chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Garry Kasparov vs Viswanathan Anand
Kasparov - Anand PCA World Championship Match (1995), New York, NY USA, rd 4, Sep-15
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense. Nimzo-English Opening (A17)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 79 more Kasparov/Anand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-08-04  hollowone: Why such an early draw with so much material?
Jun-08-04  acirce: Seems quite drawish to me, should be mass exchanges on the d-file and then there are opposite-colored bishops.
Jun-08-04  Eatman: Most players as white would play on here since one could try to torture black for quite a while, but Kasparov must have felt that it was not worth exerting his own energy over. Possibly also has to do with match situation.
Jun-09-04  acirce: I agree, I usually play on forever if I have an advantage and there is no realistic risk of losing; which does NOT imply that I would play on against Anand, though :-)
Apr-11-05  dragon40: The 4th game from their 1995 WC Match.

The final position did surpise a lot of GM's that thought Kasparov had a chance for a real tangible advantage here. The main variation they were looking at was (instead of 21. Be3 as was played): 21. Bb2, f6 22. e5! making use of the pawn majority. A couple sample variatons that were given after 22. e5!: 22...f5; 23.Rfd1, Qf7; 24.Rd6!, and if 24...Bxc4; 25. Rxh6! 25...gxh6; 26.e6 22.e5 fxe5; 23.Rfe1, Qf7; 24. Rxe5 Of course these are samples and Kasparov after the game said he was worried about a potential counter-attack involving..f4 at some moment (it seems that if ..f4 occured, than Kg2 or even g4 would have been more than enough to render the attempt docile). I will usually play on if I feel I have an advantage and I dont feel as if I can lose. The match score before this game was 1.5-1.5 and Kasparov may have felt that it was good enough to keep it that way.

Nov-29-05  morphyvsfischer: Apparently Kaspy lacked trust in his pet variation AGAIN after 4 d4.

10...Bxc3? 11 Qxc3 dxc4 12 Qxc4 and white has better chances, with two good bishops.

16...Nxe4? (not a good way of exchanging pieces) 17 Bxe4 Nxc4 (...Bh3 18 Bb2! Bxf1 19 Rxf1 and the bishops seem more active than the rooks) 18 Bd5! (Qxc4 Qxe4 is equal) Ne5 19 Bb2 and the bishops give white a clear advantage

16 ...Bh3!? 17 Bxh3 Nxe4 18 Qc2 Nf3+ 19 Kh1 Qe5 20 Bg2 Qh5 (aiming to attack the white king) 21 h3 Nfg5 22 h4 Rad8 23 Ra2 is a very sharp, interesting position, avoiding a likely draw.

Attempting to retain the bishops by 18 Qc2 gives black good compensation after ...Bf5 19 Bb2 Qe6 threatens ...Ng5 (since the bishop is guarded) with good compensation for the pawn.

Another boring draw could have been much more interesting.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Match Anand!
by amadeus
Match Anand!
by chessgain
Round 4
from WCC Index [Kasparov-Anand 1995] by Hesam7
Game 4, Match tied 2-2
from 1995 Classical World Chess Championship by Penguincw
another sleeper draw
from Trade Center title match by kevin86


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC