
of your life
Even more, if you are going to be "stunned" every time that a line of a computer
changes with the new releases.... you will be "stunned" the rest
of your life again
Real Chess and software world are not the same.
Software is just a guide that must be interpreted.
|Nov-01-13|| ||davide2013: Obviously I was "stunned" by the resignation, because I wouldn't resign in such position. I would have continued to play, and draw the game. And Houdini, who is however rated 3300, quite above any living or dead GM. Didn't consider such position lost too.
Since I don't live inside a chess school, with other GMs, I looked for a confirmation to my judgment of the final position, and someone who is about 1300 points stronger than me, also agreed. Hope you understand now.|
|Nov-01-13|| ||aliejin: " I was "stunned" by the resignation"
I explained very clearly .....
|Nov-01-13|| ||davide2013: So Aliejin apart the sterile troll polemic that you are trying to stir in here. Do you have actually any line which would prove my conclusion (the game is a draw) or Houdini's analysis, wrong?|
|Nov-01-13|| ||tamar: Probably Podgorny resigned when he saw his counter attack failing in the line given by CHO'D Alexander beginning with 28...h6 29 Be3 Nc4 |
click for larger view
when both 30 Bd4 and 30 Nf6+ are winning.
However, the unassuming 29...Nd7
click for larger view
stops that attack, and it is difficult to progress for White without exchanging his bishop for the knight (once it reaches e5). The resulting 2 knights versus rook pawn ending would be tending toward a draw.
Gull 2.2x64 basically confirms that difficulty, showing a consistent .38 to .41 advantage for White but no breakthroughs.
Kasparov gives "28...h6 29 Be3 Nc4 30 Nf6+ Kf8 31 Bc5+ Kg7 32 Bd4 wins" OMGP V1 page 454
I am inclined to believe Kasparov is copying someone else here, which happens a lot at the end of games.
Someone resigns in a dangerous looking position, and analysis goes unchallenged for years.
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC